A peasant is a pre-industrial agricultural laborer or farmer with limited land ownership, especially one living in the Middle Ages under feudalism and paying rent, tax, fees, or services to a landlord. In Europe, three classes of peasants existed: slave, serf, and free tenant. Peasants hold title to land either in fee simple or by any of several forms of land tenure, among them socage, quit-rent, leasehold, and copyhold.
In a colloquial sense, "peasant" often has a pejorative meaning
that is therefore seen as insulting and controversial in some circles,
even when referring to farm laborers in the developing world; as early as in 13th-century Germany the word also could mean "rustic," or "robber," as the English term villain. In 21st-century English, the term includes the pejorative sense of "an ignorant, rude, or unsophisticated person". The word rose to renewed popularity in the 1940s–1960s as a collective term, often referring to rural populations of developing countries in general – as the "semantic successor to 'native', incorporating all its condescending and racial overtones".
The word peasantry is commonly used in a non-pejorative sense as a collective noun for the rural population in the poor and developing countries of the world. Via Campesina, an organization claiming to represent about 200 million farm-workers' rights around the world, self-defines as an "International Peasant's Movement" as of 2019. The United Nations and even its Human Rights Council prominently uses the term "peasant" in a non-pejorative sense, just like in its Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas adopted in 2018. In general English-language literature, the use of "peasant" has been in steady decline since 1970.
More precise terms that describe current farm laborers without land ownership are farmworker or campesino, tenant farmer, and sharecropper.
Etymology
The word "peasant" is derived from the 15th-century French word païsant, meaning one from the pays, or countryside; ultimately from the Latin pagus, or outlying administrative district.
Social position
Peasants typically made up the majority of the agricultural labour force in a pre-industrial society. The majority of the people — according to one estimate 85% of the population — in the Middle Ages were peasants.
Though "peasant" is a word of loose application, once a market economy had taken root, the term peasant proprietors was frequently used to describe the traditional rural population in countries where smallholders
farmed much of the land. More generally, the word "peasant" is
sometimes used to refer pejoratively to those considered to be "lower
class", perhaps defined by poorer education and/or a lower income.
Medieval European peasants
The open field system
of agriculture dominated most of northern Europe during medieval times
and endured until the nineteenth century in many areas. Under this
system, peasants lived on a manor presided over by a lord or a bishop of the church.
Peasants paid rent or labor services to the lord in exchange for their
right to cultivate the land. Fallowed land, pastures, forests, and
wasteland were held in common. The open field system required
cooperation among the peasants of the manor. It was gradually replaced by individual ownership and management of land.
The relative position of peasants in Western Europe improved greatly after the Black Death had reduced the population of medieval Europe
in the mid-14th century: resulting in more land for the survivors and
making labor more scarce. In the wake of this disruption to the
established order, later centuries saw the invention of the printing
press, the development of widespread literacy and the enormous social and intellectual changes of the Enlightenment.
The evolution of ideas in an environment of relatively widespread literacy laid the groundwork for the Industrial Revolution, which enabled mechanically and chemically augmented agricultural production while simultaneously increasing the demand for factory workers in cities, who became what Karl Marx called the proletariat. The trend toward individual ownership of land, typified in England by Enclosure,
displaced many peasants from the land and compelled them, often
unwillingly, to become urban factory-workers, who came to occupy the
socio-economic stratum formerly the preserve of the medieval peasants.
This process happened in an especially pronounced and truncated
way in Eastern Europe. Lacking any catalysts for change in the 14th
century, Eastern European peasants largely continued upon the original
medieval path until the 18th and 19th centuries. Serfdom
was abolished in Russia in 1861, and while many peasants would remain
in areas where their family had farmed for generations, the changes did
allow for the buying and selling of lands traditionally held by
peasants, and for landless ex-peasants to move to the cities.
Even before emancipation in 1861, serfdom was on the wane in Russia.
The proportion of serfs within the empire had gradually decreased "from
45–50 percent at the end of the eighteenth century, to 37.7 percent in
1858."
Early modern Germany
In Germany, peasants continued to center their lives in the village
well into the 19th century. They belonged to a corporate body and helped
to manage the community resources and to monitor community life.
In the East they had the status of serfs bound permanently to parcels
of land. A peasant is called a "Bauer" in German and "Bur" in Low German (pronounced in English like boor).
In most of Germany, farming was handled by tenant farmers who
paid rents and obligatory services to the landlord—typically a nobleman.
Peasant leaders supervised the fields and ditches and grazing rights,
maintained public order and morals, and supported a village court which
handled minor offenses. Inside the family the patriarch made all the
decisions, and tried to arrange advantageous marriages for his children.
Much of the villages' communal life centered on church services and
holy days. In Prussia, the peasants drew lots to choose conscripts
required by the army. The noblemen handled external relationships and
politics for the villages under their control, and were not typically
involved in daily activities or decisions.
France
Information about the complexities of the French Revolution,
especially the fast-changing scene in Paris, reached isolated areas
through both official announcements and long-established oral networks.
Peasants responded differently to different sources of information. The
limits on political knowledge in these areas depended more on how much
peasants chose to know than on bad roads or illiteracy. Historian Jill
Maciak concludes that peasants "were neither subservient, reactionary,
nor ignorant."
In his seminal book Peasants into Frenchmen: the Modernization of Rural France, 1880–1914 (1976), historian Eugen Weber
traced the modernization of French villages and argued that rural
France went from backward and isolated to modern and possessing a sense
of French nationhood during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
He emphasized the roles of railroads, republican schools, and universal
military conscription. He based his findings on school records,
migration patterns, military-service documents and economic trends.
Weber argued that until 1900 or so a sense of French nationhood was weak
in the provinces. Weber then looked at how the policies of the Third Republic created a sense of French nationality in rural areas. The book was widely praised, but some argued that a sense of Frenchness existed in the provinces before 1870.
Use of the term for Chinese farmers
Farmers in China have been sometimes referred to as "peasants" in
English-language sources. However, the traditional term for farmer, nongfu (农夫), simply refers to "farmer" or "agricultural worker". In the 19th century, Japanese intellectuals reinvented the Chinese terms fengjian (封建) for "feudalism" and nongmin (农民), or "farming people", terms used in the description of feudal Japanese society. These terms created a negative image of Chinese farmers by making a class distinction where one had not previously existed. Anthropologist Myron Cohen considers these terms to be neologisms that represented a cultural and political invention. He writes:
This divide represented a radical departure from tradition: F. W. Mote and others have shown how especially during the later imperial era (Ming and Qing dynasties), China was notable for the cultural, social, political, and economic interpenetration of city and countryside. But the term nongmin did enter China in association with Marxist and non-Marxist Western perceptions of the "peasant," thereby putting the full weight of the Western heritage to use in a new and sometimes harshly negative representation of China's rural population. Likewise, with this development Westerners found it all the more "natural" to apply their own historically derived images of the peasant to what they observed or were told in China. The idea of the peasant remains powerfully entrenched in the Western perception of China to this very day.
Modern Western writers often continue to use the term peasant for Chinese farmers, typically without ever defining what the term means.
This Western use of the term suggests that China is stagnant,
"medieval", underdeveloped, and held back by its rural population.
Cohen writes that the "imposition of the historically burdened Western
contrasts of town and country, shopkeeper and peasant, or merchant and
landlord, serves only to distort the realities of the Chinese economic
tradition".
Use of the term for Latin American farmers
In Latin America, the term "peasant" is translated to "Campesino" (from campo – country person), but the meaning has changed over time. While most Campesinos
before the 20th century were in equivalent status to peasants – they
usually didn't own land and had to make payments to or were in an
employment position towards a landlord (the hacienda system), most Latin American countries saw one or more extensive land reforms in the 20th century.
The land reforms of Latin America were wide-reaching socialist, nationalist and bolivarian-motivated government initiatives that redistributed lands from large land holders to former peasants – farm workers and tenant farmers.
Hence, many Campesinos in Latin America today are closer small holders
who own their land and don't pay rent to a landlord – rather than
peasants who don't own land.
The international organization Via Campesino, with millions of members in South America still refers to itself as an "international peasants' movement".
Historiography
In medieval Europe society was theorized as being organized into three estates: those who work, those who pray, and those who fight. The Annales School of 20th-century French historians emphasized the importance of peasants. Its leader Fernand Braudel devoted the first volume—called The Structures of Everyday Life—of his major work, Civilization and Capitalism 15th–18th Century to the largely silent and invisible world that existed below the market economy.
Other research in the field of peasant studies was promoted by Florian Znaniecki and Fei Xiaotong, and in the post-1945 studies of the "great tradition" and the "little tradition" in the work of Robert Redfield. In the 1960s, anthropologists and historians began to rethink the role of peasant revolt in world history and in their own disciplines. Peasant revolution was seen as a Third World response to capitalism and imperialism.
The anthropologist Eric Wolf, for instance, drew on the work of earlier scholars in the Marxist tradition such as Daniel Thorner, who saw the rural population as a key element in the transition from feudalism to capitalism. Wolf and a group of scholars criticized both Marx and the field of Modernization theorists for treating peasants as lacking the ability to take action. James C. Scott's
field observations in Malaysia convinced him that villagers were active
participants in their local politics even though they were forced to
use indirect methods. Many of these activist scholars looked back to the
peasant movement in India and to the theories of the revolution in China led by Mao Zedong
starting in the 1920s. The anthropologist Myron Cohen, however, asked
why the rural population in China were called "peasants" rather than
"farmers", a distinction he called political rather than scientific. One important outlet for their scholarly work and theory was The Journal of Peasant Studies.