https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropological_linguistics
Anthropological linguistics is the subfield of linguistics and anthropology, which deals with the place of language in its wider social and cultural context, and its role in making and maintaining cultural practices and societal structures. While many linguists believe that a true field of anthropological linguistics is nonexistent, preferring the term linguistic anthropology to cover this subfield, many others regard the two as interchangeable.
Anthropological linguistics is the subfield of linguistics and anthropology, which deals with the place of language in its wider social and cultural context, and its role in making and maintaining cultural practices and societal structures. While many linguists believe that a true field of anthropological linguistics is nonexistent, preferring the term linguistic anthropology to cover this subfield, many others regard the two as interchangeable.
Overview
Anthropological
linguistics is one of many disciplines which studies the role of
languages in the social lives of individuals and within communities. To do this, experts have had to understand not only the logic behind linguistic systems – such as their grammars – but also record the activities in which those systems are used. In the 1960s and 1970s, sociolinguistics
and anthropological linguistics were often viewed as one single field
of study, but they have since become more separate as more academic
distance has been put between them. Though there are many similarities
and a definite sharing of topics – such as gender and language – they are two related but separate entities.
Anthropological linguistics came about in the United States as a
subfield of anthropology, when anthropologists were beginning to study
the indigenous cultures, and the indigenous languages could no longer be ignored, and quickly morphed into the subfield of linguistics that it is known as today.
Anthropological linguistics has had a major impact in the studies of such areas as visual perception (especially colour) and bioregional democracy, both of which are concerned with distinctions that are made in languages about perceptions of the surroundings.
Conventional linguistic anthropology also has implications for sociology and self-organization of peoples. Study of the Penan people, for instance, reveals that their language employs six different and distinct words whose best English translation is "we". Anthropological linguistics studies these distinctions, and relates them to types of societies
and to actual bodily adaptation to the senses, much as it studies
distinctions made in languages regarding the colours of the rainbow:
seeing the tendency to increase the diversity of terms, as evidence that
there are distinctions that bodies in this environment must make, leading to situated knowledge and perhaps a situated ethics, whose final evidence is the differentiated set of terms used to denote "we".
Structures
Phonology
A
common variation of linguistics that focuses on the sounds within
speech of any given language. Phonology puts a large focus on the
systematic structure of the sounds being observed.
Morphology
Morphology
in linguistics commonly looks at the structure of words within a
language to develop a better understanding for the word form being used.
Morphology looks broadly at the connection of word forms within a
specific language in relation to the culture or environment it is rooted
within.
Methodology
There are two major trends in the theoretical and methodological study of attitudes in the social sciences - mentalist and behaviorist.
The mentalist trend treats attitude as a mediating concept while the
behaviorist trend operationally defines it as a probability concept,
though in research practice both derive their attitude measures from
response variation.
While there are many different views concerning the structure and
components of attitudes, there is, however, an overwhelming agreement
that attitudes are learned, lasting, and positively related to behavior.
Methodology in attitude studies includes direct and indirect measures
of all kinds, but language attitude studies have tended to make more use of questionnaires than of other methods. The matched guise technique
- a sociolinguistic experimental technique used to determine the true
feelings of an individual or community towards a specific language,
dialect, or accent - has been extensively used for studies relating to
the social significance of languages and language varieties. A special
adaptation of this technique, called mirror image, appears promising for measuring consensual evaluations of language switching at the situational level. Situational based self-report instruments such as those used by Greenfield and Fishman
also promise to be very effective instruments for studies pertaining to
normative views concerning the situational use of languages and
language varieties. The commitment measure has been found to be
particularly suited for collecting data on behavioral tendencies. Data obtained through interviewing may be difficult to process and score – and may provide bias
from those being interviewed – but the research interview can be
particularly effective for attitude assessment, especially when used to
complement the observational method.
Data collected through the observational method can be formally
processed like data obtained through more formalized instruments if
attempts are made to record the data in more public forms instead of
only through the approach most characteristic for this kind of data have
used so far.
Many linguists believe that comparisons of linguistic and social behavior have been blocked by the fact that linguistic and anthropological studies are rarely based on comparable sets of data. While an anthropologist's description refers to specific communities, linguistic analysis
refers to a single language or dialect, and the behaviors formed
through verbal signs and structural similarities. The process of
linguistic analysis is oriented towards the discovery of unitary,
structurally similar wholes.[7]
The effect of these procedures is the selection of one single variety
out of the many varieties that characterize everyday speech and
behavior. English
is often thought of as one single language, as though people forget the
many dialects and accents that come with it. English spoken in the United States of America will not be the same English spoken in Australia, or in the countries of Africa. Even American English spoken in New York will not be exactly the same as American English spoken in Alabama.
Code-switching
While code-switching,
a situation in which a speaker alternates between two or more
languages, or language varieties, in the context of a single
conversation, is not the only form of linguistic variability to carry a
social, or referential meaning, it does provide a particularly clear
approach to understanding the relationship between social processes and
linguistic forms, because both the social and the linguistic boundaries
in question tend to be most evident than in other monolingual settings.
In anthropological linguistics, code-switching has been approached as a
structurally unified phenomenon whose significance comes from a
universal pattern of relationships between form, function, and context.
Many linguists are approaching code-switching as a form of verbal
strategy, which represents the ways in which the linguistic resources
available to individuals may vary according to the nature of their
social boundaries within their communities.
While the emphasis is on language use in social interaction as the
preferred focus for examining exactly how those processes work, it is
clear that future research must take into account the situation of that
interaction within the specific community, or across communities. The study of code-switching will increasingly be able to contribute to an understanding of the nature of speech communities.
Related fields
Anthropological linguistics is concerned with
- Descriptive (or synchronic) linguistics: Describing dialects (forms of a language used by a specific speech community). This study includes phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and grammar.
- Historical (or diachronic) linguistics: Describing changes in dialects and languages over time. This study includes the study of linguistic divergence and language families, comparative linguistics, etymology, and philology.
- Ethnolinguistics: Analyzing the relationship between culture, thought, and language.
- Sociolinguistics: Analyzing the social functions of language and the social, political, and economic relationships among and between members of speech communities.
