Grand Unified Theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A
Grand Unified Theory (
GUT) is a model in
particle physics in which at high energy, the three
gauge interactions of the
Standard Model which define the
electromagnetic,
weak, and
strong interactions or forces, are merged into one single force. This unified interaction is characterized by one larger
gauge symmetry and thus several force carriers, but one unified
coupling constant. If Grand Unification is realized in nature, there is the possibility of a
grand unification epoch in the early universe in which the fundamental forces are not yet distinct.
Models that do not unify all interactions using one
simple Lie group as the gauge symmetry, but do so using
semisimple groups, can exhibit similar properties and are sometimes referred to as Grand Unified Theories as well.
Unifying
gravity with the other three interactions would provide a
theory of everything (TOE), rather than a GUT. Nevertheless, GUTs are often seen as an intermediate step towards a TOE.
Because their masses are predicted to be just a few orders of magnitude below the
Planck scale, at the
GUT scale,
well beyond the reach of foreseen particle colliders experiments, novel
particles predicted by GUT models cannot be observed directly. Instead,
effects of grand unification might be detected through indirect
observations such as
proton decay, electric dipole moments of elementary particles, or the properties of
neutrinos.
[1] Some grand unified theories predict the existence of
magnetic monopoles.
As of 2012, all GUT models which aim to be completely realistic are
quite complicated, even compared to the Standard Model, because they
need to introduce additional fields and interactions, or even additional
dimensions of space. The main reason for this complexity lies in the
difficulty of reproducing the observed fermion masses and mixing angles.
Due to this difficulty, and due to the lack of any observed effect of
grand unification so far, there is no generally accepted GUT model.
History
Historically, the first true GUT which was based on the
simple Lie group SU(5), was proposed by
Howard Georgi and
Sheldon Glashow in 1974.
[2] The
Georgi–Glashow model was preceded by the
Semisimple Lie algebra Pati–Salam model by
Abdus Salam and
Jogesh Pati,
[3] who pioneered the idea to unify gauge interactions.
The acronym GUT was first coined in 1978 by CERN researchers
John Ellis, Andrzej Buras,
Mary K. Gaillard, and
Dimitri Nanopoulos, however in the final version of their paper
[4] they opted for the less anatomical
GUM (Grand Unification Mass). Nanopoulos later that year was the first to use
[5] the acronym in a paper.
[6]
Motivation
The fact that the
electric charges of
electrons and
protons
seem to cancel each other exactly to extreme precision is essential for
the existence of the macroscopic world as we know it, but this
important property of elementary particles is not explained in the
Standard Model of particle physics.
While the description of
strong and
weak interactions within the Standard Model is based on
gauge symmetries governed by the
simple symmetry groups SU(3) and
SU(2) which allow only discrete charges, the remaining component, the
weak hypercharge interaction is described by an
abelian symmetry U(1) which in principle allows for arbitrary charge assignments.
[note 1] The observed
charge quantization, namely the fact that all known
elementary particles carry electric charges which appear to be exact multiples of
1/3 of the
"elementary" charge, has led to the idea that
hypercharge
interactions and possibly the strong and weak interactions might be
embedded in one Grand Unified interaction described by a single, larger
simple symmetry group containing the Standard Model. This would
automatically predict the quantized nature and values of all elementary
particle charges. Since this also results in a prediction for the
relative strengths of the
fundamental interactions which we observe, in particular the
weak mixing angle, Grand Unification ideally reduces the number of independent input parameters, but is also constrained by observations.
Grand Unification is reminiscent of the unification of electric and magnetic forces by
Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism in the 19th century, but its physical implications and mathematical structure are qualitatively different.
Unification of matter particles
Schematic representation of fermions and bosons in SU(5) GUT showing 5 + 10
split in the multiplets. Neutral bosons (photon, Z-boson, and neutral
gluons) are not shown but occupy the diagonal entries of the matrix in
complex superpositions
SU(5)
SU(5) is the simplest GUT. The smallest
simple Lie group which contains the
standard model, and upon which the first Grand Unified Theory was based, is
- .
Such group symmetries allow the reinterpretation of several known
particles as different states of a single particle field. However, it is
not obvious that the simplest possible choices for the extended "Grand
Unified" symmetry should yield the correct inventory of elementary
particles. The fact that all currently known (2009) matter particles fit
nicely into three copies of the smallest
group representations of
SU(5)
and immediately carry the correct observed charges, is one of the first
and most important reasons why people believe that a Grand Unified
Theory might actually be realized in nature.
The two smallest
irreducible representations of
SU(5) are
5 and
10. In the standard assignment, the
5 contains the
charge conjugates of the right-handed
down-type quark color triplet and a left-handed
lepton isospin doublet, while the
10 contains the six
up-type quark components, the left-handed
down-type quark color triplet, and the right-handed
electron. This scheme has to be replicated for each of the three known
generations of matter. It is notable that the theory is
anomaly free with this matter content.
The hypothetical
right-handed neutrinos are not contained in any of these representations, which can explain their relative heaviness (see
seesaw mechanism).
SO(10)
The pattern of
weak isospin, W, weaker isospin, W', strong g3 and g8, and baryon minus lepton, B, charges for particles in the
SO(10) Grand Unified Theory, rotated to show the embedding in
E6.
The next simple Lie group which contains the standard model is
- .
Here, the unification of matter is even more complete, since the
irreducible spinor representation 16 contains both the
5 and
10 of
SU(5) and a right-handed neutrino, and thus the complete particle content of one generation of the extended
standard model with
neutrino masses. This is already the largest
simple group which achieves the unification of matter in a scheme involving only the already known matter particles (apart from the
Higgs sector).
Since different standard model fermions are grouped together in
larger representations, GUTs specifically predict relations among the
fermion masses, such as between the
electron and the
down quark, the
muon and the
strange quark, and the
tau lepton and the
bottom quark for
SU(5) and
SO(10). Some of these mass relations hold approximately, but most don't (see
Georgi-Jarlskog mass relation).
The boson matrix for
SO(10) is found by taking the
15 × 15 matrix from the
10 + 5 representation of
SU(5)
and adding an extra row and column for the right handed neutrino. The
bosons are found by adding a partner to each of the 20 charged bosons (2
right-handed W bosons, 6 massive charged gluons and 12 X/Y type bosons)
and adding an extra heavy neutral Z-boson to make 5 neutral bosons in
total. The boson matrix will have a boson or its new partner in each row
and column. These pairs combine to create the familiar 16D Dirac
spinor matrices of
SO(10).
SU(8)
Assuming 4 generations of fermions instead of 3 makes a total of
64 types of particles. These can be put into
64 = 8 + 56 representations of
SU(8). This can be divided into
SU(5) × SU(3)F × U(1) which is the
SU(5) theory together with some heavy bosons which act on the generation number.
O(16)
Again assuming 4 generations of fermions, the
128 particles and anti-particles can be put into a single spinor representation of
O(16).
Symplectic Groups and Quaternion Representations
Symplectic gauge groups could also be considered. For example
Sp(8) has a representation in terms of
4 × 4 quaternion unitary matrices which has a
16 dimensional real representation and so might be considered as a candidate for a gauge group.
Sp(8) has 32 charged bosons and 4 neutral bosons. It's subgroups include
SU(4) so can at least contain the gluons and photon of
SU(3) × U(1).
Although it's probably not possible to have weak bosons acting on
chiral fermions in this representation. A quaternion representation of
the fermions might be:
A further complication with
quaternion
representations of fermions is that there are two types of
multiplication: left multiplication and right multiplication which must
be taken into account. It turns out that including left and right-handed
4 × 4 quaternion matrices is equivalent to
including a single right-multiplication by a unit quaternion which adds
an extra SU(2) and so has an extra neutral boson and two more charged
bosons. Thus the group of left and right handed
4 × 4 quaternion matrcies is
Sp(8) × SU(2) which does include the standard model bosons:
If
is a quaternion valued spinor,
is quaternion hermitian
4 × 4 matrix coming from
Sp(8) and
is a pure imaginary quaternion (both of which are 4-vector bosons) then the interaction term is:
-
E8 and Octonion Representations
It can be noted that a generation of 16 fermions can be put into the form of an
Octonion
with each element of the octonion being an 8-vector. If the 3
generations are then put in a 3x3 hermitian matrix with certain
additions for the diagonal elements then these matrices form an
exceptional (grassman-)
Jordan algebra, which has the symmetry group of one of the exceptional Lie groups (F
4, E
6, E
7 or E
8) depending on the details.
Because they are fermions the anti-commutators of the Jordan algebra become commutators. It is known that E
6 has subgroup
O(10) and so is big enough to include the Standard Model. An E
8
gauge group, for example, would have 8 neutral bosons, 120 charged
bosons and 120 charged anti-bosons.
To account for the 248 fermions in
the lowest multiplet of E
8, these would either have to include anti-particles (and so have
Baryogenesis), have new undiscovered particles, or have gravity-like (
Spin connection) bosons affecting elements of the particles spin direction. Each of these poses theoretical problems.
Beyond Lie Groups
Other structures have been suggested including Lie 3-algebras and
Lie superalgebras. Neither of these fit with
Yang–Mills theory. In particular Lie superalgebras would introduce bosons with the wrong statistics.
Supersymmetry however does fit with Yang–Mills. For example N=4 Super Yang Mills Theory requires an
SU(N) gauge group.
Unification of forces and the role of supersymmetry
The unification of forces is possible due to the energy scale dependence of force
coupling parameters in
quantum field theory called
renormalization group running,
which allows parameters with vastly different values at usual energies
to converge to a single value at a much higher energy scale.
[7]
The
renormalization group running of the three gauge couplings in the
Standard Model has been found to nearly, but not quite, meet at the same point if the
hypercharge is normalized so that it is consistent with
SU(5) or
SO(10)
GUTs, which are precisely the GUT groups which lead to a simple fermion
unification. This is a significant result, as other Lie groups lead to
different normalizations. However, if the
supersymmetric extension
MSSM
is used instead of the Standard Model, the match becomes much more
accurate. In this case, the coupling constants of the strong and
electroweak interactions meet at the
grand unification energy, also known as the GUT scale:
- .
It is commonly believed that this matching is unlikely to be a
coincidence, and is often quoted as one of the main motivations to
further investigate
supersymmetric theories
despite the fact that no supersymmetric partner particles have been
experimentally observed (May 2014). Also, most model builders simply
assume
supersymmetry because it solves the
hierarchy problem—i.e., it stabilizes the electroweak
Higgs mass against
radiative corrections.
[citation needed]
Neutrino masses
Since
Majorana masses of the right-handed neutrino are forbidden by
SO(10) symmetry,
SO(10) GUTs predict the Majorana masses of right-handed neutrinos to be close to the
GUT scale where the symmetry is
spontaneously broken in those models. In
supersymmetric
GUTs, this scale tends to be larger than would be desirable to obtain
realistic masses of the light, mostly left-handed neutrinos via the
seesaw mechanism.
Proposed theories
Several such theories have been proposed, but none is currently
universally accepted. An even more ambitious theory that includes
all fundamental forces, including
gravitation, is termed a
theory of everything. Some common
mainstream GUT models are:
Not quite GUTs:
Note: These models refer to
Lie algebras not to
Lie groups. The Lie group could be
[SU(4) × SU(2) × SU(2)]/Z2, just to take a random example.
The most promising candidate is
SO(10).
[citation needed] (Minimal)
SO(10) does not contain any
exotic fermions (i.e. additional fermions besides the
Standard Model fermions and the right-handed neutrino), and it unifies each generation into a single
irreducible representation. A number of other GUT models are based upon subgroups of
SO(10). They are the minimal
left-right model,
SU(5),
flipped SU(5) and the
Pati–Salam model. The GUT group E
6 contains
SO(10), but models based upon it are significantly more complicated. The primary reason for studying E
6 models comes from
E8 × E8 heterotic string theory.
GUT models generically predict the existence of
topological defects such as
monopoles,
cosmic strings,
domain walls, and others. But none have been observed. Their absence is known as the
monopole problem in
cosmology. Most GUT models also predict
proton decay,
although not the Pati–Salam model; current experiments still haven't
detected proton decay. This experimental limit on the proton's lifetime
pretty much rules out minimal
SU(5).
- Proton Decay. These graphics refer to the X bosons and Higgs bosons.
-
Dimension 6 proton decay mediated by the
X boson
in
SU(5) GUT
-
Dimension 6 proton decay mediated by the
X boson
in flipped
SU(5) GUT
-
Dimension 6 proton decay mediated by the triplet Higgs
and the anti-triplet Higgs
in
SU(5) GUT
Some GUT theories like
SU(5) and
SO(10) suffer from what is called the
doublet-triplet problem. These theories predict that for each electroweak Higgs doublet, there is a corresponding
colored Higgs triplet field with a very small mass (many orders of magnitude smaller than the GUT scale here). In theory, unifying
quarks with
leptons,
the Higgs doublet would also be unified with a Higgs triplet. Such
triplets have not been observed. They would also cause extremely rapid
proton decay (far below current experimental limits) and prevent the
gauge coupling strengths from running together in the renormalization
group.
Most GUT models require a threefold replication of the matter fields.
As such, they do not explain why there are three generations of
fermions. Most GUT models also fail to explain the
little hierarchy between the fermion masses for different generations.
Ingredients
A GUT model basically consists of a
gauge group which is a
compact Lie group, a
connection form for that Lie group, a
Yang–Mills action for that connection given by an
invariant symmetric bilinear form over its Lie algebra (which is specified by a
coupling constant for each factor), a
Higgs sector consisting of a number of scalar fields taking on values within real/complex
representations of the Lie group and chiral
Weyl fermions taking on values within a complex rep of the Lie group. The Lie group contains the
Standard Model group and the Higgs fields acquire
VEVs leading to a
spontaneous symmetry breaking to the
Standard Model. The Weyl fermions represent matter.
Current status
As of 2012, there is still no hard evidence that nature is described by a Grand Unified Theory.
Moreover, since we have no idea which
Higgs particle has been observed, the smaller electroweak unification is still pending.
[8] The discovery of
neutrino oscillations indicates that the Standard Model is incomplete and has led to renewed interest toward certain GUT such as
SO(10). One of the few possible experimental tests of certain GUT is
proton decay and also fermion masses. There are a few more special tests for supersymmetric GUT.
The
gauge coupling strengths of
QCD, the
weak interaction and
hypercharge seem to meet at a common length scale called the
GUT scale and equal approximately to 10
16 GeV, which is slightly suggestive. This interesting numerical observation is called the
gauge coupling unification, and it works particularly well if one assumes the existence of
superpartners
of the Standard Model particles. Still it is possible to achieve the
same by postulating, for instance, that ordinary (non supersymmetric)
SO(10) models break with an intermediate gauge scale, such as the one of Pati–Salam group