Search This Blog

Friday, February 20, 2015

Autonomous car



From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Junior, a robotic Volkswagen Passat, at Stanford University in October 2009.

General Motors' Firebird II was described as having an "electronic brain" that allowed it to move into a lane with a metal conductor and follow it along.

An autonomous car,[1] also known as a driverless car,[2] self-driving car[3] and robotic car,[4] is an automated or autonomous vehicle capable of fulfilling the main transportation capabilities of a traditional car. As an autonomous vehicle, it is capable of sensing its environment and navigating without human input. Robotic cars exist mainly as prototypes and demonstration systems. As of 2014, the only self-driving vehicles that are commercially available are open-air shuttles for pedestrian zones that operate at 12.5 miles per hour (20.1 km/h).[5]

Autonomous vehicles sense their surroundings with such techniques as radar, lidar, GPS, and computer vision. Advanced control systems interpret sensory information to identify appropriate navigation paths, as well as obstacles and relevant signage.[6][7] By definition, autonomous vehicles are capable of updating their maps based on sensory input, allowing the vehicles to keep track of their position even when conditions change or when they enter uncharted environments.[citation needed]

Some demonstrative systems, precursory to autonomous cars, date back to the 1920s and 30s. The first self-sufficient and truly autonomous cars appeared in the 1980s, with Carnegie Mellon University's Navlab and ALV projects in 1984 and Mercedes-Benz and Bundeswehr University Munich's EUREKA Prometheus Project in 1987. Since then, numerous major companies and research organizations have developed working prototype autonomous vehicles.

Definition

Autonomous means having the power for self-government.[8] Many historical projects related to vehicle autonomy have in fact only been automated (made to be automatic) due to a heavy reliance on artificial hints in their environment, such as magnetic strips. Autonomous control implies good performance under significant uncertainties in the environment for extended periods of time and the ability to compensate for system failures without external intervention.[8] As can be seen from many projects mentioned, it is often suggested to extend the capabilities of an autonomous car by implementing communication networks both in the immediate vicinity (for collision avoidance) and far away (for congestion management). By bringing in these outside influences in the decision process, some would no longer regard the car's behaviour or capabilities as autonomous; for example Wood et al. (2012) writes "This Article generally uses the term "autonomous," instead of the term "automated." We have chosen to use the term "autonomous" because it is the term that is currently in more widespread use (and thus is more familiar to the general public). However, the latter term is arguably more accurate. "Automated" connotes control or operation by a machine, while "autonomous" connotes acting alone or independently. Most of the vehicle concepts (that we are currently aware of) have a person in the driver’s seat, utilize a communication connection to the Cloud or other vehicles, and do not independently select either destinations or routes for reaching them. Thus, the term "automated" would more accurately describe these vehicle concepts".[9]

In the United States, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has established an official classification system:[10]
  • Level 0: The driver completely controls the vehicle at all times.
  • Level 1: Individual vehicle controls are automated, such as electronic stability control or automatic braking.
  • Level 2: At least two controls can be automated in unison, such as adaptive cruise control in combination with lane keeping.
  • Level 3: The driver can fully cede control of all safety-critical functions in certain conditions. The car senses when conditions require the driver to retake control and provides a "sufficiently comfortable transition time" for the driver to do so.
  • Level 4: The vehicle performs all safety-critical functions for the entire trip, with the driver not expected to control the vehicle at any time. As this vehicle would control all functions from start to stop, including all parking functions, it could include unoccupied cars.

History

The RRL's modified 1960 Citroen DS19 to be automatically controlled at the Science Museum, London.

Experiments have been conducted on automating cars since at least the 1920s;[11] promising trials took place in the 1950s and work has proceeded since then. The first self-sufficient and truly autonomous cars appeared in the 1980s, with Carnegie Mellon University's Navlab[12] and ALV[13][14] projects in 1984 and Mercedes-Benz and Bundeswehr University Munich's EUREKA Prometheus Project [15] in 1987. Since then, numerous major companies and research organizations have developed working prototype autonomous vehicles. including Mercedes-Benz, General Motors, Continental Automotive Systems, Autoliv Inc., Bosch, Nissan, Renault, Toyota, Audi, Volvo, Peugeot, AKKA Technologies, Vislab from University of Parma, Oxford University and Google.[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] In July 2013, Vislab demonstrated BRAiVE, a vehicle that moved autonomously on a mixed traffic route open to public traffic.[24] As of 2013, four U.S. states have passed laws permitting autonomous cars: Nevada, Florida, California, and Michigan.[25][26][27][28][29]

In Europe, cities in Belgium, France, Italy and the UK are planning to operate transport systems for driverless cars,[30][31][32] and Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain have allowed testing robotic cars in traffic. In 2015, the UK Government launched public trials of the LUTZ Pathfinder driverless pod in Milton Keynes.[33]

Potential advantages

An increase in the use of autonomous cars would make possible such benefits as:
  • Fewer traffic collisions, due to an autonomous system's increased reliability and faster reaction time compared to human drivers.[34]
  • Increased roadway capacity and reduced traffic congestion due to reduced need for safety gaps[35][36] and the ability to better manage traffic flow.[34]
  • Relief of vehicle occupants from driving and navigation chores.[34]
  • Higher speed limit for autonomous cars.[37]
  • Removal of constraints on occupants' state – in an autonomous car, it would not matter if the occupants were under age, over age,[38] unlicensed, blind, distracted, intoxicated, or otherwise impaired.
  • Alleviation of parking scarcity, as cars could drop off passengers, park far away where space is not scarce, and return as needed to pick up passengers.
  • Reduction of physical space required for vehicle parking.[39]
  • Elimination of redundant passengers – the robotic car could drive unoccupied to wherever it is required, such as to pick up passengers or to go in for maintenance. This would be especially relevant to trucks, taxis and car-sharing services.[36][40][41]
  • Reduction in the need for traffic police and vehicle insurance.[42]
  • Reduction of physical road signage – autonomous cars could receive necessary communication electronically (although physical signs may still be required for any human drivers).[43][44][45]
  • Smoother ride.[46]
  • Reduction in car theft, due to the vehicle's self-awareness.[47]

Potential obstacles

In spite of the various benefits to increased vehicle automation, some foreseeable challenges persist:
  • Liability for damage.[48]
  • Resistance by individuals to forfeit control of their cars.[49]
  • Software reliability.[50]
  • A car's computer could potentially be compromised, as could a communication system between cars.[51][52]
  • Implementation of legal framework and establishment of government regulations for self-driving cars.[53]
  • Drivers being inexperienced if situations arose requiring manual driving.[54]
  • Loss of driving-related jobs.[42][55][56]
  • Loss of privacy.[57]
  • Competition for the radio spectrum desired for the car's communication.[58]
  • Self-driving cars could potentially be loaded with explosives and used as bombs.[59]
  • Ethical problems analogous to the trolley problem arise in situations where an autonomous car's software is forced during an unavoidable crash to choose between multiple harmful courses of action.[60][61][62]
  • Susceptibility of the car's navigation system to different types of weather. (As of 2014 Google's prototype has not driven in snow or heavy rain.) [63]
  • Autonomous cars may require very high-quality specialised maps to operate properly. These maps would be costly to produce for roads worldwide. Where these maps may be out of date, they would need to be able to fall back to reasonable behaviors.[63]
  • Autonomous cars have to be able to respond correctly to police and other pedestrian gestures and non-verbal cues.[63]
  • To function optimally autonomous cars need changes in road infrastructure with many design and cost implications. For example, traffic lights may need to be re-designed and upgraded to communicate with the vehicles and street lighting may need to be re-designed. These changes may have profound social, legal and financial implications.[64]

Policy implications

If fully autonomous cars become commercially available they have the potential to be a disruptive innovation with major implications for society. The likelihood of widespread adoption is still unclear, but if they are used on a wide scale policy makers face a number of unresolved questions about their effects.[64] One fundamental question is about their effect on travel behaviour. Some people believe that they will increase car ownership and car use because it will become easier to use them and they will ultimately be more useful.[64] This may in turn encourage urban sprawl and ultimately total private vehicle use. Others argue that it will be easier to share cars and that this will thus discourage outright ownership and decrease total usage, and make cars more efficient forms of transportation in relation to the present situation.[65]

Legislation


U.S. States that allow driverless cars public road testing.

In the United States, state vehicle codes generally do not envisage — but do not necessarily prohibit — highly automated vehicles.[66] To clarify the legal status of and otherwise regulate such vehicles, several states have enacted or are considering specific laws.[67] As of the end of 2013, four U.S. states, (Nevada, Florida, California, and Michigan), along with the District of Columbia, have successfully enacted laws addressing autonomous vehicles.

In June 2011, the Nevada Legislature passed a law to authorize the use of autonomous cars. Nevada thus became the first jurisdiction in the world where autonomous vehicles might be legally operated on public roads. According to the law, the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles (NDMV) is responsible for setting safety and performance standards and the agency is responsible for designating areas where autonomous cars may be tested.[26][27][68] This legislation was supported by Google in an effort to legally conduct further testing of its Google driverless car.[28] The Nevada law defines an autonomous vehicle to be "a motor vehicle that uses artificial intelligence, sensors and global positioning system coordinates to drive itself without the active intervention of a human operator." The law also acknowledges that the operator will not need to pay attention while the car is operating itself. Google had further lobbied for an exemption from a ban on distracted driving to permit occupants to send text messages while sitting behind the wheel, but this did not become law.[28][69][70] Furthermore, Nevada's regulations require a person behind the wheel and one in the passenger’s seat during tests.[71]

A Toyota Prius modified by Google to operate as a driverless car.

In 2013, the government of the United Kingdom permitted the testing of autonomous cars on public roads.[72] Prior to this, all testing of robotic vehicles in the UK had been conducted on private property.[72]

In 2014 the Government of France announced that testing of autonomous cars on public roads would be allowed in 2015. 2000 km of road would be opened through the national territory, especially in Bordeaux, in Isère, Île-de-France and Strasbourg.

Vehicular communication systems

Individual vehicles may benefit from information obtained from other vehicles in the vicinity, especially information relating to traffic congestion and safety hazards. Vehicular communication systems use vehicles and roadside units as the communicating nodes in a peer-to-peer network, providing each other with information. As a cooperative approach, vehicular communication systems can allow all cooperating vehicles to be more effective. According to a 2010 study by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, vehicular communication systems could help avoid up to 81 percent of all traffic accidents.[1]
In 2012, computer scientists at the University of Texas in Austin began developing smart intersections designed for autonomous cars. The intersections will have no traffic lights and no stop signs, instead using computer programs that will communicate directly with each car on the road.[73]

Through the implementation of Global Positioning System (GPS), navigation of the autonomous vehicles is simplified. The location of the vehicle can also be acquired by the longitude and latitude obtained by the GPS.[74]

Public opinion surveys

In a 2011 online survey of 2,006 US and UK consumers by Accenture, 49% said they would be comfortable using a "driverless car".[75]

A 2012 survey of 17,400 vehicle owners by J.D. Power and Associates found 37% initially said they would be interested in purchasing a fully autonomous car. However, that figure dropped to 20% if told the technology would cost $3,000 more.[76]

In a 2012 survey of about 1,000 German drivers by automotive researcher Puls, 22% of the respondents had a positive attitude towards these cars, 10% were undecided, 44% were skeptical and 24% were hostile.[77]

A 2013 survey of 1,500 consumers across 10 countries by Cisco Systems found a full 57% "stated they would be likely to ride in a car controlled entirely by technology that does not require a human driver", with Brazil, India and China the most willing to trust autonomous technology.[78]

In a 2014 US telephone survey by Insurance.com, over three-quarters of licensed drivers said they would at least consider buying a self-driving car, rising to 86% if car insurance were cheaper. 31.7% said they would not continue to drive once an autonomous car was available instead.[79]

Predictions

Autonomous vehicles are still a developing technology; a large number of companies and researchers have speculated about future developments and the possible effects of the cars.
  • 2015, Tesla will introduce "Autopilot". This feature combines automatic lane change (after signal is applied), adaptive cruise control, and sign recognition to regulate speed and location. It's expected to be the first vehicle manufacturer to offer automatic lane change.[80]
  • By the mid-2010s, Toyota plans to roll out near-autonomous vehicles dubbed Automated Highway Driving Assist with Lane Trace Control and Cooperative-adaptive Cruise Control.[81]
  • By 2016, Audi plans to market vehicles that can autonomously steer, accelerate and brake at lower speeds, such as in traffic jams.[82]
  • By 2016, Mercedes plans to introduce "Autobahn Pilot" aka Highway Pilot, the system allow hands-free highway driving with autonomous overtaking of other vehicles.[83]
  • By 2016, Mobileye expects to release hands-free driving technology for highways.[84]
  • In 2016 (2017 model year), GM plans to offer a "super cruise" feature on select Cadillac models, with autonomous lane keeping, speed control, and brake control, so that parts of trips can be made without touching the wheel or pedals.[85]
  • By early 2017, the US Department of Transportation hopes to publish a rule mandating vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication by an as-yet unspecified deadline.[86] GM says that by the 2017 model year, the Cadillac CTS will be V2V equipped.[87]
  • By 2018, Mobileye expects autonomous capabilities for country roads and city traffic.[88]
  • By 2018, Nissan anticipates to have a feature that can allow the vehicle manoeuver its way on multi-lane highways.[89]
  • By 2020, Volvo envisages having cars in which passengers would be immune from injuries.[90] Volvo also claim vehicles will effectively be "crash free." [91]
  • By 2020, GM, Mercedes-Benz, Audi, Nissan, BMW, Renault, Tesla and Google all expect to sell vehicles that can drive themselves at least part of the time.[58][92][93][94][95][96][97]
  • 2020, ABI Research forecasts that truly self-driving cars would become a reality by 2020 and that 10 million such new cars would be rolling out on to United States' public highways every year by 2032.[98]
  • By 2024, Jaguar expects to release an autonomous car.[99]
  • By 2024, Google autonomous car project head's goal to have all outstanding problems with the autonomous car be resolved.[100]
  • By 2025, Daimler and Ford expect autonomous vehicles on the market.[101][102] Ford predicts it will have the first mass-market autonomous vehicle.[103]
  • By 2025, most new GM vehicles will have automated driving functions as well as vehicle-to-vehicle communication technology.[104]
  • By 2035, IHS Automotive report says will be the year most self-driving vehicles will be operated completely independent from a human occupant’s control.[105]
  • By 2035, Navigant Research forecasts that autonomous vehicles will gradually gain traction in the market over the coming two decades and by 2035, sales of autonomous vehicles will reach 95.4 million annually, representing 75% of all light-duty vehicle sales.[106]
  • By 2040, expert members of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) have estimated that up to 75% of all vehicles will be autonomous.[107]
  • In 2014 Raj Rajkumar, director of autonomous driving research at Carnegie-Mellon University said that the artificial intelligence necessary for a driverless car would not be available "anytime soon" and that Detroit car makers believe "the prospect of a fully self-driving car arriving anytime soon is 'pure science fiction.'"[108]
With Autonomous vehicles,
  • Columbia University's The Earth Institute forecasts the reduction of United States' fleet of vehicles by a factor of 10.[109]
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers forecasts a reduction of traffic accidents by a factor of 10 and it concludes that the fleet of vehicles in the United States may collapse from 245 million to just 2.4 million.[110]
  • KPMG LLP and the Center for Automotive Research (CAR) foresee improvements in productivity and energy efficiency as well as new business models.[111]
  • Morgan Stanley estimates that autonomous cars could save the United States $1.3 trillion annually by lowering fuel consumption ($169 billion), reducing crash costs ($488 billion) and boosting productivity ($645 billion).[112]

In fiction

In film and television


Minority Report's Lexus 2054 on display in Paris, France in October 2002.
  • Dudu, a VW Beetle, features in a 1971 to 1978 German series of movies similar to Disneys Herbie but with an electronic brain.
  • KITT, the autonomous Pontiac Trans Am in the 1982 TV series Knight Rider, was sentient and autonomous.* The 1983 film Christine features a sentient, autonomous car as the title character.
  • In the 1988 film Who Framed Roger Rabbit, starring Bob Hoskins, the character Benny the Cab, a sentient taxicab, drives on his own.
  • In the 1989 film Batman, starring Michael Keaton, the Batmobile is shown to be able to drive to Batman's current location with some navigation commands from Batman and possibly some autonomy.
  • The 1990 film Total Recall, starring Arnold Schwarzenegger, features taxis called Johnny Cabs controlled by artificial intelligence in the car or the android occupants.
  • The 1993 film Demolition Man, starring Sylvester Stallone and set in 2032, features vehicles that can be self-driven or commanded to "Auto Mode" where a voice-controlled computer operates the vehicle.
  • The 1994 film Timecop, starring Jean-Claude Van Damme, set in 2004 and 1994, has cars that can either be self-driven or commanded to drive to specific locations such as "home".
  • Another Arnold Schwarzenegger movie, The 6th Day from 2000, features an autonomous car commanded by Michael Rapaport.
  • The 2002 film Minority Report, set in Washington, D.C. in 2054, features an extended chase sequence involving autonomous cars. The vehicle of protagonist John Anderton is transporting him when its systems are overridden by police in an attempt to bring him into custody.

I, Robot's Audi RSQ at CeBIT in March 2005.
  • The 2004 film I, Robot features autonomous vehicles driving on highways, allowing the car to travel safer at higher speeds than if manually controlled. The option to manually operate the vehicles is available.
  • "Driven", series 4 episode 11 of the 2006 TV series NCIS features a robotic vehicle named "Otto," part of a high-level project of the Department of Defense, which causes the death of a Navy Lieutenant, and then later almost kills Abby.
  • The éX-Driver anime series features autonomous electric-powered vehicles driven by Artificial Intelligences (AIs). These sometimes malfunction or are taken over by malicious users, requiring interception and intervention by éX-Drivers operating manually controlled gas-powered vehicles.

In literature


Parallel Worlds Exist And Interact With Our World, Say Physicists


parallel_worlds_by_mamuka753-d5gbx2g 

Quantum mechanics, though firmly tested, is so weird and anti-intuitive that famed physicist Richard Feynman once remarked, “I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics.” 

Attempts to explain some of the bizarre consequences of quantum theory have led to some mind-bending ideas, such as the Copenhagen interpretation and the many-worlds interpretation.
 
Now there’s a new theory on the block, called the “many interacting worlds” hypothesis (MIW), and the idea is just as profound as it sounds. The theory suggests not only that parallel worlds exist, but that they interact with our world on the quantum level and are thus detectable. Though still speculative, the theory may help to finally explain some of the bizarre consequences inherent in quantum mechanics, reports RT.com.

The theory is a spin-off of the many-worlds interpretation in quantum mechanics — an idea that posits that all possible alternative histories and futures are real, each representing an actual, though parallel, world. One problem with the many-worlds interpretation, however, has been that it is fundamentally untestable, since observations can only be made in our world. Happenings in these proposed “parallel” worlds can thus only be imagined.

MIW, however, says otherwise. It suggests that parallel worlds can interact on the quantum level, and in fact that they do.

“The idea of parallel universes in quantum mechanics has been around since 1957,” explained Howard Wiseman, a physicist at Griffith University in Brisbane, Australia, and one of the physicists to come up with MIW. “In the well-known ‘Many-Worlds Interpretation’, each universe branches into a bunch of new universes every time a quantum measurement is made. All possibilities are therefore realised – in some universes the dinosaur-killing asteroid missed Earth. In others, Australia was colonised by the Portuguese.”

“But critics question the reality of these other universes, since they do not influence our universe at all,” he added. “On this score, our “Many Interacting Worlds” approach is completely different, as its name implies.”

Wiseman and colleagues have proposed that there exists “a universal force of repulsion between ‘nearby’ (i.e. similar) worlds, which tends to make them more dissimilar.” Quantum effects can be explained by factoring in this force, they propose.

Whether or not the math holds true will be the ultimate test for this theory. Does it or does it not properly predict quantum effects mathematically? But the theory is certain to provide plenty of fodder for the imagination.

For instance, when asked about whether their theory might entail the possibility that humans could someday interact with other worlds, Wiseman said: “It’s not part of our theory. But the idea of [human] interactions with other universes is no longer pure fantasy.”

What might your life look like if you made different choices? Maybe one day you’ll be able to look into one of these alternative worlds and find out.

( via mnn.com )

Volvo says self-driving cars will react 'faster than most humans'

Original link:  http://phys.org/news/2015-02-volvo-self-driving-cars-react-faster.html



Volvo Cars announced that it had completed designs for self-driving cars which it plans to put on the road in two years 
Volvo Cars announced that it had completed designs for self-driving cars which it plans to put on the road in two years.
 
 
Swedish carmaker Volvo Cars announced Thursday that it had completed designs for self-driving cars which it plans to put on the road in two years.


"Volvo Cars has designed a complete production-viable system," Peter Mertens, head of Volvo's said in a statement.

"The key to making this unprecedented leap is a complex network of sensors, cloud-based positioning systems and intelligent braking and steering technologies."

The Chinese-owned group is locked in a race with its Japanese competitors Nissan and US Internet giant Google to be the first to put fully automated cars into circulation.

"Autonomous driving will fundamentally change the way we look at driving," said Mertens, calling the venture "uncharted territory" and underlining the challenges of meeting strict safety requirements.

The group said it has developed an "autopilot" with backup systems that will continue to function safely even if certain parts stop working. It also claimed that the new car would react "faster than most humans" in an emergency.

"Making this complex system 99 percent reliable is not good enough. You need to get much closer to 100 percent before you can let mix with other road users in real-life traffic," said Erik Coelingh, a Volvo technical specialist.

Volvo Cars plans to put 100 self-driving cars on roads around the Swedish city of Gothenburg in 2017 in a pilot initiative with Sweden's transport authority and local government.

Volvo Car Corporation is a separate entity from the Volvo Group, the maker of trucks, buses and construction machinery, since the auto company was sold to Ford in 1999. It was sold to Geely in 2010.

CyborgRx: How Smart Implants Could Change Medicine


They're already helping people like Chelsey Loeb. The 26-year-old can't feel the responsive neurostimulator (RNS System for short) firing electrical pulses into her brain. It's about the size of an iPod Nano and is constantly monitoring electrical activity from under her skull, looking for signs of a seizure so it can send out a targeted pulse to cut one off before it begins.

Designed by Silicon Valley-based NeuroPace, the RNS System is on the frontier of this new technology. But there are hopes that devices implanted under the skin could one day do things like automatically regulate glucose levels in diabetics or tell someone when their knee is about to give out.

Right now, smart implants are giving hope to epilepsy patients like Loeb. Across the nation, 128 of them have been installed since the FDA approved the device in 2013. Clinical trials showed a 38 percent drop in the average number of seizures per month. So far, it's working for Loeb.

Trying to beat epilepsy

She first noticed the seizures in the summer, when she was only 15 years old. It wasn't immediately clear what was happening to her.

"It almost felt like I was dreaming, like I was having a dream in the middle of the day," Loeb told NBC News.

With school looming, she finally told her parents about the strange sensations she was having. The doctor told her she suffered from intractable epilepsy. At first, it got better with medication. The seizures stopped for a year and a half, and she was able to do things that typical 18-year-olds do, like drive a car and go off to college.
Chelsey Loeb 
Chelsey Loeb, 26, with Werner Doyle, her neurosurgeon at NYU Langone’s Comprehensive Epilepsy Center.
Then they came back — at first about every month, then every day. Worse, they were getting more severe. Sometimes, she would wake up after wandering around for several minutes with no memory of what had happened.

She had to stop driving. In her classroom in Paterson, New Jersey, she needed an assistant, who would look after her whenever she would "get the aura," a feeling that a seizure was about to hit.

Finally, she decided she'd had enough. Loeb learned that she was a candidate for a relatively new procedure at New York University Langone Medical Center.

Over the course of two surgeries in November, they removed part of her left temporal lobe. It had been scarred, possibly since birth. Removing the entire lobe could have ended the seizures — but it also would have destroyed her short-term memory.

Instead, doctors supplemented the excision with the RNS System. Researchers aren't completely sure why it works, because nobody fully understands how the brain functions.

Smart Brain Implant Helps Fight Seizures

Back in the 1930s and 1940s, doctors would perform lobotomies and electroshock therapy, blunt measures meant to treat a wide array of conditions nobody really understood.

The latter was used as a "reset" button on the entire brain, said Werner Doyle, the NYU neurosurgeon who operated on Loeb. The RNS System allows for more targeted treatment.

"You're not rebooting the whole brain," he told NBC News. "It's like when you are on your laptop computer, and there is one application that gets stuck. What you do is quit that application and reboot it."

After only eight days in the hospital, she was at her parents' home with a device roughly the size of a curved iPod nano connected to her brain. Everyday, she passes a wand-like device over her head, which uploads her brain activity to the cloud. That lets doctors study it and make adjustments when she comes into the hospital.

"It's like a big puzzle," she said. "They are trying to figure out how to make it work with my brain, because my brain is unlike any other."

Smarter medical devices

Researchers think similar devices could help patients battle obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), Parkinson's disease and even depression. Sensortech Corporation announced a Bluetooth-enabled knee replacement in 2013 that gives doctors data in real-time, helping reduce the duration of surgery. 
The company thinks the technology could one day be used to give wireless updates on wear and tear for the life of an artificial joint.

At Boston Children's Hospital, bioroboticist Pierre Dupont is working on a way to use machines to treat esophageal atresia. Babies born with this condition can't eat because their mouths don't connect to their stomachs.

Treating it now requires frequent X-rays and repeatedly sedating infants as sutures that stick outside of the baby's back are tightened to guide the growing parts of the esophagus together.

Dupont is testing a device that could detect how the esophagus is growing and use its motor to adjust accordingly, vastly reducing the risk and hospital time involved in fixing the condition. (So far, it has only been tried in pigs).

His team is also researching smart devices that could regulate blood flow from the heart for kids with congenital heart defects. None of these are available on the market right now. Doctors in the future, however, might find smart devices that can adjust to their surroundings especially useful when treating children.

"That's a big challenge," Dupont told NBC News. "You need something that accommodates growth."
DARPA, the research arm of the U.S. Department of Defense, is also looking into smart implants. In August 2014, it announced the Electrical Prescriptions (ElectRx) program, which encourages the development of "ultraminiaturized devices" the size of nerve fibers that would "continually assess conditions and provide stimulus patterns tailored to help maintain healthy organ function."
ElectRX DARPA

Researchers are also starting to think about how multiple smart devices might work together. The EU-funded WISERBAN is a project aimed at creating a 'wireless body-area network' (WBAN) that would let smart implants communicate wirelessly with each other and the outside world without draining their limited power resources.

Battery life is a major issue when it comes to these devices. The tiny battery in the RNS System only lasts three to four years — after which, the whole device needs to be replaced with surgery. Smart implants also need to be small in order to fit next to organs inside of the human body.

At least researchers know how the heart and esophagus work. The brain is still a mystery. Creating devices that target the right areas of the brain when scientists aren't even sure how the brain works is a serious challenge.

"We're like the Wright brothers at the stage where they were first trying to build an airplane," said Tim Denison, director of Medtronic's neuromodulation division. "Before they could do it, they had to build a wind tunnel to understand the principles of flight."

From the Tin Man to the Teen Titans: A History of Cyborgs

That could change if programs like the $300 million BRAIN Initiative announced by the White House in 2013 can accomplish its goal of showing how "individual cells and complex neural circuits interact in both time and space." Treating something like Parkinson's disease with a smart implant is still probably far in the future.

For epilepsy patients like Loeb, the benefits could be more immediate. It's too early to tell if the RNS System has solved her problem. Doctors had to spend time monitoring and adjusting the device.
But over the last month, she has only had one seizure, a huge improvement over the daily seizures she was having before.

Now, she is eager to be more independent. She wants to take the train, work and meet new people without the nagging fear of a seizure in waiting in the wings.

"I feel a little more like myself," she said. "I don't have to worry every day about when the next one is coming." 

Oliver Sacks



From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oliver Sacks
9.13.09OliverSacksByLuigiNovi.jpg
Sacks at the 2009 Brooklyn Book Festival
Born Oliver Wolf Sacks
(1933-07-09) 9 July 1933 (age 81)
London, England
Known for Popular books containing case studies of some of his patients
Medical career
Profession Physician

Oliver Wolf Sacks, CBE (born 9 July 1933) is an American-British neurologist, writer, and amateur chemist who is Professor of Neurology at New York University School of Medicine. Between 2007 and 2012, he was professor of neurology and psychiatry at Columbia University, where he also held the position of "Columbia Artist". Before that, he spent many years on the clinical faculty of Yeshiva University's Albert Einstein College of Medicine. He also holds the position of visiting professor at the United Kingdom's University of Warwick.[1]

Sacks is the author of numerous best-selling books,[2] including several collections of case studies of people with neurological disorders. His 1973 book Awakenings, an autobiographical account of his efforts to help victims of encephalitis lethargica regain proper neurological function, was adapted into the Academy Award-nominated film of the same name in 1990 starring Robin Williams and Robert De Niro. He and his book Musicophilia: Tales of Music and the Brain were the subject of "Musical Minds", an episode of the PBS series Nova.

Early life

Sacks was the youngest of four children born to a North London Jewish couple: Samuel Sacks, a physician (died June 1990),[3] and Muriel Elsie Landau, one of the first female surgeons in England.[4] Sacks has a large extended family, and his first cousins include Israeli statesman Abba Eban, writer and director Jonathan Lynn, and economist Robert Aumann.

When Sacks was six years old, he and his brother Michael were evacuated from London to escape the Blitz, retreating to a boarding school in the Midlands where he remained until 1943.[4] Unknown to his family, at the school, he and his brother Michael ".. subsisted on meagre rations of turnips and beetroot and suffered cruel punishments at the hands of a sadistic headmaster."[5] He attended St Paul's School in London. During his youth he was a keen amateur chemist, as recalled in his memoir Uncle Tungsten.[6] He also learned to share his parents' enthusiasm for medicine and entered The Queen's College, Oxford, in 1951,[4] from which he received a Bachelor of Arts degree in physiology and biology in 1954.[7] At the same institution, in 1958 he went on to undertake a Master of Arts and earn a BM BCh, thereby qualifying to practice medicine. Sacks left England for Canada then made his way from there to the United States for a different career path.[5] He undertook residencies and fellowship work at Mt. Zion Hospital in San Francisco and at UCLA.[8]

Career

After converting his British qualifications to American recognition (i.e., an MD as opposed to BM BCh), Sacks moved to New York, where he has lived and practiced neurology since 1965.

Sacks began consulting at chronic care facility Beth Abraham Hospital (now Beth Abraham Health Services, a member of CenterLight Health System) in the Bronx, in 1966.[9] At Beth Abraham, Sacks worked with a group of survivors of the 1920s sleeping sickness, encephalitis lethargica, who had been unable to move on their own for decades.[9] These patients and his treatment of them were the basis of Sacks' book Awakenings.[9]

Sacks served as an instructor and later clinical professor of neurology at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine from 1966 to 2007, and also held an appointment at the New York University School of Medicine from 1992 to 2007. In July 2007 he joined the faculty of Columbia University Medical Center as a professor of neurology and psychiatry.[8] At the same time, he was appointed Columbia University's first "Columbia University Artist" at the University's Morningside Heights campus, recognising the role of his work in bridging the arts and sciences.

Since 1966 Sacks has served as a neurological consultant to various New York City nursing homes that are run by the Little Sisters of the Poor, and from 1966 to 1991 was a consulting neurologist at Bronx Psychiatric Center. Sacks returned to New York University School of Medicine in 2012, serving as both a professor of neurology and consulting neurologist in the center's epilepsy center.

Sacks' work at Beth Abraham helped provide the foundation on which the Institute for Music and Neurologic Function (IMNF) is built; Sacks is currently an honorary medical advisor.[10] The Institute honoured Sacks in 2000 with its first Music Has Power Award.[11] The IMNF again bestowed a Music Has Power Award on Sacks in 2006 to commemorate "his 40 years at Beth Abraham and honor his outstanding contributions in support of music therapy and the effect of music on the human brain and mind".[12]

Sacks remains a consultant neurologist to the Little Sisters of the Poor, and maintains a practice in New York City. He serves on the boards of the The Neurosciences Institute and the New York Botanical Garden.

Writing

Beginning in 1970, Sacks wrote of his experience with neurological patients. His books have been translated into over 25 languages. In addition to his books, Sacks is a regular contributor to The New Yorker and The New York Review of Books, as well as other medical, scientific, and general publications.[13][14][15] He was awarded the Lewis Thomas Prize for Writing about Science in 2001.[16]

Sacks' work has been featured in a "broader range of media than those of any other contemporary medical author"[17] and in 1990, The New York Times said he "has become a kind of poet laureate of contemporary medicine".[18] His descriptions of people coping with and adapting to neurological conditions or injuries often illuminate the ways in which the normal brain deals with perception, memory and individuality.

Sacks considers that his literary style grows out of the tradition of 19th-century "clinical anecdotes," a literary style that included detailed narrative case histories. He also counts among his inspirations the case histories of the Russian neuropsychologist A. R. Luria.[19]

Sacks describes his cases with a wealth of narrative detail, concentrating on the experiences of the patient (in the case of his A Leg to Stand On, the patient was himself). The patients he describes are often able to adapt to their situation in different ways despite the fact that their neurological conditions are usually considered incurable.[20] His most famous book, Awakenings, upon which the 1990 feature film of the same name is based, describes his experiences using the new drug L-Dopa on Beth Abraham post-encephalitic patients.[9] Awakenings was also the subject of the first documentary made (in 1974) for the British television series Discovery.

In his other books, he describes cases of Tourette syndrome and various effects of Parkinson's disease. The title article of The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat is about a man with visual agnosia[21] and was the subject of a 1986 opera by Michael Nyman. The title article of An Anthropologist on Mars, which won a Polk Award for magazine reporting, is about Temple Grandin, an autistic professor. Seeing Voices, Sacks' 1989 book, covers a variety of topics in deaf studies.
In his book The Island of the Colorblind Sacks writes about an island where many people have achromatopsia (total colorblindness, very low visual acuity and high photophobia), and describes the Chamorro people of Guam, who have a high incidence of a neurodegenerative disease known as Lytico-Bodig disease (a devastating combination of ALS, dementia, and parkinsonism). Along with Paul Alan Cox, Sacks has published papers suggesting a possible environmental cause for the cluster, namely the toxin beta-methylamino L-alanine (BMAA) from the cycad nut accumulating by biomagnification in the flying fox bat.[22][23]

In November 2012 Oliver Sacks released his latest book, Hallucinations. In this work Sacks takes a look into why ordinary people can sometimes experience hallucinations and removes the stigma placed behind the word. He explains, "Hallucinations don't belong wholly to the insane. Much more commonly, they are linked to sensory deprivation, intoxication, illness or injury."[24] Sacks writes about the not so well known phenomenon called Charles Bonnet Syndrome, which has been found to occur in elderly people who have lost their eyesight. The book has been described by Entertainment Weekly as, "Elegant… An absorbing plunge into a mystery of the mind,"[25]

Criticism

Sacks has sometimes faced criticism in the medical and disability studies communities. During the 1970s and 1980s, his book and articles on the "Awakenings" patients were criticized or ignored by much of the medical establishment, on the grounds that his work was not based on the quantitative, double-blind study model. His account of abilities of autistic savants has been questioned by researcher Makoto Yamaguchi.[26] According to Yamaguchi, Sacks' mathematical explanations are also irrelevant.[27] Arthur K. Shapiro—described as "the father of modern tic disorder research"[28]—referring to Sacks' celebrity status and that his literary publications received greater publicity than Shapiro's medical publications, said he is "a much better writer than he is a clinician".[29]
Howard Kushner's A Cursing Brain?: The Histories of Tourette Syndrome, says Shapiro "contrasted his own careful clinical work with Sacks' idiosyncratic and anecdotal approach to a clinical investigation".[30]

More sustained has been the critique of his political and ethical positions. Although many characterise Sacks as a "compassionate" writer and doctor,[31][32][33] others feel that he exploits his subjects.[34] Sacks was called "the man who mistook his patients for a literary career" by British academic and disability-rights activist Tom Shakespeare,[35] and one critic called his work "a high-brow freak show".[36] Such criticism was echoed by a Sacks-like caricature played by Bill Murray in the film The Royal Tenenbaums.[37] Sacks has stated "I would hope that a reading of what I write shows respect and appreciation, not any wish to expose or exhibit for the thrill... but it's a delicate business."[38]

Honors

Since 1996 Sacks has been a member of The American Academy of Arts and Letters (Literature).[39]
In 1999 he became a Fellow of the New York Academy of Sciences.[40] Also in 1999, he became an Honorary Fellow at The Queen's College, Oxford.[41] In 2002 he became Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (Class IV—Humanities and Arts, Section 4—Literature)[42] and he was awarded the 2001 Lewis Thomas Prize by Rockefeller University.[43]

Sacks has been awarded honorary doctorates from the Georgetown University (1990),[44] College of Staten Island (1991),[7] Tufts University (1991),[45] New York Medical College (1991),[7] Medical College of Pennsylvania (1992),[7] Bard College (1992),[46] Queen's University (Ontario) (2001),[47] Gallaudet University (2005),[48] University of Oxford (2005),[49] Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (2006),[50] and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (2008).

Oxford University awarded him an honorary Doctor of Civil Law degree in June 2005.[51]

Sacks received the position "Columbia Artist" from Columbia University in 2007, a post that was created specifically for him. In this capacity he gains unconstrained access to the University, regardless of department or discipline.[52]

Sacks was appointed Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) in the 2008 Queen's Birthday Honours.[53]

84928 Oliversacks, a 2 miles (3.2 km)-diameter main-belt minor planet discovered in 2003, was named in his honour.[54]

In February 2010 Sacks was named to the Freedom From Religion Foundation's Honorary Board of distinguished achievers.[55]

Personal life

Throughout his life, Sacks has suffered from a condition known as prosopagnosia or face blindness.[56] In a December 2010 interview Sacks discussed how he had also lost his stereoscopic vision the previous year due to a malignant tumor in his right eye. He now has no vision in his right eye.[57] His loss of stereo vision was recounted in his book The Mind's Eye, published in October 2010.[58] Sacks discussed his struggles with prosopagnosia in an interview with Lesley Stahl on 18 March 2012 episode of 60 Minutes.

Sacks has never married or lived with anyone and says that he is celibate.[59] In a December 2001 interview he stated that he had not had a relationship in many years and has described his shyness as "a disease".[60] Sacks swims almost every day and has done so for decades, especially when he lived in the City Island section of the Bronx. He discussed his work and his personal health problems in 28 June 2011 BBC documentary Imagine.[57]

Sacks has also written about a near-fatal accident he had at age 41, a year after the publication of Awakenings, when he fell and broke his leg "while mountaineering alone."[61]

During his time at UCLA, Sacks lived in Topanga Canyon [62]and experimented heavily with various drugs. He described his experiences in an article published in 2012 by The New Yorker[63] and his 2012 book Hallucinations. Sacks describes a transformative incident he had after taking a massive dose of amphetamine, then reading a book by the 19th century migraine physician Edward Liveing (father of George Downing Liveing). Sacks claimed this experience convinced him to chronicle and publish his observations of neurological diseases and oddities, becoming the "Liveing of our Time".[63]

In February 2015, writing in The New York Times, Sacks announced that he had been diagnosed with terminal cancer—multiple metastases in the liver from the ocular melanoma to which he had previously lost his vision in one eye. Measuring his remaining time in "months," Sacks announced his intent to "live in the richest, deepest, most productive way I can," and wrote that "I want and hope in the time that remains to deepen my friendships, to say farewell to those I love, to write more, to travel if I have the strength, to achieve new levels of understanding and insight."[64]

Publications

As main author

As contributor


Operator (computer programming)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operator_(computer_programmin...