Quantified self, also known as lifelogging, is a specific movement by Gary Wolf and Kevin Kelly
from Wired magazine, which began in 2007 and tries to incorporate
technology into data acquisition on aspects of a person's daily life.
People collect data in terms of food consumed, quality of surrounding
air, mood, skin conductance as a proxy for arousal, pulse oximetry for blood oxygen level, and performance, whether mental or physical. Wolf has described quantified self as "self-knowledge through self-tracking with technology".
People choose to wear self-monitoring and self-sensing sensors (e.g. EEG, ECG) and wearable computing to collect data. Among the specific biometrics one can track are insulin and cortisol levels, sequence DNA, and the microbial cells which inhabit one's body.
Other terms for using self-tracking data to improve daily functioning are self-tracking, auto-analytics, body hacking, self-quantifying, self-surveillance, and personal informatics.
History
According to Riphagen et al., the history of the quantimetric self-tracking using wearable computers began in the 1970s:
The history of self-tracking using wearable sensors in combination with wearable computing and wireless communication already exists for many years, and also appeared, in the form of sousveillance back in the 1970s [13, 12]
Quantimetric self-sensing was proposed for the use of wearable
computers to automatically sense and measure exercise and dietary intake
in 2002:
Sensors that measure biological signals, ... a personal data recorder that records ... Lifelong videocapture together with blood-sugar levels, ... correlate blood-sugar levels with activities such as eating, by capturing a food record of intake.
The "quantified self" or "self-tracking" are contemporary labels.
They reflect the broader trend of the progressions for organization and
meaning-making in human history; there has been a use of self-taken
measurements and data collection that attempted the same goals that the
quantified movement has. Scientisation plays a major role in legitimizing self-knowledge through self-tracking.
As early as 2001, media artists such as Ellie Harrison
and Alberto Frigo extensively pioneered the concept, proposing a new
direction of labour-intensive self-tracking without using privacy
infringing automation.
The term "quantified self" appears to have been proposed in San Francisco, CA, by Wired Magazine editors Gary Wolf and Kevin Kelly in 2007
as "a collaboration of users and tool makers who share an interest in
self knowledge through self-tracking." In 2010, Wolf spoke about the
movement at TED, and in May 2011, the first international conference was held in Mountain View, California.
There are conferences in America and Europe. Gary Wolf said "Almost
everything we do generates data." Wolf suggests that companies target
advertising or recommend products use data from phones, tablets,
computers, other technology, and credit cards. However, using the data
they make can give people new ways to deal with medical problems, help
sleep patterns, and improve diet.
Philosophers like Michel Foucault are recognized as being a part
of the foundations in the ideas of the quantified movement. Foucault and
other philosophers focus on the idea of "care of the self," in which
they emphasize the importance of self-knowledge for personal
development. Foucault explains that it involves looking inside oneself
and emphasizes self-reflection, which is also associated with the
quantified self movement, where self-tracking participants can attend
"show-and-tell" style conventions to share their experiences with the
technology.
Today the global community has over a hundred groups in 34 countries around the world, with the largest groups in San Francisco, New York, London, and Boston having over 1500 members each.
Methodologies
Like any empirical study, the primary method is the collection and analysis of data. In many cases, data are collected automatically using wearable sensors -not limited to, but often worn on the wrist. In other cases, data may be logged manually.
The data are typically analyzed using traditional techniques such as linear regression to establish correlations among the variables under investigation. As in every attempt to understand potentially high-dimensional data, visualization
techniques can suggest hypotheses that may be tested more rigorously
using formal methods. One simple example of a visualization method is
to view the change in some variable – say weight in pounds – over time.
Even though the idea is not new, the technology is. Many people
would track what they would eat or how much physical activity they got
within a week. Technology has made it easier and simpler to gather and
analyze personal data. Since these technologies have become smaller and
cheaper to be put in smart phones or tablets, it is easier to take the
quantitative methods used in science and business and apply them to the
personal sphere.
Narratives constitute a symbiotic relationship with bodies of
large data. Therefore, quantified self participants are encouraged to
share their experiences of self-tracking at various conferences and
meetings.
Applications
A major application of quantified self has been in health and wellness improvement.
Many devices and services help with tracking physical activity, caloric
intake, sleep quality, posture, and other factors involved in personal
well-being. Corporate wellness programs, for example, will often
encourage some form of tracking. Genetic testing and other services have
also become popular.
Quantified self is also being used to improve personal or professional productivity,
with tools and services being used to help people keep track of what
they do during the workday, where they spend their time, and whom they
interact with.
One other application has been in the field of education, where wearable
devices are being used in schools so that students can learn more about
their own activities and related math and science.
Many start-up companies occupy the market right now.
Most of them help track data for some type of health pattern, be it
sleep or asthma. However, there are bigger companies such as Nike,
Jawbone and FitBit that occupy some of the space in the market.
A recent movement in quantified self is gamification.
There is a wide variety of self-tracking technologies that allow
everyday activities to be turned into games by awarding points or
monetary value to encourage people to compete with their friends. The
success of connected sport is part of the gamification movement. People can pledge a certain amount of real or fake money, or receive awards and trophies.
Many of these self-tracking applications or technologies are
compatible with each other and other websites so people can share
information with one another. Each technology may integrate with other apps or websites to show a bigger picture of health patterns, goals, and journaling.
For example, one may figure out that migraines were more likely to have
painful side effects when using a particular migraine drug. Or one can
study personal temporal associations between exercise and mood.
The quantified self is also demonstrating to be a major component of "big data
science", due to the amount of data that users are collecting on a
daily basis. Although these data set streams are not conventional big
data, they become interesting sites for data analysis projects, that
could be used in medical-related fields to predict health patterns or
aide in genomic studies. Examples of studies that have been done using
QS data include projects such as the DIYgenomics studies, the Harvard's Personal Genome Project, and the American Gut microbiome project.
Quantified Baby
Quantified
Baby is a branch of the Quantified Self movement that is concerned with
collecting extensive data on a baby's daily activities, and using this
data to make inferences about behaviour and health. A number of software
and hardware products exist to assist data collection by the parent or
to collect data automatically for later analysis. Reactions to
"Quantified Baby" are mixed.
Parents are often told by health professionals to record daily
activities about their babies in the first few months, such as feeding
times, sleeping times and nappy changes.
This is useful for both the parent (used to maintain a schedule and
ensure they remain organized) and for the health professional (to make
sure the baby is on target and occasionally to assist in diagnosis).
For quantified self, knowledge is power, and knowledge about oneself easily translates as a tool for self-improvement.
The aim for many is to use this tracking to ultimately become better
parents. Some parents use sleep trackers because they worry about sudden infant death syndrome.
A number of apps exist that have been made for parents wanting to
track their baby's daily activities. The most frequently tracked
metrics are feeding, sleeping and diaper changes. Mood, activity, medical appointments and milestones are also sometimes covered. Other apps are specifically made for breastfeeding mothers, or those who are pumping their milk to build up a supply for their baby.
Quantified baby, as in quantified self, is associated with a combination of wearable sensors and wearable computing. The synergy of these is related to the concept of the internet of things.
Devices and services
Notable self-quantification tools are listed below. Numerous other hardware devices and software are available, as a result of advances and cost reductions in sensor technology, mobile connectivity, and battery life.
Activity monitors
- Apple Watch
- Garmin activity trackers
- BodyMedia FIT – skin temperature, galvanic skin response; acquired by Jawbone in April 2013
- Fitbit Tracker – steps taken, stairs climbed, distance traveled, calories burned, sleep quality, heart rate
- Instant App - Automatically tracks activities: Phone/app usage, fitness, places, travel & sleep
- Jawbone UP – steps taken, calories burned, eating habits, sleep quality and sleep cycle vibration alarm; behavioral nudges (water consumption, movement, sleep)
- Nike+ FuelBand – steps taken, calories burned. To be discontinued.
- Nokia Steel HR - steps, sleep, calories, heart rate, smart phone notifications
- Razer Nabu – sleep, steps you've walked, distance travelled, calories burnt, and active start and stop time
- Pebble – motion and sleep tracking.
- QardioCore – ECG, activity, body temperature monitoring
- Samsung Gear Fit – heart rate, pedometer, accelerometer; notifications from compatible phones
- Technogym – display a "performance index" in conjunction with a heart rate monitor
- Weight Watchers ActiveLink - accelerometer-based activity tracking with estimation of calorie consumption
- Zephyr BioHarness – complex physiological monitoring
- Simband – open source physiological monitoring
- Misfit Wearables – activity and sleep monitoring (tracking step count, calories burned, distance traveled, and number of hours of light and deep sleep)
Sleep-specific monitors
- SleepBot – a freeware app, for Android and iOS
- WakeMate – a wristband plus an accompanying app
- Zeo – a sleep-monitoring headband (company is now defunct)
- SleepCycle - app for iOS to track sleep
Diet and weight
Other
- 23andMe – genetics
- BACtrack – alcohol intake and its effect on the body
- dacadoo Health Score and platform for behavioral change
- QardioArm Smart Blood Pressure Monitor
- Sleepio
- uBiome – personal microbiome
- Thriva - blood test
- Lioness - a vibrator that tracks sexual response
Debates and criticism
The
Quantified Self movement has faced some criticism related to the
limitations it inherently contains or might pose to other domains.
Within these debates, there are some discussions around the nature,
responsibility and outcome of the Quantified Self movement and its
derivative practices. Generally, most bodies of criticism tackle the
issue of data exploitation and data privacy but also health literacy
skills in the practice of self-tracking. While most of the users
engaging in self tracking practices are using the gathered data for
self-knowledge and self-improvement, in some cases, self-tracking is
pushed and forced by employers over employees in certain workplace
environments, health and life insurers or by substance addiction
programs (drug and alcohol monitoring) in order to monitor the physical
activity of the subject and analyze the data in order to gather
conclusions. Usually the data gathered by this practice of self-tracking
can be accessed by commercial, governmental, research and marketing
agencies.
The data fetishist critique
Another
recurrent line of debate revolves around "data fetishism". Data
fetishism is referred to as the phenomenon evolving when active users of
self-tracking devices become enticed by the satisfaction and sense of
achievement and fulfillment that numerical data offers.
Proponents of such line of criticism tend to claim that data in this
sense becomes simplistic, where complex phenomenon become transcribed
into reductionist data.
This reductionist line of criticism generally incorporates fears and
concerns with the ways in which ideas on health are redefined, as well
as doctor-patient dynamics and the experience of self-hood among
self-trackers. Because of such arguments, the Quantified Self movement
has been criticized for providing predetermined ideals of health,
well-being and self-awareness. Rather than increasing the personal
skills for self-knowledge, it distances the user from the self by
offering an inherently normative and reductionist framework.
An alternative line of criticism still linked to the reductionist
discourse but still proposing a more hopeful solution is related the
lack of health literacy among most of self-trackers. The European Health
Literacy Survey Consortium Health defines health literacy as "[...]
people's knowledge, motivations, and competencies to access, understand,
appraise, and apply health information in order to make judgements and
take decisions in everyday life concerning healthcare, disease
prevention and health promotion to maintain or improve quality of life
during the life course."
Generally, people tend to focus mostly on the data collecting stage,
while stages of data archiving, analysis and interpretation are often
overlooked because of the skills necessary to conduct such processes,
which explains the call for the improvement of health literacy skills
among Self-Quantifiers.
The health literacy critique is different from the data-fetishist
critique in its approach to data influence on the human life, health
and experience. While the data-fetishist critical discourse ascribes a
crucial power of influence to numbers and data, the health literacy
critique views gathered data as useless and powerless without the human
context and the analysis and reflection skills of the user that are
needed to act on the numbers. Data collection alone is not deterministic
or normative, according to the health literacy critique. The "know thy
numbers to know thyself" slogan of the Quantified Self movement is
inconsistent, it has been claimed, in the sense that it does not fully
acknowledge the need for auxiliary skills of health literacy to actually
get to "know thyself".
The solution proposed by proponents of the health literacy critique in
order to improve the practice of self-tracking and its results is a
focus on addressing individual and systemic barriers. The individual
barriers are faced by elderly citizens when having to deal with
contemporary technology or in cases where there is a need for
culturally-sound practices while systemic barriers could be overcome
when involving the participation of more health literacy experts and the
organization of health literacy education.