Ethics in technology is a sub-field of ethics addressing the ethical questions specific to the Technology Age. Some prominent works of philosopher Hans Jonas are devoted to ethics of technology. The subject has also been explored, following the work of Mario Bunge, under the term technoethics.
Fundamental problems
It
is often held that technology itself is incapable of possessing moral
or ethical qualities, since "technology" is merely tool making. But many
now believe that each piece of technology is endowed with and radiating
ethical commitments all the time, given to it by those that made it,
and those that decided how it must be made and used. Whether merely a
lifeless amoral 'tool' or a solidified embodiment of human values
"ethics of technology" refers to two basic subdivisions:-
- The ethics involved in the development of new technology—whether it is always, never, or contextually right or wrong to invent and implement a technological innovation.
- The ethical questions that are exacerbated by the ways in which technology extends or curtails the power of individuals—how standard ethical questions are changed by the new powers.
In the former case, ethics of such things as computer security and computer viruses
asks whether the very act of innovation is an ethically right or wrong
act. Similarly, does a scientist have an ethical obligation to produce
or fail to produce a nuclear weapon?
What are the ethical questions surrounding the production of
technologies that waste or conserve energy and resources? What are the
ethical questions surrounding the production of new manufacturing
processes that might inhibit employment, or might inflict suffering in
the third world?
In the latter case, the ethics of technology quickly break down
into the ethics of various human endeavors as they are altered by new
technologies. For example, bioethics is now largely consumed with questions that have been exacerbated by the new life-preserving technologies, new cloning technologies, and new technologies for implantation. In law, the right of privacy is being continually attenuated by the emergence of new forms of surveillance and anonymity. The old ethical questions of privacy and free speech are given new shape and urgency in an Internet age. Such tracing devices as RFID, biometric analysis and identification, genetic screening, all take old ethical questions and amplify their significance.
Technoethics
Technoethics (TE) is an interdisciplinary
research area that draws on theories and methods from multiple
knowledge domains (such as communications, social sciences information
studies, technology studies, applied ethics, and philosophy) to provide
insights on ethical dimensions of technological systems and practices
for advancing a technological society.
Technoethics views technology and ethics as socially embedded
enterprises and focuses on discovering the ethical use of technology,
protecting against the misuse of technology, and devising common
principles to guide new advances in technological development and
application to benefit society. Typically, scholars in technoethics have
a tendency to conceptualize technology and ethics
as interconnected and embedded in life and society. Technoethics
denotes a broad range of ethical issues revolving around technology –
from specific areas of focus affecting professionals working with
technology to broader social, ethical, and legal issues concerning the
role of technology in society and everyday life.
Technoethical perspectives are constantly in transition as
technology advances in areas unseen by creators, as users change the
intended uses of new technologies. Humans cannot be separated from these
technologies because it is an inherent part of consciousness
and meaning in life therefore, requiring an ethical model. The short
term and longer term ethical considerations for technologies do not just
engage the creator and producer but makes the user question their
beliefs in correspondence with this technology and how governments must
allow, react to, change, and/or deny technologies.
Definitions
Using
theories and methods from multiple domains, technoethics provides
insights on ethical aspects of technological systems and practices,
examines technology-related social policies and interventions, and
provides guidelines for how to ethically use new advancements in
technology.
Technoethics provides a systems theory and methodology to guide a
variety of separate areas of inquiry into human-technological activity
and ethics.
Moreover, the field unites both technocentric and bio-centric
philosophies, providing "conceptual grounding to clarify the role of
technology to those affected by it and to help guide ethical problem
solving and decision making in areas of activity that rely on
technology." As a bio-techno-centric field, technoethics "has a relational orientation to both technology and human activity";
it provides "a system of ethical reference that justifies that profound
dimension of technology as a central element in the attainment of a
'finalized' perfection of man.'
- Ethics address the issues of what is 'right', what is 'just', and what is 'fair'. Ethics describe moral principles influencing conduct; accordingly, the study of ethics focuses on the actions and values of people in society (what people do and how they believe they should act in the world).
- Technology is the branch of knowledge that deals with the creation and use of technical means and their interrelation with life, society, and the environment; it may draw upon a variety of fields, including industrial arts, engineering, applied science, and pure science. Technology "is core to human development and a key focus for understanding human life, society and human consciousness."
History of technoethics
Though the ethical consequences of new technologies have existed since Socrates' attack on writing in Plato's dialogue, Phaedrus,
the formal field of technoethics had only existed for a few decades.
The first traces of TE can be seen in Dewey and Peirce's pragmatism. With the advent of the industrial revolution,
it was easy to see that technological advances were going to influence
human activity. This is why they put emphasis on the responsible use of
technology.
The term "technoethics" was coined in 1977 by the philosopher Mario Bunge
to describe the responsibilities of technologists and scientists to
develop ethics as a branch of technology. Bunge argued that the current
state of technological progress was guided by ungrounded practices based
on limited empirical evidence
and trial-and-error learning. He recognized that "the technologist must
be held not only technically but also morally responsible for whatever
he designs or executes: not only should his artifacts be optimally
efficient but, far from being harmful, they should be beneficial, and
not only in the short run but also in the long term." He recognized a
pressing need in society to create a new field called 'Technoethics' to
discover rationally grounded rules for guiding science and
technological progress.
With the spurt in technological advances came technological
inquiry. Societal views of technology were changing; people were
becoming more critical of the developments that were occurring and
scholars were emphasizing the need to understand and to take a deeper
look and study the innovations. Associations were uniting scholars from
different disciplines to study the various aspects of technology. The
main disciplines being philosophy, social sciences
and science and technology studies (STS). Though many technologies were
already focused on ethics, each technology discipline was separated
from each other, despite the potential for the information to intertwine
and reinforce itself. As technologies became increasingly developed in
each discipline, their ethical implications paralleled their
development, and became increasingly complex. Each branch eventually
became united, under the term technoethics, so that all areas of
technology could be studied and researched based on existing, real-world
examples and a variety of knowledge, rather than just
discipline-specific knowledge.
Ethics theories
Technoethics
involves the ethical aspects of technology within a society that is
shaped by technology. This brings up a series of social and ethical
questions regarding new technological advancements and new boundary
crossing opportunities. Before moving forward and attempting to address
any ethical questions and concerns, it is important to review the three
major ethical theories to develop a perspective foundation :
- Utilitarianism (Bentham, J) is an ethical theory which attempts to maximize happiness and reduce suffering for the greatest number of people. Utilitarianism focused on results and consequences rather than rules.
- Duty Ethics (Kant) notes the obligations that one has to society and follows society's universal rules. It focuses on the rightness of actions instead of the consequences, focusing on what an individual should do.
- Virtue Ethics is another main perspective in normative ethics. It highlights the role and virtues that an individual's character contains to be able to determine or evaluate ethical behaviour in society.
- Relationship ethics states that care and consideration are both derived from human communication. Therefore, ethical communication is the core substance to maintain healthy relationships.
Historical framing of technology – four main periods
- Greek civilization defined technology as techné. Techné is "the set principles, or rational method, involved in the production of an object or the accomplishment of an end; the knowledge such as principles of method; art." This conceptualization of technology used during the early Greek and Roman period to denote the mechanical arts, construction, and other efforts to create, in Cicero's words, a "second nature" within the natural world.
- Modern conceptualization of technology as invention materialized in the 17th century in Bacon's futuristic vision of a perfect society governed by engineers and scientists in Saloman's House, to raise the importance of technology in society.
- The German term "Tecknik" was used in the 19th-20th century. Technik is the totality of processes, machines, tools and systems employed in the practical arts and Engineering. Webber popularized it when it was used in broader fields. Mumford said it was underlying a civilization. Known as: before 1750: Eotechnic, in 1750-1890: Paleoethnic and in 1890: Neoethnic. Place it at the center of social life in close connection to social progress and societal change. Mumford says that a machine cannot be divorced from its larger social pattern, for it is the pattern that gives it meaning and purpose.
- Rapid advances in technology provoked a negative reaction from scholars who saw technology as a controlling force in society with the potential to destroy how people live (Technological Determinism). Heidegger warned people that technology was dangerous in that it exerted control over people through its mediating effects, thus limiting authenticity of experience in the world that defines life and gives life meaning. It is an intimate part of the human condition, deeply entrenched in all human history, society and mind.
Significant technoethical developments in society
Many
advancements within the past decades have added to the field of
technoethics. There are multiple concrete examples that have illustrated
the need to consider ethical dilemmas in relation to technological
innovations. Beginning in the 1940s influenced by the British eugenic movement, the Nazis conduct "racial hygiene" experiments causing widespread, global anti-eugenic sentiment. In the 1950s the first satellite Sputnik 1 orbited the earth, the Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant was the first nuclear power plant to be opened, the American nuclear tests take place. The 1960s brought about the first manned moon landing, ARPANET created which leads to the later creation of the Internet, first heart transplantation completed, and the Telstar communications satellite is launched. The 70s, 80s, 90s, 2000s and 2010s also brought multiple developments.
Technological consciousness
Technological
consciousness is the relationship between humans and technology.
Technology is seen as an integral component of human consciousness and
development. Technology, consciousness and society are intertwined in a
relational process of creation that is key to human evolution.
Technology is rooted in the human mind, and is made manifest in the
world in the form of new understandings and artifacts. The process of
technological consciousness frames the inquiry into ethical
responsibility concerning technology by grounding technology in human
life.
The structure of technological consciousness is relational but
also situational, organizational, aspectual and integrative.
Technological consciousness situates new understandings by creating a
context of time and space. As well, technological consciousness
organizes disjointed sequences of experience under a sense of unity that
allows for a continuity of experience. The aspectual component of
technological consciousness recognizes that individuals can only be
conscious of aspects of an experience, not the whole thing. For this
reason, technology manifests itself in processes that can be shared with
others. The integrative characteristics of technological consciousness
are assimilation, substitution and conversation. Assimilation allows for
unfamiliar experiences to be integrated with familiar ones.
Substitution is a metaphorical process allowing for complex experiences
to be codified and shared with others — for example, language.
Conversation is the sense of an observer within an individual's
consciousness, providing stability and a standpoint from which to
interact with the process.
Misunderstandings of consciousness and technology
The
common misunderstandings about consciousness and technology are listed
as follows. The first misunderstanding is that consciousness is only in
the head when in fact, consciousness is not only in the head meaning
that "[c]onsciousness is responsible for the creation of new conscious
relations wherever imagined, be it in the head, on the street or in the
past."
The second misunderstanding is technology is not a part of
consciousness. The truth is that technology is a part of consciousness
as "the conceptualization of technology has gone through drastic
changes." The third misunderstanding is that technology controls society
and consciousness, when really technology does not control society and
consciousness; meaning "that technology is rooted in consciousness as an
integral part of mental life for everyone. This understanding will most
likely alter how both patients and psychologists deal with the trials
and tribunes of living with technology."
The last misunderstanding is society controls technology and
consciousness which is not true, society does not control technology and
consciousness. "…(other) accounts fail to acknowledge the complex
relational nature of technology as an operation within mind and society.
This realization shifts the focus on technology to its origins within
the human mind as explained through the theory of technological
consciousness."
- Consciousness (C) is only a part of the head: C is responsible for the creation of new conscious relations
- Technology (T) is not part of C: Humans cannot be separated from technology
- T controls society and C: Technology cannot control the mind
- Society controls T and C: Society fails to take in account the consideration of society shaping what technology gets developed?
Ethical challenges
Ethical challenges arise in many different situations:
- Human knowledge processes;
- Workplace discrimination;
- Strained work life balance in technologically enhanced work environments;
- digital divide: Inequalities in information access for parts of the population;
- Unequal opportunities for scientific and technological development;
- Norris says access to information and knowledge resources within a knowledge society tend to favour the economically privileged who have greater access to technological tools needed to access information and knowledge resources disseminated online and the privatization of knowledge;
- Inequality in terms of how scientific and technological knowledge is developed around the globe. Developing countries do not have the same opportunities as developed countries to invest in costly large-scale research and expensive research facilities and instrumentation;
- Organizational responsibility and accountability issues;
- Intellectual property issues;
- Information overload: Information processing theory is working memory that has a limited capacity and too much information can lead to cognitive overload resulting in loss of information from short term memory;
- Limit an organization's ability to innovate and respond for change;
- Knowledge society is intertwined with changing technology requiring new skills of its workforce. Cutler says that there is the perception that older workers lack experience with new technology and that retaining programs may be less effective and more expensive for older workers. Cascio says that there is a growth of virtual organizations. Saetre & Sornes say that it is a blurring of the traditional time and space boundaries has also led to many cases in the blurring of work and personal life;
- Negative impacts of many scientific and technological innovations have on humans and the environment has led to some skepticism and resistance to increasing dependence on technology within the Knowledge Society. Doucet calls for city empowerment to have the courage and foresight to make decisions that are acceptable to its inhabitants rather that succumb to global consumer capitalism and the forces of international corporations on national and local governments;
- Scientific and technological innovations that have transformed organizational life within a global economy have also supplanted human autonomy and control in work within a technologically oriented workplace;
- The persuasive potential of technology raises the question of "how sensitive ... designers and programmers [should] be to the ethics of the persuasive technology they design." Technoethics can be used to determine the level of ethical responsibility that should be associated with outcomes of the use of technology, whether intended or unintended;
- Rapidly changing organizational life and the history of unethical business practices have given rise to public debates concerning organizational responsibility and trust. The advent of virtual organizations and telework has bolstered ethical problems by providing more opportunities for fraudulent behaviour and the production of misinformation. Concerted efforts are required to uphold ethical values in advancing new knowledge and tools within societal relations which do not exclude people or limit liberties of some people at the expense of others.
Current issues
Copyright
Digital
copyrights are a heated issue because there are so many sides to the
discussion. There are ethical considerations surrounding the artist,
producer, end user, and the country are intertwined. Not to mention the
relationships with other countries and the impact on the use (or no use)
of content housed in their countries. In Canada, national laws such as the Copyright Act and the history behind Bill C-32 are just the beginning of the government's attempt to shape the "wild west" of Canadian Internet activities.
The ethical considerations behind Internet activities such a
peer-to-peer file sharing involve every layer of the discussion – the
consumer, artist, producer, music/movie/software industry, national
government, and international relations. Overall, technoethics forces
the "big picture" approach to all discussions on technology in society.
Although time consuming, this "big picture" approach offers some level
of reassurance when considering that any law put in place could
drastically alter the way we interact with our technology and thus the
direction of work and innovation in the country.
The use of copyrighted material to create new content is a hotly debated topic.
The emergence of the musical "mashup" genre has compounded the issue of
creative licensing. A moral conflict is created between those who
believe that copyright protects any unauthorized use of content, and
those who maintain that sampling and mash-ups are acceptable musical
styles and, though they use portions of copyrighted material, the end
result is a new creative piece which is the property of the creator, and
not of the original copyright holder. Whether or not the mashup genre
should be allowed to use portions of copyrighted material to create new
content is one which is currently under debate.
Cybercriminality
For many years,
new technologies took an important place in social, cultural,
political, and economic life. Thanks to the democratization of
informatics access and the network's globalization, the number of exchanges and transaction is in perpetual progress.
Many people are exploiting the facilities and anonymity that modern technologies offer in order to commit multiple criminal activities. Cybercrime
is one of the fastest growing areas of crime. The problem is that some
laws that profess to protect people from those who would do wrong things
via digital means also threaten to take away people's freedom.
Privacy vs. security: Full-body airport scanners
Since the introduction of full body X-ray scanners
to airports in 2007, many concerns over traveler privacy have arisen.
Individuals are asked to step inside a rectangular machine that takes an
alternate wavelength image of the person's naked body for the purpose
of detecting metal and non-metal objects being carried under the clothes
of the traveler. This screening technology comes in two forms,
millimeter wave technology (MM-wave technology) or backscatter X-rays
(similar to x-rays used by dentists). Full-body scanners were
introduced into airports to increase security and improve the quality of
screening for objects such as weapons or explosives due to an increase
of terrorist attacks involving airplanes occurring in the early 2000s.
Ethical concerns of both travelers and academic groups include
fear of humiliation due to the disclosure of anatomic or medical
details, exposure to a low level of radiation (in the case of
backscatter X-ray technology), violation of modesty and personal privacy,
clarity of operating procedures, the use of this technology to
discriminate against groups, and potential misuse of this technology for
reasons other than detecting concealed objects. Also people with
religious beliefs that require them to remain physically covered (arms,
legs, face etc.) at all times will be unable and morally opposed to
stepping inside of this virtually intrusive scanning technology. The Centre for Society, Science and Citizenship
have discussed their ethical concerns including the ones mentioned
above and suggest recommendations for the use of this technology in
their report titled "Whole Body Imaging at airport checkpoints: the
ethical and policy context" (2010).
Privacy and GPS technologies
The discourse around GPS tracking devices and geolocation technologies and this contemporary technology's ethical ramifications on privacy is growing as the technology becomes more prevalent in society. As discussed in the New York Times's
Sunday Review on September 22, 2012, the editorial focused on the
ethical ramifications that imprisoned a drug offender because of the GPS
technology in his cellphone
was able to locate the criminal's position. Now that most people carry
on the person a cell, the authorities have the ability to constantly
know the location of a large majority of citizens. The ethical
discussion now can be framed from a legal perspective. As raised in the
editorial, there are stark infractions that these geolocation devices on
citizens' Fourth Amendment and their protection against unreasonable
searches. This reach of this issue is not just limited to the United
States but affects more democratic state that uphold similar citizens'
rights and freedoms against unreasonable searches.
These geolocation technologies are not only affecting how
citizens interact with their state but also how employees interact with
their workplaces. As discussed in article by the Canadian Broadcasting
Company, "GPS and privacy", that a growing number of employers are
installing geolocation technologies in "company vehicles,
equipment and cellphones" (Hein, 2007). Both academia and unions are
finding these new powers of employers to be indirect contradiction with civil liberties.
This changing relationship between employee and employer because of the
integration of GPS technology into popular society is demonstrating a
larger ethical discussion on what are appropriate privacy levels. This
discussion will only become more prevalent as the technology becomes
more popular.
Genetically modified organisms
Genetically modified foods
have become quite common in developed countries around the world,
boasting greater yields, higher nutritional value, and greater
resistance to pests, but there are still many ethical concerns regarding
their use. Even commonplace genetically modified crops like corn raise questions of the ecological consequences of unintended cross pollination, potential horizontal gene transfer, and other unforeseen health concerns for humans and animals.
Trademarked organisms like the "Glofish" are a relatively new occurrence. These zebrafish,
genetically modified to appear in several fluorescent colours and sold
as pets in the United States, could have unforeseen effects on
freshwater environments were they ever to breed in the wild.
Providing they receive approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), another new type of fish may be arriving soon. The "AquAdvantage salmon",
engineered to reach maturity within roughly 18 months (as opposed to
three years in the wild), could help meet growing global demand. There
are health and environmental concerns associated with the introduction
any new GMO, but more importantly this scenario highlights the potential
economic impact a new product may have. The FDA does perform an economic impact analysis to weigh, for example, the consequences these new genetically modified fish
may have on the traditional salmon fishing industry against the long
term gain of a cheaper, more plentiful source of salmon. These
technoethical assessments,
which regulatory organizations like the FDA are increasingly faced with
worldwide, are vitally important in determining how GMOs—with all of
their potential beneficial and harmful effects—will be handled moving
forward.
Pregnancy screening technology
For over 40 years, newborn screening has been a triumph of the 20th century public health system.[citation needed]
Through this technology, millions of parents are given the opportunity
to screen for and test a number of disorders, sparing the death of their
children or complications such as mental retardation. However, this
technology is growing at a fast pace, disallowing researchers and
practitioners from being able to fully understand how to treat diseases
and provide families in need with the resources to cope.
A version of pre-natal testing, called tandem mass spectrometry,
is a procedure that "measures levels and patterns of numerous
metabolites in a single drop of blood, which are then used to identify
potential diseases. Using this same drop of blood, tandem mass
spectrometry enables the detection of at least four times the number of
disorders than was possible with previous technologies." This allows for
a cost-effective and fast method of pre-natal testing.
However, critics of tandem mass spectrometry and technologies
like it are concerned about the adverse consequences of expanding
newborn screen technology and the lack of appropriate research and
infrastructure needed to provide optimum medical services to patients.
Further concerns include "diagnostic odysseys", a situation in which the
patient aimlessly continues to search for diagnoses where none exists.
Among other consequences, this technology raises the issue of
whether individuals other than newborn will benefit from newborn
screening practices. A reconceptualization of the purpose of this
screening will have far reaching economic, health and legal impact. This
discussion is only just beginning and requires informed citizenry to
reach legal if not moral consensus on how far we as a society are
comfortable with taking this technology.
Citizen journalism
Citizen journalism is a concept describing citizens who wish to act
as a professional journalist or media person by "collecting, reporting,
analyzing, and disseminating news and information." According to Jay Rosen,
citizen journalists are "the people formerly known as the audience,"
who "were on the receiving end of a media system that ran one way, in a
broadcasting pattern, with high entry fees and a few firms competing to
speak very loudly while the rest of the population listened in isolation
from one another— and who today are not in a situation like that at
all. ... The people formerly known as the audience are simply the public
made realer, less fictional, more able, less predictable".
The internet has provided society with a modern and accessible
public space. Due to the openness of the internet, there are discernible
effects on the traditional profession of journalism. Although the
concept of citizen journalism is a seasoned one, "the presence of online
citizen journalism content in the marketplace may add to the diversity
of information that citizens have access to when making decisions
related to the betterment of their community or their life".
The emergence of online citizen journalism is fueled by the growing use
of social media websites to share information about current events and
issues locally, nationally and internationally.
The open and instantaneous nature of the internet affects the
criteria of information quality on the web. A journalistic code of
ethics is not instilled for those who are practicing citizen journalism.
Journalists, whether professional or citizen, have needed to adapt to
new priorities of current audiences: accessibility, quantity of
information, quick delivery and aesthetic appeal.
Thus, technology has affected the ethical code of the profession of
journalism with the popular free and instant sharing qualities of the
internet. Professional journalists have had to adapt to these new
practices to ensure that truthful and quality reporting is being
distributed. The concept can be seen as a great advancement in how
society communicates freely and openly or can be seen as contributing to
the decay of traditional journalistic practices and codes of ethics.
Other issues to consider:
- Privacy concerns: location services on cell devices which tell all users where a person is should they decide to turn on this feature, social media, online banking, new capabilities of cellular devices, Wi-fi, etc.
- New music technology: People see more electronic music today with the new technology able to create it, as well as more advanced recording technology
Recent developments
Despite
the amassing body of scholarly work related to technoethics beginning
in the 1970s, only recently has it become institutionalized and
recognized as an important interdisciplinary research area and field of
study. In 1998, the Epson Foundation founded the Instituto de Tecnoética
in Spain under the direction of Josep Esquirol. This institute has
actively promoted technoethical scholarship through awards, conferences,
and publications.
This helped encourage scholarly work for a largely European audience.
The major driver for the emergence of technoethics can be attributed to
the publication of major reference works available in English and
circulated globally. The "Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and
Ethics" included a section on technoethics which helped bring it into
mainstream philosophy.
This helped to raise further interest leading to the publication of the
first reference volume in the English language dedicated to the
emerging field of Technoethics. The two volume Handbook of Research on Technoethics explores the complex connections between ethics and the rise of new technologies (e.g., life-preserving technologies, stem cell research, cloning technologies, new forms of surveillance and anonymity, computer networks,
Internet advancement, etc.) This recent major collection provides the
first comprehensive examination of technoethics and its various branches
from over 50 scholars around the globe. The emergence of technoethics
can be juxtaposed with a number of other innovative interdisciplinary
areas of scholarship which have surfaced in recent years such as technoscience and technocriticism.
With all the developments we've had in technology it has created a
lot advancement for the music industry both positive and negative. A
main concern is piracy and illegal downloading; with all that is
available through the internet a lot of music (TV shows and movies as
well) have become easily accessible to download and upload for free.
This does create new challenges for artist, producers, and copyright
laws. The advances it has positively made for the industry is a whole
new genre of music. Computers are being used to create electronic music,
as well as synthesizers (computerized/electronic piano).
This type of music is becoming rapidly more common and listened to.
These advances have allowed the industry to try new things and make new
explorations.
Future developments
The
future of technoethics is a promising, yet evolving field. The studies
of e-technology in workplace environments are an evolving trend in
technoethics. With the constant evolution of technology, and innovations
coming out daily, technoethics is looking to be a rather promising
guiding framework for the ethical assessments of new technologies. Some
of the questions regarding technoethics and the workplace environment
that have yet to be examined and treated are listed below:
- Are organizational counter measures not necessary because it invades employee privacy?
- Are surveillance cameras and computer monitoring devices invasive methods that can have ethical repercussions?
- Should organizations have the right and power to impose consequences?
UNESCO
UNESCO
– a specialized intergovernmental agency of the United Nations,
focusing on promotion of education, culture social and natural sciences
and communication and information.
In the future, the use of principles as expressed in the UNESCO
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005) will also be
analyzed to broaden the description of bioethical reasoning (Adell &
Luppicini, 2009).
Areas of technoethical inquiry
Biotech ethics
Biotech ethics concerned with ethical dilemmas surrounding the use of
biotechnologies in fields including medical research, health care, and
industrial applications. Topics such as cloning ethics, e-health ethics, telemedicine ethics, genetics ethics, neuroethics, and sport and nutrition ethics fall into this category; examples of specific issues include the debates surrounding euthanasia and reproductive rights.
Technoethics and cognition
This
area of technoethical inquiry is concerned with technology's relation
to the human mind, artificial agents, and society. Topics of study that
would fit into this category would be artificial morality and moral agents, technoethical systems and techno-addiction.
An artificial agent describes any type of technology that is
created to act as an agent, either of its own power or on behalf of
another agent. An artificial agent may try to advance its own goals or
those of another agent.
Technoethics and society
This
field is concerned with the uses of technology to ethically regulate
aspects of a society. For example: digital property ethics, social theory, law, science, organizational ethics and global ethics.
Technofeminism
Technoethics
has concerned itself with society as a general group and made no
distinctions between the genders, but considers technological effects
and influences on each gender individually. This is an important consideration as some technologies are created for use by a specific gender, including birth control, abortion, fertility treatments, and Viagra. Feminists have had a significant influence on the prominence and development of reproductive technologies.
Technoethical inquiry must examine these technologies' effects on the
intended gender while also considering their influence on the other
gender. Another dimension of technofeminism concerns female involvement
in technological development: women's participation in the field of
technology has broadened society's understanding of how technology
affects the female experience in society.
Information and communication technoethics
Information and communication technoethics is "concerned with ethical issues and responsibilities arising when dealing with information and communication technology in the realm of communication." This field is related to internet ethics, rational and ethical decision making models, and information ethics.
A major area of interest is the convergence of technologies: as
technologies become more interdependent and provide people with multiple
ways of accessing the same information, they transform society and
create new ethical dilemmas. This is particularly evident in the realms
of the internet. In recent years, users have had the unprecedented
position of power in creating and disseminating news and other
information globally via social networking; the concept of "citizen journalism"
primarily relates to this. With developments in the media, has led to
open media ethics as Ward writes, leading to citizen journalism.
In cases such as the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami or the 2011 Arab Spring
movements, citizen journalists were seen to have been significant
sources of facts and information in relation to the events. These were
re-broadcast by news outlets, and more importantly, re-circulated by and
to other internet users. As Jay David Bolter and Richard Grusin state
in their book Remediation: Understanding New Media (1999): "The liveness
of the Web is a refashioned version of the liveness of broadcast
television" However, it is commonly political events (such as 'Occupy' movements or the Iran Elections of 2009)
that tend to raise ethical questions and concerns. In the latter
example, there had been efforts made by the Iranian government in
censoring and prohibiting the spread of internal happenings to the
outside by its citizen journalists. This occurrence questioned the
importance of the spread of crucial information regarding the issue, and
the source from which it came from (citizen journalists, government
authorities, etc.). This goes to prove how the internet "enables new
forms of human action and expression [but] at the same time it disables
[it]"
Information and Communication Technoethics also identifies ways to
develop ethical frameworks of research structures in order to capture
the essence of new technologies.
Educational and professional technoethics
Technoethical inquiry in the field of education examines how
technology impacts the roles and values of education in society. This
field considers changes in student values and behavior related to
technology, including access to inappropriate material in schools,
online plagiarism using material copied directly from the internet, or purchasing papers from online resources and passing them off as the student's own work. Educational technoethics also examines the digital divide
that exists between educational institutions in developed and
developing countries or between unequally-funded institutions within the
same country: for instance, some schools offer students access to
online material, while others do not. Professional technoethics focuses
on the issue of ethical responsibility for those who work with
technology within a professional setting, including engineers, medical
professionals, and so on. Efforts have been made to delineate ethical principles in professions such as computer programming.
Environmental and engineering technoethics
Environmental technoethics originate from the 1960s and 1970s'
interest in environment and nature. The field focuses on the human use
of technologies that may impact the environment; areas of concern include transport, mining, and sanitation. Engineering technoethics emerged in the late 19th century. As the Industrial Revolution
triggered a demand for expertise in engineering and a need to improve
engineering standards, societies began to develop codes of professional
ethics and associations to enforce these codes.
Ethical inquiry into engineering examines the "responsibilities of
engineers combining insights from both philosophy and the social
sciences."
Technoethical assessment and design
A technoethical assessment (TEA) is an interdisciplinary,
systems-based approach to assessing ethical dilemmas related to
technology. TEAs aim to guide actions related to technology in an
ethical direction by advancing knowledge of technologies and their
effects; successful TEAs thus produce a shared understanding of
knowledge, values, priorities, and other ethical aspects associated with
technology. TEAs involve five key steps:
- Evaluate the intended ends and possible side effects of the technology in order to discern its overall value (interest).
- Compare the means and intended ends in terms of technical and non-technical (moral and social) aspects.
- Reject those actions where the output (overall value) does not balance the input in terms of efficiency and fairness.
- Consider perspectives from all stakeholder groups.
- Examine technological relations at a variety of levels (e.g. biological, physical, psychological, social, and environmental).
Technoethical design (TED) refers to the process of designing technologies in an ethical manner, involving stakeholders in participatory design
efforts, revealing hidden or tacit technological relations, and
investigating what technologies make possible and how people will use
them. TED involves the following four steps:
- Ensure that the components and relations within the technological system are explicitly understood by those in the design context.
- Perform a TEA to identify relevant technical knowledge.
- Optimize the technological system in order to meet stakeholders' and affected individuals' needs and interests.
- Consult with representatives of stakeholder and affected groups in order to establish consensus on key design issues.
Both TEA and TED rely on systems theory,
a perspective that conceptualizes society in terms of events and
occurrences resulting from investigating system operations. Systems
theory assumes that complex ideas can be studied as systems with common
designs and properties which can be further explained using systems
methodology. The field of technoethics regards technologies as
self-producing systems that draw upon external resources and maintain
themselves through knowledge creation; these systems, of which humans
are a part, are constantly in flux as relations between technology,
nature, and society change. TEA attempts to elicit the knowledge, goals,
inputs, and outputs that comprise technological systems. Similarly, TED
enables designers to recognize technology's complexity and power, to
include facts and values in their designs, and to contextualize
technology in terms of what it makes possible and what makes it
possible.
Organizational technoethics
Recent
advances in technology and their ability to transmit vast amounts of
information in a short amount of time has changed the way information is
being shared amongst co-workers and managers throughout organizations
across the globe. Starting in the 1980s with information and
communications technologies (ICTs), organizations have seen an increase
in the amount of technology that they rely on to communicate within and
outside of the workplace. However, these implementations of technology
in the workplace create various ethical concerns and in turn a need for
further analysis of technology in organizations. As a result of this
growing trend, a subsection of technoethics known as organizational
technoethics has emerged to address these issues.
Key scholarly contributions
Key scholarly contributions linking ethics, technology, and society can be found in a number of seminal works:
- The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of Ethics for the Technological Age (Hans Jonas, 1979).
- On Technology, Medicine and Ethics (Hans Jonas, 1985).
- The Real World of Technology (Franklin, 1990).
- Thinking Ethics in Technology: Hennebach Lectures and Papers, 1995-1996 (Mitcham, 1997).
- Technology and the Good Life (Higgs, Light & Strong, 2000).
- Readings in the Philosophy of Technology (Kaplin, 2004).
- Ethics and technology: Ethical issues in an age of information and communication technology (Tavani, 2004).
This resulting scholarly attention to ethical issues arising from
technological transformations of work and life has helped given rise to a
number of key areas (or branches) of technoethical inquiry under
various research programs (i.e., computer ethics, engineering ethics, environmental technoethics, biotech ethics, Nanoethics, educational technoethics, information and communication ethics, media ethics, and Internet ethics).
