A
person with an external locus of control attributes academic success or
failure to luck or chance, a higher power or the influence of another
person, rather than their own actions. They also struggle more with
procrastination and difficult tasks.
Locus of control is the degree to which people believe that
they, as opposed to external forces (beyond their influence), have
control over the outcome of events in their lives. The concept was
developed by Julian B. Rotter in 1954, and has since become an aspect of personality psychology. A person's "locus" (plural "loci", Latin for "place" or "location") is conceptualized as internal (a belief
that one can control one's own life) or external (a belief that life is
controlled by outside factors which the person cannot influence, or
that chance or fate controls their lives).
Individuals with a strong internal locus of control believe
events in their life are primarily a result of their own actions: for
example, when receiving exam results, people with an internal locus of
control tend to praise or blame themselves and their abilities. People
with a strong external locus of control tend to praise or blame external
factors such as the teacher or the difficulty of the exam.
Locus of control has generated much research in a variety of areas in psychology. The construct is applicable to such fields as educational psychology, health psychology, industrial and organizational psychology, and clinical psychology.
Debate continues whether domain-specific or more global measures of
locus of control will prove to be more useful in practical application.
Careful distinctions should also be made between locus of control (a
personality variable linked with generalized expectancies about the
future) and attributional style (a concept concerning explanations for past outcomes), or between locus of control and concepts such as self-efficacy.
Locus of control is one of the four dimensions of core self-evaluations – one's fundamental appraisal of oneself – along with neuroticism, self-efficacy, and self-esteem.
The concept of core self-evaluations was first examined by Judge,
Locke, and Durham (1997), and since has proven to have the ability to
predict several work outcomes, specifically, job satisfaction and job performance.
In a follow-up study, Judge et al. (2002) argued that locus of control,
neuroticism, self-efficacy, and self-esteem factors may have a common
core.
History
Weiner's attribution theory as
applied to student motivation
|
Perceived locus of control
|
Internal
|
External
|
Attributions of control
|
Ability
|
Hardness of tasks
|
Attributions of no control
|
Effort
|
Luck or fate
|
Locus of control as a theoretical construct derives from Julian B. Rotter's (1954) social learning theory
of personality. It is an example of a problem-solving generalized
expectancy, a broad strategy for addressing a wide range of situations.
In 1966 he published an article in Psychological Monographs which
summarized over a decade of research (by Rotter and his students), much
of it previously unpublished. In 1976, Herbert M. Lefcourt defined the
perceived locus of control: "...a generalised expectancy for internal as
opposed to external control of reinforcements". Attempts have been made to trace the genesis of the concept to the work of Alfred Adler,
but its immediate background lies in the work of Rotter and his
students. Early work on the topic of expectations about control of
reinforcement had been performed in the 1950s by James and Phares
(prepared for unpublished doctoral dissertations supervised by Rotter at
Ohio State University).
Another Rotter student, William H. James studied two types of "expectancy shifts":
- Typical expectancy shifts, believing that success (or failure) would be followed by a similar outcome
- Atypical expectancy shifts, believing that success (or failure) would be followed by a dissimilar outcome
Additional research led to the hypothesis that typical expectancy
shifts were displayed more often by those who attributed their outcomes
to ability, whereas those who displayed atypical expectancy were more
likely to attribute their outcomes to chance. This was interpreted that
people could be divided into those who attribute to ability (an internal
cause) versus those who attribute to luck (an external cause). Bernard Weiner argued that rather than ability-versus-luck, locus may relate to whether attributions are made to stable or unstable causes.
Rotter (1975, 1989) has discussed problems and misconceptions in others' use of the internal-versus-external construct.
Personality orientation
Rotter (1975) cautioned that internality and externality represent two ends of a continuum, not an either/or typology. Internals
tend to attribute outcomes of events to their own control. People who
have internal locus of control believe that the outcomes of their
actions are results of their own abilities. Internals believe that their
hard work would lead them to obtain positive outcomes.
They also believe that every action has its consequence, which makes
them accept the fact that things happen and it depends on them if they
want to have control over it or not. Externals attribute outcomes
of events to external circumstances. A person with an external locus of
control will tend to believe that the their present circumstances are
not the effect of their own influence, decisions, or control,
and even that their own actions are a result of external factors, such
as fate, luck, history, the influence of powerful forces, or
individually or unspecified others (such as governmental entities;
corporations; racial, religious, ethnic, or fraternal groups; sexes;
political affiliations; outgroups; or even perceived individual personal
antagonists) and/or a belief that the world is too complex for one to
predict or influence its outcomes. Laying blame on others for one's own
circumstances with the implication one is owed a moral or other debt is
an indicator of a tendency toward an external locus of control. It
should not be thought, however, that internality is linked exclusively
with attribution to effort and externality with attribution to luck (as
Weiner's work – see below – makes clear). This has obvious implications
for differences between internals and externals in terms of their
achievement motivation, suggesting that internal locus is linked with
higher levels of need for achievement.
Due to their locating control outside themselves, externals tend to
feel they have less control over their fate. People with an external
locus of control tend to be more stressed and prone to clinical depression.
Internals were believed by Rotter (1966) to exhibit two essential
characteristics: high achievement motivation and low
outer-directedness. This was the basis of the locus-of-control scale
proposed by Rotter in 1966, although it was based on Rotter's belief
that locus of control is a single construct. Since 1970, Rotter's
assumption of uni-dimensionality has been challenged, with Levenson (for
example) arguing that different dimensions of locus of control (such as
beliefs that events in one's life are self-determined, or organized by
powerful others and are chance-based) must be separated. Weiner's early
work in the 1970s suggested that orthogonal
to the internality-externality dimension, differences should be
considered between those who attribute to stable and those who attribute
to unstable causes.
This new, dimensional theory meant that one could now attribute
outcomes to ability (an internal stable cause), effort (an internal
unstable cause), task difficulty (an external stable cause) or luck (an
external, unstable cause). Although this was how Weiner originally saw
these four causes, he has been challenged as to whether people see luck
(for example) as an external cause, whether ability is always perceived
as stable, and whether effort is always seen as changing. Indeed, in
more recent publications (e.g. Weiner, 1980) he uses different terms for
these four causes (such as "objective task characteristics" instead of
"task difficulty" and "chance" instead of "luck"). Psychologists since
Weiner have distinguished between stable and unstable effort, knowing
that in some circumstances effort could be seen as a stable cause
(especially given the presence of words such as "industrious" in
English).
Regarding locus of control, there is another type of control that
entails a mix among the internal and external types. People that have
the combination of the two types of locus of control are often referred
to as Bi-locals. People that have Bi-local characteristics are known to
handle stress and cope with their diseases more efficiently by having
the mixture of internal and external locus of control.
People that have this mix of loci of control can take personal
responsibility for their actions and the consequences thereof while
remaining capable of relying upon and having faith in outside resources;
these characteristics correspond to the internal and external loci of
control, respectively.
Measuring scales
The most widely used questionnaire to measure locus of control is the 13-item (plus six filler items), forced-choice scale
of Rotter (1966). However, this is not the only questionnaire; Bialer's
(1961) 23-item scale for children predates Rotter's work. Also relevant
to the locus-of-control scale are the Crandall Intellectual Ascription
of Responsibility Scale (Crandall, 1965) and the Nowicki-Strickland
Scale (Nowicki & Strickland 1973). One of the earliest psychometric scales to assess locus of control (using a Likert-type
scale, in contrast to the forced-choice alternative measure in Rotter's
scale) was that devised by W. H. James for his unpublished doctoral
dissertation, supervised by Rotter at Ohio State University; however,
this remains unpublished.
Many measures of locus of control have appeared since Rotter's
scale. These were reviewed by Furnham and Steele (1993) and include
those related to health psychology, industrial and organizational psychology and those specifically for children (such as the Stanford Preschool Internal-External Scale for three- to six-year-olds). Furnham and Steele (1993) cite data
suggesting that the most reliable, valid questionnaire for adults is the
Duttweiler scale. For a review of the health questionnaires cited by
these authors, see "Applications" below.
The Duttweiler (1984) Internal Control Index (ICI) addresses
perceived problems with the Rotter scales, including their
forced-choice format, susceptibility to social desirability and heterogeneity (as indicated by factor analysis).
She also notes that, while other scales existed in 1984 to measure
locus of control, "they appear to be subject to many of the same
problems".
Unlike the forced-choice format used on Rotter's scale, Duttweiler's
28-item ICI uses a Likert-type scale in which people must state whether
they would rarely, occasionally, sometimes, frequently or usually behave
as specified in each of 28 statements. The ICI assess variables
pertinent to internal locus: cognitive processing, autonomy, resistance
to social influence, self-confidence and delay of gratification. A small (133 student-subject) validation study indicated that the scale had good internal consistency reliability (a Cronbach's alpha of 0.85).
Attributional style
Attributional style (or explanatory style) is a concept introduced by Lyn Yvonne Abramson, Martin Seligman and John D. Teasdale.
This concept advances a stage further than Weiner, stating that in
addition to the concepts of internality-externality and stability a
dimension of globality-specificity is also needed. Abramson et al.
believed that how people explained successes and failures in their lives
related to whether they attributed these to internal or external
factors, short-term or long-term factors, and factors that affected all
situations.
The topic of attribution theory (introduced to psychology by Fritz Heider)
has had an influence on locus of control theory, but there are
important historical differences between the two models. Attribution
theorists have been predominantly social psychologists,
concerned with the general processes characterizing how and why people
make the attributions they do, whereas locus of control theorists have
been concerned with individual differences.
Significant to the history of both approaches are the contributions made by Bernard Weiner
in the 1970s. Before this time, attribution theorists and locus of
control theorists had been largely concerned with divisions into
external and internal loci of causality. Weiner added the dimension of
stability-instability (and later controllability), indicating how a
cause could be perceived as having been internal to a person yet still
beyond the person's control. The stability dimension added to the
understanding of why people succeed or fail after such outcomes.
Applications
Locus of control's best known application may have been in the area of health psychology,
largely due to the work of Kenneth Wallston. Scales to measure locus of
control in the health domain were reviewed by Furnham and Steele in
1993. The best-known are the Health Locus of Control Scale and the
Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale, or MHLC.
The latter scale is based on the idea (echoing Levenson's earlier work)
that health may be attributed to three sources: internal factors (such
as self-determination of a healthy lifestyle), powerful others (such as
one's doctor) or luck (which is very dangerous as lifestyle advice will
be ignored – these people are very difficult to help).
Some of the scales reviewed by Furnham and Steele (1993) relate to health in more specific domains, such as obesity
(for example, Saltzer's (1982) Weight Locus of Control Scale or
Stotland and Zuroff's (1990) Dieting Beliefs Scale), mental health (such
as Wood and Letak's (1982) Mental Health Locus of Control Scale or the
Depression Locus of Control Scale of Whiteman, Desmond and Price, 1987)
and cancer (the Cancer Locus of Control Scale of Pruyn et al., 1988). In
discussing applications of the concept to health psychology Furnham and
Steele refer to Claire Bradley's work, linking locus of control to the
management of diabetes mellitus.
Empirical data on health locus of control in a number of fields was
reviewed by Norman and Bennett in 1995; they note that data on whether
certain health-related behaviors are related to internal health locus of
control have been ambiguous. They note that some studies found that
internal health locus of control is linked with increased exercise, but
cite other studies which found a weak (or no) relationship between
exercise behaviors (such as jogging)
and internal health locus of control. A similar ambiguity is noted for
data on the relationship between internal health locus of control and
other health-related behaviors (such as breast self-examination,
weight control and preventive-health behavior). Of particular interest
are the data cited on the relationship between internal health locus of
control and alcohol consumption.
Norman and Bennett note that some studies that compared alcoholics with non-alcoholics suggest alcoholism
is linked to increased externality for health locus of control;
however, other studies have linked alcoholism with increased
internality. Similar ambiguity has been found in studies of alcohol
consumption in the general, non-alcoholic population. They are more
optimistic in reviewing the literature on the relationship between
internal health locus of control and smoking cessation,
although they also point out that there are grounds for supposing that
powerful-others and internal-health loci of control may be linked with
this behavior. It is thought that, rather than being caused by one or
the other, that alcoholism is directly related to the strength of the
locus, regardless of type, internal or external.
They argue that a stronger relationship is found when health
locus of control is assessed for specific domains than when general
measures are taken. Overall, studies using behavior-specific health
locus scales have tended to produce more positive results. These scales have been found to be more predictive of general behavior than more general scales, such as the MHLC scale.
Norman and Bennett cite several studies that used health-related
locus-of-control scales in specific domains (including smoking
cessation), diabetes, tablet-treated diabetes, hypertension, arthritis, cancer, and heart and lung disease.
They also argue that health locus of control is better at
predicting health-related behavior if studied in conjunction with health
value (the value people attach to their health), suggesting that health
value is an important moderator variable
in the health locus of control relationship. For example, Weiss and
Larsen (1990) found an increased relationship between internal health
locus of control and health when health value was assessed.
Despite the importance Norman and Bennett attach to specific measures
of locus of control, there are general textbooks on personality which
cite studies linking internal locus of control with improved physical
health, mental health and quality of life in people with diverse conditions: HIV, migraines, diabetes, kidney disease and epilepsy.
During the 1970s and 1980s, Whyte correlated locus of control
with the academic success of students enrolled in higher-education
courses. Students who were more internally controlled believed that hard
work and focus would result in successful academic progress, and they
performed better academically. Those students who were identified as
more externally controlled (believing that their future depended upon
luck or fate) tended to have lower academic-performance levels. Cassandra B. Whyte
researched how control tendency influenced behavioral outcomes in the
academic realm by examining the effects of various modes of counseling
on grade improvements and the locus of control of high-risk college
students.
Rotter also looked at studies regarding the correlation between
gambling and either an internal or external locus of control. For
internals, gambling is more reserved. When betting, they primarily
focus on safe and moderate wagers. Externals, however, take more
chances and, for example, bet more on a card or number that has not
appeared for a certain period, under the notion that this card or number
has a higher chance of occurring.
Organizational psychology and religion
Other fields to which the concept has been applied include industrial and organizational psychology, sports psychology, educational psychology and the psychology of religion.
Richard Kahoe has published work in the latter field, suggesting that
intrinsic religious orientation correlates positively (and extrinsic
religious orientation correlates negatively) with internal locus.
Of relevance to both health psychology and the psychology of religion
is the work of Holt, Clark, Kreuter and Rubio (2003) on a questionnaire
to assess spiritual-health locus of control. The authors distinguished
between an active spiritual-health locus of control (in which "God
empowers the individual to take healthy actions") and a more passive spiritual-health locus of control (where health is left up to God). In industrial and organizational psychology,
it has been found that internals are more likely to take positive
action to change their jobs (rather than merely talk about occupational
change) than externals.
Locus of control relates to a wide variety of work variables, with
work-specific measures relating more strongly than general measures.
In Educational setting, some research has shown that students who were
intrinsically motivated had processed reading material more deeply and
had better academic performance than students with extrinsic motivation.
Consumer research
Locus
of control has also been applied to the field of consumer research. For
example, Martin, Veer and Pervan (2007) examined how the weight locus
of control of women (i.e., beliefs about the control of body weight)
influence how they react to female models in advertising of different
body shapes. They found that women who believe they can control their
weight ("internals"), respond most favorably to slim models in
advertising, and this favorable response is mediated by
self-referencing. In contrast, women who feel powerless about their
weight ("externals"), self-reference larger-sized models, but only
prefer larger-sized models when the advertisement is for a non-fattening
product. For fattening products, they exhibit a similar preference for
larger-sized models and slim models. The weight locus of control measure
was also found to be correlated with measures for weight control
beliefs and willpower.
Political ideology
Locus of control has been linked to political ideology.
In the 1972 U.S. presidential election, research of college students
found that those with an internal locus of control were substantially
more likely to register as a Republican, while those with an external locus of control were substantially more likely to register as a Democratic. A 2011 study surveying students at Cameron University in Oklahoma found similar results,
although these studies were limited in scope. Consistent with these
findings, Kaye Sweetser (2014) found that Republicans significantly
displayed greater internal locus of control than Democrats and
Independents.
Those with an internal locus of control are more likely to be of higher socioeconomic status, and are more likely to be politically involved (e.g., following political news, joining a political organization) Those with an internal locus of control are also more likely to vote.
Familial origins
The development of locus of control is associated with family style and resources, cultural stability and experiences with effort leading to reward.[citation needed]
Many internals have grown up with families modeling typical internal
beliefs; these families emphasized effort, education, responsibility and
thinking, and parents typically gave their children rewards they had
promised them. In contrast, externals are typically associated with
lower socioeconomic status.
Societies experiencing social unrest increase the expectancy of being
out-of-control; therefore, people in such societies become more
external.
The 1995 research of Schneewind suggests that "children in large single parent families headed by women are more likely to develop an external locus of control"
Schultz and Schultz also claim that children in families where parents
have been supportive and consistent in discipline develop internal locus
of control. At least one study has found that children whose parents
had an external locus of control are more likely to attribute their
successes and failures to external causes.
Findings from early studies on the familial origins of locus of control
were summarized by Lefcourt: "Warmth, supportiveness and parental
encouragement seem to be essential for development of an internal
locus".
However, causal evidence regarding how parental locus of control
influences offspring locus of control (whether genetic, or
environmentally mediated) is lacking.
Locus of control becomes more internal with age. As children grow
older, they gain skills which give them more control over their
environment. However, whether this or biological development is
responsible for changes in locus is unclear.
Age
Some studies showed that with age people develop a more internal locus of control, but other study results have been ambiguous. Longitudinal data collected by Gatz and Karel imply that internality may increase until middle age, decreasing thereafter.
Noting the ambiguity of data in this area, Aldwin and Gilmer (2004)
cite Lachman's claim that locus of control is ambiguous. Indeed, there
is evidence here that changes in locus of control in later life relate
more visibly to increased externality (rather than reduced internality)
if the two concepts are taken to be orthogonal.
Evidence cited by Schultz and Schultz (2005) suggests that locus of
control increases in internality until middle age. The authors also note
that attempts to control the environment become more pronounced between
ages eight and fourteen.
Health locus of control is how people measure and understand how
people relate their health to their behavior, health status and how long
it may take to recover from a disease.
Locus of control can influence how people think and react towards their
health and health decisions. Each day we are exposed to potential
diseases that may affect our health. The way we approach that reality
has a lot to do with our locus of control. Sometimes it is expected to
see older adults experience progressive declines in their health, for
this reason it is believed that their health locus of control will be
affected.
However, this does not necessarily mean that their locus of control
will be affected negatively but older adults may experience decline in
their health and this can show lower levels of internal locus of
control.
Age plays an important role in one's internal and external locus
of control. When comparing a young child and an older adult with their
levels of locus of control in regards to health, the older person will
have more control over their attitude and approach to the situation. As
people age they become aware of the fact that events outside of their
own control happen and that other individuals can have control of their
health outcomes.
A study published in the journal Psychosomatic Medicine
examined the health effect of childhood locus of control. 7,500 British
adults (followed from birth), who had shown an internal locus of control
at age 10, were less likely to be overweight at age 30. The children
who had an internal locus of control also appeared to have higher levels
of self-esteem.
Gender-based differences
As
Schultz and Schultz (2005) point out, significant gender differences in
locus of control have not been found for adults in the U.S. population.
However, these authors also note that there may be specific sex-based
differences for specific categories of items to assess locus of control;
for example, they cite evidence that men may have a greater internal
locus for questions related to academic achievement.
A study made by Takaki and colleagues (2006), focused on the sex
or gendered differences with relationship to internal locus of control
and self-efficacy in hemodialysis patients and their compliance.
This study showed that female people who had high internal locus of
control were less compliant in regards to their health and medical
advice compared to the male people that participated in this study. Compliance
is known to be the degree in which a person's behavior, in this case
the patient, has a relationship with the medical advice. For example, a
person that is compliant will correctly follow his/her doctor's advice.
A 2018 study that looked at the relationship between locus of control and optimism
among children aged 10–15, however, found that an external locus of
control was more prevalent among young girls. The study found no
significant differences had been found in internal and unknown locus of
control.
Cross-cultural and regional issues
The question of whether people from different cultures vary in locus of control has long been of interest to social psychologists.
Japanese people tend to be more external in locus-of-control orientation than people in the U.S.; however, differences in locus of control between different countries within Europe (and between the U.S. and Europe) tend to be small. As Berry et al. pointed out in 1992, ethnic groups within the United States have been compared on locus of control; African Americans in the U.S. are more external than whites when socioeconomic status is controlled. Berry et al.
also pointed out in 1992 how research on other ethnic minorities in the
U.S. (such as Hispanics) has been ambiguous. More on cross-cultural
variations in locus of control can be found in Shiraev & Levy (2004). Research in this area indicates that locus of control has been a useful concept for researchers in cross-cultural psychology.
On a less broad scale, Sims and Baumann explained how regions in
the United States cope with natural disasters differently. The example
they used was tornados. They "applied Rotter's theory to explain why
more people have died in tornado[e]s in Alabama than in Illinois".
They explain that after giving surveys to residents of four counties in
both Alabama and Illinois, Alabama residents were shown to be more
external in their way of thinking about events that occur in their
lives. Illinois residents, however, were more internal. Because Alabama
residents had a more external way of processing information, they took
fewer precautions prior to the appearance of a tornado. Those in
Illinois, however, were more prepared, thus leading to fewer casualties.
Later studies find that these geographic differences can be explained by differences in relational mobility.
Relational mobility is a measure of how much choice individuals have in
terms of whom to form relationships with, including friendships,
romantic partnerships, and work relations. Relational mobility is low in
cultures with a subsistence economy that requires tight cooperation and
coordination, such as farming, while it is high in cultures based on nomadic herding and in urban industrial cultures.
A cross-cultural study found that the relational mobility is lowest in East Asian countries where rice farming is common, and highest in South American countries.
Self-efficacy
Self-efficacy refers to an individual's belief in their capacity to
execute behaviors necessary to produce specific performance attainments. It is a related concept introduced by Albert Bandura, and has been measured by means of a psychometric scale.
It differs from locus of control by relating to competence in
circumscribed situations and activities (rather than more general
cross-situational beliefs about control). Bandura has also emphasised
differences between self-efficacy and self-esteem,
using examples where low self-efficacy (for instance, in ballroom
dancing) are unlikely to result in low self-esteem because competence in
that domain is not very important (see valence)
to an individual. Although individuals may have a high internal health
locus of control and feel in control of their own health, they may not
feel efficacious in performing a specific treatment regimen that is
essential to maintaining their own health.
Self-efficacy plays an important role in one's health because when
people feel that they have self-efficacy over their health conditions,
the effects of their health becomes less of a stressor.
Smith (1989) has argued that locus of control only weakly
measures self-efficacy; "only a subset of items refer directly to the
subject's capabilities". Smith noted that training in coping skills led to increases in self-efficacy, but did not affect locus of control as measured by Rotter's 1966 scale.
Stress
The previous section showed how self-efficacy can be related to a person's locus of control, and stress
also has a relationship in these areas. Self-efficacy can be something
that people use to deal with the stress that they are faced within their
everyday lives. Some findings suggest that higher levels of external
locus of control combined with lower levels self-efficacy are related to
higher illness-related psychological distress.
People who report a more external locus of control also report more
concurrent and future stressful experiences and higher levels of
psychological and physical problems. These people are also more vulnerable to external influences and as a result, they become more responsive to stress.
Veterans of the military forces who have spinal cord injuries and
post-traumatic stress are a good group to look at in regard to locus of
control and stress. Aging shows to be a very important factor that can
be related to the severity of the symptoms of PTSD experienced by patients following the trauma of war.
Research suggests that patients with a spinal cord injury benefit from
knowing that they have control over their health problems and their
disability, which reflects the characteristics of having an internal
locus of control.
A study by Chung et al. (2006) focused on how the responses of
spinal cord injury post-traumatic stress varied depending on age. The
researchers tested different age groups including young adults,
middle-aged, and elderly; the average age was 25, 48, and 65 for each
group respectively. After the study, they concluded that age does not
make a difference on how spinal cord injury patients respond to the
traumatic events that happened.
However, they did mention that age did play a role in the extent to
which the external locus of control was used, and concluded that the
young adult group demonstrated more external locus of control
characteristics than the other age groups to which they were being
compared.