He shows me recent footage captured by spacecraft that have their sights
trained on our star. The Sun is revealed in exquisite detail, but its face is
strangely featureless.
"If you want to go back to see when the Sun was this inactive... you've got
to go back about 100 years," he says.
This solar lull is baffling scientists, because right now the Sun should be
awash with activity.
It has reached its solar maximum, the point in its 11-year cycle where
activity is at a peak.
This giant ball of plasma should be peppered with sunspots, exploding with
flares and spewing out huge clouds of charged particles into space in the form
of coronal mass ejections.
But apart from the odd event, like some recent solar flares, it has been very
quiet. And this damp squib of a maximum follows a solar minimum - the period
when the Sun's activity troughs - that was longer and lower than scientists
expected.
"It's completely taken me and many other solar scientists by surprise," says
Dr Lucie Green, from University College London's Mullard Space Science
Laboratory.
The drop off in activity is happening surprisingly quickly, and scientists
are now watching closely to see if it will continue to plummet.
"It could mean a very, very inactive star, it would feel like the Sun is
asleep... a very dormant ball of gas at the centre of our Solar System,"
explains Dr Green.
This, though, would certainly not be the first time this has happened.
“Start Quote
End Quote Prof Mike Lockwood University of ReadingIt's an unusually rapid decline”
During the latter half of the 17th Century, the Sun went
through an extremely quiet phase - a period called the Maunder Minimum.
Historical records reveal that sunspots virtually disappeared during this
time.
Dr Green says: "There is a very strong hint that the Sun is acting in the
same way now as it did in the run-up to the Maunder Minimum."
Mike Lockwood, professor of space environment physics, from the University of
Reading, thinks there is a significant chance that the Sun could become
increasingly quiet.
An analysis of ice-cores, which hold a long-term record of solar activity,
suggests the decline in activity is the fastest that has
been seen in 10,000 years.
"It's an unusually rapid decline," explains Prof Lockwood.
"We estimate that within about 40 years or so there is a 10% to 20% - nearer
20% - probability that we'll be back in Maunder Minimum conditions."
The era of solar inactivity in the 17th Century coincided with a period of
bitterly cold winters in Europe.
Londoners enjoyed frost fairs on the Thames after it froze over, snow cover
across the continent increased, the Baltic Sea iced over - the conditions were
so harsh, some describe it as a mini-Ice Age.
And Prof Lockwood believes that this regional effect could have been in part
driven by the dearth of activity on the Sun, and may happen again if our star
continues to wane.
"It's a very active research topic at the present time, but we do think there
is a mechanism in Europe where we should expect more cold winters when solar
activity is low," he says.
He believes this local effect happens because the amount of ultraviolet light
radiating from the Sun dips when solar activity is low.
This means that less UV radiation hits the stratosphere - the layer of air
that sits high above the Earth. And this in turn feeds into the jet stream - the
fast-flowing air current in the upper atmosphere that can drive the weather.
The results of this are dominantly felt above Europe, says Prof Lockwood.
"These are large meanders in the jet stream, and they're called blocking
events because they block off the normal moist, mild winds we get from the
Atlantic, and instead we get cold air being dragged down from the Arctic and
from Russia," he says.
"These are what we call a cold snap... a series of three or four cold snaps
in a row adds up to a cold winter. And that's quite likely what we'll see as
solar activity declines."
So could this regional change in Europe have a knock-on effect on for the
rest of the world's climate? And what are the implications for global
warming?
In a recent report by the UN's
climate panel, scientists concluded that they were 95% certain that humans
were the "dominant cause" of global warming since the 1950s, and if greenhouse
gases continue to rise at their current rate, then the global mean temperature
could rise by as much as 4.8C.
“Start Quote
End Quote Prof Richard Harrison Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryThis feels like a period where it's very strange... but also it stresses that we don't really understand the star that we live with”
And while some have argued that ebbs and flows in the
Sun's activity are driving the climate - overriding the effect of greenhouse gas
emissions, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concludes that solar
variation only makes a small contribution to the Earth's climate.
Prof Lockwood says that while UV light varies with solar activity, other
forms of radiation from the Sun that penetrate the troposphere (the lower layer
of air that sits above the Earth) do not change that much.
He explains: "If we take all the science that we know relating to how the Sun
emits heat and light and how that heat and light powers our climate system, and
we look at the climate system globally, the difference that it makes even going
back into Maunder Minimum conditions is very small.
"I've done a
number of studies that show at the very most it might buy you about five
years before you reach a certain global average temperature level. But that's
not to say, on a more regional basis there aren't changes to the patterns of our
weather that we'll have to get used to."
But this weather would not be the only consequence of a drawn out period of
inactivity, says Dr Green.
"If the Sun were to get very quiet, one of the few things that would happen
is that we'd have very few displays of the northern lights. They are driven by
solar activity, and we'd miss out on this beautiful natural phenomenon," she
explains.
However, there could be positive effects too.
"Solar activity drives a whole range of space weather, and these are
ultimately effects on the electricity networks, on satellites, on radio
communications and GPS on your sat-nav," she explains.
And while scientists cannot discount that the random bursts of activity may
still occur, calmer periods of space weather would help to maintain the
technological infrastructure that we rely so heavily on.
While the full consequences of a quietening Sun are not fully understood, one
thing scientists are certain about is that our star is unpredictable, and
anything could happen next.
"This feels like a period where it's very strange... but also it stresses
that we don't really understand the star that we live with." says Prof
Harrison.
"Because it's complicated - it's a complex beast."
Follow Rebecca on
Twitter