The launch of a Long March 3B carrier rocket at Xichang Satellite Launch Center.
| |
Function | Carrier rocket |
---|---|
Manufacturer | CALT |
Country of origin | China |
Cost per launch | More than US $70M (compare Long march 3A cost) |
Size | |
Height |
|
Diameter | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) |
Mass |
|
Stages | 3 / 4 |
Capacity | |
Payload to LEO | 11,500 kg (25,400 lb) |
Payload to SSO | 7,100 kg (15,700 lb) |
Payload to GTO |
|
Payload to GEO | 2,000 kg (4,400 lb) |
Payload to HCO | 3,300 kg (7,300 lb) |
Associated rockets | |
Family | Long March |
Derivatives | Long March 3C |
Comparable | |
Launch history | |
Status |
|
Launch sites | Xichang LC-2, LC-3 |
Total launches |
|
Successes |
|
Failures | 1 (3B, Intelsat 708) |
Partial failures |
|
First flight |
|
Last flight |
|
Boosters (3B) | |
No. boosters | 4 |
Length | 15.33 m (50.3 ft) |
Diameter | 2.25 m (7 ft 5 in) |
Propellant mass | 37,700 kg (83,100 lb) |
Engines | 1 × YF-25 |
Thrust | 740.4 kN (166,400 lbf) |
Specific impulse | 2,556.2 m/s (260.66 s) |
Burn time | 127 s |
Fuel | N2O4 / UDMH |
Boosters (3B/E) | |
No. boosters | 4 |
Length | 16.1 m (53 ft) |
Diameter | 2.25 m (7 ft 5 in) |
Propellant mass | 41,100 kg (90,600 lb) |
Engines | 1 × YF-25 |
Thrust | 740.4 kN (166,400 lbf) |
Specific impulse | 2,556.2 m/s (260.66 s) |
Burn time | 140 s |
Fuel | N2O4 / UDMH |
First stage (3B) | |
Length | 23.27 m (76.3 ft) |
Diameter | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) |
Propellant mass | 171,800 kg (378,800 lb) |
Engines | 4 × YF-21C |
Thrust | 2,961.6 kN (665,800 lbf) |
Specific impulse | 2,556.5 m/s (260.69 s) |
Burn time | 145 s |
Fuel | N2O4 / UDMH |
First stage (3B/E) | |
Length | 24.76 m (81.2 ft) |
Diameter | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) |
Propellant mass | 186,200 kg (410,500 lb) |
Engines | 4 × YF-21C |
Thrust | 2,961.6 kN (665,800 lbf) |
Specific impulse | 2,556.5 m/s (260.69 s) |
Burn time | 158 s |
Fuel | N2O4 / UDMH |
Second stage | |
Length | 12.92 m (42.4 ft) |
Diameter | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) |
Propellant mass | 49,400 kg (108,900 lb) |
Engines | |
Thrust |
|
Specific impulse |
|
Burn time | 185 s |
Fuel | N2O4 / UDMH |
Third stage | |
Length | 12.38 m (40.6 ft) |
Diameter | 3.0 m (9.8 ft) |
Propellant mass | 18,200 kg (40,100 lb) |
Engines | 2 × YF-75 |
Thrust | 167.17 kN (37,580 lbf) |
Specific impulse | 4,295 m/s (438.0 s) |
Burn time | 478 s |
Fuel | LH2 / LOX |
Fourth stage (optional) – YZ-1 | |
Engines | 1 × YF-50D |
Thrust | 6.5 kN (1,500 lbf) |
Specific impulse | 315.5 s (3.094 km/s) |
Fuel | N2O4 / UDMH |
The Long March 3B (Chinese: 长征三号乙火箭, Chang Zheng 3B), also known as the CZ-3B and LM-3B, is a Chinese orbital carrier rocket. Introduced in 1996, it is launched from Launch Area 2 and 3 at the Xichang Satellite Launch Center in Sichuan. A three-stage rocket with four strap-on liquid rocket boosters, it is currently the most powerful member of the Long March rocket family and the heaviest of the Long March 3 rocket family, and is mainly used to place communications satellites into geosynchronous orbits.
An enhanced version, the Long March 3B/E or G2, was introduced in 2007 to increase the rocket's GTO cargo capacity and lift heavier GEO communications satellites. The Long March 3B also served as the basis for the medium-capacity Long March 3C, which was first launched in 2008.
As of December 2019, the Long March 3B and 3B/E have conducted 61 successful launches, plus one failure and two partial failures, giving them a success rate of 95.3%.
History
The development of the Long March 3B began in 1986 to meet the needs
of the international GEO communications satellite market. During its
maiden flight on 14 February 1996 carrying the Intelsat 708
satellite, the rocket suffered a guidance failure two seconds into the
flight and destroyed a nearby town, killing at least six people, but outside estimates suggest that anywhere between 200 and 500 people might have been killed. However, the author of the report later ruled out large casualties, because evidence suggests that the crash site was evacuated before the launch.
The Long March 3B and 3B/E rockets conducted ten successful launches between 1997 and 2008.
In 1997, the Agila 2
satellite was forced to use onboard propellant to reach its correct
orbit because of poor injection accuracy on the part of its Long March
3B launch vehicle. In 2009, a Long March 3B partially failed during launch due to a third stage anomaly, which resulted in the Palapa-D satellite reaching a lower orbit than planned.
Nonetheless, the satellite was able to maneuver itself into the planned
orbit. The Long March 3B and its variants remain in active use as of
January 2014, having conducted a total of 23 consecutive successful launches.
In December 2013, a Long March 3B/E successfully lifted Chang'e 3, China's first Lunar lander and rover into the projected lunar-transfer orbit.
Design and variants
The Long March 3B is based on the Long March 3A as its core stage, with four liquid boosters strapped on the first stage. It has an LEO cargo capacity of 11,200 kilograms (24,700 lb) and a GTO capacity is 5,100 kilograms (11,200 lb).
Long March 3B/E
The
Long March 3B/E, also known as 3B/G2, is an enhanced variant of the
Long March 3B, featuring an enlarged first stage and boosters,
increasing its GTO payload capacity to 5,500 kilograms (12,100 lb). Its maiden flight took place on 13 May 2007, when it successfully launched Nigeria's NigComSat-1, the first African geosynchronous communications satellite. In 2013, it successfully launched China's first lunar lander Chang'e 3 and lunar rover Yutu.
Since 2015, the Long March 3B and 3C can optionally accommodate a YZ-1 upper stage, which has been used to carry dual launches or BeiDou navigation satellites into medium-Earth orbit.
Long March 3C
A modified version of the Long March 3B, the Long March 3C, was developed in the mid-1990s to bridge the gap in payload capacity between the Long March 3B and 3A.
It is almost identical to the Long March 3B, but has two boosters
instead of four, giving it a reduced GTO payload capacity of 3,800
kilograms (8,400 lb). Its maiden launch took place on 25 April 2008.
List of Launches
Flight number | Date (UTC) | Launch site | Version | Payload | Orbit | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | February 14, 1996 19:01 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B | Intelsat 708 | GTO | Failure |
2 | August 19, 1997 17:50 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B | Agila-2 | GTO | Success |
3 | October 16, 1997 19:13 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B | APStar 2R | GTO | Success |
4 | May 30, 1998 10:00 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B | Chinastar 1 | GTO | Success |
5 | July 18, 1998 09:20 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B | SinoSat 1 | GTO | Success |
6 | April 12, 2005 12:00 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B | APStar 6 | GTO | Success |
7 | October 28, 2006 16:20 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B | SinoSat 2 | GTO | Success |
8 | May 13, 2007 16:01 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | NigComSat-1 | GTO | Success |
9 | July 5, 2007 12:08 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B | ChinaSat 6B | GTO | Success |
10 | June 9, 2008 12:15 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B | ChinaSat 9 | GTO | Success |
11 | October 29, 2008 16:53 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | Venesat-1 | GTO | Success |
12 | August 31, 2009 09:28 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B | Palapa-D | GTO | Partial Failure |
13 | September 4, 2010 16:14 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | SinoSat 6 | GTO | Success |
14 | June 20, 2011 16:13 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | ChinaSat 10 | GTO | Success |
15 | August 11, 2011 16:15 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | Paksat-1R | GTO | Success |
16 | September 18, 2011 16:33 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | ChinaSat 1A | GTO | Success |
17 | October 7, 2011 08:21 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | Eutelsat W3C | GTO | Success |
18 | December 19, 2011 16:41 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | NigComSat-1R | GTO | Success |
19 | March 31, 2012 10:27 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | APStar 7 | GTO | Success |
20 | April 29, 2012 20:50 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B | Compass-M3 Compass-M4 |
MTO | Success |
21 | May 26, 2012 15:56 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | ChinaSat 2A | GTO | Success |
22 | September 18, 2012 19:10 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B | Compass-M5 Compass-M6 |
MTO | Success |
23 | November 27, 2012 10:13 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | ChinaSat 12 | GTO | Success |
24 | May 1, 2013 16:06 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | ChinaSat 11 | GTO | Success |
25 | December 1, 2013 17:30 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | Chang'e 3 | LTO | Success |
26 | December 20, 2013 16:42 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | Túpac Katari 1 | GTO | Success |
27 | July 25, 2015 12:29 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E + YZ-1 | BeiDou M1-S BeiDou M2-S |
MEO | Success |
28 | September 12, 2015 15:42 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | TJS-1 | GTO | Success |
29 | September 29, 2015 23:13 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E | BeiDou I2-S | GTO | Success |
30 | October 16, 2015 16:16 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | APStar 9 | GTO | Success |
31 | November 3, 2015 16:25 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E | ChinaSat 2C | GTO | Success |
32 | November 20, 2015 16:07 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | LaoSat-1 | GTO | Success |
33 | December 9, 2015 16:46 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E | ChinaSat 1C | GTO | Success |
34 | December 28, 2015 16:04 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | Gaofen 4 | GTO | Success |
35 | January 15, 2016 16:57 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E | Belintersat-1 | GTO | Success |
36 | August 5, 2016 16:22 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E | Tiantong-1-01 | GTO | Success |
37 | December 10, 2016 16:11 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E | Fengyun-4A | GTO | Success |
38 | January 5, 2017 15:18 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | TJS-2 | GTO | Success |
39 | April 12, 2017 11:04 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | Shijian 13 | GTO | Success |
40 | June 19, 2017 16:11 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | Chinasat 9A | GTO | Partial Failure |
41 | November 5, 2017 11:45 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E + YZ-1 | BeiDou-3 M1 BeiDou-3 M2 |
MEO | Success |
42 | December 10, 2017 16:40 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | Alcomsat-1 | GTO | Success |
43 | January 11, 2018 23:18 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E + YZ-1 | BeiDou-3 M7 BeiDou-3 M8 |
MEO | Success |
44 | February 12, 2018 05:03 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E + YZ-1 | BeiDou-3 M3 BeiDou-3 M4 |
MEO | Success |
45 | March 29, 2018 17:56 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E + YZ-1 | BeiDou-3 M9 BeiDou-3 M10 |
MEO | Success |
46 | May 3, 2018 16:06 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | Apstar 6C | GTO | Success |
47 | July 29, 2018 01:48 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E + YZ-1 | BeiDou-3 M5 BeiDou-3 M6 |
MEO | Success |
48 | August 24, 2018 23:52 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E + YZ-1 | BeiDou-3 M11 BeiDou-3 M12 |
MEO | Success |
49 | September 19, 2018 14:07 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E + YZ-1 | BeiDou-3 M13 BeiDou-3 M14 |
MEO | Success |
50 | October 15, 2018 04:23 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E + YZ-1 | BeiDou-3 M15 BeiDou-3 M16 |
MEO | Success |
51 | November 1, 2018 15:57 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | BeiDou-3 G1 | GTO | Success |
52 | November 18, 2018 18:07 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E + YZ-1 | BeiDou-3 M17 BeiDou-3 M18 |
MEO | Success |
53 | December 7, 2018 18:23 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | Chang'e 4 | LTO | Success |
54 | January 10, 2019 17:11 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | ChinaSat 2D | GTO | Success |
55 | March 9, 2019 16:28 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E | ChinaSat 6C | GTO | Success |
56 | March 31, 2019 15:51 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | Tianlian 2-01 | GTO | Success |
57 | April 20, 2019 14:41 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E | BeiDou-3 I1 | GTO | Success |
58 | June 24, 2019 18:09 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E | BeiDou-3 I2 | GTO | Success |
59 | August 19, 2019 12:03 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | ChinaSat 18 | GTO | Success |
60 | September 22, 2019 21:10 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E + YZ-1 | BeiDou-3 M23 BeiDou-3 M24 | MEO | Success |
61 | October 17, 2019 15:21 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E | TJSW-4 | GTO | Success |
62 | November 4, 2019 17:43 |
LA-2, XSLC | 3B/E | BeiDou-3 I3 | GTO | Success |
63 | November 23, 2019 00:55 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E + YZ-1 | BeiDou-3 M21 BeiDou-3 M22 | MEO | Success |
64 | December 16, 2019 07:22 |
LA-3, XSLC | 3B/E + YZ-1 | BeiDou-3 M19 BeiDou-3 M20 | MEO | Success |
Flight mishaps
Intelsat 708 launch failure
On February 14, 1996, the launch of the first Long March 3B with Intelsat 708
failed just after liftoff when the launch vehicle veered off course and
exploded when it hit the ground at T+23 seconds. One person on the
ground was killed by the explosion (the total number of casualties is
unknown). The cause of the accident was traced to short-circuiting of
the vehicle's guidance platform at liftoff.
The number of casualties is debated and unclear even decades after the
accident. The Chinese official death toll is usually of the order of few
casualties, whereas some estimates place the number of people dead to a
few hundred.
The participation of Space Systems/Loral
in the accident investigation caused great political controversy in the
United States, since information provided during the accident
investigation would help China improve its rockets and ballistic
missiles. The U.S. Congress reclassified satellite technology as a munition and placed it back under the restrictive International Traffic in Arms Regulations in 1998. No license to launch U.S. spacecraft on Chinese rockets has been approved by the U.S. State Department since then, and an official at the Bureau of Industry and Security
emphasized in 2016 that "no U.S.-origin content, regardless of
significance, regardless of whether it’s incorporated into a
foreign-made item, can go to China."
Palapa-D partial launch failure
On August 31, 2009, during the launch of Palapa-D,
the third stage engine under-performed and placed the satellite into a
lower than planned orbit. The satellite was able to make up the
performance shortfall using its own engine and reach geosynchronous
orbit, but with its lifetime shortened to 10.5 years from the originally
projected 15-16.
Investigation found that the failure was due to burn-through of the
engine’s gas generator, and that "the most likely cause of the
burn-through was foreign matter or humidity-caused icing in the engine’s
liquid-hydrogen injectors".
ChinaSat-9A partial launch failure
On June 19th, 2017, a Long March 3B/E mission carrying ChinaSat-9A ended in partial failure.
Officials did not release details regarding the status of the mission for at least 4 hours after liftoff.
Two weeks later, on July 7th, officials confirmed that the mission had
been anomalous, with Space Daily reporting that "an anomaly was found on
the carrier rocket's rolling control thruster, part of the attitude
control engine, during the third gliding phase". The failure in the
rocket's third stage left the payload in a lower than intended orbit,
and the payload was forced to spend two weeks reaching its intended
orbit under its own power.