Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) represents a surgical concept and set of methods, that use computer technology for surgical planning, and for guiding or performing surgical interventions. CAS is also known as computer-aided surgery, computer-assisted intervention, image-guided surgery and surgical navigation, but these are terms that are more or less synonymous with CAS. CAS has been a leading factor in the development of robotic surgery.
General principles
Creating a virtual image of the patient
The
most important component for CAS is the development of an accurate
model of the patient. This can be conducted through a number of medical imaging technologies including CT, MRI, x-rays, ultrasound
plus many more. For the generation of this model, the anatomical
region to be operated has to be scanned and uploaded into the computer
system. It is possible to employ a number of scanning methods, with the
datasets combined through data fusion techniques. The final objective is the creation of a 3D dataset
that reproduces the exact geometrical situation of the normal and
pathological tissues and structures of that region. Of the available
scanning methods, the CT is preferred,
because MRI data sets are known to have volumetric deformations that
may lead to inaccuracies. An example data set can include the collection
of data compiled with 180 CT slices, that are 1 mm apart, each having
512 by 512 pixels. The contrasts of the 3D dataset (with its tens of millions of pixels)
provide the detail of soft vs hard tissue structures, and thus allow a
computer to differentiate, and visually separate for a human, the
different tissues and structures. The image data taken from a patient
will often include intentional landmark features, in order to be able to
later realign the virtual dataset against the actual patient during
surgery.
Image analysis and processing
Image
analysis involves the manipulation of the patients 3D model to extract
relevant information from the data. Using the differing contrast levels
of the different tissues within the imagery, as examples, a model can
be changed to show just hard structures such as bone, or view the flow
of arteries and veins through the brain.
Diagnostic, preoperative planning, surgical simulation
Using
specialized software the gathered dataset can be rendered as a virtual
3D model of the patient, this model can be easily manipulated by a
surgeon to provide views from any angle and at any depth within the
volume. Thus the surgeon can better assess the case and establish a more
accurate diagnostic. Furthermore, the surgical intervention will be
planned and simulated virtually, before actual surgery takes place
(computer-aided surgical simulation [CASS]). Using dedicated software,
the surgical robot will be programmed to carry out the planned actions
during the actual surgical intervention.
In
computer-assisted surgery, the actual intervention is defined as
surgical navigation. Using the surgical navigation system the surgeon
uses special instruments, which are tracked by the navigation system.
The position of a tracked instrument in relation to the patient's
anatomy is shown on images of the patient, as the surgeon moves the
instrument. The surgeon thus uses the system to 'navigate' the location
of an instrument. The feedback the system provides of the instrument
location is particularly useful in situations where the surgeon cannot
actually see the tip of the instrument, such as in minimally invasive
surgeries.
Robotic surgery
Robotic surgery is a term used for correlated actions of a surgeon
and a surgical robot (that has been programmed to carry out certain
actions during the preoperative planning procedure). A surgical robot is
a mechanical device (generally looking like a robotic arm) that is
computer-controlled.
Robotic surgery can be divided into three types, depending on the degree
of surgeon interaction during the procedure: supervisory-controlled,
telesurgical, and shared-control.
In a supervisory-controlled system, the procedure is executed solely by
the robot, which will perform the pre-programmed actions. A
telesurgical system, also known as remote surgery,
requires the surgeon to manipulate the robotic arms during the
procedure rather than allowing the robotic arms to work from a
predetermined program. With shared-control systems, the surgeon carries
out the procedure with the use of a robot that offers steady-hand
manipulations of the instrument. In most robots, the working mode can be
chosen for each separate intervention, depending on the surgical
complexity and the particularities of the case.
Applications
Computer-assisted
surgery is the beginning of a revolution in surgery. It already makes a
great difference in high-precision surgical domains, but it is also
used in standard surgical procedures.
Computer-assisted neurosurgery
Telemanipulators
have been used for the first time in neurosurgery, in the 1980s. This
allowed a greater development in brain microsurgery (compensating
surgeon’s physiological tremor by 10-fold), increased accuracy and
precision of the intervention. It also opened a new gate to minimally
invasive brain surgery, furthermore reducing the risk of post-surgical
morbidity by avoiding accidental damage to adjacent centers.
Computer-assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery
Bone segment navigation is the modern surgical approach in orthognathic surgery (correction of the anomalies of the jaws and skull), in temporo-mandibular joint (TMJ) surgery, or in the reconstruction of the mid-face and orbit.
It is also used in implantology where the available bone can be
seen and the position, angulation and depth of the implants can be
simulated before the surgery. During the operation surgeon is guided
visually and by sound alerts. IGI (Image Guided Implantology) is one of
the navigation systems which uses this technology.
Guided Implantology
New
therapeutic concepts as guided surgery are being developed and applied
in the placement of dental implants. The prosthetic rehabilitation is
also planned and performed parallel to the surgical procedures. The
planning steps are at the foreground and carried out in a cooperation of
the surgeon, the dentist and the dental technician. Edentulous
patients, either one or both jaws, benefit as the time of treatment is
reduced.
Regarding the edentulous patients, conventional denture support
is often compromised due to moderate bone atrophy, even if the dentures
are constructed based on correct anatomic morphology.
Using cone beam computed tomography, the patient and the existing
prosthesis are being scanned. Furthermore, the prosthesis alone is also
scanned. Glass pearls of defined diameter are placed in the prosthesis
and used as reference points for the upcoming planning. The resulting
data is processed and the position of the implants determined. The
surgeon, using special developed software, plans the implants based on
prosthetic concepts considering the anatomic morphology. After the
planning of the surgical part is completed, a CAD/CAM surgical guide for
dental placement is constructed. The mucosal-supported surgical splint
ensures the exact placement of the implants in the patient. Parallel to
this step, the new implant supported prosthesis is constructed.
The dental technician, using the data resulting from the previous
scans, manufactures a model representing the situation after the
implant placement. The prosthetic compounds, abutments, are already
prefabricated. The length and the inclination can be chosen. The
abutments are connected to the model at a position in consideration of
the prosthetic situation. The exact position of the abutments is
registered. The dental technician can now manufacture the prosthesis.
The fit of the surgical splint is clinically proved. After that,
the splint is attached using a three-point support pin system. Prior to
the attachment, irrigation with a chemical disinfectant is advised. The
pins are driven through defined sheaths from the vestibular to the oral
side of the jaw. Ligaments anatomy should be considered, and if
necessary decompensation can be achieved with minimal surgical
interventions. The proper fit of the template is crucial and should be
maintained throughout the whole treatment. Regardless of the mucosal
resilience, a correct and stable attachment is achieved through the bone
fixation.
The access to the jaw can now only be achieved through the sleeves
embedded in the surgical template. Using specific burs through the
sleeves the mucosa is removed. Every bur used, carries a sleeve
compatible to the sleeves in the template, which ensures that the final
position is achieved but no further progress in the alveolar ridge can
take place. Further procedure is very similar to the traditional implant
placement. The pilot hole is drilled and then expanded. With the aid of
the splint, the implants are finally placed. After that, the splint can
be removed.
With the aid of a registration template, the abutments can be
attached and connected to the implants at the defined position. No less
than a pair of abutments should be connected simultaneously to avoid any
discrepancy. An important advantage of this technique is the parallel
positioning of the abutments. A radiological control is necessary to
verify the correct placement and connection of implant and abutment.
In a further step, abutments are covered by gold cone caps, which
represent the secondary crowns. Where necessary, the transition of the
gold cone caps to the mucosa can be isolated with rubber dam rings.
The new prosthesis corresponds to a conventional total prosthesis
but the basis contains cavities so that the secondary crowns can be
incorporated. The prosthesis is controlled at the terminal position and
corrected if needed. The cavities are filled with a self-curing cement
and the prosthesis is placed in the terminal position. After the
self-curing process, the gold caps are definitely cemented in the
prosthesis cavities and the prosthesis can now be detached. Excess
cement may be removed and some corrections like polishing or under
filling around the secondary crowns may be necessary.
The new prosthesis is fitted using a construction of telescope double
cone crowns. At the end position, the prosthesis buttons down on the
abutments to ensure an adequate hold.
At the same sitting, the patient receives the implants and the
prosthesis. An interim prosthesis is not necessary. The extent of the
surgery is kept to minimum. Due to the application of the splint, a
reflection of soft tissues in not needed. The patient experiences less
bleeding, swelling and discomfort. Complications such as injuring of
neighbouring structures are also avoided.
Using 3D imaging during the planning phase, the communication between
the surgeon, dentist and dental technician is highly supported and any
problems can easily detected and eliminated. Each specialist accompanies
the whole treatment and interaction can be made. As the end result is
already planned and all surgical intervention is carried according to
the initial plan, the possibility of any deviation is kept to a minimum.
Given the effectiveness of the initial planning the whole treatment
duration is shorter than any other treatment procedures.
Computer-assisted ENT surgery
Image-guided
surgery and CAS in ENT commonly consists of navigating preoperative
image data such as CT or cone beam CT to assist with locating or
avoiding anatomically important regions such as the optical nerve or the
opening to the frontal sinuses.
For use in middle-ear surgery there has been some application of
robotic surgery due to the requirement for high-precision actions.
Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS)
The application of robotic surgery is widespread in orthopedics, especially in routine interventions, like total hip replacement or pedicle screw insertion.
It is also useful in pre-planning and guiding the correct anatomical
position of displaced bone fragments in fractures, allowing a good
fixation by osteosynthesis, especially for malrotated bones. Early CAOS systems include the HipNav, OrthoPilot, and Praxim.
Computer-assisted visceral surgery
With
the advent of computer-assisted surgery, great progresses have been
made in general surgery towards minimal invasive approaches. Laparoscopy
in abdominal and gynecologic surgery is one of the beneficiaries,
allowing surgical robots to perform routine operations, like
colecystectomies, or even hysterectomies. In cardiac surgery, shared
control systems can perform mitral valve replacement or ventricular
pacing by small thoracotomies. In urology, surgical robots contributed
in laparoscopic approaches for pyeloplasty or nephrectomy or prostatic
interventions.
Computer-assisted cardiac interventions
Applications
include atrial fibrillation and cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Pre-operative MRI or CT is used to plan the procedure. Pre-operative
images, models or planning information can be registered to
intra-operative fluoroscopic image to guide procedures.
Computer-assisted radiosurgery
Radiosurgery is also incorporating advanced robotic systems. CyberKnife
is such a system that has a lightweight linear accelerator mounted on
the robotic arm. It is guided towards tumor processes, using the
skeletal structures as a reference system (Stereotactic Radiosurgery
System). During the procedure, real time X-ray is used to accurately
position the device before delivering radiation beam. The robot can
compensate for respiratory motion of the tumor in real-time.
Advantages
CAS
starts with the premise of a much better visualization of the operative
field, thus allowing a more accurate preoperative diagnostic and a
well-defined surgical planning, by using surgical planning in a
preoperative virtual environment.
This way, the surgeon can easily assess most of the surgical
difficulties and risks and have a clear idea about how to optimize the
surgical approach and decrease surgical morbidity. During the operation,
the computer guidance improves the geometrical accuracy of the surgical
gestures and also reduce the redundancy of the surgeon’s acts. This
significantly improves ergonomy in the operating theatre, decreases the risk of surgical errors and reduces the operating time.
Disadvantages
There
are several disadvantages of computer-assisted surgery. Many systems
have costs in the millions of dollars, making them a large investment
for even big hospitals. Some people believe that improvements in
technology, such as haptic feedback, increased processor speeds, and
more complex and capable software will increase the cost of these
systems.
Another disadvantage is the size of the systems. These systems have
relatively large footprints. This is an important disadvantage in
today's already crowded-operating rooms. It may be difficult for both
the surgical team and the robot to fit into the operating room.