chemical reactions that converts a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen into liquid hydrocarbons. These reactions occur in the presence of metal catalysts,
typically at temperatures of 150–300 °C (302–572 °F) and pressures of
one to several tens of atmospheres. The process was first developed by Franz Fischer and Hans Tropsch at the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut für Kohlenforschung in Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany, in 1925.
The Fischer–Tropsch process is a collection of
As a premier example of C1 chemistry, the Fischer–Tropsch process is an important reaction in both coal liquefaction and gas to liquids technology for producing liquid hydrocarbons. In the usual implementation, carbon monoxide and hydrogen, the feedstocks for FT, are produced from coal, natural gas, or biomass in a process known as gasification. The Fischer–Tropsch process then converts these gases into a synthetic lubrication oil and synthetic fuel.
The Fischer–Tropsch process has received intermittent attention as a
source of low-sulfur diesel fuel and to address the supply or cost of
petroleum-derived hydrocarbons.
Reaction mechanism
The
Fischer–Tropsch process involves a series of chemical reactions that
produce a variety of hydrocarbons, ideally having the formula (CnH2n+2). The more useful reactions produce alkanes as follows:
- (2n + 1) H2 + n CO → CnH2n+2 + n H2O
where n is typically 10–20. The formation of methane (n = 1) is unwanted. Most of the alkanes produced tend to be straight-chain, suitable as diesel fuel. In addition to alkane formation, competing reactions give small amounts of alkenes, as well as alcohols and other oxygenated hydrocarbons.
Fischer–Tropsch intermediates and elemental reactions
Converting a mixture of H2
and CO into aliphatic products is a multi-step reaction with several
intermediate compounds. The growth of the hydrocarbon chain may be
visualized as involving a repeated sequence in which hydrogen atoms are
added to carbon and oxygen, the C–O bond is split and a new C–C bond is
formed.
For one –CH2– group produced by CO + 2 H2 → (CH2) + H2O, several reactions are necessary:
- Associative adsorption of CO
- Splitting of the C–O bond
- Dissociative adsorption of 2 H2
- Transfer of 2 H to the oxygen to yield H2O
- Desorption of H2O
- Transfer of 2 H to the carbon to yield CH2
The conversion of CO to alkanes involves hydrogenation of CO, the hydrogenolysis (cleavage with H2) of C–O bonds, and the formation of C–C bonds. Such reactions are assumed to proceed via initial formation of surface-bound metal carbonyls. The CO ligand is speculated to undergo dissociation, possibly into oxide and carbide ligands. Other potential intermediates are various C1 fragments including formyl (CHO), hydroxycarbene (HCOH), hydroxymethyl (CH2OH), methyl (CH3), methylene (CH2), methylidyne
(CH), and hydroxymethylidyne (COH). Furthermore, and critical to the
production of liquid fuels, are reactions that form C–C bonds, such as migratory insertion. Many related stoichiometric reactions have been simulated on discrete metal clusters, but homogeneous Fischer–Tropsch catalysts are poorly developed and of no commercial importance.
Addition of isotopically labelled alcohol to the feed stream
results in incorporation of alcohols into product. This observation
establishes the facility of C–O bond scission. Using 14C-labelled ethylene and propene
over cobalt catalysts results in incorporation of these olefins into
the growing chain. Chain growth reaction thus appears to involve both
‘olefin insertion’ as well as ‘CO-insertion’.
Feedstocks: gasification
Fischer–Tropsch
plants associated with coal or related solid feedstocks (sources of
carbon) must first convert the solid fuel into gaseous reactants, i.e., CO, H2, and alkanes. This conversion is called gasification and the product is called synthesis gas ("syngas"). Synthesis gas obtained from coal gasification tends to have a H2:CO ratio of ~0.7 compared to the ideal ratio of ~2. This ratio is adjusted via the water-gas shift reaction. Coal-based Fischer–Tropsch plants produce varying amounts of CO2,
depending upon the energy source of the gasification process. However,
most coal-based plants rely on the feed coal to supply all the energy
requirements of the Fischer–Tropsch process.
Feedstocks: GTL
Carbon monoxide for FT catalysis is derived from hydrocarbons. In gas to liquids
(GTL) technology, the hydrocarbons are low molecular weight materials
that often would be discarded or flared. Stranded gas provides
relatively cheap gas. GTL is viable provided gas remains relatively
cheaper than oil.
Several reactions are required to obtain the gaseous reactants required for Fischer–Tropsch catalysis. First, reactant gases entering a Fischer–Tropsch reactor must be desulfurized. Otherwise, sulfur-containing impurities deactivate ("poison") the catalysts required for Fischer–Tropsch reactions.
Several reactions are employed to adjust the H2:CO ratio. Most important is the water-gas shift reaction, which provides a source of hydrogen at the expense of carbon monoxide:
- H2O + CO → H2 + CO2
For Fischer–Tropsch plants that use methane as the feedstock, another important reaction is steam reforming, which converts the methane into CO and H2:
- H2O + CH4 → CO + 3 H2
Process conditions
Generally,
the Fischer–Tropsch process is operated in the temperature range of
150–300 °C (302–572 °F). Higher temperatures lead to faster reactions
and higher conversion rates but also tend to favor methane production.
For this reason, the temperature is usually maintained at the low to
middle part of the range. Increasing the pressure leads to higher
conversion rates and also favors formation of long-chained alkanes,
both of which are desirable. Typical pressures range from one to
several tens of atmospheres. Even higher pressures would be favorable,
but the benefits may not justify the additional costs of high-pressure
equipment, and higher pressures can lead to catalyst deactivation via
coke formation.
A variety of synthesis-gas compositions can be used. For cobalt-based catalysts the optimal H2:CO ratio is around 1.8–2.1. Iron-based catalysts can tolerate lower ratios, due to intrinsic water-gas shift reaction activity of the iron catalyst. This reactivity can be important for synthesis gas derived from coal or biomass, which tend to have relatively low H2:CO ratios (< 1).
Design of the Fischer–Tropsch process reactor
Efficient
removal of heat from the reactor is the basic need of Fischer–Tropsch
reactors since these reactions are characterized by high exothermicity.
Four types of reactors are discussed:
Multi tubular fixed-bed reactor
- This type of reactor contains a number of tubes with small diameter. These tubes contain catalyst and are surrounded by boiling water which removes the heat of reaction. A fixed-bed reactor is suitable for operation at low temperatures and has an upper temperature limit of 257 °C (530 K). Excess temperature leads to carbon deposition and hence blockage of the reactor. Since large amounts of the products formed are in liquid state, this type of reactor can also be referred to as a trickle flow reactor system.
Entrained flow reactor
- An important requirement of the reactor for the Fischer–Tropsch process is to remove the heat of the reaction. This type of reactor contains two banks of heat exchangers which remove heat; the remainder of which is removed by the products and recycled in the system. The formation of heavy waxes should be avoided, since they condense on the catalyst and form agglomerations. This leads to fluidization. Hence, risers are operated over 297 °C (570 K).
Slurry reactors
- Heat removal is done by internal cooling coils. The synthesis gas is bubbled through the waxy products and finely-divided catalyst which is suspended in the liquid medium. This also provides agitation of the contents of the reactor. The catalyst particle size reduces diffusional heat and mass transfer limitations. A lower temperature in the reactor leads to a more viscous product and a higher temperature (> 297 °C, 570 K) gives an undesirable product spectrum. Also, separation of the product from the catalyst is a problem.
Fluid-bed and circulating catalyst (riser) reactors
- These are used for high-temperature Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (nearly 340 °C) to produce low-molecular-weight unsaturated hydrocarbons on alkalized fused iron catalysts. The fluid-bed technology (as adapted from the catalytic cracking of heavy petroleum distillates) was introduced by Hydrocarbon Research in 1946–50 and named the 'Hydrocol' process. A large scale Fischer–Tropsch Hydrocol plant (350,000 tons per annum) operated during 1951–57 in Brownsville, Texas. Due to technical problems, and lacking economy due to increasing petroleum availability, this development was discontinued. Fluid-bed Fischer–Tropsch synthesis has recently been very successfully reinvestigated by Sasol. One reactor with a capacity of 500,000 tons per annum is now in operation and even larger ones are being built (nearly 850,000 tons per annum). The process is now used mainly for C2 and C7 alkene production. This new development can be regarded as an important progress in Fischer–Tropsch technology. A high-temperature process with a circulating iron catalyst ('circulating fluid bed', 'riser reactor', 'entrained catalyst process') was introduced by the Kellogg Company and a respective plant built at Sasol in 1956. It was improved by Sasol for successful operation. At Secunda, South Africa, Sasol operated 16 advanced reactors of this type with a capacity of approximately 330,000 tons per annum each. Now the circulating catalyst process is being replaced by the superior Sasol-advanced fluid-bed technology. Early experiments with cobalt catalyst particles suspended in oil have been performed by Fischer. The bubble column reactor with a powdered iron slurry catalyst and a CO-rich syngas was particularly developed to pilot plant scale by Kölbel at the Rheinpreuben Company in 1953. Recently (since 1990) low-temperature Fischer–Tropsch slurry processes are under investigation for the use of iron and cobalt catalysts, particularly for the production of a hydrocarbon wax, or to be hydrocracked and isomerised to produce diesel fuel, by Exxon and Sasol. Today slurry-phase (bubble column) low-temperature Fischer–Tropsch synthesis is regarded by many authors as the most efficient process for Fischer–Tropsch clean diesel production. This Fischer–Tropsch technology is also under development by the Statoil Company (Norway) for use on a vessel to convert associated gas at offshore oil fields into a hydrocarbon liquid.
Product distribution
In general the product distribution of hydrocarbons formed during the Fischer–Tropsch process follows an Anderson–Schulz–Flory distribution, which can be expressed as:
- Wn/n = (1 − α)2αn−1
where Wn is the weight fraction of hydrocarbons containing n carbon atoms, and α
is the chain growth probability or the probability that a molecule will
continue reacting to form a longer chain. In general, α is largely
determined by the catalyst and the specific process conditions.
Examination of the above equation reveals that methane will always be the largest single product so long as α is less than 0.5; however, by increasing α
close to one, the total amount of methane formed can be minimized
compared to the sum of all of the various long-chained products.
Increasing α increases the formation of long-chained
hydrocarbons. The very long-chained hydrocarbons are waxes, which are
solid at room temperature. Therefore, for production of liquid
transportation fuels it may be necessary to crack some of the
Fischer–Tropsch products. In order to avoid this, some researchers have
proposed using zeolites or other catalyst substrates with fixed sized
pores that can restrict the formation of hydrocarbons longer than some
characteristic size (usually n < 10). This way they can drive
the reaction so as to minimize methane formation without producing lots
of long-chained hydrocarbons. Such efforts have had only limited
success.
Catalysts
A variety of catalysts can be used for the Fischer–Tropsch process, the most common are the transition metals cobalt, iron, and ruthenium. Nickel can also be used, but tends to favor methane formation (“methanation”).
Cobalt
Cobalt-based
catalysts are highly active, although iron may be more suitable for
certain applications. Cobalt catalysts are more active for
Fischer–Tropsch synthesis when the feedstock is natural gas. Natural gas
has a high hydrogen to carbon ratio, so the water-gas shift is not
needed for cobalt catalysts. Iron catalysts are preferred for lower
quality feedstocks such as coal or biomass. Synthesis gases derived from
these hydrogen-poor feedstocks has a low-hydrogen-content and require
the water-gas shift reaction. Unlike the other metals used for this
process (Co, Ni, Ru), which remain in the metallic state during
synthesis, iron catalysts tend to form a number of phases, including
various oxides and carbides
during the reaction. Control of these phase transformations can be
important in maintaining catalytic activity and preventing breakdown of
the catalyst particles.
In addition to the active metal the catalysts typically contain a
number of "promoters," including potassium and copper. Group 1 alkali
metals, including potassium, are a poison for cobalt catalysts but are
promoters for iron catalysts. Catalysts are supported on
high-surface-area binders/supports such as silica, alumina, or zeolites.
Promotors also have an important influence on activity. Alkali metal
oxides and copper are common promotors, but the formulation depends on
the primary metal, iron vs cobalt. Alkali oxides on cobalt catalysts generally cause activity to drop severely even with very low alkali loadings. C≥5 and CO2 selectivity increase while methane and C2–C4 selectivity decrease. In addition, the alkene to alkane ratio increases.
Fischer–Tropsch catalysts are sensitive to poisoning by
sulfur-containing compounds. Cobalt-based catalysts are more sensitive
than their iron counterparts.
Iron
Fischer–Tropsch iron catalysts need alkali promotion to attain high activity and stability (e.g. 0.5 wt% K
2O). Addition of Cu for reduction promotion, addition of SiO
2, Al
2O
3 for structural promotion and maybe some manganese can be applied for selectivity control (e.g. high olefinicity). The working catalyst is only obtained when—after reduction with hydrogen—in the initial period of synthesis several iron carbide phases and elemental carbon are formed whereas iron oxides are still present in addition to some metallic iron. With iron catalysts two directions of selectivity have been pursued. One direction has aimed at a low-molecular-weight olefinic hydrocarbon mixture to be produced in an entrained phase or fluid bed process (Sasol–Synthol process). Due to the relatively high reaction temperature (approx. 340 °C), the average molecular weight of the product is so low that no liquid product phase occurs under reaction conditions. The catalyst particles moving around in the reactor are small (particle diameter 100 µm) and carbon deposition on the catalyst does not disturb reactor operation. Thus a low catalyst porosity with small pore diameters as obtained from fused magnetite (plus promoters) after reduction with hydrogen is appropriate. For maximising the overall gasoline yield, C3 and C4 alkenes have been oligomerized at Sasol. However, recovering the olefins for use as chemicals in, e.g., polymerization processes is advantageous today. The second direction of iron catalyst development has aimed at highest catalyst activity to be used at low reaction temperature where most of the hydrocarbon product is in the liquid phase under reaction conditions. Typically, such catalysts are obtained through precipitation from nitrate solutions. A high content of a carrier provides mechanical strength and wide pores for easy mass transfer of the reactants in the liquid product filling the pores. The main product fraction then is a paraffin wax, which is refined to marketable wax materials at Sasol; however, it also can be very selectively hydrocracked to a high quality diesel fuel. Thus, iron catalysts are very flexible.
2O). Addition of Cu for reduction promotion, addition of SiO
2, Al
2O
3 for structural promotion and maybe some manganese can be applied for selectivity control (e.g. high olefinicity). The working catalyst is only obtained when—after reduction with hydrogen—in the initial period of synthesis several iron carbide phases and elemental carbon are formed whereas iron oxides are still present in addition to some metallic iron. With iron catalysts two directions of selectivity have been pursued. One direction has aimed at a low-molecular-weight olefinic hydrocarbon mixture to be produced in an entrained phase or fluid bed process (Sasol–Synthol process). Due to the relatively high reaction temperature (approx. 340 °C), the average molecular weight of the product is so low that no liquid product phase occurs under reaction conditions. The catalyst particles moving around in the reactor are small (particle diameter 100 µm) and carbon deposition on the catalyst does not disturb reactor operation. Thus a low catalyst porosity with small pore diameters as obtained from fused magnetite (plus promoters) after reduction with hydrogen is appropriate. For maximising the overall gasoline yield, C3 and C4 alkenes have been oligomerized at Sasol. However, recovering the olefins for use as chemicals in, e.g., polymerization processes is advantageous today. The second direction of iron catalyst development has aimed at highest catalyst activity to be used at low reaction temperature where most of the hydrocarbon product is in the liquid phase under reaction conditions. Typically, such catalysts are obtained through precipitation from nitrate solutions. A high content of a carrier provides mechanical strength and wide pores for easy mass transfer of the reactants in the liquid product filling the pores. The main product fraction then is a paraffin wax, which is refined to marketable wax materials at Sasol; however, it also can be very selectively hydrocracked to a high quality diesel fuel. Thus, iron catalysts are very flexible.
Ruthenium
Ruthenium
is the most active of the FT catalysts. It works at the lowest
reaction temperatures, and it produces the highest molecular weight
hydrocarbons. It acts as a Fischer–Tropsch catalyst as the pure metal,
without any promotors, thus providing the simplest catalytic system of
Fischer–Tropsch synthesis, where mechanistic conclusions should be the
easiest—e.g., much easier than with iron as the catalyst. Like with
nickel, the selectivity changes to mainly methane at elevated
temperature. Its high price and limited world resources exclude
industrial application. Systematic Fischer–Tropsch studies with
ruthenium catalysts should contribute substantially to the further
exploration of the fundamentals of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. There is
an interesting question to consider: what features have the metals
nickel, iron, cobalt, and ruthenium in common to let them—and only
them—be Fischer–Tropsch catalysts, converting the CO/H2
mixture to aliphatic (long chain) hydrocarbons in a ‘one step reaction’.
The term ‘one step reaction’ means that reaction intermediates are not
desorbed from the catalyst surface. In particular, it is amazing that
the much carbided alkalized iron catalyst gives a similar reaction as
the just metallic ruthenium catalyst.
HTFT and LTFT
High-Temperature
Fischer–Tropsch (or HTFT) is operated at temperatures of 330–350 °C and
uses an iron-based catalyst. This process was used extensively by Sasol in their coal-to-liquid
plants (CTL). Low-Temperature Fischer–Tropsch (LTFT) is operated at
lower temperatures and uses an iron or cobalt-based catalyst. This
process is best known for being used in the first integrated GTL-plant
operated and built by Shell in Bintulu, Malaysia.
History
Since the invention of the original process by Fischer and Tropsch, working at the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut for Chemistry in the 1920s, many refinements and adjustments were made. Fischer and Tropsch filed a number of patents, e.g., U.S. Patent 1,746,464, applied 1926, published 1930. It was commercialized by Brabag in Germany in 1936. Being petroleum-poor but coal-rich, Germany used the Fischer–Tropsch process during World War II to produce ersatz
(replacement) fuels. Fischer–Tropsch production accounted for an
estimated 9% of German war production of fuels and 25% of the automobile
fuel.
The United States Bureau of Mines, in a program initiated by the Synthetic Liquid Fuels Act, employed seven Operation Paperclip synthetic fuel scientists in a Fischer–Tropsch plant in Louisiana, Missouri in 1946.
In Britain, Alfred August Aicher obtained several patents for improvements to the process in the 1930s and 1940s. Aicher's company was named Synthetic Oils Ltd (not related to a company of the same name in Canada).
Commercialization
Ras Laffan, Qatar
The LTFT facility Pearl GTL at Ras Laffan,
Qatar, is the largest FT plant. It uses cobalt catalysts at 230 °C,
converting natural gas to petroleum liquids at a rate of 140,000 barrels
per day (22,000 m3/d), with additional production of 120,000 barrels (19,000 m3) of oil equivalent in natural gas liquids and ethane. The plant in Ras Laffan was commissioned in 2007, called Oryx GTL, has a capacity of 34,000 barrels per day (5,400 m3/d).
The plant utilizes the Sasol slurry phase distillate process, which
uses a cobalt catalyst. Oryx GTL is a joint venture between Qatar Petroleum and Sasol.
Sasol
Another large scale implementation of Fischer–Tropsch technology is a series of plants operated by Sasol in South Africa, a country with large coal reserves, but little oil. The first commercial plant opened in 1952.
Sasol uses coal and now natural gas as feedstocks and produces a
variety of synthetic petroleum products, including most of the country's
diesel fuel.
Sasol scrapped plans to build the GTL plant in Westlake, Louisiana.
PetroSA
PetroSA,
another South African company, operates a refinery with a 36,000
barrels a day plant that completed semi-commercial demonstration in
2011, paving the way to begin commercial preparation. The technology can
be used to convert natural gas, biomass or coal into synthetic fuels.
Shell middle distillate synthesis
One of the largest implementations of Fischer–Tropsch technology is in Bintulu, Malaysia. This Shell facility converts natural gas into low-sulfur Diesel fuels and food-grade wax. The scale is 12,000 barrels per day (1,900 m3/d).
Velocys
Construction
is underway for Velocys' commercial reference plant incorporating its
microchannel Fischer–Tropsch technology; ENVIA Energy's Oklahoma City
GTL project being built adjacent to Waste Management's East Oak landfill
site. The project is being financed by a joint venture between Waste
Management, NRG Energy, Ventech and Velocys. The feedstock for this
plant will be a combination of landfill gas and pipeline natural gas.
UPM (Finland)
In October 2006, Finnish paper and pulp manufacturer UPM
announced its plans to produce biodiesel by the Fischer–Tropsch process
alongside the manufacturing processes at its European paper and pulp
plants, using waste biomass resulting from paper and pulp manufacturing processes as source material.
Rentech
A
demonstration-scale Fischer–Tropsch plant was built and operated by
Rentech, Inc., in partnership with ClearFuels, a company specializing in
biomass gasification. Located in Commerce City, Colorado, the facility
produces about 10 barrels per day (1.6 m3/d) of fuels from natural gas. Commercial-scale facilities are planned for Rialto, California; Natchez, Mississippi; Port St. Joe, Florida; and White River, Ontario.
Rentech closed down their pilot plant in 2013, and abandoned work on
their FT process as well as the proposed commercial facilities.
INFRA GTL Technology
In 2010, INFRA built a compact Pilot Plant
for conversion of natural gas into synthetic oil. The plant modeled the
full cycle of the GTL chemical process including the intake of pipeline
gas, sulfur removal, steam methane reforming, syngas conditioning, and
Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. In 2013 the first pilot plant was acquired by
VNIIGAZ Gazprom LLC. In 2014 INFRA commissioned and operated on a
continuous basis a new, larger scale full cycle Pilot Plant. It
represents the second generation of INFRA's testing facility and is
differentiated by a high degree of automation and extensive data
gathering system. In 2015, INFRA built its own catalyst factory in
Troitsk (Moscow, Russia). The catalyst factory has a capacity of over 15
tons per year, and produces the unique proprietary Fischer–Tropsch
catalysts developed by the company's R&D division. In 2016, INFRA
designed and built a modular, transportable GTL (gas-to-liquid) M100
plant for processing natural and associated gas into synthetic crude oil
in Wharton (Texas, USA). The M100 plant is operating as a technology
demonstration unit, R&D platform for catalyst refinement, and
economic model to scale the Infra GTL process into larger and more
efficient plants.
Other
In the
United States and India, some coal-producing states have invested in
Fischer–Tropsch plants. In Pennsylvania, Waste Management and
Processors, Inc. was funded by the state to implement Fischer–Tropsch
technology licensed from Shell and Sasol to convert so-called waste coal
(leftovers from the mining process) into low-sulfur diesel fuel.
Research developments
Choren Industries has built a plant in Germany
that converts biomass to syngas and fuels using the Shell
Fischer–Tropsch process structure. The company went bankrupt in 2011 due
to impracticalities in the process.
Biomass gasification (BG) and Fischer–Tropsch (FT) synthesis can in principle be combined to produce renewable transportation fuels (biofuels).
U.S. Air Force certification
Syntroleum,
a publicly traded United States company, has produced over 400,000 U.S.
gallons (1,500,000 L) of diesel and jet fuel from the Fischer–Tropsch
process using natural gas and coal at its demonstration plant near Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Syntroleum is working to commercialize its licensed Fischer–Tropsch
technology via coal-to-liquid plants in the United States, China, and
Germany, as well as gas-to-liquid plants internationally. Using natural
gas as a feedstock, the ultra-clean, low sulfur fuel has been tested
extensively by the United States Department of Energy (DOE) and the United States Department of Transportation (DOT). Most recently, Syntroleum has been working with the United States Air Force
to develop a synthetic jet fuel blend that will help the Air Force to
reduce its dependence on imported petroleum. The Air Force, which is the
United States military's largest user of fuel, began exploring
alternative fuel sources in 1999. On December 15, 2006, a B-52 took off from Edwards Air Force Base, California for the first time powered solely by a 50–50 blend of JP-8
and Syntroleum's FT fuel. The seven-hour flight test was considered a
success. The goal of the flight test program is to qualify the fuel
blend for fleet use on the service's B-52s, and then flight test and
qualification on other aircraft. The test program concluded in 2007.
This program is part of the Department of Defense
Assured Fuel Initiative, an effort to develop secure domestic sources
for the military energy needs. The Pentagon hopes to reduce its use of
crude oil from foreign producers and obtain about half of its aviation
fuel from alternative sources by 2016. With the B-52 now approved to use the FT blend, the C-17 Globemaster III, the B-1B, and eventually every airframe in its inventory to use the fuel by 2011.
Carbon dioxide reuse
Carbon
dioxide is not a typical feedstock for FT catalysis. Hydrogen and
carbon dioxide react over a cobalt-based catalyst, producing methane.
With iron-based catalysts unsaturated short-chain hydrocarbons are also
produced. Upon introduction to the catalyst's support, ceria functions as a reverse water-gas shift catalyst, further increasing the yield of the reaction. The short-chain hydrocarbons were upgraded to liquid fuels over solid acid catalysts, such as zeolites.
Process efficiency
Using conventional FT technology the process ranges in carbon efficiency from 25 to 50 percent and a thermal efficiency of about 50% for CTL facilities idealised at 60% with GTL facilities at about 60% efficiency idealised to 80% efficiency.
Fischer–Tropsch in nature
A Fischer–Tropsch-type process has also been suggested to have produced a few of the building blocks of DNA and RNA within asteroids. Similarly, the hypothetical abiogenic petroleum formation requires some naturally occurring FT-like processes.