Female education in STEM includes child and adult female represented in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM ). In 2017, 33% of students in STEM fields were women.
The organization UNESCO has stated that this gender disparity is due to discrimination, biases, social norms and expectations that influence the quality of education women receive and the subjects they study. UNESCO also believes that having more women in STEM fields is desirable because it would help bring about sustainable development.
Current status of girls and women in STEM education
Overall trends in STEM education
Gender differences in STEM education participation are already visible in early childhood care and education in science- and math-related play, and become more pronounced at higher levels of education. Girls appear to lose interest in STEM subjects with age, particularly between early and late adolescence. This decreased interest affects participation in advanced studies at the secondary level and in higher education.
Female students represent 35% of all students enrolled in STEM-related
fields of study at this level globally . Differences are also observed
by disciplines, with female enrollment lowest in engineering,
manufacturing and construction, natural science, mathematics and
statistics and ICT
fields. Significant regional and country differences in female
representation in STEM studies can be observed, though, suggesting the
presence of contextual factors affecting girls’ and women’s engagement
in these fields. Women leave STEM disciplines in disproportionate
numbers during their higher education studies, in their transition to
the world of work and even in their career cycle.
Learning achievement in STEM education
Data
on gender differences in learning achievement present a complex
picture, depending on what is measured (subject, knowledge acquisition
against knowledge application), the level of education/age of students,
and geographic location. Overall, women's participation has been
increasing, but significant regional variations exist. For example,
where data are available in Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean,
the gender gap is largely in favour of boys in mathematics achievement
in secondary education. In contrast, in the Arab States, girls perform
better than boys in both subjects in primary and secondary education. As
with the data on participation, national and regional variations in
data on learning achievement suggest the presence of contextual factors
affecting girls’ and women’s engagement in these fields. Girls’
achievement seems to be stronger in science than mathematics and where
girls do better than boys, the score differential is up to three times
higher than where boys do better. girls tend to outperform boys in certain sub-topics such as biology and chemistry but do less well in physics and earth science.
The gender gap has fallen significantly in science in secondary education among TIMSS trend countries:
14 out of 17 participating countries had no gender gap in science in
2015, compared to only one in 1995. However, the data is less well known
outside of these 17 countries. The gender gap in boys' favour is
slightly bigger in mathematics but improvements over time in girls’
favour are also observed in certain countries, despite the important
regional variations. Gender differences are observed within mathematic
sub-topics with girls outperforming boys in topics such as algebra and geometry
but doing less well in "number". Girls’ performance is stronger in
assessments that measure knowledge acquisition than those measuring
knowledge application. Country coverage in terms of data availability is
quite limited while data is collected at different frequency and
against different variables in the existing studies. There are large
gaps in our knowledge of the situation in low- and middle-income
countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Central Asia, and South and West Asia, particularly at secondary level.
Factors influencing girls' and women's participation and achievement in STEM education
According to UNESCO, there are multiple and overlapping factors which
influence girls' and women's participation, achievement and progression
in STEM studies and careers, all of which interact in complex ways,
including:
- Individual level: biological factors that may influence individuals’ abilities, skills, and behaviour such as brain structure and function, hormones, genetics, and cognitive traits like spatial and linguistic skills. It also considers psychological factors, including self-efficacy, interest and motivation.
- Family and peer level: parental beliefs and expectations, parental education and socioeconomic status, and other household factors, as well as peer influences.
- School level: factors within the learning environment, including teachers’ profile, experience, beliefs and expectations, curricula, learning materials and resources, teaching strategies and student teacher interactions, assessment practices and the overall school environment.
- Societal level: social and cultural norms related to gender equality, and gender stereotypes in the media.
Individual level
The question of whether there are differences in cognitive ability
between men and women has long been a topic of debate among researchers
and scholars. Some studies have found no differences in the neural
mechanism of learning based on sex.
Loss of interest has been the major reason cited for girls opting
out of STEM. However, some have stated that this choice is influenced
heavily by the socialization process and stereotyped ideas about gender
roles, including stereotypes about gender and STEM. Gender stereotypes
that communicate the idea that STEM studies and careers are male domains
can negatively affect girls’ interest, engagement and achievement in
STEM and discourage them from pursuing STEM careers. Girls who
assimilate such stereotypes have lower levels of self-efficacy and
confidence in their ability than boys. Self-efficacy affects both STEM
education outcomes and aspirations for STEM careers to a considerable
extent. Some studies have shown that girls appear to lose interest in
STEM subjects with age.
Family and peer level
Parents,
including their beliefs and expectations, play an important role in
shaping girls’ attitudes towards, and interest in, STEM studies. Parents
with traditional beliefs about gender roles and who treat girls and
boys unequally can reinforce stereotypes about gender and ability in
STEM. Parents can also have a strong influence on girls' STEM
participation and learning achievement through the family values,
environment, experiences and encouragement that they provide. Some
research finds that parents’ expectations, particularly the mother’s
expectations, have more influence on the higher education
and career choices of girls than those of boys. Higher socio-economic
status and parental educational qualifications are associated with
higher scores in mathematics
and science for both girls and boys. Girls’ science performance appears
to be more strongly associated with mothers’ higher educational
qualifications, and boys’ with their fathers’. Family members with STEM
careers can also influence girls’ STEM engagement. The broader
socio-cultural context of the family can also play a role. Factors such
as ethnicity, the language used at home, immigrant status and family
structure may also have an influence on girls’ participation and
performance in STEM. Peers can also impact on girls’ motivation and
feeling of belonging in STEM education. Influence of female peers is a
significant predictor of girls’ interest and confidence in mathematics
and science.
School level
Qualified
teachers with specialization in STEM can positively influence girls’
performance and engagement with STEM education and their interest in
pursuing STEM careers. Female STEM teachers often have stronger benefits
for girls, possibly by acting as role models and by helping to dispel
stereotypes about sex-based STEM ability. Teachers’ beliefs, attitudes,
behaviours and interactions with students, as well as Curricula
and learning materials, can all play a role as well. Opportunities for
real-life experiences with STEM, including hands-on practice,
apprenticeships, career counselling and mentoring can expand girls’
understanding of STEM studies and professions and maintain interest.
Assessment processes and tools that are gender-biased or include gender stereotypes
may negatively affect girls’ performance in STEM. Girls’ learning
outcomes in STEM can also be compromised by psychological factors such
as mathematics or test anxiety.
The confidence of a female teacher in STEM subjects also has a
strong impact on how well female students will perform in those subjects
in the elementary school classroom. For example, female elementary
teachers with anxiety around math will negatively affect the achievement
of their female students in math.
Correlations have been found between gender bias in female elementary
students and their achievement in math. Those who had lower achievement
over time have also been found to believe that boys are inherently
better at math than girls
.
A 2018 study found that while girls perform better or equal to
boys in two out of three countries, in nearly all countries more girls
were qualified to college-level
study than had enrolled. Researchers found that female enrolment to
STEM subjects was relatively lower in countries with a high degree of
gender equality – a gender-equality paradox.
Societal level
Cultural and social norms
influence girls’ perceptions about their abilities, role in society and
career and life aspirations.The degree of gender equality in wider
society influences girls’ participation and performance in STEM. In
countries with greater gender equality, girls tend to have more positive
attitudes and confidence about mathematics and the gender gap in
achievement in the subject is smaller. Targeted measures to promote
gender equality, such as gender mainstreaming legislation or policies
such as quotas, financial incentives or other, can increase girls’ and
women’s participation in STEM education and careers. Gender stereotypes
portrayed in the media are internalized by children and adults and affect the way they see themselves and others. Media can perpetuate or challenge gender stereotypes about STEM abilities and careers.
In a study conducted women who took exams with men preformed worse than
women who took exams with other women. Stereotype threat occurs when
the individuals are aware that they may be judged based on a stereotype.