The Rayleigh–Jeans law agrees with experimental results at
large wavelengths (low frequencies) but strongly disagrees at short
wavelengths (high frequencies). This inconsistency between observations
and the predictions of classical physics is commonly known as the ultraviolet catastrophe. Its resolution in 1900 with the derivation by Max Planck of Planck's law, which gives the correct radiation at all frequencies, was a foundational aspect of the development of quantum mechanics in the early 20th century.
Historical development
In 1900, the British physicist Lord Rayleigh derived the λ−4 dependence of the Rayleigh–Jeans law based on classical physical arguments and empirical facts. A more complete derivation, which included the proportionality constant, was presented by Rayleigh and Sir James Jeans
in 1905. The Rayleigh–Jeans law revealed an important error in physics
theory of the time. The law predicted an energy output that diverges
towards infinity
as wavelength approaches zero (as frequency tends to infinity).
Measurements of the spectral emission of actual black bodies revealed
that the emission agreed with the Rayleigh–Jeans law at low frequencies
but diverged at high frequencies; reaching a maximum and then falling
with frequency, so the total energy emitted is finite.
where h is the Planck constant and kB the Boltzmann constant.
The Planck's law does not suffer from an ultraviolet catastrophe, and
agrees well with the experimental data, but its full significance (which
ultimately led to quantum theory) was only appreciated several years
later. Since,
then in the limit of high temperatures or long wavelengths, the term in
the exponential becomes small, and the exponential is well approximated
with the Taylor polynomial's first-order term,
So,
This results in Planck's blackbody formula reducing to
which is identical to the classically derived Rayleigh–Jeans expression.
The same argument can be applied to the blackbody radiation expressed in terms of frequency ν = c/λ. In the limit of small frequencies, that is ,
This last expression is the Rayleigh–Jeans law in the limit of small frequencies.
Consistency of frequency and wavelength dependent expressions
When comparing the frequency and wavelength dependent expressions of the Rayleigh–Jeans law it is important to remember that
and
Therefore,
even after substituting the value , because has units of energy emitted per unit time per unit area of emitting surface, per unit solid angle, per unit wavelength, whereas has units of energy emitted per unit time per unit area of emitting surface, per unit solid angle, per unit frequency. To be consistent, we must use the equality
where both sides now have units of power (energy emitted per unit time) per unit area of emitting surface, per unit solid angle.
Starting with the Rayleigh–Jeans law in terms of wavelength we get
where
This leads us to find:
Other forms of Rayleigh–Jeans law
Depending
on the application, the Planck function can be expressed in 3 different
forms. The first involves energy emitted per unit time per unit area
of emitting surface, per unit solid angle, per spectral unit. In this
form, the Planck function and associated Rayleigh–Jeans limits are given
by
or
Alternatively, Planck's law can be written as an expression
for emitted power integrated over all solid angles. In this form, the
Planck function and associated Rayleigh–Jeans limits are given by
or
In other cases, Planck's law is written as
for energy per unit volume (energy density). In this form, the Planck
function and associated Rayleigh–Jeans limits are given by