Orbital elements are the parameters required to uniquely identify a specific orbit. In celestial mechanics these elements are generally considered in classicaltwo-body systems, where a Kepler orbit
is used. There are many different ways to mathematically describe the
same orbit, but certain schemes, each consisting of a set of six
parameters, are commonly used in astronomy and orbital mechanics.
A real orbit (and its elements) changes over time due to gravitational perturbations by other objects and the effects of relativity. A Keplerian orbit is merely an idealized, mathematical approximation at a particular time.
Keplerian elements
In this diagram, the orbital plane
(yellow) intersects a reference plane (gray). For Earth-orbiting
satellites, the reference plane is usually the Earth's equatorial plane,
and for satellites in solar orbits it is the ecliptic plane. The intersection is called the line of nodes, as it connects the center of mass with the ascending and descending nodes. The reference plane, together with the vernal point (♈︎), establishes a reference frame.
When viewed from an inertial frame, two orbiting bodies trace out distinct trajectories. Each of these trajectories has its focus at the common center of mass.
When viewed from a non-inertial frame centred on one of the bodies,
only the trajectory of the opposite body is apparent; Keplerian elements
describe these non-inertial trajectories. An orbit has two sets of
Keplerian elements depending on which body is used as the point of
reference. The reference body is called the primary, the other body is called the secondary.
The primary does not necessarily possess more mass than the secondary,
and even when the bodies are of equal mass, the orbital elements depend
on the choice of the primary.
The main two elements that define the shape and size of the ellipse:
Eccentricity (e)—shape of the ellipse, describing how much it is elongated compared to a circle (not marked in diagram).
Semimajor axis (a)—the sum of the periapsis and apoapsis distances
divided by two. For circular orbits, the semimajor axis is the distance
between the centers of the bodies, not the distance of the bodies from
the center of mass.
Two elements define the orientation of the orbital plane in which the ellipse is embedded:
Inclination (i)—vertical tilt of the ellipse with respect to the reference plane, measured at the ascending node (where the orbit passes upward through the reference plane, the green angle i
in the diagram). Tilt angle is measured perpendicular to line of
intersection between orbital plane and reference plane. Any three points
on an ellipse will define the ellipse orbital plane. The plane and the
ellipse are both two-dimensional objects defined in three-dimensional
space.
Longitude of the ascending node (Ω)—horizontally orients the ascending node of the ellipse (where the orbit passes upward through the reference plane, symbolized by ☊) with respect to the reference frame's vernal point (symbolized by ♈︎). This is measured in the reference plane, and is shown as the green angle Ω in the diagram.
And finally:
Argument of periapsis (ω)
defines the orientation of the ellipse in the orbital plane, as an
angle measured from the ascending node to the periapsis (the closest
point the satellite object comes to the primary object around which it
orbits, the blue angle ω in the diagram).
True anomaly (ν, θ, or f) at epoch (M0) defines the position of the orbiting body along the ellipse at a specific time (the "epoch").
The mean anomaly
is a mathematically convenient "angle" which varies linearly with time,
but which does not correspond to a real geometric angle. It can be
converted into the true anomalyν, which does represent the real geometric angle in the plane of the ellipse, between periapsis
(closest approach to the central body) and the position of the orbiting
object at any given time. Thus, the true anomaly is shown as the red
angle ν in the diagram, and the mean anomaly is not shown.
The angles of inclination, longitude of the ascending node, and argument of periapsis can also be described as the Euler angles defining the orientation of the orbit relative to the reference coordinate system.
Note that non-elliptic trajectories also exist, but are not
closed, and are thus not orbits. If the eccentricity is greater than
one, the trajectory is a hyperbola. If the eccentricity is equal to one and the angular momentum is zero, the trajectory is radial. If the eccentricity is one and there is angular momentum, the trajectory is a parabola.
Required parameters
Given an inertial frame of reference and an arbitrary epoch (a specified point in time), exactly six parameters are necessary to unambiguously define an arbitrary and unperturbed orbit.
This is because the problem contains six degrees of freedom. These correspond to the three spatial dimensions which define position (x, y, z in a Cartesian coordinate system), plus the velocity in each of these dimensions. These can be described as orbital state vectors, but this is often an inconvenient way to represent an orbit, which is why Keplerian elements are commonly used instead.
Sometimes the epoch is considered a "seventh" orbital parameter, rather than part of the reference frame.
If the epoch is defined to be at the moment when one of the
elements is zero, the number of unspecified elements is reduced to five.
(The sixth parameter is still necessary to define the orbit; it is
merely numerically set to zero by convention or "moved" into the
definition of the epoch with respect to real-world clock time.)
Alternative parametrizations
Keplerian elements can be obtained from orbital state vectors (a three-dimensional vector for the position and another for the velocity) by manual transformations or with computer software.
Other orbital parameters can be computed from the Keplerian elements such as the period, apoapsis, and periapsis.
(When orbiting the Earth, the last two terms are known as the apogee
and perigee.) It is common to specify the period instead of the
semi-major axis in Keplerian element sets, as each can be computed from
the other provided the standard gravitational parameter, GM, is given for the central body.
Using, for example, the "mean anomaly" instead of "mean anomaly at epoch" means that time t
must be specified as a seventh orbital element. Sometimes it is assumed
that mean anomaly is zero at the epoch (by choosing the appropriate
definition of the epoch), leaving only the five other orbital elements
to be specified.
Different sets of elements are used for various astronomical bodies. The eccentricity, e, and either the semi-major axis, a, or the distance of periapsis, q, are used to specify the shape and size of an orbit. The angle of the ascending node, Ω, the inclination, i, and the argument of periapsis, ω, or the longitude of periapsis, ϖ, specify the orientation of the orbit in its plane. Either the longitude at epoch, L0, the mean anomaly at epoch, M0, or the time of perihelion passage, T0,
are used to specify a known point in the orbit. The choices made depend
whether the vernal equinox or the node are used as the primary
reference. The semi-major axis is known if the mean motion and the gravitational mass are known.
It is also quite common to see either the mean anomaly (M) or the mean longitude (L) expressed directly, without either M0 or L0 as intermediary steps, as a polynomial function with respect to time. This method of expression will consolidate the mean motion (n) into the polynomial as one of the coefficients. The appearance will be that L or M are expressed in a more complicated manner, but we will appear to need one fewer orbital element.
Mean motion can also be obscured behind citations of the orbital period P.
The angles Ω, i, ω are the Euler angles (α, β, γ with the notations of that article) characterizing the orientation of the coordinate system
x̂, ŷ, ẑ from the inertial coordinate frame Î, Ĵ, K̂
where:
Î, Ĵ is in the equatorial plane of the central body. Î is in the direction of the vernal equinox. Ĵ is perpendicular to Î and with Î defines the reference plane. K̂
is perpendicular to the reference plane. Orbital elements of bodies
(planets, comets, asteroids,...) in the solar system usually use the ecliptic as that plane.
x̂, ŷ are in the orbital plane and with x̂ in the direction to the pericenter (periapsis). ẑ is perpendicular to the plane of the orbit. ŷ is mutually perpendicular to x̂ and ẑ.
Then, the transformation from the Î, Ĵ, K̂ coordinate frame to the x̂, ŷ, ẑ frame with the Euler angles Ω, i, ω is:
where
The inverse transformation, which computes the 3 coordinates in the
I-J-K system given the 3 (or 2) coordinates in the x-y-z system, is
represented by the inverse matrix. According to the rules of matrix algebra,
the inverse matrix of the product of the 3 rotation matrices is
obtained by inverting the order of the three matrices and switching the
signs of the three Euler angles.
The transformation from x̂, ŷ, ẑ to Euler angles Ω, i, ω is:
where arg(x,y) signifies the polar argument that can be computed with the standard function atan2(y,x) available in many programming languages.
Orbit prediction
Under ideal conditions of a perfectly spherical central body and zero perturbations, all orbital elements except the mean anomaly are constants. The mean anomaly changes linearly with time, scaled by the mean motion,
Hence if at any instant t0 the orbital parameters are [e0, a0, i0, Ω0, ω0, M0], then the elements at time t0 + δt is given by [e0, a0, i0, Ω0, ω0, M0 + n δt]
Perturbations and elemental variance
Unperturbed, two-body, Newtonian orbits are always conic sections, so the Keplerian elements define an ellipse, parabola, or hyperbola.
Real orbits have perturbations, so a given set of Keplerian elements
accurately describes an orbit only at the epoch. Evolution of the
orbital elements takes place due to the gravitational pull of bodies other than the primary, the nonsphericity of the primary, atmosphericdrag, relativistic effects, radiation pressure, electromagnetic forces, and so on.
Keplerian elements can often be used to produce useful
predictions at times near the epoch. Alternatively, real trajectories
can be modeled as a sequence of Keplerian orbits that osculate
("kiss" or touch) the real trajectory. They can also be described by
the so-called planetary equations, differential equations which come in
different forms developed by Lagrange, Gauss, Delaunay, Poincaré, or Hill.
Two-line elements
Keplerian elements parameters can be encoded as text in a number of formats. The most common of them is the NASA/NORAD"two-line elements" (TLE) format,
originally designed for use with 80-column punched cards, but still in
use because it is the most common format, and can be handled easily by
all modern data storages as well.
Depending on the application and object orbit, the data derived
from TLEs older than 30 days can become unreliable. Orbital positions
can be calculated from TLEs through the SGP/SGP4/SDP4/SGP8/SDP8 algorithms.
Artist's impression of the evolution of a hot high-mass binary star.
Hubble image of the Sirius binary system, in which Sirius B can be clearly distinguished (lower left)
A binary star is a star system consisting of two starsorbiting around their common barycenter. Systems of two or more stars are called multiple star systems.
These systems, especially when more distant, often appear to the
unaided eye as a single point of light, and are then revealed as
multiple by other means. Research over the last two centuries suggests
that half or more of visible stars are part of multiple star systems.
The term double star is often used synonymously with binary star; however, double star can also mean optical double star.
Optical doubles are so called because the two stars appear close
together in the sky as seen from the Earth; they are almost on the same line of sight.
Nevertheless, their "doubleness" depends only on this optical effect;
the stars themselves are distant from one another and share no physical
connection. A double star can be revealed as optical by means of
differences in their parallax measurements, proper motions, or radial velocities.
Most known double stars have not been studied sufficiently closely to
determine whether they are optical doubles or they are doubles
physically bound through gravitation into a multiple star system.
Binary star systems are very important in astrophysics because calculations of their orbits allow the masses
of their component stars to be directly determined, which in turn
allows other stellar parameters, such as radius and density, to be
indirectly estimated. This also determines an empirical mass-luminosity
relationship (MLR) from which the masses of single stars can be
estimated.
Binary stars are often detected optically, in which case they are called visual binaries.
Many visual binaries have long orbital periods of several centuries or
millennia and therefore have orbits which are uncertain or poorly
known. They may also be detected by indirect techniques, such as spectroscopy (spectroscopic binaries) or astrometry (astrometric binaries). If a binary star happens to orbit in a plane along our line of sight, its components will eclipse and transit each other; these pairs are called eclipsing binaries, or, as they are detected by their changes in brightness during eclipses and transits, photometric binaries.
If components in binary star systems are close enough they can
gravitationally distort their mutual outer stellar atmospheres. In some
cases, these close binary systems can exchange mass, which may bring their evolution to stages that single stars cannot attain. Examples of binaries are Sirius, and Cygnus X-1 (Cygnus X-1 being a well-known black hole). Binary stars are also common as the nuclei of many planetary nebulae, and are the progenitors of both novae and type Ia supernovae.
Discovery
The term binary was first used in this context by Sir William Herschel in 1802, when he wrote:
If, on the contrary, two stars
should really be situated very near each other, and at the same time so
far insulated as not to be materially affected by the attractions of
neighbouring stars, they will then compose a separate system, and remain
united by the bond of their own mutual gravitation towards each other.
This should be called a real double star; and any two stars that are
thus mutually connected, form the binary sidereal system which we are
now to consider.
By the modern definition, the term binary star is generally restricted to pairs of stars which revolve around a common center of mass. Binary stars which can be resolved with a telescope or interferometric methods are known as visual binaries.
For most of the known visual binary stars one whole revolution has not
been observed yet, they are observed to have travelled along a curved
path or a partial arc.
This figure shows a system with two stars
The more general term double star is used for pairs of stars which are seen to be close together in the sky. This distinction is rarely made in languages other than English. Double stars may be binary systems
or may be merely two stars that appear to be close together in the sky
but have vastly different true distances from the Sun. The latter are
termed optical doubles or optical pairs.
John Michell
was the first to suggest that double stars might be physically attached
to each other when he argued in 1767 that the probability that a double
star was due to a chance alignment was small. William Herschel began observing double stars in 1779 and soon thereafter published catalogs of about 700 double stars.
By 1803, he had observed changes in the relative positions in a number
of double stars over the course of 25 years, and concluded that they
must be binary systems; the first orbit of a binary star, however, was not computed until 1827, when Félix Savary computed the orbit of Xi Ursae Majoris. Since this time, many more double stars have been catalogued and measured. The Washington Double Star Catalog, a database of visual double stars compiled by the United States Naval Observatory, contains over 100,000 pairs of double stars, including optical doubles as well as binary stars. Orbits are known for only a few thousand of these double stars, and most have not been ascertained to be either true binaries or optical double stars.
This can be determined by observing the relative motion of the pairs.
If the motion is part of an orbit, or if the stars have similar radial velocities and the difference in their proper motions is small compared to their common proper motion, the pair is probably physical.
One of the tasks that remains for visual observers of double stars is
to obtain sufficient observations to prove or disprove gravitational
connection.
Classifications
Edge-on disc of gas and dust present around the binary star system HD 106906.
Methods of observation
Binary stars are classified into four types according to the way in which they are observed: visually, by observation; spectroscopically, by periodic changes in spectral lines; photometrically, by changes in brightness caused by an eclipse; or astrometrically, by measuring a deviation in a star's position caused by an unseen companion.
Any binary star can belong to several of these classes; for example,
several spectroscopic binaries are also eclipsing binaries.
Visual binaries
A visual binary
star is a binary star for which the angular separation between the two
components is great enough to permit them to be observed as a double
star in a telescope, or even high-powered binoculars. The angular resolution
of the telescope is an important factor in the detection of visual
binaries, and as better angular resolutions are applied to binary star
observations, an increasing number of visual binaries will be detected.
The relative brightness of the two stars is also an important factor, as
glare from a bright star may make it difficult to detect the presence
of a fainter component.
The brighter star of a visual binary is the primary star, and the dimmer is considered the secondary. In some publications (especially older ones), a faint secondary is called the comes (plural comites; companion). If the stars are the same brightness, the discoverer designation for the primary is customarily accepted.
The position angle
of the secondary with respect to the primary is measured, together with
the angular distance between the two stars. The time of observation is
also recorded. After a sufficient number of observations are recorded
over a period of time, they are plotted in polar coordinates with the primary star at the origin, and the most probable ellipse is drawn through these points such that the Keplerian law of areas is satisfied. This ellipse is known as the apparent ellipse,
and is the projection of the actual elliptical orbit of the secondary
with respect to the primary on the plane of the sky. From this projected
ellipse the complete elements of the orbit may be computed, where the semi-major axis can only be expressed in angular units unless the stellar parallax, and hence the distance, of the system is known.
Spectroscopic binaries
Sometimes, the only evidence of a binary star comes from the Doppler effect on its emitted light. In these cases, the binary consists of a pair of stars where the spectral lines
in the light emitted from each star shifts first towards the blue, then
towards the red, as each moves first towards us, and then away from us,
during its motion about their common center of mass, with the period of their common orbit.
In these systems, the separation between the stars is usually
very small, and the orbital velocity very high. Unless the plane of the
orbit happens to be perpendicular to the line of sight, the orbital velocities will have components in the line of sight and the observed radial velocity of the system will vary periodically. Since radial velocity can be measured with a spectrometer by observing the Doppler shift of the stars' spectral lines, the binaries detected in this manner are known as spectroscopic binaries. Most of these cannot be resolved as a visual binary, even with telescopes of the highest existing resolving power.
In some spectroscopic binaries, spectral lines from both stars
are visible and the lines are alternately double and single. Such a
system is known as a double-lined spectroscopic binary (often denoted
"SB2"). In other systems, the spectrum of only one of the stars is seen
and the lines in the spectrum shift periodically towards the blue, then
towards red and back again. Such stars are known as single-lined
spectroscopic binaries ("SB1").
The orbit of a spectroscopic binary is determined by making a
long series of observations of the radial velocity of one or both
components of the system. The observations are plotted against time, and
from the resulting curve a period is determined. If the orbit is circular then the curve will be a sine curve. If the orbit is elliptical, the shape of the curve will depend on the eccentricity of the ellipse and the orientation of the major axis with reference to the line of sight.
It is impossible to determine individually the semi-major axisa and the inclination of the orbit plane i. However, the product of the semi-major axis and the sine of the inclination (i.e. a sin i) may be determined directly in linear units (e.g. kilometres). If either a or i can be determined by other means, as in the case of eclipsing binaries, a complete solution for the orbit can be found.
Binary stars that are both visual and spectroscopic binaries are
rare, and are a valuable source of information when found. About 40 are
known. Visual binary stars often have large true separations, with
periods measured in decades to centuries; consequently, they usually
have orbital speeds too small to be measured spectroscopically.
Conversely, spectroscopic binary stars move fast in their orbits because
they are close together, usually too close to be detected as visual
binaries. Binaries that are found to be both visual and spectroscopic
thus must be relatively close to Earth.
Eclipsing binaries
Algol
B orbits Algol A. This animation was assembled from 55 images of the
CHARA interferometer in the near-infrared H-band, sorted according to
orbital phase.
An eclipsing binary star is a binary star system in which the
orbit plane of the two stars lies so nearly in the line of sight of the
observer that the components undergo mutual eclipses. In the case where the binary is also a spectroscopic binary and the parallax of the system is known, the binary is quite valuable for stellar analysis. Algol, a triple star system in the constellation Perseus, contains the best-known example of an eclipsing binary.
This
video shows an artist's impression of an eclipsing binary star system.
As the two stars orbit each other they pass in front of one another and
their combined brightness, seen from a distance, decreases.
Eclipsing binaries are variable stars, not because the light of the individual components vary but because of the eclipses. The light curve
of an eclipsing binary is characterized by periods of practically
constant light, with periodic drops in intensity when one star passes in
front of the other. The brightness may drop twice during the orbit,
once when the secondary passes in front of the primary and once when the
primary passes in front of the secondary. The deeper of the two
eclipses is called the primary regardless of which star is being
occulted, and if a shallow second eclipse also occurs it is called the
secondary eclipse. The size of the brightness drops depends on the
relative brightness of the two stars, the proportion of the occulted
star that is hidden, and the surface brightness (ie. effective temperature) of the stars. Typically the occultation of the hotter star causes the primary eclipse.
An eclipsing binaries' period of orbit may be determined from a study of its light curve,
and the relative sizes of the individual stars can be determined in
terms of the radius of the orbit, by observing how quickly the
brightness changes as the disc of the nearest star slides over the disc
of the other star. If it is also a spectroscopic binary, the orbital elements
can also be determined, and the mass of the stars can be determined
relatively easily, which means that the relative densities of the stars
can be determined in this case.
Since about 1995, measurement of extragalactic eclipsing
binaries' fundamental parameters has become possible with 8-meter class
telescopes. This makes it feasible to use them to directly measure the
distances to external galaxies, a process that is more accurate than
using standard candles. By 2006, they had been used to give direct distance estimates to the LMC, SMC, Andromeda Galaxy, and Triangulum Galaxy. Eclipsing binaries offer a direct method to gauge the distance to galaxies to an improved 5% level of accuracy.
Non-eclipsing binaries that can be detected through photometry
Nearby non-eclipsing binaries can also be photometrically
detected by observing how the stars affect each other in three ways.
The first is by observing extra light which the stars reflect from their
companion. Second is by observing ellipsoidal light variations which
are caused by deformation of the star's shape by their companions. The
third method is by looking at how relativistic beaming affects the apparent magnitude of the stars. Detecting binaries with these methods requires accurate photometry.
Astrometric binaries
Astronomers have discovered some stars that seemingly orbit around an empty space. Astrometric binaries
are relatively nearby stars which can be seen to wobble around a point
in space, with no visible companion. The same mathematics used for
ordinary binaries can be applied to infer the mass
of the missing companion. The companion could be very dim, so that it
is currently undetectable or masked by the glare of its primary, or it
could be an object that emits little or no electromagnetic radiation, for example a neutron star.
The visible star's position is carefully measured and detected to
vary, due to the gravitational influence from its counterpart. The
position of the star is repeatedly measured relative to more distant
stars, and then checked for periodic shifts in position. Typically this
type of measurement can only be performed on nearby stars, such as those
within 10 parsecs. Nearby stars often have a relatively high proper motion, so astrometric binaries will appear to follow a wobbly path across the sky.
If the companion is sufficiently massive to cause an observable
shift in position of the star, then its presence can be deduced. From
precise astrometric
measurements of the movement of the visible star over a sufficiently
long period of time, information about the mass of the companion and its
orbital period can be determined. Even though the companion is not visible, the characteristics of the system can be determined from the observations using Kepler's laws.
This method of detecting binaries is also used to locateextrasolar planets
orbiting a star. However, the requirements to perform this measurement
are very exacting, due to the great difference in the mass ratio, and
the typically long period of the planet's orbit. Detection of position
shifts of a star is a very exacting science, and it is difficult to
achieve the necessary precision. Space telescopes can avoid the blurring
effect of Earth's atmosphere, resulting in more precise resolution.
Configuration of the system
Detached
Semidetached
Contact
Configurations
of a binary star system with a mass ratio of 3. The black lines
represent the inner critical Roche equipotentials, the Roche lobes.
Another classification is based on the distance between the stars, relative to their sizes:
Detached binaries are binary stars where each component is within its Roche lobe, i.e. the area where the gravitational pull
of the star itself is larger than that of the other component. The
stars have no major effect on each other, and essentially evolve
separately. Most binaries belong to this class.
Semidetached binary stars are binary stars where one of
the components fills the binary star's Roche lobe and the other does
not. Gas from the surface of the Roche-lobe-filling component (donor) is
transferred to the other, accreting star. The mass transfer dominates the evolution of the system. In many cases, the inflowing gas forms an accretion disc around the accretor.
A contact binary is a type of binary star in which both components of the binary fill their Roche lobes. The uppermost part of the stellar atmospheres forms a common envelope that surrounds both stars. As the friction of the envelope brakes the orbital motion, the stars may eventually merge. W Ursae Majoris is an example.
When a binary system contains a compact object such as a white dwarf, neutron star or black hole, gas from the other (donor) star can accrete onto the compact object. This releases gravitational potential energy, causing the gas to become hotter and emit radiation. Cataclysmic variable stars, where the compact object is a white dwarf, are examples of such systems.
In X-ray binaries, the compact object can be either a neutron star or a black hole. These binaries are classified as low-mass or high-mass according to the mass of the donor star. High-mass X-ray binaries contain a young, early-type, high-mass donor star which transfers mass by its stellar wind, while low-mass X-ray binaries are semidetached binaries in which gas from a late-type donor star or a white dwarf overflows the Roche lobe and falls towards the neutron star or black hole. Probably the best known example of an X-ray binary is the high-mass X-ray binaryCygnus X-1. In Cygnus X-1, the mass of the unseen companion is estimated to be about nine times that of the Sun, far exceeding the Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff limit
for the maximum theoretical mass of a neutron star. It is therefore
believed to be a black hole; it was the first object for which this was
widely believed.
The Applegate mechanism explains long term orbital period variations seen in certain eclipsing binaries. As a main-sequence star
goes through an activity cycle, the outer layers of the star are
subject to a magnetic torque changing the distribution of angular
momentum, resulting in a change in the star's oblateness. The orbit of
the stars in the binary pair is gravitationally coupled to their shape
changes, so that the period shows modulations (typically on the order of
∆P/P ∼ 10−5) on the same time scale as the activity cycles (typically on the order of decades).
Another phenomenon observed in some Algol binaries has been
monotonic period increases. This is quite distinct from the far more
common observations of alternating period increases and decreases
explained by the Applegate mechanism. Monotonic period increases have
been attributed to mass transfer, usually (but not always) from the less
massive to the more massive star.
Designations
A and B
Artist’s impression of the binary star system AR Scorpii.
The components of binary stars are denoted by the suffixes A and B appended to the system's designation, A denoting the primary and B the secondary. The suffix AB
may be used to denote the pair (for example, the binary star α Centauri
AB consists of the stars α Centauri A and α Centauri B.) Additional
letters, such as C, D, etc., may be used for systems with more than two stars. In cases where the binary star has a Bayer designation and is widely separated, it is possible that the members of the pair will be designated with superscripts; an example is Zeta Reticuli, whose components are ζ1 Reticuli and ζ2 Reticuli.
Discoverer designations
Double stars are also designated by an abbreviation giving the discoverer together with an index number. α Centauri, for example, was found to be double by Father Richaud in 1689, and so is designated RHD 1. These discoverer codes can be found in the Washington Double Star Catalog.
Hot and cold
The components of a binary star system may be designated by their relative temperatures as the hot companion and cool companion.
Examples:
Antares
(Alpha Scorpii) is a red supergiant star in a binary system with a
hotter blue main-sequence star Antares B. Antares B can therefore be
termed a hot companion of the cool supergiant.
Symbiotic stars
are binary star systems composed of a late-type giant star and a hotter
companion object. Since the nature of the companion is not
well-established in all cases, it may be termed a "hot companion".
The luminous blue variableEta Carinae
has recently been determined to be a binary star system. The secondary
appears to have a higher temperature than the primary and has therefore
been described as being the "hot companion" star. It may be a Wolf–Rayet star.
R Aquarii
shows a spectrum which simultaneously displays both a cool and hot
signature. This combination is the result of a cool red supergiant
accompanied by a smaller, hotter companion. Matter flows from the
supergiant to the smaller, denser companion.
While it is not impossible that some binaries might be created through gravitational capture between two single stars, given the very low likelihood of such an event (three objects being actually required, as conservation of energy
rules out a single gravitating body capturing another) and the high
number of binaries currently in existence, this cannot be the primary
formation process. The observation of binaries consisting of stars not
yet on the main sequence supports the theory that binaries develop during star formation. Fragmentation of the molecular cloud during the formation of protostars is an acceptable explanation for the formation of a binary or multiple star system.
The outcome of the three-body problem,
in which the three stars are of comparable mass, is that eventually one
of the three stars will be ejected from the system and, assuming no
significant further perturbations, the remaining two will form a stable
binary system.
Mass transfer and accretion
As a main-sequence star increases in size during its evolution, it may at some point exceed its Roche lobe, meaning that some of its matter ventures into a region where the gravitational pull of its companion star is larger than its own.
The result is that matter will transfer from one star to another
through a process known as Roche lobe overflow (RLOF), either being
absorbed by direct impact or through an accretion disc. The mathematical point through which this transfer happens is called the first Lagrangian point. It is not uncommon that the accretion disc is the brightest (and thus sometimes the only visible) element of a binary star.
If a star grows outside of its Roche lobe too fast for all
abundant matter to be transferred to the other component, it is also
possible that matter will leave the system through other Lagrange points
or as stellar wind, thus being effectively lost to both components.
Since the evolution of a star is determined by its mass, the process
influences the evolution of both companions, and creates stages that
cannot be attained by single stars.
Studies of the eclipsing ternary Algol led to the Algol paradox in the theory of stellar evolution:
although components of a binary star form at the same time, and massive
stars evolve much faster than the less massive ones, it was observed
that the more massive component Algol A is still in the main sequence, while the less massive Algol B is a subgiant at a later evolutionary stage. The paradox can be solved by mass transfer: when the more massive star became a subgiant, it filled its Roche lobe,
and most of the mass was transferred to the other star, which is still
in the main sequence. In some binaries similar to Algol, a gas flow can
actually be seen.
It is also possible for widely separated binaries to lose
gravitational contact with each other during their lifetime, as a result
of external perturbations. The components will then move on to evolve
as single stars. A close encounter between two binary systems can also
result in the gravitational disruption of both systems, with some of the
stars being ejected at high velocities, leading to runaway stars.
If a white dwarf has a close companion star that overflows its Roche lobe, the white dwarf will steadily accrete
gases from the star's outer atmosphere. These are compacted on the
white dwarf's surface by its intense gravity, compressed and heated to
very high temperatures as additional material is drawn in. The white
dwarf consists of degenerate matter and so is largely unresponsive to heat, while the accreted hydrogen is not. Hydrogen fusion can occur in a stable manner on the surface through the CNO cycle,
causing the enormous amount of energy liberated by this process to blow
the remaining gases away from the white dwarf's surface. The result is
an extremely bright outburst of light, known as a nova.
In extreme cases this event can cause the white dwarf to exceed the Chandrasekhar limit and trigger a supernova that destroys the entire star, another possible cause for runaways. An example of such an event is the supernova SN 1572, which was observed by Tycho Brahe. The Hubble Space Telescope recently took a picture of the remnants of this event.
Astrophysics
Binaries
provide the best method for astronomers to determine the mass of a
distant star. The gravitational pull between them causes them to orbit
around their common center of mass. From the orbital pattern of a visual
binary, or the time variation of the spectrum of a spectroscopic
binary, the mass of its stars can be determined, for example with the binary mass function.
In this way, the relation between a star's appearance (temperature and
radius) and its mass can be found, which allows for the determination of
the mass of non-binaries.
Because a large proportion of stars exist in binary systems,
binaries are particularly important to our understanding of the
processes by which stars form. In particular, the period and masses of
the binary tell us about the amount of angular momentum in the system. Because this is a conserved quantity in physics, binaries give us important clues about the conditions under which the stars were formed.
Calculating the center of mass in binary stars
In a simple binary case, r1, the distance from the center of the first star to the center of mass or barycenter, is given by:
where:
a is the distance between the two stellar centers and
If a is taken to be the semi-major axis of the orbit of one body around the other, then r1 will be the semimajor axis of the first body's orbit around the center of mass or barycenter, and r2 = a – r1
will be the semimajor axis of the second body's orbit. When the center
of mass is located within the more massive body, that body will appear
to wobble rather than following a discernible orbit.
Research findings
It is estimated that approximately one third of the star systems in the Milky Way are binary or multiple, with the remaining two thirds being single stars. The overall multiplicity frequency of ordinary stars is a monotonically increasing function of stellar mass. That is, the likelihood of being in a binary or a multi-star system steadily increases as the mass of the components increase.
There is a direct correlation between the period of revolution of a binary star and the eccentricity
of its orbit, with systems of short period having smaller eccentricity.
Binary stars may be found with any conceivable separation, from pairs
orbiting so closely that they are practically in contact with each other, to pairs so distantly separated that their connection is indicated only by their common proper motion through space. Among gravitationally bound binary star systems, there exists a so-called log normal distribution
of periods, with the majority of these systems orbiting with a period
of about 100 years. This is supporting evidence for the theory that
binary systems are formed during star formation.
In pairs where the two stars are of equal brightness, they are also of the same spectral type.
In systems where the brightnesses are different, the fainter star is bluer if the brighter star is a giant star, and redder if the brighter star belongs to the main sequence.
Artist's impression of the sight from a (hypothetical) moon of planet HD 188753 Ab (upper left), which orbits a triple star system. The brightest companion is just below the horizon.
The mass of a star can be directly determined only from its gravitational attraction. Apart from the Sun and stars which act as gravitational lenses,
this can be done only in binary and multiple star systems, making the
binary stars an important class of stars. In the case of a visual binary
star, after the orbit and the stellar parallax of the system has been determined, the combined mass of the two stars may be obtained by a direct application of the Keplerian harmonic law.
Unfortunately, it is impossible to obtain the complete orbit of a
spectroscopic binary unless it is also a visual or an eclipsing binary,
so from these objects only a determination of the joint product of mass
and the sine
of the angle of inclination relative to the line of sight is possible.
In the case of eclipsing binaries which are also spectroscopic binaries,
it is possible to find a complete solution for the specifications
(mass, density, size, luminosity, and approximate shape) of both members of the system.
Planets
Schematic of a binary star system with one planet on an S-type orbit and one on a P-type orbit.
While a number of binary star systems have been found to harbor extrasolar planets, such systems are comparatively rare compared to single star systems. Observations by the Kepler space telescope have shown that most single stars of the same type as the Sun have plenty of planets, but only one-third of binary stars do. According to theoretical simulations, even widely separated binary stars often disrupt the discs of rocky grains from which protoplanets
form. On the other hand, other simulations suggest that the presence of
a binary companion can actually improve the rate of planet formation
within stable orbital zones by "stirring up" the protoplanetary disk,
increasing the accretion rate of the protoplanets within.
A study of fourteen previously known planetary systems found
three of these systems to be binary systems. All planets were found to
be in S-type orbits around the primary star. In these three cases the
secondary star was much dimmer than the primary and so was not
previously detected. This discovery resulted in a recalculation of
parameters for both the planet and the primary star.
Science fiction has often featured planets of binary or ternary stars as a setting, for example George Lucas' Tatooine from Star Wars, and one notable story, "Nightfall",
even takes this to a six-star system. In reality, some orbital ranges
are impossible for dynamical reasons (the planet would be expelled from
its orbit relatively quickly, being either ejected from the system
altogether or transferred to a more inner or outer orbital range),
whilst other orbits present serious challenges for eventual biospheres
because of likely extreme variations in surface temperature during
different parts of the orbit. Planets that orbit just one star in a
binary system are said to have "S-type" orbits, whereas those that orbit
around both stars have "P-type" or "circumbinary"
orbits. It is estimated that 50–60% of binary systems are capable of
supporting habitable terrestrial planets within stable orbital ranges.
Examples
The two visibly distinguishable components of Albireo.
The large distance between the components, as well as their difference in color, make Albireo one of the easiest observable visual binaries. The brightest member, which is the third-brightest star in the constellationCygnus, is actually a close binary itself. Also in the Cygnus constellation is Cygnus X-1, an X-ray source considered to be a black hole. It is a high-mass X-ray binary, with the optical counterpart being a variable star. Sirius is another binary and the brightest star in the night time sky, with a visual apparent magnitude of −1.46. It is located in the constellation Canis Major. In 1844 Friedrich Bessel deduced that Sirius was a binary. In 1862 Alvan Graham Clark discovered the companion (Sirius B; the visible star is Sirius A). In 1915 astronomers at the Mount Wilson Observatory determined that Sirius B was a white dwarf, the first to be discovered. In 2005, using the Hubble Space Telescope, astronomers determined Sirius B to be 12,000 km (7,456 mi) in diameter, with a mass that is 98% of the Sun.
An example of an eclipsing binary is Epsilon Aurigae in the constellation Auriga. The visible component belongs to the spectral class
F0, the other (eclipsing) component is not visible. The last such
eclipse occurred from 2009–2011, and it is hoped that the extensive
observations that will likely be carried out may yield further insights
into the nature of this system. Another eclipsing binary is Beta Lyrae, which is a semidetached binary star system in the constellation of Lyra.
Other interesting binaries include 61 Cygni (a binary in the constellation Cygnus, composed of two K class (orange)main-sequence stars, 61 Cygni A and 61 Cygni B, which is known for its large proper motion), Procyon (the brightest star in the constellation Canis Minor and the eighth-brightest star in the night time sky, which is a binary consisting of the main star with a faint white dwarf
companion), SS Lacertae (an eclipsing binary which stopped eclipsing),
V907 Sco (an eclipsing binary which stopped, restarted, then stopped
again) and BG Geminorum (an eclipsing binary which is thought to contain a black hole with a K0 star in orbit around it).
Multiple star examples
Systems with more than two stars are termed multiple stars. Algol is the most noted ternary (long thought to be a binary), located in the constellation Perseus. Two components of the system eclipse each other, the variation in the intensity of Algol first being recorded in 1670 by Geminiano Montanari. The name Algol means "demon star" (from Arabic: الغول al-ghūl), which was probably given due to its peculiar behavior. Another visible ternary is Alpha Centauri, in the southern constellation of Centaurus, which contains the fourth-brightest star in the night sky, with an apparent visual magnitude
of −0.01. This system also underscores the fact that binaries need not
be discounted in the search for habitable planets. Alpha Centauri A and B
have an 11 AU distance at closest approach, and both should have stable
habitable zones.
There are also examples of systems beyond ternaries: Castor is a sextuple star system, which is the second-brightest star in the constellation Gemini
and one of the brightest stars in the nighttime sky. Astronomically,
Castor was discovered to be a visual binary in 1719. Each of the
components of Castor is itself a spectroscopic binary. Castor also has a
faint and widely separated companion, which is also a spectroscopic
binary. The Alcor–Mizar visual binary in Ursa Majoris also consists of six stars, four comprising Mizar and two comprising Alcor.