The environmental impact of transport is significant because transport is a major user of energy, and burns most of the world's petroleum. This creates air pollution, including nitrous oxides and particulates, and is a significant contributor to global warming through emission of carbon dioxide.
Within the transport sector, road transport is the largest contributor to global warming.
Environmental regulations
in developed countries have reduced the individual vehicle's emission.
However, this has been offset by an increase in the number of vehicles,
and increased use of each vehicle (an effect known as the Jevons paradox).
Some pathways to reduce the carbon emissions of road vehicles have been considerably studied.
Energy use and emissions vary largely between modes, causing environmentalists to call for a transition from air and road to rail and human-powered transport, and increase transport electrification and energy efficiency.
The transportation sector is a major source of greenhouse gas
emissions (GHGs) in the United States.
An estimated 30 percent of national GHGs are directly attributable to
transportation—and in some regions, the proportion is even higher.
Transportation methods are the greatest contributing source of GHGs in
the U.S., accounting for 47 percent of the net increase in total U.S.
emissions since 1990.
Other environmental impacts of transport systems include traffic congestion and automobile-oriented urban sprawl,
which can consume natural habitat and agricultural lands. By reducing
transportation emissions globally, it is predicted that there will be
significant positive effects on Earth's air quality, acid rain, smog and climate change.
The health impact of transport emissions is also of concern. A
recent survey of the studies on the effect of traffic emissions on
pregnancy outcomes has linked exposure to emissions to adverse effects
on gestational duration and possibly also intrauterine growth.
As listed above direct impacts such as noise pollution and carbon monoxide
emissions create direct and harmful effects on the environment, along
with indirect impacts. The indirect impacts are often of higher
consequence which leads to the misconception that it's the opposite
since it is frequently understood that initial effects cause the most
damage. For example, particulates which are the outcome of incomplete
combustion done by an internal combustion engine, are not linked
with respiratory and cardiovascular problems since they contribute to
other factors not only to that specific condition. Even though the
environmental impacts are usually listed individually there are also
cumulative impacts. The synergetic consequences of transport activities.
They take into account of the varied effects of direct and indirect
impacts on an ecosystem. Climate change is the sum total impact of several natural and human-made factors. 15% of global CO2 emissions are attributed to the transport sector.
Mode
The following table compares the emissions of the different transport means for passenger transport in Europe:
Transport mean | Passengers average |
Emissions (g CO2/(km*pax)) |
---|---|---|
Train | 156 | 14 |
Small car | 4 | 42 |
Big car | 4 | 55 |
Bus | 12.7 | 68 |
Motorbike | 1.2 | 72 |
Small car | 1.5 | 104 |
Big car | 1.5 | 158 |
Plane | 88 | 285 |
Ship | – | 245 |
Bicycle | 1 | 0 |
Aviation
Aviation emissions vary based on length of flight. For covering long
distances, longer flights are a better investment of the high energy
costs of take-off and landing than very short flights, yet by nature of
their length inevitably use much more energy. CO
2 emissions from air travel range from 0.24 kg CO
2 per passenger mile (0.15 kg/km per passenger) for short flights down to 0.18 kg CO
2 per passenger mile (0.11 kg/km per passenger) for long flights. Researchers have been raising concern about the globally increasing hypermobility of society, involving frequent and often long distance air travel and the resulting environmental and climate impacts. This threatens to overcome gains made in the efficiency of aircraft and their operations. Climate scientist Kevin Anderson raised concern about the growing effect of air transport on the climate in a paper and a presentation in 2008. He has pointed out that even at a reduced annual rate of increase in UK passenger air travel and with the government's targeted emissions reductions in other energy use sectors, by 2030 aviation would be causing 70% of the UK's allowable CO
2 emissions.
2 emissions from air travel range from 0.24 kg CO
2 per passenger mile (0.15 kg/km per passenger) for short flights down to 0.18 kg CO
2 per passenger mile (0.11 kg/km per passenger) for long flights. Researchers have been raising concern about the globally increasing hypermobility of society, involving frequent and often long distance air travel and the resulting environmental and climate impacts. This threatens to overcome gains made in the efficiency of aircraft and their operations. Climate scientist Kevin Anderson raised concern about the growing effect of air transport on the climate in a paper and a presentation in 2008. He has pointed out that even at a reduced annual rate of increase in UK passenger air travel and with the government's targeted emissions reductions in other energy use sectors, by 2030 aviation would be causing 70% of the UK's allowable CO
2 emissions.
Worse, aircraft emissions at stratospheric altitudes have a
greater contribution to radiative forcing than do emissions at sea
level, due to effects several greenhouses gases in the emissions, apart
from CO2. The other GHGs include methane (CH4), NOx which leads to ozone [O3],
and water vapor. Overall, in 2005 the radiative forcing caused by
aviation amounted to 4.9% of all human-caused radiative forcing on
Earth's heat balance.
Road transport
Cycling
Cycling has a low carbon-emission and low environmental impact.
Cars
Unleaded gasoline has 8.91 kg and diesel has 10.15 kg of CO2 per gallon. CO2
emissions originating from ethanol are disregarded by international
agreements however so gasoline containing 10% ethanol would only be
considered to produce 8.02 kg of CO2 per gallon.
The average fuel economy for new light-duty vehicles sold in the US of
the 2017 model year was about 24.9 MPG giving around 0.36 kg of CO2 per mile.
The Department of Transportation's MOBILE 6.2 model, used by regional
governments to model air quality, uses a fleet average (all cars, old
and new) of 20.3 mpg giving around 0.44 kg of CO2 per mile.
In Europe, the European Commission enforced that from 2015 all new cars registered shall not emit more than an average of 0.130 kg of CO2 per kilometre (kg CO2/km). The target is that by 2021 the average emissions for all new cars is 0.095 kg of CO2 per kilometre.
Buses
On average, inner city commuting buses emit 0.3 kg of CO
2 per passenger mile (0.18 kg/km per passenger), and long distance (>20 mi, >32 km) bus trips emit 0.08 kg of CO
2 per passenger mile (0.05 kg/km per passenger). Road and transportation conditions vary, so some carbon calculations add 10% to the total distance of the trip to account for potential traffic jams, detours, and pit-stops that may arise.
2 per passenger mile (0.18 kg/km per passenger), and long distance (>20 mi, >32 km) bus trips emit 0.08 kg of CO
2 per passenger mile (0.05 kg/km per passenger). Road and transportation conditions vary, so some carbon calculations add 10% to the total distance of the trip to account for potential traffic jams, detours, and pit-stops that may arise.
Rail
On average, commuter rail and subway trains emit 0.17 kg of CO
2 per passenger mile (0.11 kg/km per passenger), and long distance (>20 mi, >32 km) trains emit 0.19 kg of CO
2 per passenger mile (0.12 kg/km per passenger). Some carbon calculations add 10% to the total trip distance to account for detours, stop-overs, and other issues that may arise. Electric trains contributes relatively less to the pollution as pollution happens in the power plants which are lot more efficient than diesel driven engines. Generally electric motors even when accounting for transmission losses are more efficient than internal combustion engines with efficiency further improving through recuperative braking.
2 per passenger mile (0.11 kg/km per passenger), and long distance (>20 mi, >32 km) trains emit 0.19 kg of CO
2 per passenger mile (0.12 kg/km per passenger). Some carbon calculations add 10% to the total trip distance to account for detours, stop-overs, and other issues that may arise. Electric trains contributes relatively less to the pollution as pollution happens in the power plants which are lot more efficient than diesel driven engines. Generally electric motors even when accounting for transmission losses are more efficient than internal combustion engines with efficiency further improving through recuperative braking.
Infrastructure
Noise
can be a direct impact on the natural environment as a result of
railroads. Trains contain many different parts that have the potential
to be thundering. Wheels, engines and non-aerodynamic cargo that
actually vibrate the tracks can cause resounding sounds. Noise caused
from directly neighboring railways has the potential to actually lessen
value to property because of the inconveniences that railroads provide
because of a close proximity. In order to combat unbearable volumes
resulting from railways, US diesel locomotives are required to be
quieter than 90 decibels at 25 meters away since 1979. This noise,
however, has been shown to be harmless to animals, except for horses who
will become skittish, that live near it.
Pollution is another direct result of railroads on the environment.
Railroads can make the environment contaminated because of what trains
carry. Railway pollution exists in all three states of matter: gaseous,
liquid, and solid. Air pollution can occur from boxcars carrying
materials such as iron ore, coal, soil, or aggregates and exposing these
materials to the air. This can release nitrogen oxide, carbon monoxide,
sulphur dioxide, or hydrocarbons into the air. Liquid pollution can
come from railways contributing to a runoff into water supplies, like
groundwater or rivers and can result from spillage of fuels like oil
into water supplies or onto land or discharge of human waste in an
unhealthy manner.
Visual Disruption of railroads is defined as a railway changing
the way that a previously undisturbed, pristine sight of nature looks.
When railways are built in wilderness areas, the environment is visually
altered; a viewer will never be able to see the original scene again,
and the builders of the railway often alter the landscape around the
railway to allow it to ride. Frequent cuttings, embankments, dikes, and
stilts are built which will change the way that landscape will look.
An example is the Royal Gorge Bridge in Canon City, Colorado. This bridge stands 955 feet above the Arkansas River and stretches 1,258 feet across. This bridge that now uses aerial trams is an unforgettable part of this Colorado landscape
Shipping
The fleet emission average for delivery vans, trucks and big rigs is 10.17 kg CO
2 per gallon of diesel consumed. Delivery vans and trucks average about 7.8 mpg (or 1.3 kg of CO
2 per mile) while big rigs average about 5.3 mpg (or 1.92 kg of CO
2 per mile).
2 per gallon of diesel consumed. Delivery vans and trucks average about 7.8 mpg (or 1.3 kg of CO
2 per mile) while big rigs average about 5.3 mpg (or 1.92 kg of CO
2 per mile).
Discharges of sewage
into our water bodies can come from many sources, including wastewater
treatment facilities, runoff from livestock operations, and vessels.
These discharges have the potential to impair water quality, adversely
affecting aquatic environments and increasing the risks to human health.
While sewage discharges have potentially wide-ranging impacts on all
aquatic environments, the impacts may be especially problematic in
marinas, slow-moving rivers, lakes and other bodies of water with low
flushing rates. Environmentally this creates invasive species that often drive other species to their extinction and cause harm to the environment and local businesses.
Emissions from ships have a much more significant environmental impacts;
many ships go internationally from port to port and are not seen for
weeks, contributing to air and water pollution on its voyage. Emission
of greenhouse gases displaces the amount of gas that allows for UV-rays
through the ozone. Sulfur and nitrogen compounds emitted from ship will
oxidize in the atmosphere to form sulfate and nitrate. Emissions
of nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and volatile organic compounds
(VOC) will lead to enhanced surface ozone formation and methane
oxidation, depleting the ozone. The effect of the international ship emission on the distribution of chemical compounds such as NOx, CO, O3, •OH, SO2, HNO3, and sulfate
is studied using a global chemical transport model (CTM), the Oslo
CTM2. In particular, the large-scale distribution and diurnal variation
of the oxidants and sulfur compounds are studied interactively.
Meteorological data (winds, temperature, precipitation, clouds, etc.)
used as input for the CTM calculations are provided by a weather
prediction model.
Shipping Emissions Factors:
Mode of Transport | kg of CO 2 per Ton-Mile |
---|---|
Air cargo | 0.8063 |
Truck | 0.1693 |
Train | 0.1048 |
Sea freight | 0.0403 |
The road haulage industry is contributing around 20% of the UK's
total carbon emissions a year, with only the energy industry having a
larger impact, at around 39%.
Road haulage is a significant consumer of fossil fuels and associated
carbon emissions – HGV vehicles account for almost 20 percent of total
emissions.
Mitigation of environmental impact
Sustainable transport
Sustainable
transport is transport with either lower environmental impact per
passenger, per distance or higher capacity. Typically sustainable
transport modes are rail, bicycle and walking.
Road-rail parallel layout
Road-Rail Parallel Layout is a design option to reduce the environmental impact of new transportation routes by locating railway tracks alongside a highway. In 1984 the Paris—Lyon
high-speed rail route in France had about 14% parallel layout with the
highway, and in 2002, 70% parallel layout was achieved with the Cologne–Frankfurt high-speed rail line.
When changing how we use the road systems and how they factor
into the amount of pollution they contribute, using existing roads is
key for changing the current layout of our road system. When deciding to
construct mitigation work, steps should be taken to install permanent
and temporary access roads as needed to support drilling/development and
production phases of the project, but minimize the number and length of
such roads. For drilling activities, using old or two-track road access
rather than constructing a higher quality access road. Develop a
traffic management plan for site access roads and for use of main public
roads. Develop and implement measures to control off-highway vehicle
traffic off of newly constructed access roads. Limit traffic to roads
and portions of rights-of-way indicated specifically for the project.
Instruct and require all personnel and contractors to adhere to speed
limits to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow. Encourage project
employees to carpool to work sites. Limit construction vehicle traffic
on public roadways to off-peak commuting times to minimize impacts on
local commuters. Restore roads to equal or better condition than before
project construction after the heavy construction period is complete.
Lastly, controlling dust along unsurfaced roads—especially near
residences and farm fields—may help prevent mixture of plants that can
lead to disputes over patents.
Involvement
Mitigation
does not entirely involve large-scale changes such as road
construction, but everyday people can contribute. Walking, cycling
trips, short or non-commute trips, can be an alternate mode of
transportation when traveling short or even long distances. A
multi-modal trip involving walking, a bus ride, and bicycling may be
counted solely as a transit trip. Economic evaluations of transportation
investments often ignore the true impacts of increased vehicular
traffic—incremental parking, traffic accidents, and consumer costs—and
the real benefits of alternative modes of transport. Most travel models
do not account for the negative impacts of additional vehicular traffic
that result from roadway capacity expansion and overestimate the
economic benefits of urban highway projects. Transportation planning
indicators, such as average traffic speeds, congestion delays, and
roadway level of service, measure mobility rather than accessibility.
Impact of e-commerce
Large retail corporations in the most recent years have focused their
attention to eCommerce spending. As a result, many industries compete
to get products and services in the hands of their consumers. In order
to beat out competition, many of these corporations created incentives
to make customers buy from their online store instead of another. The
most popular incentive among customers turned out to be either free,
fast, or 2- day shipping. While these shipping options get products and
services to the hands of buyers at unbelievably fast rates than ever
before, there a negative externalities to public roads and to climate change.
E-Commerce
businesses are incentivized to implement free, fast, or 2- day shipping
because these programs almost always come with a membership program
that consumers need to buy into in order to receive the benefit of no
shipping charge. These membership programs are great at obtaining
customer loyalty, as these customers tend to stay with the businesses,
especially with one stop shop stores like Walmart, Target, Costco, or
Amazon. If these E-Commerce stores do not provide enough delivery
options, they lose in sales. A survey in 2016 by UPS
shows that 46% of online shoppers abandoned a shopping cart due to a
shipping time that was too long and that 1 and 3 online shoppers look at
the speed of delivery from the marketplaces they buy from.
Consumers are demanding the fast delivery of goods and services.
AlixPartners LLP found that consumers expect to wait an average of 4.8
days for delivery, down from 5.5 days in 2012. And the share of those
who are willing to wait more than five days has declined to 60% from 74%
in four years.
E-commerce shopping can be seen as the best way to reduce one's
carbon footprint. Yet, this is only true to some extent. Shopping online
is less energy intensive than driving to a physical store location and
then driving back home. This is because shipping can take advantage of economies of scale.
However, these benefits are diminished when e-commerce stores package
items separately or when customers buy items separately and do not take
the time to one stop shop.
For large stores with a large online presence, they can have millions
of customers opting for these shipping benefits. As a result, they are
unintentionally increasing carbon emissions from not consolidating their
purchases. Josué Velázquez-Martínez, a sustainable logistics professor
at MIT notes that "if you are willing to wait a week for shipping, you
just kill 20 trees instead of 100 trees." The only time shipping works in being less energy intensive is when
customer do not choose rush delivery, which includes 2-day shipping. M.
Sanjayan, the CEO of Conservation International, explains that getting
your online purchase delivered at home in just two days puts more polluting vehicles on the road.
In addition to standard shipping, consumers must be satisfied with
their purchases so that they do not constantly returns items. By
returning shipments on standard shipping, the positive contribution to
environment is being taken back. In research done by Vox, they found in
2016 transportation overtook power plants as the top prouder of carbon
dioxide emissions in the US for the first time since 1979. This environmental impact came from nearly a quarter of transportation trucks that either carry medium and heavy duty loads of merchandise; these trucks are often the ones doing e-commerce shipping.
Since 2009, UPS deliveries have increased by 65%.
With the increase in deliveries, there is a demand for trucks on the
road, resulting in more carbon emissions in our atmosphere. More
recently, there has been research to help combat greenhouse gas emission
to the atmosphere with better traffic signals. These WiFi signals cut
down on wait time at stop lights and reduce wasting fuel. These signals
help automobiles adjust their velocity so that they can increase their
chances of getting through the light, smoothing travel patterns and
obtaining fuel-economy
benefits. These small adjustments result in big changes in fuel
savings. The cities that have started implementing smart light
technology such as San Jose, CA and Las Vegas, NV. Light technology has
shown to save 15-20% in fuel savings. According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency,
transportation is the second leading source of GHG emission behind
electricity and project that by 2050 freight transportation emissions
will pass passenger vehicle emissions. Another technological advancements is truck platooning,
trucks are able to send signals to neighboring trucks about their
speed. This communication between vehicles reduces congestion on the
roads and reduce drag, increasing fuel savings by 10 to 20%.
With these tech implementations in major cities and towns, there
is the ability to reach an optimal level of pollution given the rise of
e-commerce shipments. The figure above illustrates that decreasing
emissions would result in the equilibrium for the market of shipping
population, which can be done by consolidating packages, light
technology, or truck platooning.