The majority of cancer cases are due to environmental risk 
factors, and many, but not all, of these environmental factors are 
controllable lifestyle choices. Greater than a reported 75% of cancer deaths could be prevented by avoiding risk factors including: tobacco, overweight / obesity, an insufficient diet, physical inactivity, alcohol, sexually transmitted infections, and air pollution. Not all environmental causes are controllable, such as naturally occurring background radiation,
 and other cases of cancer are caused through hereditary genetic 
disorders. Current gene editing techniques under development may serve 
as preventative measures in the future.
 Future preventative screening measures can be additionally improved by 
minimizing invasiveness and increasing specificity by taking individual 
biologic make up into account, also known as "population-based 
personalized cancer screening."
The concerned
Death rate adjusted for age for malignant cancer per 100,000 inhabitants in 2004. 
      
| 
  no data 
  ≤ 55 
  55–80 
  80–105 
  105–130 
  130–155 
  155–180 | 
  180–205 
  205–230 
  230–255 
  255–280 
  280–305 
  ≥ 305 | 
Anyone can get cancer,
 the age is one of the biggest factors that can make a person more 
likely to get cancer: 3 out of 4 cancers are found in people aged 55 or 
older.
Dietary
This advertisement advises a healthy diet to prevent cancer.
While many dietary recommendations have been proposed to reduce the 
risk of cancer, the evidence to support them is not definitive. The primary dietary factors that increase risk are obesity and alcohol consumption; with a diet low in fruits and vegetables and high in red meat being implicated but not confirmed. A 2014 meta-analysis did not find a relationship between fruits and vegetables and cancer. Consumption of coffee is associated with a reduced risk of liver cancer. Studies have linked excessive consumption of red or processed meat to an increased risk of breast cancer, colon cancer, and pancreatic cancer, a phenomenon which could be due to the presence of carcinogens in meats cooked at high temperatures.
 Dietary recommendations for cancer prevention typically include an 
emphasis on vegetables, fruit, whole grains, and fish, and an avoidance 
of processed and red meat (beef, pork, lamb), animal fats, and refined 
carbohydrates.
Physical activity
Research shows that regular physical activity helps to reduce up to 30% the risk of a variety of cancer types, such as colon cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer and endometrium cancer. The biological mechanisms underlying this association are still not well understood
 but different biological pathways involved in cancer have been studied 
suggesting that physical activity reduces cancer risk by helping weight 
control, reducing hormones such as estrogen and insulin, reducing 
inflammation and strengthening the immune system.
Medication
The
 concept that medications can be used to prevent cancer is attractive, 
and evidence supports their use in a few defined circumstances. In the general population, NSAIDs reduce the risk of colorectal cancer however due to the cardiovascular and gastrointestinal side effects they cause overall harm when used for prevention. Aspirin has been found to reduce the risk of death from cancer by about 7%. COX-2 inhibitor may decrease the rate of polyp formation in people with familial adenomatous polyposis however are associated with the same adverse effects as NSAIDs. Daily use of tamoxifen or raloxifene has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of developing breast cancer in high-risk women. The benefit verses harm for 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor such as finasteride is not clear.
Vitamins have not been found to be effective at preventing cancer, although low blood levels of vitamin D are correlated with increased cancer risk. Whether this relationship is causal and vitamin D supplementation is protective has not yet been determined. Beta-Carotene supplementation has been found to increase lung cancer rates in those who are high risk. Folic acid supplementation has not been found effective in preventing colon cancer and may increase colon polyps.
 A 2018 systematic review concluded that selenium has no beneficial 
effect in reducing the risk of cancer based on high quality evidence.
 However, more studies are needed to determine whether individuals with a
 specific genetic background or nutritional status may benefit, and 
whether certain formulations of selenium may have an effect on risk.
Vaccination
Anti-cancer vaccines can be preventative / prophylactic or be used as therapeutic treatment.
 All such vaccines incite adaptive immunity by enhancing cytotoxic T 
lymphocyte (CTL) recognition and activity against tumor-associated or 
tumor-specific antigens (TAA and TSAs). 
Vaccines have been developed that prevent infection by some carcinogenic viruses. Human papillomavirus vaccine (Gardasil and Cervarix) decreases the risk of developing cervical cancer. The hepatitis B vaccine prevents infection with hepatitis B virus and thus decreases the risk of liver cancer. The administration of human papillomavirus and hepatitis B vaccinations is recommended when resources allow.
Some cancer vaccines are usually immunoglobulin-based and target antigens specific to cancer or abnormal human cells.
 These vaccines may be given to treat cancer during the progression of 
disease to boost the immune system's ability to recognize and attack 
cancer antigens as foreign entities. Antibodies for cancer cell vaccines
 may be taken from the patient's own body (autologous vaccine) or from 
another patient (allogeneic vaccine).
 Several autologous vaccines, such as Oncophage for kidney cancer and 
Vitespen for a variety of cancers, have either been released or are 
undergoing clinical trial. FDA-approved vaccines, such as Sipuleucel-T 
for metastasizing prostate cancer or Nivolumab for melanoma and lung 
cancer can act either by targeting over-expressed or mutated proteins or
 by temporarily inhibiting immune checkpoints to boost immune activity.
Screening
Screening
 procedures, commonly sought for more prevalent cancers, such as colon, 
breast, and cervical, have greatly improved in the past few decades from
 advances in biomarker identification and detection. Early detection of pancreatic cancer biomarkers was accomplished using SERS-based immunoassay approach.
 A SERS-base multiplex protein biomarker detection platform in a 
microfluidic chip to detect is used to detect several protein biomarkers
 to
predict the type of disease and critical biomarkers and increase the 
chance of diagnosis between diseases with similar biomarkers (PC, OVC, 
and pancreatitis).
Cervical Cancer
Cervical
 cancer is usually screened through in vitro examination of the cells of
 the cervix (e.g. Pap smear), colposcopy, or direct inspection of the 
reproductive system, or DNA-testing for HPV, considered an oncogenic 
virus.
 Screening should start between the age of 20 – 30 years; women between 
21 – 29 years old are encouraged to receive Pap smear screens every 
three years, and those over 29 every five years.
 For women older than the age of 65 and with no history of cervical 
cancer or abnormality, and with an appropriate precedence of negative 
Pap test results may cease regular screening.
Still, adherence to recommended screening plans depends on age 
and may be linked to "educational level, culture, psychosocial issues, 
and marital status," further emphasizing the importance of addressing 
these challenges in regards to cancer screening.
Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal
 cancer is most often screened with the fecal occult blood test (FOBT). 
Variants of this test include guaiac-based FOBT (gFOBT), the fecal 
immunochemical test (FIT), and stool DNA (sDNA) testing.
 Further testing includes flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), total colonoscopy
 (TC), or computed tomography (CT) scans if a TC is non-ideal. A 
recommended age at which to begin screening is 50 years. However, this 
is highly dependent on medical history and exposure to CRC risk factors.
 Effective screening has been shown to reduce CRC incidence by 33% and 
CRC morality by 43%.
Breast Cancer
The
 estimated number of new breast cancer cases in the US in 2018 is 
predicted to be more than 1.7 million, with more than six-hundred 
thousand deaths.
 Factors such as breast size, reduced physical activity, obesity and 
overweight status, infertility and never having had children, hormone 
replacement therapy (HRT), and genetics are risk factors for breast 
cancer.
 Mammograms are widely used to screen for breast cancer, and are 
recommended for women 50–74 years of age by the US Preventive Services 
Task Force (USPSTF). However, the USPSTF recommended against 
mammographies for women 40–49 years old due to possibility of 
over diagnosis.
Preventable causes of cancer
As
 of 2017, tobacco use, diet and nutrition, physical activity, 
obesity/overweight status, infectious agents, and chemical and physical 
carcinogens have been reported to be the leading areas where cancer 
prevention can be practiced through enacting positive lifestyle changes,
 getting appropriate regular screening, and getting vaccinated.
The development of many common cancers are incited by such risk 
factors. For example, consumption of tobacco and alcohol, a medical 
history of genital warts and STDs, immunosuppression, unprotected sex, 
and early age of first sexual intercourse and pregnancy all may serve as
 risk factors for cervical cancer. Obesity, red meat of processed meat 
consumption, tobacco and alcohol, and a medical history of inflammatory 
bowel diseases are all risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC). On the 
other hand, exercise and consumption of vegetables may help decrease the
 risk of CRC.
Several preventable causes of cancer were highlighted in Doll and Peto's landmark 1981 study,
 estimating that 75 – 80% of cancers in the United States could be 
prevented by avoidance of 11 different factors.  A 2013 review of more 
recent cancer prevention literature by Schottenfeld et al.,
 summarizing studies reported between 2000 and 2010, points to most of 
the same avoidable factors identified by Doll and Peto. However, 
Schottenfeld et al. considered fewer factors (e.g. non inclusion of 
diet) in their review than Doll and Peto, and indicated that avoidance 
of these fewer factors would result in prevention of 60% of cancer 
deaths.  The table below indicates the proportions of cancer deaths 
attributed to different factors, summarizing the observations of Doll 
and Peto, Shottenfeld et al. and several other authors, and shows the 
influence of major lifestyle factors on the prevention of cancer, such 
as tobacco, an unhealthy diet, obesity and infections.
| Factor | Doll and Peto | Schottenfeld et al. | Other reports | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Tobacco | 30% | 30% | 38% men, 23% women, 30%, 25-30% | 
| Deleterious diet | 35% | - | 32%, 10%, 30-35% | 
| Obesity | * | 10% | 14% women, 20% men, among non-smokers, 10-20%, 19-20% United States, 16-18% Great Britain, 13% Brazil, 11-12% China | 
| Infection† | 10% | 5-8% | 7-10%, 8% developed nations, 26% developing nations, 10% high income, 25% African | 
| Alcohol | 3% | 3-4% | 3.6%, 8% USA, 20% France | 
| Occupational exposures | 4% | 3-5% | 2-10%, may be 15-20% in men | 
| Radiation (solar and ionizing) | 3% | 3-4% | up to 10% | 
| Physical inactivity | * | <5 font="">5> | 7% | 
| Reproductive and sexual behavior | 1-13% | - | - | 
| Pollution | 2% | - | - | 
| Medicines and medical procedures | 1% | - | - | 
| Industrial products | <1 font="">1> | - | - | 
| Food additives | <1 font="">1> | - | - | 
*Included in diet
†Carcinogenic infections include: for the uterine cervix (human 
papillomavirus [HPV]), liver (hepatitis B virus [HBV] and hepatitis C 
virus [HCV]), stomach (Helicobacter pylori [H pylori]), lymphoid tissues (Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]), nasopharynx (EBV), urinary bladder (Schistosoma hematobium), and biliary tract (Opisthorchis viverrini, Clonorchis sinensis)
History of Cancer Prevention
Cancer
 has been thought to be a preventable disease since the time of Roman 
physician Galen, who observed that unhealthy diet was correlated with 
cancer incidence. In 1713, Italian physician Ramazzini hypothesized that
 abstinence caused lower rates of cervical cancer in nuns. Further 
observation in the 18th century led to the discovery that certain 
chemicals, such as tobacco, soot and tar (leading to scrotal cancer in 
chimney sweepers, as reported by Percivall Pot in 1775), could serve as 
carcinogens for humans. Although Potts suggested preventative measures 
for chimney sweeps (wearing clothes to prevent contact bodily contact 
with soot), his suggestions were only put into practice in Holland, 
resulting in decreasing rates of scrotal cancer in chimney sweeps. 
Later, the 19th century brought on the onset of the classification of 
chemical carcinogens.
In the early 20th century, physical and biological carcinogens, 
such as X ray radiation or the Rous Sarcoma Virus discovered  1911, were
 identified. Despite observed correlation of environmental or chemical 
factors with cancer development, there was a deficit of formal 
prevention research and lifestyle changes for cancer prevention were not
 feasible during this time.
Timeline of Cancer Prevention Research
In
 the 1970s, federally-funded efforts brought the importance of diet and 
early screening in the prevention of cancer to the public eye. 
- 1971 - Nixon signs NCA, federally-funded cancer research established.
- 1974 - Disadvantaged women benefit from NCI-funded ovarian screening.
- 1977 - Senate Select Committee on Nutrition publishes dietary guidelines for cancer prevention.
- 1978 - Community Hospital Oncology Program (CHOP)
- 1979 - NCI diet for cancer prevention: low-fat, low alcohol, increased fiber, balanced diet.
- In the 1980s, early federally-funded programs and institutions were established to pioneer research in the field of cancer prevention.
- 1981 - Community Clinical Oncology Program.
- 1982 - "Chemoprevention:" Nutrients and compounds for cancer prevention. SBIR moves research to private sector. Smoking, Tobacco, and Cancer Program.
- 1983 - NCI begins chemoprevention and early detection research. Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP) and Division of Cancer Prevention and Control (DCPC) added to NCI.
- 1984 - DCPC research and clinical trials, meets with Kellogg company to discuss health claims in cereal publicity
- 1985 - Linxian China Dysplasia trial and ATBC cancer prevention studies
- 1986 - CCOP expands research to be large scale and include control groups
- 1987 - NCI guidelines for cervical and breast cancer screenings, cancer prevention fellowship program (CPFP)
- 1988 - Reagan signs Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act (mammography screenings)
- 1989 - MB-CCOP (minority-based community clinical oncology program)
- In the 1990s, many chemopreventative clinical trials began recruiting. Often, these studies lasted for more than a decade, so their results would be released in the early 2000s.
- 1991 - Chemoprevention (synthetic and natural) studies, DCPC + Produce for Better Health Foundation begins 5-A-Day message (fruit and veggie daily servings), ASSIST (smoking) initiative
- 1992 - Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT)
- 1993 - NCI mammography guidelines are dropped (controversy?), prostate lung colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial begins (PLCO), FOBT test for CRC mortality, CAPS (colorectal adenoma prevention), enrollment for prostate cancer trial, NCI international breast cancer screening workshop
- 1994 - ATBC results show causal relationship between beta-carotene and lung cancer incidence in male Fins
- 1996 - ASCUS/LSIL Triage Study (HPV testing)
- 1997 - DCP and DCCPS splits from DCPC
- 1998 - Tamoxifen decreases breast cancer (Fisher?)
- 1999 - EDRN (early detection research network) and RAPID (access to prevention) established
- 1999 - Tamoxifen and raloxifene (STAR) clinical trials began, APC (adenoma celecoxib trial)
- Due to technological advancements, improved detection of biomarkers, and increased public and governmental support for cancer prevention research, the 21st century brought large improvements in the understanding of cancer genesis and development.
- 2001 - Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) Begins Recruiting Men over the age of 55 to test the effectiveness of these two dietary supplements as prostate cancer prevention agents
- 2002 - Initial Results Released from the ASCUS/LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) on HPV Testing. HPV testing is found not useful for women with low-grade lesions due to the high incidence of HPV in women
- 2002 - National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) Begins
- 2002 - Results from the Colorectal Adenoma Prevention Study (CAPS) Released. Results indicate that daily use of aspirin can reduce the development of colorectal tumors by 35% in patients with a pre-existing history of polyps
- 2003 - Results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) Released
- 2004 - August: “Decades of Progress 1983 to 2003” Published. The first 20 years of the NCI Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP), the precursor to the NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), are documented
- 2004 - Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib (APC) Trial Suspended suspended based on an increased incidence of major cardiovascular events in participants taking celecoxib (Celebrex®)
- 2005 - Results of the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT) Updated. Results show a continued reduction of invasive breast cancer incidence as well as a decrease in some negative side effects, including increased risk of stroke, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis
- 2006 - Initial Results of the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) Released. Initial results show that postmenopausal women who are at increased risk of breast cancer can reduce their risk of developing the disease if they take the drug raloxifene
- 2008 - Initial results from the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) Released. Initial results indicate that selenium and vitamin E do not contribute to the prevention of prostate cancer. In fact, test results suggest a slight increase in prostate cancer incidence in subjects taking vitamin E
- 2009 - Prostate Results from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial Released. Results show that screening men 55 years of age and older with PSA tests and digital rectal exams was not effective in reducing prostate cancer mortality
- 2010 - Early Detection Research Network (EDRN) Continues as New Grants Awarded
- 2010 - Alliance of Glycobiologists for Detection of Cancer Identify Key Antitumor Antibodies. They find that cancer patients produce antibodies that target abnormal proteins with sugar molecules attached made by their tumors, suggesting that antitumor antibodies in the blood may be a source of sensitive biomarkers for cancer detection
- 2010 - Initial Results of the Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST) Released. Initial results show that screening with low-dose helical computerized tomography (CT) reduced lung cancer deaths by about 20% among current and former heavy smokers
- 2011 - Lung Results from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial Released
- 2011 - Ovarian Results from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial Released. PLCO results show that screening for ovarian cancer with transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) and the CA-125 blood test did not result in fewer deaths from the disease compared with usual care
- 2012 - Colorectal Results from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial Released. Results confirm that screening people 55 years of age and older for colorectal cancer using flexible sigmoidoscopy reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality
- 2013 - NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Approved for Start, opening the way for the program to bring state-of-the art cancer prevention, control, treatment and imaging clinical trials, cancer care delivery research, and disparities studies to individuals in their own communities
- 2013 - National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) Researchers Issue Finding on Overdiagnosis
- 2014 - Prevention of Early Menopause Study (POEMS) Clinical Trial Results Announced
- 2014 - Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) Findings Updated. Men who had high levels of selenium at the start of the trial, as assessed by measures of selenium in their toenail clippings, had almost double the chance of developing a high-grade prostate cancer if they took the selenium supplement
- 2015 - Cancer Prevention and Control Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) Established
- 2015 - NCORP Sites Participate in Enrolling Patients in the NCI-MATCH (Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice) Precision Medicine Trial
- 2015 - Consortium on Imaging and Biomarkers is Created with Grants to Eight Principal Investigators. The consortium focuses on combining imaging methods with biomarkers to improve the accuracy of screening, early cancer detection, and diagnosis of early stage cancers
- 2015 - NCI Awards Grants to Create the Consortium for Molecular Characterization of Screen-Detected Lesions
- 2016 - The White House Announces $1 billion in Investments in the National Cancer Moonshot initiative. Prevention, including cancer vaccine development and early cancer detection, are two of the five opportunity areas
- 2016 - Ovarian Cancer Study Tests Lead Time of Potential Biomarkers
- 2016 - Largest Ever US Study to Research Causes and Genetics of Blood Diseases
- 2016 - Data from the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP Study (IDATA) Are Made Available to Qualified Investigators
- 2016 - Olanzapine Helps Prevent Nausea and Vomiting Caused by Chemotherapy
- 2016 - Study Confirms Benefits of Early Palliative Care for Advanced Cancer
- 2016 - Think Tank Emphasizes Identifying and Creating the Next Generation of Community-Based Cancer Prevention Studies
- 2017 - NCI's Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program (CPFP) Celebrates 30 Years
- 2017 - NCI Joins Leading Groups on Disparities Statement
- 2017 - TMIST Trial Aims to Provide Clarity on Breast Cancer Screening Approaches
- 2017 - Pre-Cancer Atlas and Other Human Tumor Atlas Network Funding Opportunity announcements Released
- 2017 - Experimental Ovarian Cancer Vaccine Shows Promise in Mice


