In mathematical analysis, the smoothness of a function is a property measured by the number of continuousderivatives it has over some domain, called differentiability class. At the very minimum, a function could be considered smooth if it is differentiable everywhere (hence continuous). At the other end, it might also possess derivatives of all orders in its domain, in which case it is said to be infinitely differentiable and referred to as a C-infinity function (or function).
Differentiability classes
Differentiability class is a classification of functions according to the properties of their derivatives. It is a measure of the highest order of derivative that exists and is continuous for a function.
Consider an open set on the real line and a function defined on with real values. Let k be a non-negative integer. The function is said to be of differentiability class if the derivatives exist and are continuous on . If is -differentiable on , then it is at least in the class since are continuous on . The function is said to be infinitely differentiable, smooth, or of class , if it has derivatives of all orders on . (So all these derivatives are continuous functions over .) The function is said to be of class , or analytic, if is smooth (i.e., is in the class ) and its Taylor series expansion around any point in its domain converges to the function in some neighborhood of the point. is thus strictly contained in . Bump functions are examples of functions in but not in .
To put it differently, the class consists of all continuous functions. The class consists of all differentiable functions whose derivative is continuous; such functions are called continuously differentiable. Thus, a function is exactly a function whose derivative exists and is of class . In general, the classes can be defined recursively by declaring to be the set of all continuous functions, and declaring for any positive integer to be the set of all differentiable functions whose derivative is in . In particular, is contained in for every , and there are examples to show that this containment is strict (). The class of infinitely differentiable functions, is the intersection of the classes as varies over the non-negative integers.
Examples
Example: Continuous (C0) But Not Differentiable
The function
is continuous, but not differentiable at x = 0, so it is of class C0, but not of class C1.
Example: Finitely-times Differentiable (Ck)
For each even integer k, the function
is continuous and k times differentiable at all x. At x = 0, however, is not (k + 1) times differentiable, so is of class Ck, but not of class Cj where j > k.
Example: Differentiable But Not Continuously Differentiable (not C1)
The function
is differentiable, with derivative
Because oscillates as x → 0, is not continuous at zero. Therefore, is differentiable but not of class C1.
Example: Differentiable But Not Lipschitz Continuous
The function
is differentiable but its derivative is unbounded on a compact set. Therefore, is an example of a function that is differentiable but not locally Lipschitz continuous.
is smooth, so of class C∞, but it is not analytic at x = ±1, and hence is not of class Cω. The function f is an example of a smooth function with compact support.
Multivariate differentiability classes
A function defined on an open set of is said to be of class on , for a positive integer , if all partial derivatives
exist and are continuous, for every non-negative integers, such that , and every . Equivalently, is of class on if the -th order Fréchet derivative of exists and is continuous at every point of . The function is said to be of class or if it is continuous on . Functions of class are also said to be continuously differentiable.
A function , defined on an open set of , is said to be of class on , for a positive integer , if all of its components
are of class , where are the natural projections defined by . It is said to be of class or if it is continuous, or equivalently, if all components are continuous, on .
The space of Ck functions
Let be an open subset of the real line. The set of all real-valued functions defined on is a Fréchet vector space, with the countable family of seminorms
where varies over an increasing sequence of compact sets whose union is , and .
The set of functions over also forms a Fréchet space. One uses the same seminorms as above, except that is allowed to range over all non-negative integer values.
The above spaces occur naturally in applications where functions
having derivatives of certain orders are necessary; however,
particularly in the study of partial differential equations, it can sometimes be more fruitful to work instead with the Sobolev spaces.
Continuity
The terms parametric continuity (Ck) and geometric continuity (Gn) were introduced by Brian Barsky, to show that the smoothness of a curve could be measured by removing restrictions on the speed, with which the parameter traces out the curve.
Parametric continuity
Parametric continuity (Ck) is a concept applied to parametric curves, which describes the smoothness of the parameter's value with distance along the curve. A (parametric) curve is said to be of class Ck, if exists and is continuous on , where derivatives at the end-points are taken to be one sided derivatives (i.e., at from the right, and at from the left).
As a practical application of this concept, a curve describing the motion of an object with a parameter of time must have C1
continuity and its first derivative is differentiable—for the object to
have finite acceleration. For smoother motion, such as that of a
camera's path while making a film, higher orders of parametric
continuity are required.
Order of parametric continuity
The various order of parametric continuity can be described as follows:
: zeroth derivative is continuous (curves are continuous)
: zeroth and first derivatives are continuous
: zeroth, first and second derivatives are continuous
: 0-th through -th derivatives are continuous
Geometric continuity
The concept of geometrical continuity or geometric continuity (Gn) was primarily applied to the conic sections (and related shapes) by mathematicians such as Leibniz, Kepler, and Poncelet. The concept was an early attempt at describing, through geometry rather than algebra, the concept of continuity as expressed through a parametric function.
The basic idea behind geometric continuity was that the five
conic sections were really five different versions of the same shape. An
ellipse tends to a circle as the eccentricity approaches zero, or to a parabola as it approaches one; and a hyperbola tends to a parabola as the eccentricity drops toward one; it can also tend to intersecting lines. Thus, there was continuity
between the conic sections. These ideas led to other concepts of
continuity. For instance, if a circle and a straight line were two
expressions of the same shape, perhaps a line could be thought of as a
circle of infinite radius. For such to be the case, one would have to make the line closed by allowing the point to be a point on the circle, and for and to be identical. Such ideas were useful in crafting the modern, algebraically defined, idea of the continuity of a function and of (see projectively extended real line for more).
Order of geometric continuity
A curve or surface can be described as having continuity, with being the increasing measure of smoothness. Consider the segments either side of a point on a curve:
: The curves touch at the join point.
: The curves also share a common tangent direction at the join point.
: The curves also share a common center of curvature at the join point.
In general, continuity exists if the curves can be reparameterized to have (parametric) continuity. A reparametrization of the curve is geometrically identical to the original; only the parameter is affected.
Equivalently, two vector functions and have continuity if and , for a scalar (i.e., if the direction, but not necessarily the magnitude, of the two vectors is equal).
While it may be obvious that a curve would require continuity to appear smooth, for good aesthetics, such as those aspired to in architecture and sports car
design, higher levels of geometric continuity are required. For
example, reflections in a car body will not appear smooth unless the
body has continuity.
A rounded rectangle (with ninety degree circular arcs at the four corners) has continuity, but does not have continuity. The same is true for a rounded cube, with octants of a sphere at its corners and quarter-cylinders along its edges. If an editable curve with continuity is required, then cubic splines are typically chosen; these curves are frequently used in industrial design.
Other concepts
Relation to analyticity
While all analytic functions are "smooth" (i.e. have all derivatives continuous) on the set on which they are analytic, examples such as bump functions
(mentioned above) show that the converse is not true for functions on
the reals: there exist smooth real functions that are not analytic.
Simple examples of functions that are smooth but not analytic at any point can be made by means of Fourier series; another example is the Fabius function.
Although it might seem that such functions are the exception rather
than the rule, it turns out that the analytic functions are scattered
very thinly among the smooth ones; more rigorously, the analytic
functions form a meagre subset of the smooth functions. Furthermore, for every open subset A of the real line, there exist smooth functions that are analytic on A and nowhere else.
It is useful to compare the situation to that of the ubiquity of transcendental numbers
on the real line. Both on the real line and the set of smooth
functions, the examples we come up with at first thought
(algebraic/rational numbers and analytic functions) are far better
behaved than the majority of cases: the transcendental numbers and
nowhere analytic functions have full measure (their complements are
meagre).
The situation thus described is in marked contrast to complex
differentiable functions. If a complex function is differentiable just
once on an open set, it is both infinitely differentiable and analytic
on that set.
Smooth partitions of unity
Smooth functions with given closed support are used in the construction of smooth partitions of unity (see partition of unity and topology glossary); these are essential in the study of smooth manifolds, for example to show that Riemannian metrics can be defined globally starting from their local existence. A simple case is that of a bump function on the real line, that is, a smooth function f that takes the value 0 outside an interval [a,b] and such that
Given a number of overlapping intervals on the line, bump
functions can be constructed on each of them, and on semi-infinite
intervals and to cover the whole line, such that the sum of the functions is always 1.
From what has just been said, partitions of unity don't apply to holomorphic functions; their different behavior relative to existence and analytic continuation is one of the roots of sheaf theory. In contrast, sheaves of smooth functions tend not to carry much topological information.
Smooth functions on and between manifolds
Given a smooth manifold, of dimension and an atlas then a map is smooth on if for all there exists a chart such that and is a smooth function from a neighborhood of in to (all partial derivatives up to a given order are continuous). Smoothness can be checked with respect to any chart of the atlas that contains since the smoothness requirements on the transition functions between charts ensure that if is smooth near in one chart it will be smooth near in any other chart.
If is a map from to an -dimensional manifold , then is smooth if, for every there is a chart containing and a chart containing such that and is a smooth function from
Smooth maps between manifolds induce linear maps between tangent spaces: for , at each point the pushforward (or differential) maps tangent vectors at to tangent vectors at : and on the level of the tangent bundle, the pushforward is a vector bundle homomorphism: The dual to the pushforward is the pullback, which "pulls" covectors on back to covectors on and -forms to -forms: In this way smooth functions between manifolds can transport local data, like vector fields and differential forms, from one manifold to another, or down to Euclidean space where computations like integration are well understood.
Preimages and pushforwards along smooth functions are, in
general, not manifolds without additional assumptions. Preimages of
regular points (that is, if the differential does not vanish on the
preimage) are manifolds; this is the preimage theorem. Similarly, pushforwards along embeddings are manifolds.
Smooth functions between subsets of manifolds
There is a corresponding notion of smooth map for arbitrary subsets of manifolds. If is a function whose domain and range are subsets of manifolds and respectively. is said to be smooth if for all there is an open set with and a smooth function such that for all
Fluorine has several distinctive differences from all other
substituents encountered in organic molecules. As a result, the physical
and chemical properties of organofluorines can be distinctive in
comparison to other organohalogens.
The carbon–fluorine bond is one of the strongest in organic chemistry (an average bond energy around 480 kJ/mol).
This is significantly stronger than the bonds of carbon with other
halogens (an average bond energy of e.g. C-Cl bond is around 320 kJ/mol) and is one of the reasons why fluoroorganic compounds have high thermal and chemical stability.
The Van der Waals radius of the fluorine substituent is only 1.47 Å,
which is shorter than in any other substituent and is close to that of
hydrogen (1.2 Å). This, together with the short bond length, is the
reason why there is no steric strain in polyfluorinated compounds. This
is another reason for their high thermal stability. In addition, the
fluorine substituents in polyfluorinated compounds efficiently shield
the carbon skeleton from possible attacking reagents. This is another
reason for the high chemical stability of polyfluorinated compounds.
Fluorine has the highest electronegativity of all elements: 3.98. This causes the high dipole moment of C-F bond (1.41 D).
Fluorine has the lowest polarizability of all atoms: 0.56 10−24 cm3. This causes very weak dispersion forces
between polyfluorinated molecules and is the reason for the
often-observed boiling point reduction on fluorination as well as for
the simultaneous hydrophobicity and lipophobicity of polyfluorinated compounds whereas other perhalogenated compounds are more lipophilic.
In comparison to aryl chlorides and bromides, aryl fluorides form Grignard reagents only reluctantly. On the other hand, aryl fluorides, e.g. fluoroanilines and fluorophenols, often undergo nucleophilic substitution efficiently.
Formally, fluorocarbons
only contain carbon and fluorine. Sometimes they are called
perfluorocarbons. They can be gases, liquids, waxes, or solids,
depending upon their molecular weight. The simplest fluorocarbon is the
gas tetrafluoromethane (CF4). Liquids include perfluorooctane
and perfluorodecalin. While fluorocarbons with single bonds are stable,
unsaturated fluorocarbons are more reactive, especially those with
triple bonds. Fluorocarbons
are more chemically and thermally stable than hydrocarbons, reflecting
the relative inertness of the C-F bond. They are also relatively lipophobic. Because of the reduced intermolecular van der Waals interactions,
fluorocarbon-based compounds are sometimes used as lubricants or are
highly volatile. Fluorocarbon liquids have medical applications as
oxygen carriers.
The structure of organofluorine compounds can be distinctive. As
shown below, perfluorinated aliphatic compounds tend to segregate from
hydrocarbons. This "like dissolves like effect" is related to the
usefulness of fluorous phases and the use of PFOA
in processing of fluoropolymers. In contrast to the aliphatic
derivatives, perfluoroaromatic derivatives tend to form mixed phases
with nonfluorinated aromatic compounds, resulting from donor-acceptor
interactions between the pi-systems.
Polymeric organofluorine compounds are numerous and commercially significant. They range from fully fluorinated species, e.g. PTFE to partially fluorinated, e.g. polyvinylidene fluoride ([CH2CF2]n) and polychlorotrifluoroethylene ([CFClCF2]n). The fluoropolymer polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE/Teflon) is a solid.
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), organic compounds that contain fluorine
and hydrogen atoms, are the most common type of organofluorine
compounds. They are commonly used in air conditioning and as refrigerants in place of the older chlorofluorocarbons such as R-12 and hydrochlorofluorocarbons such as R-21. They do not harm the ozone layer as much as the compounds they replace; however, they do contribute to global warming. Their atmospheric concentrations and contribution to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are rapidly increasing, causing international concern about their radiative forcing.
Fluorocarbons with few C-F bonds behave similarly to the parent hydrocarbons, but their reactivity can be altered significantly. For example, both uracil and 5-fluorouracil
are colourless, high-melting crystalline solids, but the latter is a
potent anti-cancer drug. The use of the C-F bond in pharmaceuticals is
predicated on this altered reactivity. Several drugs and agrochemicals contain only one fluorine center or one trifluoromethyl group.
Unlike other greenhouse gases in the Paris Agreement, hydrofluorocarbons have other international negotiations.
In September 2016, the so-called New York Declaration urged a global reduction in the use of HFCs. On 15 October 2016, due to these chemicals contribution to climate change, negotiators from 197 nations meeting at the summit of the United Nations Environment Programme in Kigali, Rwanda reached a legally-binding accord to phase out hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) in an amendment to the Montreal Protocol.
Fluorocarbenes
As
indicated throughout this article, fluorine-substituents lead to
reactivity that differs strongly from classical organic chemistry. The
premier example is difluorocarbene, CF2, which is a singlet whereas carbene (CH2) has a triplet ground state. This difference is significant because difluorocarbene is a precursor to tetrafluoroethylene.
Perfluorinated compounds are fluorocarbon derivatives, as they are
closely structurally related to fluorocarbons. However, they also
possess new atoms such as nitrogen, iodine, or ionic groups, such as perfluorinated carboxylic acids.
Methods for preparation of C–F bonds
Organofluorine
compounds are prepared by numerous routes, depending on the degree and
regiochemistry of fluorination sought and the nature of the precursors.
The direct fluorination of hydrocarbons with F2, often diluted with N2, is useful for highly fluorinated compounds:
R 3CH + F 2 → R 3CF + HF
Such reactions however are often unselective and require care because hydrocarbons can uncontrollably "burn" in F 2, analogous to the combustion of hydrocarbon in O 2.
For this reason, alternative fluorination methodologies have been
developed. Generally, such methods are classified into two classes.
Electrophilic fluorination rely on sources of "F+". Often such reagents feature N-F bonds, for example F-TEDA-BF4.
Asymmetric fluorination, whereby only one of two possible enantiomeric
products are generated from a prochiral substrate, rely on
electrophilic fluorination reagents. Illustrative of this approach is the preparation of a precursor to anti-inflammatory agents:
A specialized but important method of electrophilic fluorination involves electrosynthesis.
The method is mainly used to perfluorinate, i.e. replace all C–H bonds
by C–F bonds. The hydrocarbon is dissolved or suspended in liquid HF,
and the mixture is electrolyzed at 5–6 V using Ni anodes. The method was first demonstrated with the preparation of perfluoropyridine (C 5F 5N) from pyridine (C 5H 5N). Several variations of this technique have been described, including the use of molten potassium bifluoride or organic solvents.
Nucleophilic fluorination
The
major alternative to electrophilic fluorination is, naturally,
nucleophilic fluorination using reagents that are sources of "F−," for Nucleophilic displacement typically of chloride and bromide. Metathesis reactions employing alkali metal fluorides are the simplest. For aliphatic compounds this is sometimes called the Finkelstein reaction, while for aromatic compounds it is known as the Halex process.
R 3CCl + MF → R 3CF + MCl (M = Na, K, Cs)
Alkyl monofluorides can be obtained from alcohols and Olah reagent (pyridinium fluoride) or another fluoridating agents.
Although hydrogen fluoride
may appear to be an unlikely nucleophile, it is the most common source
of fluoride in the synthesis of organofluorine compounds. Such reactions
are often catalysed by metal fluorides such as chromium trifluoride. 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane, a replacement for CFC's, is prepared industrially using this approach:
Notice that this transformation entails two reaction types, metathesis (replacement of Cl− by F−) and hydrofluorination of an alkene.
Deoxofluorination
Deoxofluorination agents effect the replacement hydroxyl and carbonyl
groups with one and two fluorides, respectively. One such reagent,
useful for fluoride for oxide exchange in carbonyl compounds, is sulfur tetrafluoride:
Apart from DAST and Deoxofluor, a wide variety of similar reagents exist, including, but not limited to, 2-pyridinesulfonyl fluoride (PyFluor) and N-tosyl-4-chlorobenzenesulfonimidoyl fluoride (SulfoxFluor).
Many of these display improved properties such as better safety
profile, higher thermodynamic stability, ease of handling, high
enantioselectivity, and selectivity over elimination side-reactions.
From fluorinated building blocks
Many
organofluorine compounds are generated from reagents that deliver
perfluoroalkyl and perfluoroaryl groups.
(Trifluoromethyl)trimethylsilane, CF3Si(CH3)3, is used as a source of the trifluoromethyl group, for example. Among the available fluorinated building blocks are CF3X (X = Br, I), C6F5Br, and C3F7I. These species form Grignard reagents that then can be treated with a variety of electrophiles.
The development of fluorous technologies (see below, under solvents) is
leading to the development of reagents for the introduction of
"fluorous tails".
A special but significant application of the fluorinated building block approach is the synthesis of tetrafluoroethylene,
which is produced on a large-scale industrially via the intermediacy of
difluorocarbene. The process begins with the thermal (600-800 °C)
dehydrochlorination of chlorodifluoromethane:
CHClF2 → CF2 + HCl
2 CF2 → C2F4
Sodium fluorodichloroacetate (CAS# 2837-90-3) is used to generate chlorofluorocarbene, for cyclopropanations.
18F-Delivery methods
The usefulness of fluorine-containing radiopharmaceuticals in 18F-positron emission tomography has motivated the development of new methods for forming C–F bonds. Because of the short half-life of 18F, these syntheses must be highly efficient, rapid, and easy. Illustrative of the methods is the preparation of fluoride-modified glucose by displacement of a triflate by a labeled fluoride nucleophile:
Biological role
Biologically synthesized organofluorines have been found in microorganisms and plants, but not animals. The most common example is fluoroacetate, which occurs as a plant defence against herbivores in at least 40 plants in Australia, Brazil and Africa. Other biologically synthesized organofluorines include ω-fluoro fatty acids, fluoroacetone, and 2-fluorocitrate which are all believed to be biosynthesized in biochemical pathways from the intermediate fluoroacetaldehyde. Adenosyl-fluoride synthase is an enzyme capable of biologically synthesizing the carbon–fluorine bond. Man made carbon–fluorine bonds are commonly found in pharmaceuticals and agrichemicals because it adds stability to the carbon framework; also, the relatively small size of fluorine is convenient as fluorine acts as an approximate bioisostere
of the hydrogen. Introducing the carbon–fluorine bond to organic
compounds is the major challenge for medicinal chemists using
organofluorine chemistry, as the carbon–fluorine bond increases the
probability of having a successful drug by about a factor of ten. An estimated 20% of pharmaceuticals, and 30–40% of agrichemicals are organofluorines, including several of the top drugs. Examples include 5-fluorouracil, fluoxetine (Prozac), paroxetine (Paxil), ciprofloxacin (Cipro), mefloquine, and fluconazole.
Fluorocarbons are also used as a propellant for metered-dose inhalers
used to administer some asthma medications. The current generation of
propellant consists of hydrofluoroalkanes (HFA), which have replaced CFC-propellant-based inhalers. CFC inhalers were banned as of 2008 as part of the Montreal Protocol because of environmental concerns with the ozone layer. HFA propellant inhalers like FloVent and ProAir ( Salbutamol ) have no generic versions available as of October 2014.
Fluorosurfactants
Fluorosurfactants, which have a polyfluorinated "tail" and a hydrophilic "head", serve as surfactants because they concentrate at the liquid-air interface due to their lipophobicity. Fluorosurfactants have low surface energies and dramatically lower surface tension. The fluorosurfactants perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) are two of the most studied because of their ubiquity, toxicity, and long residence times in humans and wildlife.
The development of organofluorine chemistry has contributed many reagents of value beyond organofluorine chemistry. Triflic acid (CF3SO3H) and trifluoroacetic acid (CF3CO2H) are useful throughout organic synthesis. Their strong acidity is attributed to the electronegativity of the trifluoromethyl group that stabilizes the negative charge. The triflate-group (the conjugate base of the triflic acid) is a good leaving group in substitution reactions.
Fluorous phases
Of topical interest in the area of "Green Chemistry," highly fluorinated substituents, e.g. perfluorohexyl (C6F13) confer distinctive solubility properties to molecules, which facilitates purification of products in organic synthesis. This area, described as "fluorous
chemistry," exploits the concept of like-dissolves-like in the sense
that fluorine-rich compounds dissolve preferentially in fluorine-rich
solvents. Because of the relative inertness of the C-F bond, such
fluorous phases are compatible with even harsh reagents. This theme has
spawned techniques of "fluorous tagging and fluorous protection.
Illustrative of fluorous technology is the use of
fluoroalkyl-substituted tin hydrides for reductions, the products being
easily separated from the spent tin reagent by extraction using
fluorinated solvents.
Organofluorine ligands in transition metal chemistry
Organofluorine ligands have long been featured in organometallic and coordination chemistry. One advantage to F-containing ligands is the convenience of 19F NMR spectroscopy
for monitoring reactions. The organofluorine compounds can serve as a
"sigma-donor ligand," as illustrated by the titanium(III) derivative [(C5Me5)2Ti(FC6H5)]BPh4. Most often, however, fluorocarbon substituents are used to enhance the Lewis acidity of metal centers. A premier example is "Eufod," a coordination complex of europium(III) that features a perfluoroheptyl modified acetylacetonateligand. This and related species are useful in organic synthesis and as "shift reagents" in NMR spectroscopy.
In an area where coordination chemistry and materials science
overlap, the fluorination of organic ligands is used to tune the
properties of component molecules. For example, the degree and
regiochemistry of fluorination of metalated 2-phenylpyridine ligands in
platinum(II) complexes significantly modifies the emission properties of
the complexes.
The coordination chemistry of organofluorine ligands also embraces fluorous technologies. For example, triphenylphosphine has been modified by attachment of perfluoroalkyl substituents that confer solubility in perfluorohexane as well as supercritical carbon dioxide. As a specific example, [(C8F17C3H6-4-C6H4)3P.
C-F bond activation
An
active area of organometallic chemistry encompasses the scission of C-F
bonds by transition metal-based reagents. Both stoichiometric and
catalytic reactions have been developed and are of interest from the
perspectives of organic synthesis and remediation of xenochemicals.
C-F bond activation has been classified as follows "(i) oxidative
addition of fluorocarbon, (ii) M–C bond formation with HF elimination,
(iii) M–C bond formation with fluorosilane elimination, (iv) hydrodefluorination
of fluorocarbon with M–F bond formation, (v) nucleophilic attack on
fluorocarbon, and (vi) defluorination of fluorocarbon". An illustrative
metal-mediated C-F activation reaction is the defluorination of
fluorohexane by a zirconium dihydride, an analogue of Schwartz's reagent:
Fluorine-containing compounds are often featured in noncoordinating or weakly coordinating anions. Both tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate, B(C6F5)4−, and the related tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate, are useful in Ziegler-Natta catalysis
and related alkene polymerization methodologies. The fluorinated
substituents render the anions weakly basic and enhance the solubility
in weakly basic solvents, which are compatible with strong Lewis acids.
Materials science
Organofluorine compounds enjoy many niche applications in materials science. With a low coefficient of friction,
fluid fluoropolymers are used as specialty lubricants.
Fluorocarbon-based greases are used in demanding applications.
Representative products include Fomblin and Krytox, made by Solvay Solexis and DuPont,
respectively. Certain firearm lubricants such as "Tetra Gun" contain
fluorocarbons. Capitalizing on their nonflammability, fluorocarbons are
used in fire fighting foam. Organofluorine compounds are components of
liquid crystal displays. The polymeric analogue of triflic acid, nafion is a solid acid that is used as the membrane in most low temperature fuel cells. The bifunctional monomer 4,4'-difluorobenzophenone is a precursor to PEEK-class polymers.
Biosynthesis of organofluorine compounds
In contrast to the many naturally-occurring organic compounds containing the heavier halides, chloride, bromide, and iodide, only a handful of biologically synthesized carbon-fluorine bonds are known. The most common natural organofluorine species is fluoroacetate, a toxin found in a few species of plants. Others include fluorooleic acid, fluoroacetone, nucleocidin (4'-fluoro-5'-O-sulfamoyladenosine), fluorothreonine, and 2-fluorocitrate. Several of these species are probably biosynthesized from fluoroacetaldehyde. The enzymefluorinase catalyzed the synthesis of 5'-deoxy-5'-fluoroadenosine (see scheme to right).
History
Organofluorine chemistry began in the 1800s with the development of organic chemistry. The first organofluorine compounds were prepared using antimony trifluoride as the F− source. The nonflammability and nontoxicity of the chlorofluorocarbons CCl3F and CCl2F2 attracted industrial attention in the 1920s. On April 6, 1938, Roy J. Plunkett a young research chemist who worked at DuPont's Jackson Laboratory in Deepwater, New Jersey, accidentally discovered polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Subsequent major developments, especially in the US, benefited from expertise gained in the production of uranium hexafluoride.
Starting in the late 1940s, a series of electrophilic fluorinating methodologies were introduced, beginning with CoF3. Electrochemical fluorination ("electrofluorination") was announced, which Joseph H. Simons had developed in the 1930s to generate highly stable perfluorinated materials compatible with uranium hexafluoride.
These new methodologies allowed the synthesis of C-F bonds without
using elemental fluorine and without relying on metathetical methods.
In 1957, the anticancer activity of 5-fluorouracil was described.
This report provided one of the first examples of rational design of
drugs. This discovery sparked a surge of interest in fluorinated pharmaceuticals and agrichemicals. The discovery of the noble gas compounds, e.g. XeF4, provided a host of new reagents starting in the early 1960s. In the 1970s, fluorodeoxyglucose was established as a useful reagent in 18F positron emission tomography.
In Nobel Prize-winning work, CFC's were shown to contribute to the
depletion of atmospheric ozone. This discovery alerted the world to the
negative consequences of organofluorine compounds and motivated the
development of new routes to organofluorine compounds. In 2002, the
first C-F bond-forming enzyme, fluorinase, was reported.
Environmental and health concerns
Only a few organofluorine compounds are acutely bioactive and highly toxic, such as fluoroacetate and perfluoroisobutene.
Some organofluorine compounds pose significant risks and dangers to health and the environment. CFCs and HCFCs (hydrochlorofluorocarbon) deplete the ozone layer and are potent greenhouse gases.
HFCs are potent greenhouse gases and are facing calls for stricter
international regulation and phase out schedules as a fast-acting
greenhouse emission abatement measure, as are perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6).
Because of the compound's effect on climate, the G-20 major economies agreed in 2013 to support initiatives to phase out use of HCFCs. They affirmed the roles of the Montreal Protocol and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in global HCFC accounting and reduction. The U.S. and China at the same time announced a bilateral agreement to similar effect.
Persistence and bioaccumulation
Because
of the strength of the carbon–fluorine bond, many synthetic
fluorocarbons and fluorocarbon-based compounds are persistent in the
environment. Fluorosurfactants, such as PFOS and PFOA, are persistent global contaminants. Fluorocarbon based CFCs and tetrafluoromethane have been reported in igneous and metamorphic rock. PFOS is a persistent organic pollutant
and may be harming the health of wildlife; the potential health effects
of PFOA to humans are under investigation by the C8 Science Panel.