"Ratlines" were a system of escape routes for Nazis and other fascists fleeing Europe in the aftermath of World War II. These escape routes mainly led toward havens in Latin America, particularly Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, Colombia, Brazil, Uruguay, Mexico, Guatemala, Ecuador, and Bolivia, as well as the United States and Switzerland.
There were two primary routes: the first went from Germany to Spain, then Argentina; the second from Germany to Rome to Genoa, then South America. The two routes developed independently but eventually came together. The ratlines were supported by clergy of the Catholic Church, and historian Michael Phayer claims this was supported by the Vatican.
While unanimously considered by reputable scholars to have committed suicide in Berlin near the end of the war, various conspiracy theories claim that Nazi leader Adolf Hitler survived the war and fled to Argentina.
There were two primary routes: the first went from Germany to Spain, then Argentina; the second from Germany to Rome to Genoa, then South America. The two routes developed independently but eventually came together. The ratlines were supported by clergy of the Catholic Church, and historian Michael Phayer claims this was supported by the Vatican.
While unanimously considered by reputable scholars to have committed suicide in Berlin near the end of the war, various conspiracy theories claim that Nazi leader Adolf Hitler survived the war and fled to Argentina.
Early Spanish ratlines
The origins of the first ratlines are connected to various developments in Vatican-Argentine relations before and during World War II. As early as 1942, Monsignor Luigi Maglione
contacted Ambassador Llobet, inquiring as to the "willingness of the
government of the Argentine Republic to apply its immigration law
generously, in order to encourage at the opportune moment European Catholic immigrants to seek the necessary land and capital in our country". Afterwards, a German priest, Anton Weber, the head of the Rome-based Society of Saint Raphael, traveled to Portugal,
continuing to Argentina, to lay the groundwork for future Catholic
immigration; this was to be a route which fascist exiles would exploit.
According to historian Michael Phayer, "this was the innocent origin of what would become the Vatican ratline".
Spain, not Rome, was the "first center of ratline activity that
facilitated the escape of Nazi fascists," although the exodus itself was
planned within the Vatican. Among the primary organizers were Charles Lescat, a French member of Action Française – an organization suppressed by Pope Pius XI and rehabilitated by Pope Pius XII – and Pierre Daye, a Belgian with contacts in the Spanish government. Lescat and Daye were the first to flee Europe with the help of Argentine cardinal Antonio Caggiano.
By 1946, there were hundreds of war criminals in Spain, and thousands of former Nazis and fascists. According to then-United States Secretary of State James F. Byrnes, Vatican cooperation in turning over these "asylum-seekers" was "negligible".
According to Phayer, Pius XII "preferred to see fascist war criminals
on board ships sailing to the New World rather than seeing them rotting
in POW camps in zonal Germany". Unlike the Vatican emigration operation in Italy that centered on Vatican City,
the ratlines of Spain, although "fostered by the Vatican," were
relatively independent of the hierarchy of the Vatican Emigration
Bureau.
Roman ratlines
Early efforts: Bishop Hudal
Bishop Alois Hudal, a Nazi sympathiser, was rector of the Pontificio Istituto Teutonico Santa Maria dell'Anima in Rome, a seminary for Austrian and German priests, and "Spiritual Director of the German People resident in Italy". After the end of the war in Italy, Hudal became active in ministering to German-speaking prisoners of war and internees then held in camps throughout Italy. In December 1944, the Vatican Secretariat of State
received permission to appoint a representative to "visit the
German-speaking civil internees in Italy", a job assigned to Hudal.
Hudal used this position to aid the escape of wanted Nazi war criminals, including Franz Stangl, commanding officer of Treblinka, Gustav Wagner, commanding officer of Sobibor, Alois Brunner, responsible for the Drancy internment camp near Paris and in charge of deportations in Slovakia to German concentration camps, and Adolf Eichmann—a
fact about which he was later unashamedly open. Some of these wanted
men were being held in internment camps: generally without identity
papers, they would be enrolled in camp registers under false names.
Other Nazis hid in Italy and sought Hudal out as his role in assisting
escapes became known on the Nazi grapevine.
In his memoirs, Hudal said of his actions, "I thank God that He
[allowed me] to visit and comfort many victims in their prisons and
concentration camps and to help them escape with false identity papers." He explained that in his eyes:
The Allies' War against Germany was not a crusade, but the rivalry of economic complexes for whose victory they had been fighting. This so-called business ... used catchwords like democracy, race, religious liberty and Christianity as a bait for the masses. All these experiences were the reason why I felt duty bound after 1945 to devote my whole charitable work mainly to former National Socialists and Fascists, especially to so-called 'war criminals'.
According to Mark Aarons and John Loftus in their book Unholy Trinity, Hudal was the first Catholic priest to dedicate himself to establishing escape routes.
Aarons and Loftus claim that Hudal provided the objects of his charity
with money to help them escape and, more importantly, provided them with
false papers, including identity documents issued by the Vatican
Refugee Organisation (Pontificia Commissione di Assistenza).
These Vatican papers were not full passports and thus were not enough
to gain passage overseas. They were, rather, the first stop in a paper
trail—they could be used to obtain a displaced person passport from the International Committee of the Red Cross
(ICRC), which in turn could be used to apply for visas. In theory, the
ICRC would perform background checks on passport applicants, but in
practice the word of a priest or particularly a bishop would be good
enough. According to statements collected by Austrian writer Gitta Sereny from a senior official of the Rome branch of the ICRC,
Hudal could also use his position as a bishop to request papers from
the ICRC "made out according to his specifications". Sereny's sources
also revealed an active illicit trade in stolen and forged ICRC papers
in Rome at the time.
According to declassified U.S. intelligence reports, Hudal was
not the only priest helping Nazi escapees at this time. In the "La Vista
Report" declassified in 1984, Counter Intelligence Corps
(CIC) operative Vincent La Vista told how he had easily arranged for
two bogus Hungarian refugees to get false ICRC documents with the help
of a letter from a Father Joseph Gallov. Gallov, who ran a
Vatican-sponsored charity for Hungarian refugees, asked no questions and
wrote a letter to his "personal contact in the International Red Cross,
who then issued the passports".
San Girolamo ratline
According
to Aarons and Loftus, Hudal's private operation was small scale
compared to what came later. The major Roman ratline was operated by a
small, but influential network of Croatian priests, members of the Franciscan order, led by Father Krunoslav Draganović, who organized a highly sophisticated chain with headquarters at the San Girolamo degli Illirici Seminary College in Rome, but with links from Austria to the final embarcation point at the port of Genoa. The ratline initially focused on aiding members of the Croatian Ustaše including its leader (or Poglavnik), Ante Pavelić.
Priests active in the chain included: Fr. Vilim Cecelja, former Deputy Military Vicar to the Ustaše, based in Austria where many Ustashe and Nazi refugees remained in hiding; Fr. Dragutin Kamber, based at San Girolamo; Fr. Dominik Mandić, an official Vatican
representative at San Girolamo and also "General Economist" or
treasurer of the Franciscan order - who used this position to put the
Franciscan press at the ratline's disposal; and Monsignor Karlo Petranović, based in Genoa.
Vilim would make contact with those hiding in Austria and help them
across the border to Italy; Kamber, Mandić and Draganović would find
them lodgings, often in the monastery itself, while they arranged
documentation; finally Draganović would phone Petranović in Genoa with the number of required berths on ships leaving for South America.
The operation of the Draganović ratline was an open secret among the intelligence and diplomatic communities in Rome. As early as August 1945, Allied commanders in Rome were asking questions about the use of San Girolamo as a "haven" for Ustaše.
A year later, a US State Department report of 12 July 1946 lists nine war criminals, including Albanians and Montenegrins
as well as Croats, plus others "not actually sheltered in the COLLEGIUM
ILLIRICUM [i.e., San Girolamo degli Illirici] but who otherwise enjoy
Church support and protection." The British envoy to the Holy See, Sir D'Arcy Osborne, asked Domenico Tardini,
a high-ranking Vatican official, for permission that would have allowed
British military police to raid ex-territorial Vatican Institutions in
Rome. Tardini declined and denied the church was sheltering war
criminals.
In February 1947, CIC Special Agent Robert Clayton Mudd reported ten members of Pavelić's Ustaša
cabinet living either in San Girolamo or in the Vatican itself. Mudd
had infiltrated an agent into the monastery and confirmed that it was
"honeycombed with cells of Ustashe operatives" guarded by "armed
youths". Mudd reported:
It was further established that these Croats travel back and forth from the Vatican several times a week in a car with a chauffeur whose license plate bears the two initials CD, "Corpo Diplomatico". It issues forth from the Vatican and discharges its passengers inside the Monastery of San Geronimo. Subject to diplomatic immunity it is impossible to stop the car and discover who are its passengers.
Mudd's conclusion was the following:
DRAGANOVIC's sponsorship of these Croat Ustashes definitely links him up with the plan of the Vatican to shield these ex-Ustasha nationalists until such time as they are able to procure for them the proper documents to enable them to go to South America. The Vatican, undoubtedly banking on the strong anti-Communist feelings of these men, is endeavoring to infiltrate them into South America in any way possible to counteract the spread of Red doctrine. It has been reliably reported, for example that Dr. VRANCIC has already gone to South America and that Ante PAVELIC and General KREN are scheduled for an early departure to South America through Spain. All these operations are said to have been negotiated by DRAGANOVIC because of his influence in the Vatican.
The existence of Draganović's ratline has been supported by a highly respected historian of Vatican diplomacy, Fr. Robert Graham:
"I've no doubt that Draganović was extremely active in syphoning off
his Croatian Ustashe friends." Graham pointed out that Draganović, in
running his 'ratline,' was not acting on behalf of the Vatican: "Just
because he's a priest doesn't mean he represents the Vatican. It was his
own operation."
At the same time, there were four occasions in which the Vatican did
intervene on behalf of interned Ustasha prisoners. The Secretariat of
State asked the UK and US governments to release Croatian POWs from British internment camps in Italy.
U.S. intelligence involvement
If
at first U.S. intelligence officers had been mere observers of the
Draganović ratline, this changed in the summer of 1947. A now
declassified U.S. Army intelligence report from 1950 sets out in detail
the history of the people smuggling operation in the three years to
follow.
According to the report, from this point on U.S. forces
themselves had begun to use Draganović's established network to evacuate
its own "visitors". As the report put it, these were "visitors who had
been in the custody of the 430th CIC and completely processed in
accordance with current directives and requirements, and whose continued
residence in Austria constituted a security threat as well as a source
of possible embarrassment to the Commanding General of USFA, since the
Soviet Command had become aware that their presence in U.S. Zone of Austria and in some instances had requested the return of these persons to Soviet custody".
These were suspected war criminals from areas occupied by the Red Army
which the U.S. was obliged to hand over for trial to the Soviets. The
U.S. reputedly was reluctant to do so, partly due to a belief that fair
trials could hardly be expected in the USSR, and at the same time, their desire to make use of Nazi scientists and other resources.
The deal with Draganović involved getting the visitors to Rome: "Dragonovich [sic]
handled all phases of the operation after the defectees arrived in
Rome, such as the procurement of IRO Italian and South American
documents, visas, stamps, arrangements for disposition, land or sea, and
notification of resettlement committees in foreign lands".
United States intelligence used these methods in order to get
important Nazi scientists and military strategists, to the extent they
had not already been claimed by the Soviet Union, to their own centres
of military science in the US. Many Nazi scientists were employed by the
U.S., retrieved in Operation Paperclip.
Argentine connection
In Nuremberg at that time something was taking place that I personally considered a disgrace and an unfortunate lesson for the future of humanity. I became certain that the Argentine people also considered the Nuremberg process a disgrace, unworthy of the victors, who behaved as if they hadn't been victorious. Now we realize that they [the Allies] deserved to lose the war.
—Argentine president Juan Perón on the Nuremberg Trials of Nazi war criminals
In his 2002 book, The Real Odessa, Argentine researcher Uki Goñi
used new access to the country's archives to show that Argentine
diplomats and intelligence officers had, on Perón's instructions,
vigorously encouraged Nazi and fascist war criminals to make their home
in Argentina. According to Goñi, the Argentines not only collaborated
with Draganović's ratline, they set up further ratlines of their own
running through Scandinavia, Switzerland and Belgium.
According to Goñi, Argentina's first move into Nazi smuggling was in January 1946, when Argentine bishop Antonio Caggiano, leader of the Argentine chapter of Catholic Action
flew with another bishop, Agustín Barrére, to Rome where Caggiano was
due to be anointed Cardinal. In Rome the Argentine bishops met with
French Cardinal Eugène Tisserant,
where they passed on a message (recorded in Argentina's diplomatic
archives) that "the Government of the Argentine Republic was willing to
receive French persons, whose political attitude during the recent war would expose them, should they return to France, to harsh measures and private revenge".
Over the spring of 1946, a number of French war criminals, fascists and Vichy officials made it from Italy to Argentina in the same way: they were issued passports by the Rome ICRC
office; these were then stamped with Argentine tourist visas (the need
for health certificates and return tickets was waived on Caggiano's
recommendation). The first documented case of a French war criminal
arriving in Buenos Aires was Émile Dewoitine,
who was later sentenced in absentia to 20 years hard labour. He sailed
first class on the same ship back with Cardinal Caggiano.
Shortly after this Argentinian Nazi smuggling became
institutionalised, according to Goñi, when Perón's new government of
February 1946 appointed anthropologist Santiago Peralta as Immigration Commissioner and former Ribbentrop
agent Ludwig Freude as his intelligence chief. Goñi argues that these
two then set up a "rescue team" of secret service agents and immigration
"advisors", many of whom were themselves European war-criminals, with
Argentine citizenship and employment.
In 2014, over 700 FBI documents were declassified revealing that
the US government had undertaken an investigation in the late 1940s and
1950s as to the reports of the possible escape of Adolf Hitler from Germany. Some leads purported that he had not committed suicide in Berlin but had fled Germany in 1945, and eventually arrived in Argentina via Spain.
Within the pages of these documents are statements, naming people and
places involved in Hitler's alleged journey from Germany to South
America including mention of the ratlines that were already in
existence. Additional CIA documents contain reported sightings and a photograph of a man alleged to be Hitler in 1954. The claim related to the photograph made by a self-proclaimed former German SS
trooper named Phillip Citroen that Hitler was still alive, and that he
"left Colombia for Argentina around January 1955." Enclosed with the CIA
report was the alleged photograph of Citroen and a person he claimed to
be Hitler. The CIA report states that neither the contact who reported
his conversations with Citroen, nor the CIA station was "in a position
to give an intelligent evaluation of the information".
The station chief's superiors told him that "enormous efforts could be
expended on this matter with remote possibilities of establishing
anything concrete", and the investigation was dropped.
ODESSA and the Gehlen Organization
The Italian and Argentine ratlines have only been confirmed
relatively recently, mainly due to research in newly declassified
archives. Until the work of Aarons and Loftus, and of Uki Goñi
(2002), a common view was that ex-Nazis themselves, organised in secret
networks, ran the escape routes alone. The most famous such network is
ODESSA (Organisation of former SS members), founded in 1946 according to
Simon Wiesenthal, which included SS-Obersturmbannführer Otto Skorzeny and Sturmbannführer Alfred Naujocks and, in Argentina, Rodolfo Freude. Alois Brunner, former commandant of Drancy internment camp near Paris, escaped to Rome, then Syria, by ODESSA. Brunner was thought to be the highest-ranking Nazi war criminal still alive as of 2007.
Persons claiming to represent ODESSA claimed responsibility for the unsuccessful July 9, 1979, car bombing in France aimed at Nazi hunters Serge and Beate Klarsfeld. According to Paul Manning,
"eventually, over 10,000 former German military made it to South
America along escape routes ODESSA and Deutsche Hilfsverein..."
Simon Wiesenthal, who advised Frederick Forsyth on the early 1970s novel/film script The Odessa File which brought the name to public attention, also names other Nazi escape organisations such as Spinne ("Spider") and Sechsgestirn
("Constellation of Six"). Wiesenthal describes these immediately after
the war as Nazi cells based in areas of Austria where many Nazis had
retreated and gone to ground.
Wiesenthal claimed that the ODESSA network shepherded escapees to the
Catholic ratlines in Rome (although he mentions only Hudal, not
Draganović); or through a second route through France and into Francoist Spain.
ODESSA was supported by the Gehlen Organization, which employed many former Nazi party members, and was headed by Reinhard Gehlen, a former German Army intelligence officer employed post-war by the CIA. The Gehlen Organization became the nucleus of the BND German intelligence agency, directed by Reinhard Gehlen from its 1956 creation until 1968.
Ratline escapees
Some of the Nazis and war criminals who escaped using ratlines include:
- Andrija Artuković, escaped to the United States; arrested in 1984 after decades of delay and extradited to Yugoslavia, where he died in 1988 from natural causes
- Klaus Barbie, fled to Bolivia in 1951 with help from the United States, as he had been an agent of the U.S. Army Counterintelligence Corps since April 1947; captured in 1983; died in prison in France on September 23, 1991
- Alois Brunner, fled to Syria in 1954; died around 2010
- Herberts Cukurs, fled to Brazil in 1945, assassinated by Mossad in Uruguay in 1965.
- Adolf Eichmann, fled to Argentina in 1950; captured 1960; executed in Israel on 1 June 1962
- Aribert Heim, disappeared in 1962; most likely died in Egypt in 1992
- Sándor Képíró, fled to Argentina, returned to Hungary in 1996. He stood trial for war crimes in Budapest in February 2011, before his death in September.
- Josef Mengele, fled to Argentina in 1949, then to other countries; died in Brazil in 1979
- Ante Pavelić, escaped to Argentina in 1948; died in Spain, in December 1959, of wounds sustained two years earlier in an assassination attempt
- Erich Priebke, fled to Argentina in 1949; arrested 1994; died in 2013
- Walter Rauff, escaped to Chile; never captured; died in 1984
- Eduard Roschmann, escaped to Argentina in 1948; fled to Paraguay to avoid extradition and died there in 1977
- Hans-Ulrich Rudel, fled to Argentina in 1948; started the "Kameradenwerk", a relief organization for Nazi criminals that helped fugitives escape
- Dinko Sakic, fled to Argentina in 1947, arrested in 1998 and extradited to Croatia. He was tried and found guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity, serving a 20 year sentence. He died in 2008.
- Franz Stangl, fled to Brazil in 1951; arrested in 1967 and extradited to West Germany; died in 1971 of heart failure
- Gustav Wagner, fled to Brazil in 1950; arrested 1978; committed suicide 1980