A drawing of a cat by T. W. Wood in Charles Darwin's book The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, described as acting "in an affectionate frame of mind".
| | National recognition of animal sentience | | Partial recognition of animal sentience1 |
| | National recognition of animal suffering | | Partial recognition of animal suffering2 |
| | No recognition of animal sentience or suffering | | Unknown |
1certain animals are excluded, only mental health is acknowledged, and/or the laws vary internally
2only includes domestic animals
2only includes domestic animals
Emotion is defined as any mental experience with high intensity and high hedonic content. The existence and nature of emotions in animals are believed to be correlated with those of humans and to have evolved from the same mechanisms. Charles Darwin
was one of the first scientists to write about the subject, and his
observational (and sometimes anecdotal) approach has since developed
into a more robust, hypothesis-driven, scientific approach. Cognitive bias tests and learned helplessness
models have shown feelings of optimism and pessimism in a wide range of
species, including rats, dogs, cats, rhesus macaques, sheep, chicks,
starlings, pigs, and honeybees. Jaak Panksepp
played a large role in the study of animal emotion, basing his research
on the neurological aspect. Mentioning seven core emotional feelings
reflected through a variety of neuro-dynamic limbic emotional action
systems, including seeking, fear, rage, lust, care, panic and play. Through brain stimulation and pharmacological challenges, such emotional responses can be effectively monitored.
Emotion has been observed and further researched through multiple
different approaches including that of behaviourism, comparative,
anecdotal, specifically Darwin's approach and what is most widely used
today the scientific approach which has a number of subfields including
functional, mechanistic, cognitive bias tests, self-medicating, spindle
neurons, vocalizations and neurology.
While emotions in animals is still quite a controversial topic it
has been studied in a extensive array of species both large and small
including primates, rodents, elephants, horses, birds, dogs, cats,
honeybees and crayfish.
Etymology, definitions, and differentiation
The word "emotion" dates back to 1579, when it was adapted from the French word émouvoir, which means "to stir up". However, the earliest precursors of the word likely date back to the very origins of language.
Emotions have been described as discrete and consistent responses
to internal or external events which have a particular significance for
the organism. Emotions are brief in duration and consist of a
coordinated set of responses, which may include physiological, behavioural, and neural mechanisms. Emotions have also been described as the result of evolution because they provided good solutions to ancient and recurring problems that faced ancestors.
Laterality
It
has been proposed that negative, withdrawal-associated emotions are
processed predominantly by the right hemisphere, whereas the left
hemisphere is largely responsible for processing positive,
approach-related emotions. This has been called the "laterality-valence hypothesis".
Basic and complex human emotions
In humans, a distinction is sometimes made between "basic" and "complex" emotions. Six emotions have been classified as basic: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness and surprise. Complex emotions would include contempt, jealousy and sympathy. However, this distinction is difficult to maintain, and animals are often said to express even the complex emotions.
Background
Behaviourist approach
A squirrel communicating with its pup
Prior to the development of animal sciences such as comparative psychology and ethology, interpretation of animal behaviour tended to favour a minimalistic approach known as behaviourism.
This approach refuses to ascribe to an animal a capability beyond the
least demanding that would explain a behaviour; anything more than this
is seen as unwarranted anthropomorphism.
The behaviourist argument is, why should humans postulate consciousness
and all its near-human implications in animals to explain some
behaviour, if mere stimulus-response is a sufficient explanation to produce the same effects?
Some behaviourists, such as John B. Watson, claim that stimulus–response models
provide a sufficient explanation for animal behaviours that have been
described as emotional, and that all behaviour, no matter how complex,
can be reduced to a simple stimulus-response association. Watson
described that the purpose of psychology was "to predict, given the
stimulus, what reaction will take place; or given the reaction, state
what the situation or stimulus is that has caused the reaction".
The cautious wording of Dixon exemplifies this viewpoint:
| “ | Recent work in the area of ethics and animals suggests that it is philosophically legitimate to ascribe emotions to animals. Furthermore, it is sometimes argued that emotionality is a morally relevant psychological state shared by humans and non-humans. What is missing from the philosophical literature that makes reference to emotions in animals is an attempt to clarify and defend some particular account of the nature of emotion, and the role that emotions play in a characterization of human nature. I argue in this paper that some analyses of emotion are more credible than others. Because this is so, the thesis that humans and nonhumans share emotions may well be a more difficult case to make than has been recognized thus far. | ” |
Moussaieff Masson and McCarthy describe a similar view (with which they disagree):
| “ | While the study of emotion is a respectable field, those who work in it are usually academic psychologists who confine their studies to human emotions. The standard reference work, The Oxford Companion to Animal Behaviour, advises animal behaviourists that "One is well advised to study the behaviour, rather than attempting to get at any underlying emotion. There is considerable uncertainty and difficulty related to the interpretation and ambiguity of emotion: an animal may make certain movements and sounds, and show certain brain and chemical signals when its body is damaged in a particular way. But does this mean an animal feels—is aware of—pain as we are, or does it merely mean it is programmed to act a certain way with certain stimuli? Similar questions can be asked of any activity an animal (including a human) might undertake, in principle. Many scientists regard all emotion and cognition (in humans and animals) as having a purely mechanistic basis. | ” |
Because of the philosophical questions of consciousness and mind
that are involved, many scientists have stayed away from examining
animal and human emotion, and have instead studied measurable brain
functions through neuroscience.
Comparative approach
In 1903, C. Lloyd Morgan published Morgan's Canon, a specialised form of Occam's razor used in ethology, in which he stated:
| “ | In no case is an animal activity to be interpreted in terms of higher psychological processes, if it can be fairly interpreted in terms of processes which stand lower
in the scale of psychological evolution and development.
|
” |
Darwin's approach
Charles Darwin initially planned to include a chapter on emotion in The Descent of Man but as his ideas progressed they expanded into a book, The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals.
Darwin proposed that emotions are adaptive and serve a communicative
and motivational function, and he stated three principles that are
useful in understanding emotional expression: First, The Principle of Serviceable Habits takes a Lamarckian stance by suggesting that emotional expressions that are useful will be passed on to the offspring. Second, The Principle of Antithesis suggests that some expressions exist merely because they oppose an expression that is useful. Third, The Principle of the Direct Action of the Excited Nervous System on the Body suggests that emotional expression occurs when nervous energy has passed a threshold and needs to be released.
Darwin saw emotional expression as an outward communication of an
inner state, and the form of that expression often carries beyond its
original adaptive use. For example, Darwin remarks that humans often
present their canine teeth when sneering in rage, and he suggests that
this means that a human ancestor probably utilized their teeth in
aggressive action. A domestic dog's simple tail wag may be used in subtly different ways to convey many meanings as illustrated in Darwin's The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals published in 1872.
- Examples of tail position indicating different emotions in dogs
"Small dog watching a cat on a table"
"Dog approaching another dog with hostile intentions"
"Dog in a humble and affectionate frame of mind"
"Half-bred shepherd dog"
"Dog caressing his master"
Anecdotal approach
Evidence
for emotions in animals has been primarily anecdotal, from individuals
who interact with pets or captive animals on a regular basis. However,
critics of animals having emotions often suggest that anthropomorphism
is a motivating factor in the interpretation of the observed behaviours.
Much of the debate is caused by the difficulty in defining emotions and
the cognitive requirements thought necessary for animals to experience
emotions in a similar way to humans.
The problem is made more problematic by the difficulties in testing for
emotions in animals. What is known about human emotion is almost all
related or in relation to human communication.
Scientific approach
In
recent years, the scientific community has become increasingly
supportive of the idea of emotions in animals. Scientific research has
provided insight into similarities of physiological changes between
humans and animals when experiencing emotion.
Much support for animal emotion and its expression results from
the notion that feeling emotions doesn't require significant cognitive
processes,
rather, they could be motivated by the processes to act in an adaptive
way, as suggested by Darwin. Recent attempts in studying emotions in
animals have led to new constructions in experimental and information
gathering. Professor Marian Dawkins suggested that emotions could be
studied on a functional or a mechanistic basis. Dawkins suggests that
merely mechanistic or functional research will provide the answer on its
own, but suggests that a mixture of the two would yield the most
significant results.
Functional
Functional
approaches rely on understanding what roles emotions play in humans and
examining that role in animals. A widely used framework for viewing
emotions in a functional context is that described by Oatley and Jenkins
who see emotions as having three stages: (i) appraisal in which there
is a conscious or unconscious evaluation of an event as relevant to a
particular goal. An emotion is positive when that goal is advanced and
negative when it is impeded (ii) action readiness where the emotion
gives priority to one or a few kinds of action and may give urgency to
one so that it can interrupt or compete with others and (iii)
physiological changes, facial expression and then behavioural action.
The structure, however, may be too broad and could be used to include
all the animal kingdom as well as some plants.
Mechanistic
The
second approach, mechanistic, requires an examination of the mechanisms
that drive emotions and search for similarities in animals.
The mechanistic approach is utilized extensively by Paul, Harding
and Mendl. Recognizing the difficulty in studying emotion in non-verbal
animals, Paul et al. demonstrate possible ways to better examine this.
Observing the mechanisms that function in human emotion expression, Paul
et al. suggest that concentration on similar mechanisms in animals can
provide clear insights into the animal experience. They noted that in
humans, cognitive biases
vary according to emotional state and suggested this as a possible
starting point to examine animal emotion. They propose that researchers
may be able to use controlled stimuli which have a particular meaning to
trained animals to induce particular emotions in these animals and
assess which types of basic emotions animals can experience.
Cognitive bias test
Is the glass half empty or half full?
A cognitive bias is a pattern of deviation in judgment, whereby
inferences about other animals and situations may be drawn in an
illogical fashion. Individuals create their own "subjective social reality" from their perception of the input. It refers to the question "Is the glass half empty or half full?",
used as an indicator of optimism or pessimism.
To test this in animals, an individual is trained to anticipate that
stimulus A, e.g. a 20 Hz tone, precedes a positive event, e.g. highly
desired food is delivered when a lever is pressed by the animal. The
same individual is trained to anticipate that stimulus B, e.g. a 10 Hz
tone, precedes a negative event, e.g. bland food is delivered when the
animal presses a lever. The animal is then tested by being played an
intermediate stimulus C, e.g. a 15 Hz tone, and observing whether the
animal presses the lever associated with the positive or negative
reward, thereby indicating whether the animal is in a positive or
negative mood. This might be influenced by, for example, the type of
housing the animal is kept in.
Using this approach, it has been found that rats which are
subjected to either handling or playful, experimenter-administered
manual stimulation (tickling) showed different responses to the intermediate stimulus: rats exposed to tickling were more optimistic.
The authors stated that they had demonstrated "...for the first time a
link between the directly measured positive affective state and decision
making under uncertainty in an animal model."
Cognitive biases have been shown in a wide range of species
including rats, dogs, rhesus macaques, sheep, chicks, starlings and
honeybees.
Self-medication with psychoactive drugs
Humans can suffer from a range of emotional or mood disorders such as depression, anxiety, fear and panic. To treat these disorders, scientists have developed a range of psychoactive drugs such as anxiolytics. Many of these drugs are developed and tested
by using a range of laboratory species. It is inconsistent to argue
that these drugs are effective in treating human emotions whilst denying
the experience of these emotions in the laboratory animals on which
they have been developed and tested.
Standard laboratory cages prevent mice from performing several
natural behaviours for which they are highly motivated. As a
consequence, laboratory mice sometimes develop abnormal behaviours
indicative of emotional disorders such as depression and anxiety. To
improve welfare, these cages are sometimes enriched with items such as
nesting material, shelters and running wheels. Sherwin and Ollson tested whether such enrichment influenced the consumption of Midazolam,
a drug widely used to treat anxiety in humans. Mice in standard cages,
standard cages but with unpredictable husbandry, or enriched cages,
were given a choice of drinking either non-drugged water or a solution
of the Midazolam. Mice in the standard and unpredictable cages drank a
greater proportion of the anxiolytic solution than mice from enriched
cages, indicating that mice from the standard and unpredictable
laboratory caging may have been experiencing greater anxiety than mice
from the enriched cages.
Spindle neurons
Spindle neurons are specialised cells found in three very restricted regions of the human brain – the anterior cingulate cortex, the frontoinsular cortex and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
The first two of these areas regulate emotional functions such as
empathy, speech, intuition, rapid "gut reactions" and social
organization in humans. Spindle neurons are also found in the brains of humpback whales, fin whales, killer whales, sperm whales, bottlenose dolphin, Risso's dolphin, beluga whales, and the African and Asian elephants.
Whales have spindle cells in greater numbers and are maintained for twice as long as humans.
The exact function of spindle cells in whale brains is still not
understood, but Hof and Van Der Gucht believe that they act as some sort
of "high-speed connections that fast-track information to and from
other parts of the cortex".
They compared them to express trains that bypass unnecessary
connections, enabling organisms to instantly process and act on
emotional cues during complex social interactions. However, Hof and Van
Der Gucht clarify that they do not know the nature of such feelings in
these animals and that we cannot just apply what we see in great apes or
ourselves to whales. They believe that more work is needed to know
whether emotions are the same for humans and whales.
Vocalizations
Though
non-human animals cannot provide useful verbal feedback about the
experiential and cognitive details of their feelings, various emotional
vocalizations of other animals may be indicators of potential affective
states.
Beginning with Darwin and his research, it has been known that
chimpanzees and other great apes perform laugh-like vocalizations,
providing scientists with more symbolic self-reports of their emotional
experiences.
Research with rats has revealed that under particular conditions, they emit 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalisations (USV) which have been postulated to reflect a positive affective state (emotion) analogous to primitive human joy; these calls have been termed "laughter". The 50 kHz USVs in rats are uniquely elevated by hedonic stimuli—such as tickling, rewarding electrical brain stimulation, amphetamine injections, mating, play, and aggression—and are suppressed by aversive stimuli.[6] Of all manipulations that elicit 50 kHz chirps in rats, tickling by humans elicits the highest rate of these calls.
Some vocalizations of domestic cats, such as purring, are well
known to be produced in situations of positive valence, such as mother
kitten interactions, contacts with familiar partner, or during tactile
stimulation with inanimate objects as when rolling and rubbing.
Therefore, purring can be generally considered as an indicator of
"pleasure" in cats.
Low pitched bleating in sheep has been associated with some
positive-valence situations, as they are produced by males as an estrus
female is approaching or by lactating mothers while licking and nursing
their lambs.
Neurological
Neuroscientific
studies based off of the instinctual, emotional action tendencies of
non-human animals accompanied by the brains neurochemical and electrical
changes are deemed to best monitor relative primary process
emotional/affective states.
Predictions based off the research conducted on animals is what leads
analysis of the neural infrastructure relevant in humans.
Psycho-neuro-ethological triangulation with both humans and animals
allows for further experimentation into animal emotions. Utilizing
specific animals that exhibit indicators of emotional states to decode
underlying neural systems aids in the discovery of critical brain
variables that regulate animal emotional expressions. Comparing the
results of the animals converse experiments occur predicting the
affective changes that should result in humans.
Specific studies where there is an increase or decrease of playfulness
or separation distress vocalizations in animals, comparing humans that
exhibit the predicted increases or decreases in feelings of joy or
sadness, the weight of evidence constructs a concrete neural hypothesis
concerning the nature of affect supporting all relevant species.
Criticism
The
argument that animals experience emotions is sometimes rejected due to a
lack of evidence, and those who do not believe in the idea of animal
intelligence, often argue that anthropomorphism
plays a role in individuals' perspectives. Those who reject that
animals have the capacity to experience emotion do so mainly by
referring to inconsistencies in studies that have endorsed the belief
emotions exist. Having no linguistic means to communicate emotion beyond
behavioral response interpretation, the difficulty of providing an
account of emotion in animals relies heavily on interpretive
experimentation, that relies on results from human subjects.
Some people oppose the concept of animal emotions and suggest
that emotions are not universal, including in humans. If emotions are
not universal, this indicates that there is not a phylogenetic
relationship between human and non-human
emotion. The relationship drawn by proponents of animal emotion, then,
would be merely a suggestion of mechanistic features that promote
adaptivity, but lack the complexity of human emotional constructs. Thus,
a social life-style may play a role in the process of basic emotions
developing into more complex emotions.
Darwin concluded, through a survey, that humans share universal
emotive expressions and suggested that animals likely share in these to
some degree. Social constructionists disregard the concept that emotions
are universal. Others hold an intermediate stance, suggesting that
basic emotional expressions and emotion are universal but the
intricacies are developed culturally. A study by Elfenbein and Ambady
indicated that individuals within a particular culture are better at
recognising other cultural members' emotions.
Examples
Primates
Primates, in particular great apes, are candidates for being able to experience empathy and theory of mind. Great apes have complex social systems; young apes and their mothers have strong bonds of attachment and when a baby chimpanzee or gorilla dies, the mother will not uncommonly carry the body around for several days. Jane Goodall has described chimpanzees as exhibiting mournful behavior. Koko,
a gorilla trained to use sign language, was reported to have expressed
vocalizations indicating sadness after the death of her pet cat, All Ball.
Beyond such anecdotal evidence, support for empathetic reactions has come from experimental studies of rhesus macaques.
Macaques refused to pull a chain that delivered food to themselves if
doing so also caused a companion to receive an electric shock. This inhibition of hurting another conspecific was more pronounced between familiar than unfamiliar macaques, a finding similar to that of empathy in humans.
Furthermore, there has been research on consolation behavior in
chimpanzees. De Waal and Aureli found that third-party contacts attempt
to relieve the distress of contact participants by consoling (e.g.
making contact, embracing, grooming) recipients of aggression, especially those that have experienced more intense aggression. Researchers were unable to replicate these results using the same observation protocol in studies of monkeys, demonstrating a possible difference in empathy between monkeys and apes.
Other studies have examined emotional processing in the great apes.
Specifically, chimpanzees were shown video clips of emotionally charged
scenes, such as a detested veterinary procedure or a favorite food, and
then were required to match these scenes with one of two
species-specific facial expressions: "happy" (a play-face) or "sad" (a
teeth-baring expression seen in frustration or after defeat). The
chimpanzees correctly matched the clips to the facial expressions that
shared their meaning, demonstrating that they understand the emotional
significance of their facial expressions. Measures of peripheral skin
temperature also indicated that the video clips emotionally affected the
chimpanzees.
Rodents
In 1998, Jaak Panksepp proposed that all mammalian species are equipped with brains capable of generating emotional experiences. Subsequent work examined studies on rodents to provide foundational support for this claim. One of these studies examined whether rats would work to alleviate the distress of a conspecific.
Rats were trained to press a lever to avoid the delivery of an electric
shock, signaled by a visual cue, to a conspecific. They were then
tested in a situation in which either a conspecific or a Styrofoam block
was hoisted into the air and could be lowered by pressing a lever. Rats
that had previous experience with conspecific distress demonstrated
greater than ten-fold more responses to lower a distressed conspecific
compared to rats in the control group, while those who had never
experienced conspecific distress expressed greater than three-fold more
responses to lower a distressed conspecific relative to the control
group. This suggests that rats will actively work to reduce the distress
of a conspecific, a phenomenon related to empathy. Comparable results
have also been found in similar experiments designed for monkeys.
Langford et al. examined empathy in rodents using an approach based in neuroscience. They reported that (1) if two mice
experienced pain together, they expressed greater levels of
pain-related behavior than if pain was experienced individually, (2) if
experiencing different levels of pain together, the behavior of each
mouse was modulated by the level of pain experienced by its social
partner, and (3) sensitivity to a noxious stimulus was experienced to
the same degree by the mouse observing a conspecific in pain as it was
by the mouse directly experiencing the painful stimulus. The authors
suggest this responsiveness to the pain of others demonstrated by mice
is indicative of emotional contagion, a phenomenon associated with empathy, which has also been reported in pigs.
One behaviour associated with fear in rats is freezing. If female rats
experience electric shocks to the feet and then witness another rat
experiencing similar footshocks, they freeze more than females without
any experience of the shocks. This suggests empathy in experienced rats
witnessing another individual being shocked. Furthermore, the
demonstrator's behaviour was changed by the behaviour of the witness;
demonstrators froze more following footshocks if their witness froze
more creating an empathy loop.
Several studies have also shown rodents can respond to a conditioned stimulus that has been associated with the distress of a conspecific, as if it were paired with the direct experience of an unconditioned stimulus. These studies suggest that rodents are capable of shared affect, a concept critical to empathy.
Horses
Although
not direct evidence that horses experience emotions, a 2016 study showed
that domestic horses react differently to seeing photographs of
positive (happy) or negative (angry) human facial expressions. When
viewing angry faces, horses look more with their left eye which is
associated with perceiving negative stimuli. Their heart rate also
increases more quickly and they show more stress-related behaviours. One
rider wrote, 'Experienced riders and trainers can learn to read the
subtle moods of individual horses according to wisdom passed down from
one horseman to the next, but also from years of trial-and-error. I
suffered many bruised toes and nipped fingers before I could detect a
curious swivel of the ears, irritated flick of the tail, or concerned
crinkle above a long-lashed eye.' This suggests that horses have
emotions and display them physically but is not concrete evidence.
Birds
Marc Bekoff reported accounts of animal behaviour which he believed was evidence of animals being able to experience emotions in his book The Emotional Lives of Animals. The following is an excerpt from his book:
| “ | A few years ago my friend Rod and I were riding our bicycles around Boulder, Colorado, when we witnessed a very interesting encounter among five magpies. Magpies are corvids, a very intelligent family of birds. One magpie had obviously been hit by a car and was laying dead on the side of the road. The four other magpies were standing around him. One approached the corpse, gently pecked at it-just as an elephant noses the carcass of another elephant- and stepped back. Another magpie did the same thing. Next, one of the magpies flew off, brought back some grass, and laid it by the corpse. Another magpie did the same. Then, all four magpies stood vigil for a few seconds and one by one flew off. | ” |
Bystander
affiliation is believed to represent an expression of empathy in which
the bystander tries to console a conflict victim and alleviate their
distress. There is evidence for bystander affiliation in ravens (e.g.
contact sitting, preening, or beak-to-beak or beak-to-body touching) and
also for solicited bystander affiliation, in which there is
post-conflict affiliation from the victim to the bystander. This
indicates that ravens may be sensitive to the emotions of others,
however, relationship value plays an important role in the prevalence
and function of these post-conflict interactions.
The capacity of domestic hens to experience empathy
has been studied. Mother hens show one of the essential underpinning
attributes of empathy: the ability to be affected by, and share, the
emotional state of their distressed chicks. However, evidence for empathy between familiar adult hens has not yet been found.
Dogs
A drawing by Konrad Lorenz showing facial expressions of a dog
Some research indicates that domestic dogs may experience negative
emotions in a similar manner to humans, including the equivalent of
certain chronic and acute psychological conditions. Much of this is from
studies by Martin Seligman on the theory of learned helplessness as an extension of his interest in depression:
A dog that had earlier been repeatedly conditioned to associate an audible stimulus with inescapable electric shocks did not subsequently try to escape the electric shocks after the warning was presented, even though all the dog would have had to do is jump over a low divider within ten seconds. The dog didn't even try to avoid the "aversive stimulus"; it had previously "learned" that nothing it did would reduce the probability of it receiving a shock. A follow-up experiment involved three dogs affixed in harnesses, including one that received shocks of identical intensity and duration to the others, but the lever which would otherwise have allowed the dog a degree of control was left disconnected and didn't do anything. The first two dogs quickly recovered from the experience, but the third dog suffered chronic symptoms of clinical depression as a result of this perceived helplessness.
A further series of experiments showed that, similar to humans, under
conditions of long-term intense psychological stress, around one third
of dogs do not develop learned helplessness or long-term depression.
Instead these animals somehow managed to find a way to handle the
unpleasant situation in spite of their past experience. The
corresponding characteristic in humans has been found to correlate
highly with an explanatory style and optimistic attitude that views the situation as other than personal, pervasive, or permanent.
Since these studies, symptoms analogous to clinical depression, neurosis, and other psychological conditions have also been accepted as being within the scope of emotion in domestic dogs. The postures of dogs may indicate their emotional state. In some instances, the recognition of specific postures and behaviors can be learned.
Psychology research has shown that when humans gaze at the face
of another human, the gaze is not symmetrical; the gaze instinctively
moves to the right side of the face to obtain information about their
emotions and state. Research at the University of Lincoln
shows that dogs share this instinct when meeting a human, and only when
meeting a human (i.e. not other animals or other dogs). They are the
only non-primate species known to share this instinct.
The existence and nature of personality traits in dogs have been
studied (15,329 dogs of 164 different breeds). Five consistent and
stable "narrow traits" were identified, described as playfulness,
curiosity/fearlessness, chase-proneness, sociability and aggressiveness.
A further higher order axis for shyness–boldness was also identified.
Dogs presented with images of either human or dog faces with
different emotional states (happy/playful or angry/aggressive) paired
with a single vocalization (voices or barks) from the same individual
with either a positive or negative emotional state or brown noise.
Dogs look longer at the face whose expression is congruent to the
emotional state of the vocalization, for both other dogs and humans.
This is an ability previously known only in humans.
The behavior of a dog can not always be an indication of its
friendliness. This is because when a dog wags its tail, most people
interpret this as the dog expressing happiness and friendliness. Though
indeed tail wagging can express these positive emotions, tail wagging is
also an indication of fear, insecurity, challenging of dominance,
establishing social relationships or a warning that the dog may bite.
Some researchers are beginning to investigate the question of whether dogs have emotions with the help of magnetic resonance imaging.
Elephants
Elephants
are known for their empathy towards members of the same species as well
as their cognitive memory. While this is true scientists continuously
debate the extent to which elephants feel emotion.
Observations show that elephants, like humans, are concerned with
distressed or deceased individuals, and render assistance to the ailing
and show a special interest in dead bodies of their own kind, however
this view is interpreted as being anthropomorphic.
Elephants have recently been suggested to pass mirror
self-recognition tests, and such tests have been linked to the capacity
for empathy. However, the experiment showing such actions did not follow
the accepted protocol for tests of self-recognition, and earlier
attempts to show mirror self-recognition in elephants have failed, so
this remains a contentious claim.
Elephants are also deemed to show emotion through vocal
expression, specifically the rumble vocalization. Rumbles are frequency
modulated, harmonically rich calls with fundamental frequencies in the
infrasonic range, with clear formant structure. Elephants exhibit
negative emotion and/or increased emotional intensity through their
rumbles, based on specific periods of social interaction and agitation.
Cats
_(14586975300).jpg)
Cat's response to a fear inducing stimulus.
It has been postulated that domestic cats can learn to manipulate their owners through vocalizations that are similar to the cries of human babies. Some cats learn to add a purr to the vocalization, which makes it less harmonious and more dissonant to humans, and therefore harder to ignore. Individual cats learn to make these vocalizations through trial-and-error;
when a particular vocalization elicits a positive response from a
human, the probability increases that the cat will use that vocalization
in the future.
Growling can be an expression of annoyance or fear, similar to
humans. When annoyed or angry, a cat wriggles and thumps its tail much
more vigorously than when in a contented state. In larger felids such
as lions,
what appears to be irritating to them varies between individuals. A
male lion may let his cubs play with his mane or tail, or he may hiss
and hit them with his paws.
Domestic male cats also have variable attitudes towards their family
members, for example, older male siblings tend not to go near younger or
new siblings and may even show hostility toward them.
Hissing
is also a vocalization associated with either offensive or defensive
aggression. They are usually accompanied by a postural display intended
to have a visual effect on the perceived threat. Cats hiss when they are
startled, scared, angry, or in pain, and also to scare off intruders
into their territory. If the hiss and growl warning does not remove the
threat, an attack by the cat may follow. Kittens as young as two to
three weeks will potentially hiss when first picked up by a human.
Honeybees
Honeybees become pessimistic after being shaken
Honeybees ("Apis mellifera carnica") were trained to extend their proboscis to a two-component odour mixture (CS+) predicting a reward (e.g., 1.00 or 2.00 M sucrose)
and to withhold their proboscis from another mixture (CS−) predicting
either punishment or a less valuable reward (e.g., 0.01 M quinine
solution or 0.3 M sucrose). Immediately after training, half of the
honeybees were subjected to vigorous shaking for 60 s to simulate the
state produced by a predatory attack on a concealed colony. This shaking
reduced levels of octopamine, dopamine, and serotonin in the hemolymph
of a separate group of honeybees at a time point corresponding to when
the cognitive bias tests were performed. In honeybees, octopamine is the
local neurotransmitter
that functions during reward learning, whereas dopamine mediates the
ability to learn to associate odours with quinine punishment. If flies
are fed serotonin, they are more aggressive; flies depleted of serotonin
still exhibit aggression, but they do so much less frequently.
Within 5 minutes of the shaking, all the trained bees began a
sequence of unreinforced test trials with five odour stimuli presented
in a random order for each bee: the CS+, the CS−, and three novel odours
composed of ratios intermediate between the two learned mixtures.
Shaken honeybees were more likely to withhold their mouthparts from the
CS− and from the most similar novel odour. Therefore, agitated honeybees
display an increased expectation of bad outcomes similar to a
vertebrate-like emotional state. The researchers of the study stated
that, "Although our results do not allow us to make any claims about the
presence of negative subjective feelings in honeybees, they call into
question how we identify emotions in any non-human animal. It is
logically inconsistent to claim that the presence of pessimistic
cognitive biases should be taken as confirmation that dogs or rats are
anxious but to deny the same conclusion in the case of honeybees."
Crayfish
The freshwater crayfish Procambarus clarkii
Crayfish naturally explore new environments but display a general preference for dark places. A 2014 study on the freshwater crayfish Procambarus clarkii tested their responses in a fear paradigm, the elevated plus maze
in which animals choose to walk on an elevated cross which offers both
aversive and preferable conditions (in this case, two arms were lit and
two were dark). Crayfish which experienced an electric shock displayed
enhanced fearfulness or anxiety as demonstrated by their preference for
the dark arms more than the light. Furthermore, shocked crayfish had
relatively higher brain serotonin concentrations coupled with elevated blood glucose, which indicates a stress response. Moreover, the crayfish calmed down when they were injected with the benzodiazepine anxiolytic, chlordiazepoxide,
used to treat anxiety in humans, and they entered the dark as normal.
The authors of the study concluded "...stress-induced avoidance behavior
in crayfish exhibits striking homologies with vertebrate anxiety."
A follow-up study using the same species confirmed the anxiolytic
effect of chlordiazepoxide, but moreover, the intensity of the
anxiety-like behaviour was dependent on the intensity of the electric
shock until reaching a plateau. Such a quantitative relationship between
stress and anxiety is also a very common feature of human and
vertebrate anxiety.
