Noise health effects are the physical and psychological health consequences of regular exposure to consistent elevated sound levels. Elevated workplace or environmental noise can cause hearing impairment, tinnitus, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, annoyance, and sleep disturbance. Changes in the immune system and birth defects have been also attributed to noise exposure.
Although age-related health effects (presbycusis) occur naturally with age,
in many countries the cumulative impact of noise is sufficient to
impair the hearing of a large fraction of the population over the course
of a lifetime. Noise exposure has been known to induce noise-induced hearing loss, tinnitus, hypertension, vasoconstriction, and other cardiovascular adverse effects.
Chronic noise exposure has been associated with sleep disturbances and
increased incidence of diabetes. Adverse cardiovascular effects occur
from chronic exposure to noise due to the sympathetic nervous system's
inability to habituate. The sympathetic nervous system maintains lighter
stages of sleep when the body is exposed to noise, which does not allow
blood pressure to follow the normal rise and fall cycle of an
undisturbed circadian rhythm.
Stress from time spent around elevated noise levels has been linked with increased workplace accident rates and aggression and other anti-social behaviors. The most significant sources are vehicles, aircraft, prolonged exposure to loud music, and industrial noise.
There are approximately 10,000 deaths per year as a result of noise in the European Union.
Noise induced hearing loss
Noise-induced
hearing loss is a permanent shift in pure-tone thresholds, resulting in
sensorineural hearing loss. The severity of a threshold shift is
dependent on duration and severity of noise exposure. Noise-induced
threshold shifts are seen as a notch on an audiogram from 3000–6000 Hz,
but most often at 4000 Hz.
Exposure to loud noises, either in a single traumatic experience
or over time, can damage the auditory system and result in hearing loss
and sometimes tinnitus
as well. Traumatic noise exposure can happen at work (e.g. loud
machinery), at play (e.g. loud sporting events, concerts, recreational
activities), and/or by accident (e.g. a backfiring engine.) Noise
induced hearing loss is sometimes unilateral and typically causes patients to lose hearing around the frequency of the triggering sound trauma.
Tinnitus
Tinnitus
is an auditory disorder characterized by the perception of a sound
(ringing, chirping, buzzing, etc.) in the ear in the absence of an
external sound source. There are two types of tinnitus: subjective and
objective. Subjective is the most common and can only be heard "in the
head" by the person affected. Objective tinnitus can be heard from those
around the affected person and the audiologist can hear it using a
stethoscope.Tinnitus can also be categorised by the way it sounds in
one's ear, pulsatile tinnitus which is caused by the vascular nature of Glomus tumours and
non-pulsatile tinnitus which usually sounds like crickets, the sea and
bees.
Though the pathophysiology of tinnitus isn't known, noise
exposure can be a contributing factor, therefore tinnitus can be
associated with hearing loss, generated by the cochlea and central
nervous system (CNS). High frequency hearing loss causes a high pitched
tinnitus and low frequency hearing loss causes a roaring tinnitus. Noise-induced tinnitus can be temporary or permanent depending on the type and amount of noise a person was exposed to.
Cardiovascular effects
Noise has been associated with important cardiovascular health problems, particularly hypertension. Noise levels of 50 dB(A) or greater at night may increase the risk of myocardial infarction by chronically elevating cortisol production.
Noise from transportation has been shown to increase blood
pressure in individuals within the surrounding residential areas, with
railways causing the greatest cardiovascular effects. Roadway noise levels are sufficient to constrict arterial blood flow and lead to elevated blood pressure. Vasoconstriction can result from elevated adrenaline levels or through medical stress
reactions. Long-term exposure to noise is correlated to increase in
cortisol and angiotensin-II levels which are respectively associated
with oxidative stress and vascular inflammation. Individuals subject to great than 80 dB(A) in the workplace are at increased risk of having increased blood pressure.
Psychological impacts of noise
Causal
relationships have been discovered between noise and psychological
effects such as annoyance, psychiatric disorders, and effects on
psychosocial well-being. Exposure to intense levels of noise can cause personality changes and violent reactions. Noise has also been shown to be a factor that attributed to violent reactions.
The psychological impacts of noise also include an addiction to loud
music. This was researched in a study where non-professional musicians
were found to have loudness addictions more often than non-musician
control subjects.
Psychological health effects from noise include depression and
anxiety. Individuals who have hearing loss, including noise induced
hearing loss, may have their symptoms alleviated with the use of hearing
aids. Individuals who do not seek treatment for their loss are 50% more
likely to have depression than their aided peers.
These psychological effects can lead to detriments in physical care in
the form of reduced self-care, work-tolerance, and increased isolation.
Auditory stimuli can serve as psychological triggers for individuals with post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Stress
Research commissioned by Rockwool, a multi-national insulation manufacturer headquartered in Denmark,
reveals that in the UK one third (33%) of victims of domestic
disturbances claim loud parties have left them unable to sleep or made
them stressed in the last two years. Around one in eleven (9%)
of those affected by domestic disturbances claims it has left them
continually disturbed and stressed. More than 1.8 million people claim
noisy neighbours have made their life a misery and they cannot enjoy
their own homes. The impact of noise on health is potentially a
significant problem across the UK given that more than 17.5 million
Britons (38%) have been disturbed by the inhabitants of neighbouring
properties in the last two year. For almost one in ten (7%) Britons
this is a regular occurrence.
The extent of the problem of noise pollution for public health is
reinforced by figures collated by Rockwool from local authority
responses to a Freedom of Information Act (FOI) request. This research reveals in the period April 2008 - 2009 UK councils
received 315,838 complaints about noise pollution from private
residences. This resulted in environmental health officers across the UK
serving 8,069 noise abatement notices, or citations under the terms of the Anti-Social Behaviour (Scotland) Act.
Westminster City Council
has received more complaints per head of population than any other
district in the UK with 9,814 grievances about noise, which equates to
42.32 complaints per thousand residents. Eight of the top 10 councils
ranked by complaints per 1,000 residents are located in London.
Annoyance
Sudden impulse noises are typically perceived as more bothersome than noise from traffic of equal volume.
Annoyance effects of noise are minimally affected by demographics, but
fear of the noise source and sensitivity to noise both strongly affect
the 'annoyance' of a noise. Sound levels as low as 40 dB(A) can generate noise complaints and the lower threshold for noise producing sleep disturbance is 45 dB(A) or lower.
Other factors that affect the 'annoyance level' of sound include
beliefs about noise prevention and the importance of the noise source,
and annoyance at the cause (i.e. non-noise related factors) of the
noise.
Many of the interpretations of the level of annoyance and the
relationship between noise levels and resulting health symptoms could be
influenced by the quality of interpersonal relationships at the
workplace, as well as the stress level generated by the work itself. Evidence for impact on annoyance of long-term noise versus recent changes is equivocal.
Approximately 35% to 40% of office workers find noise levels from 55 to 60 dB(A) extremely irritating. The noise standard in Germany for mentally stressful tasks is set at 55 dB(A), however, if the noise source is continuous, the threshold level for tolerability among office workers is lower than 55 dB(A).
Child physical development
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency authored a pamphlet in 1978 that suggested a correlation between low-birthweight (using the World Health Organization definition of less than 2,500 grams (88 oz) and high sound levels, and also high rates of birth defects in places where expectant mothers are exposed to elevated sound levels, such as typical airport environs. Specific birth abnormalities included harelip, cleft palate, and defects in the spine.
According to Lester W. Sontag of The Fels Research Institute (as
presented in the same EPA study): “There is ample evidence that
environment has a role in shaping the physique, behavior, and function
of animals, including man, from conception and not merely from birth. The fetus
is capable of perceiving sounds and responding to them by motor
activity and cardiac rate change." The effects of noise exposure are
highest when it occurs between 15 and 60 days after conception, a period
in which major internal organs and the central nervous system are formed.
Later developmental effects occur as vasoconstriction in the mother reduces blood flow and therefore oxygen and nutrition to the fetus. Low birth weights and noise were also associated with lower levels of certain hormones in the mother. These hormones are thought to affect fetal growth and to be good indicators of protein
production. The difference between the hormone levels of pregnant
mothers in noisy versus quiet areas increased as birth approached.
In a 2000 publication, a review of studies on birthweight and
noise exposure note that while some older studies suggest that when
women are exposed to >65 dB aircraft noise a small decrease in
birthweight occurs, in a more recent study of 200 Taiwanese women
including noise dosimetry measurements of individual noise exposure, the
authors found no significant association between noise exposure and
birth weight after adjusting for relevant confounders, e.g. social
class, maternal weight gain during pregnancy, etc.
Cognitive development
When
young children are regularly exposed to levels of noise that interfere
with speech, they may develop speech or reading difficulties, because
auditory processing functions are compromised. Children continue to
develop their speech perception abilities until they reach their teens.
Evidence has shown that when children learn in noisier classrooms, they
have more difficulties understanding speech than those who learn in
quieter settings.
In a study conducted by Cornell University in 1993, children
exposed to noise in learning environments experienced trouble with word
discrimination, as well as various cognitive developmental delays. In particular, the writing learning impairment dysgraphia is commonly associated with environmental stressors in the classroom.
High noise levels have also been known to damage the physical
health of small children. Children from noisy residences often have a
heart rate that is significantly higher (by 2 beats/min on average) than
those of children from quieter homes.
Prevention
A hearing protection device (HPD) is an ear protection device worn in or over the ears while exposed to hazardous noise to help prevent noise-induced hearing loss.
HPDs reduce (not eliminate) the level of the noise entering the ear.
HPDs can also protect against other effects of noise exposure such as tinnitus and hyperacusis. Proper hygiene and care of HPDs may reduce chances of outer ear infections. There are many different types of HPDs available for use, including earmuffs, earplugs, electronic hearing protection devices, and semi-insert devices. One can measure the personal attenuation rating through a hearing protection fit-testing system.
Earmuff style hearing protection devices are designed to fit over the outer ear, or pinna. Earmuff HPDs typically consist of two ear cups and a head band. Earplug style hearing protection devices are designed to fit in the ear canal. Earplugs come in a variety of different subtypes. Some HPDs reduce the sound reaching the eardrum
through a combination of electronic and structural components.
Electronic HPDs are available in both earmuff and custom earplug styles.
Electronic microphones, circuitry, and receivers perform active noise reduction, also known as noise-cancelling, in which a signal that is 180-degrees out-of-phase of the noise is presented, which in theory cancels the noise. Canal caps are similar to earplugs in that they consists of soft tip that is inserted into the opening of the ear canal.
Regulations
Environmental noise regulations usually specify a maximum outdoor noise level of 60 to 65 dB(A),
while occupational safety organizations recommend that the maximum
exposure to noise is 40 hours per week at 85 to 90 dB(A). For every
additional 3 dB(A), the maximum exposure time is reduced by a factor 2,
e.g. 20 hours per week at 88 dB(A). Sometimes, a factor of two per
additional 5 dB(A) is used, however, these occupational regulations are
acknowledged by the health literature as inadequate to protect against hearing loss
and other health effects. In an effort to prevent noise-induced hearing
loss, many programs and initiative have been created, like the Buy Quiet program, which encourages employers to purchase quieter tools and equipment, and the Safe-In-Sound Award, which recognizes organizations with successful hearing loss prevention strategies.
With regard to indoor noise pollution in residences, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has not set any restrictions on limits to the level of noise.
Rather, it has provided a list of recommended levels in its Model Community Noise Control Ordinance, which was published in 1975. For instance, the recommended noise level for indoor residences is less than or equal to 45 dB.
Noise pollution
control in residences is not funded by the federal government in part
because of the disagreements in establishing causal links between sounds
and health risks, since the effect of noise is often psychological and
also, because it leaves no singular tangible trace of damage on the
human body. For instance, hearing loss could be attributed to a variety
of factors including age, rather than solely due to excessive exposure
to noise.
A state or local government is able to regulate indoor residential
noise, however, such as when excessive noise from within a home causes
disturbances to nearby residences.
Effects on dogs
While
people are often educated on the effects of noise exposure in humans,
there are also different noise exposure effects in animals as well. An
example of this would be in dogs, and the noise exposure levels
occurring within kennels. Dogs experience this noise exposure whether
it be a long stay at an animal shelter, or a weekend stay at a boarding
facility.
Organizations like NIOSH and OSHA
have different regulations when it comes to the noise exposure levels
in industrial workers. Currently there are no regulations related to
the noise exposure for dogs even with such damaging effects related to
their health. Health risks dogs are exposed to include ear damage and
behavioral changes.
The average noise exposure in a kennel is greater than 100 dB
SPL. According to OSHA these levels would yield in the use of hearing
protection for the workers of those kennels due to the risk of noise
induced hearing loss. The anatomical structures of the human and dog
ears are very similar, so it is thought that these levels will
negatively impact the hearing of canines in kennels. The ABR
can be used to estimate the hearing threshold of dogd, and can be used
to show either a temporary threshold shift or permanent threshold shift
after being exposed to excessive sound levels.
Behavioral effects to excessive noise exposure include hiding,
urinating, defecating, panting, pacing, drooling, disregard to commands,
trembling, and barking.
These behavioral patterns pose a much greater problem to canines than
meets the eye. All of these behavioral patterns are characteristics
that result in a longer stay at the kennels before being adopted.
A longer stay at the shelter results in a longer duration of noise
exposure and therefore more likely to show either a temporary or
permanent threshold shift in the canine's hearing.
These excessive noise levels are not only harming the dogs
physical and psychological state, but the workers' and potential
adoptive families' physical and psychological state as well. The
workers' psychological state could affect the care provided to the dogs.
These loud noise exposures also have the potential to reduce the
amount of time that potential adoptive families spend in the facility.
This can result in less dogs being adopted and more time being exposed
to excessive sound levels.
To reduce the level of noise exposure poses a little more
difficulty because the majority of the noise is coming from the dogs
(barking), but structural changes can be made to the facilities in order
to reduce the noise. Structural changes could include how many dogs
are put in one area, more absorbing material rather than metal cages and
cement walls and floors, and possibly in the future use of hearing
protection devices (HPD) for the dogs. All of these structural changes would also benefit the humans involved as well as the use of HPD's (ear plugs).