EFT should not be confused with emotion-focused coping, a category of coping proposed by some psychologists, although clinicians have used EFT to help improve clients' emotion-focused coping.
History
EFT began in the mid-1980s as an approach to helping couples. EFT was originally formulated and tested by Sue Johnson and Les Greenberg in 1985, and the first manual for emotionally focused couples therapy was published in 1988.
To develop the approach, Johnson and Greenberg began reviewing
videos of sessions of couples therapy to identify, through observation
and task analysis, the elements that lead to positive change. They were influenced in their observations by the humanistic experiential psychotherapies of Carl Rogers and Fritz Perls,
both of whom valued (in different ways) present-moment emotional
experience for its power to create meaning and guide behavior. Johnson and Greenberg saw the need to combine experiential therapy with the systems theoretical view that meaning-making and behavior cannot be considered outside of the whole situation in which they occur. In this "experiential–systemic" approach to couples therapy, as in other approaches to systemic therapy,
the problem is viewed as belonging not to one partner, but rather to
the cyclical reinforcing patterns of interactions between partners.
Emotion is viewed not only as a within-individual phenomena, but also
as part of the whole system that organizes the interactions between
partners.
In 1986, Greenberg chose "to refocus his efforts on developing and studying an experiential approach to individual therapy". Greenberg and colleagues shifted their attention away from couples therapy toward individual psychotherapy.
They attended to emotional experiencing and its role in individual
self-organization. Building on the experiential theories of Rogers and
Perls and others such as Eugene Gendlin, as well as on their own extensive work on information processing and the adaptive role of emotion in human functioning, Greenberg, Rice & Elliott (1993) created a treatment manual with numerous clearly outlined principles for what they called a process-experiential approach to psychological change. Elliott et al. (2004) and Goldman & Greenberg (2015)
have further expanded the process-experiential approach, with detailed
manuals of specific methods of therapeutic intervention. Goldman & Greenberg (2015) presents case formulation maps for this approach.
Johnson continued to develop EFT for couples, integrating attachment theory with systemic and humanistic approaches, and explicitly expanding attachment theory's understanding of love relationships.
Johnson's model retained the original three stages and nine steps and
two sets of interventions that aim to reshape the attachment bond: one
set of interventions to track and restructure patterns of interaction
and one to access and reprocess emotion.
Johnson's goal is the creation of positive cycles of interpersonal
interaction wherein individuals are able to ask for and offer comfort
and support to safe others, facilitating interpersonal emotion
regulation.
Greenberg & Goldman (2008)
developed a variation of EFT for couples that contains some elements
from Greenberg and Johnson's original formulation but adds several steps
and stages. Greenberg and Goldman posit three motivational
dimensions—(1) attachment, (2) identity or power, and (3) attraction or liking—that impact emotion regulation in intimate relationships.
Similar terminology, different meanings
The terms emotion-focused therapy and emotionally focused therapy have different meanings for different therapists.
In Les Greenberg's approach the term emotion-focused
is sometimes used to refer to psychotherapy approaches in general that
emphasize emotion. Greenberg "decided that on the basis of the
development in emotion theory that treatments such as the process
experiential approach, as well as some other approaches that emphasized
emotion as the target of change, were sufficiently similar to each other
and different from existing approaches to merit being grouped under the
general title of emotion-focused approaches." He and colleague Rhonda Goldman noted their choice to "use the more American phrasing of emotion-focused
to refer to therapeutic approaches that focused on emotion, rather than
the original, possibly more English term (reflecting both Greenberg's
and Johnson's backgrounds) emotionally focused." Greenberg uses the term emotion-focused to suggest assimilative integration of an emotional focus into any approach to psychotherapy. He considers the focus on emotions to be a common factor among various systems of psychotherapy: "The term emotion-focused therapy
will, I believe, be used in the future, in its integrative sense, to
characterize all therapies that are emotion-focused, be they psychodynamic, cognitive-behavioral, systemic, or humanistic." Greenberg co-authored a chapter on the importance of research by clinicians and integration of psychotherapy approaches that stated:
In addition to these empirical findings, leaders of major orientations have voiced serious criticisms of their preferred theoretical approaches, while encouraging an open-minded attitude toward other orientations.... Furthermore, clinicians of different orientations recognized that their approaches did not provide them with the clinical repertoire sufficient to address the diversity of clients and their presenting problems.
Sue Johnson's use of the term emotionally focused therapy refers to a specific model of relationship therapy that explicitly integrates systems and experiential approaches and places prominence upon attachment theory as a theory of emotion regulation.
Johnson views attachment needs as a primary motivational system for
mammalian survival; her approach to EFT focuses on attachment theory as a
theory of adult love wherein attachment, care giving, and sex are
intertwined.
Attachment theory is seen to subsume the search for personal autonomy,
dependability of the other and a sense of personal and interpersonal
attractiveness, lovability and desire. Johnson's approach to EFT aims to
reshape attachment strategies towards optimal interdependency and
emotion regulation, for resilience and physical, emotional, and
relational health.
Features
Experiential focus
All EFT approaches have retained emphasis on the importance of Rogerian
empathic attunement and communicated understanding. They all focus upon
the value of engaging clients in emotional experiencing
moment-to-moment in session. Thus, an experiential focus is prominent in all EFT approaches.
All EFT theorists have expressed the view that individuals engage with
others on the basis of their emotions, and construct a sense of self
from the drama of repeated emotionally laden interactions.
The information-processing theory of emotion and emotional appraisal (in accordance with emotion theorists such as Magda B. Arnold, Paul Ekman, Nico Frijda, and James Gross) and the humanistic, experiential emphasis on moment-to-moment emotional expression (developing the earlier psychotherapy approaches of Carl Rogers, Fritz Perls, and Eugene Gendlin) have been strong components of all EFT approaches since their inception. EFT approaches value emotion as the target and agent of change, honoring the intersection of emotion, cognition, and behavior. EFT approaches posit that emotion is the first, often subconscious response to experience. All EFT approaches also use the framework of primary and secondary (reactive) emotion responses.
Maladaptive emotion responses and negative patterns of interaction
Greenberg and some other EFT theorists have categorized emotion responses into four types (see § Emotion response types below) to help therapists decide how to respond to a client at a particular time: primary adaptive, primary maladaptive, secondary reactive, and instrumental. Greenberg has posited six principles of emotion processing: (1) awareness of emotion or naming what one feels, (2) emotional expression, (3) regulation of emotion, (4) reflection
on experience, (5) transformation of emotion by emotion, and (6)
corrective experience of emotion through new lived experiences in
therapy and in the world.
While primary adaptive emotion responses are seen as a reliable guide
for behavior in the present situation, primary maladaptive emotion
responses are seen as an unreliable guide for behavior in the present
situation (alongside other possible emotional difficulties such as lack
of emotional awareness, emotion dysregulation, and problems in meaning-making).
Johnson rarely distinguishes between adaptive and maladaptive primary emotion responses, and rarely distinguishes emotion responses as dysfunctional or functional. Instead, primary emotional responses are usually construed as normal survival reactions in the face of what John Bowlby called "separation distress". EFT for couples, like other systemic therapies that emphasize interpersonal relationships, presumes that the patterns of interpersonal interaction are the problematic or dysfunctional element.
The patterns of interaction are amenable to change after accessing the
underlying primary emotion responses that are subconsciously driving the
ineffective, negative reinforcing cycles of interaction. Validating
reactive emotion responses and reprocessing newly accessed primary
emotion responses is part of the change process.
Individual therapy
Individual therapy
Goldman & Greenberg 2015
proposed a 14-step case formulation process that regards
emotion-related problems as stemming from at least four different
possible causes: lack of awareness or avoidance of emotion, dysregulation of emotion, maladaptive emotion response, or a problem with making meaning of experiences. The theory features four types of emotion response, categorizes needs under "attachment" and "identity", specifies
four types of emotional processing difficulties, delineates different
types of empathy, has at least a dozen different task markers, relies on two interactive tracks of emotion and narrative
processes as sources of information about a client, and presumes a dialectical-constructivist model of psychological development and an emotion schematic system.
The emotion schematic system is seen as the central catalyst of self-organization, often at the base of dysfunction and ultimately the road to cure. For simplicity, we use the term emotion schematic process to refer to the complex synthesis process in which a number of coactivated emotion schemes coapply, to produce a unified sense of self in relation to the world.
Techniques used in "coaching clients to work through their feelings" may include the Gestalt therapy
empty chair technique, frequently used for resolving "unfinished
business", and the two-chair technique, frequently used for
self-critical splits.
Emotion response types
Emotion-focused theorists have posited that each person's emotions are organized into idiosyncratic emotion schemes that are highly variable both between people and within the same person over time, but for practical purposes emotional responses can be classified into four broad types: primary adaptive, primary maladaptive, secondary reactive, and instrumental.
- Primary adaptive emotion responses are initial emotional responses to a given stimulus that have a clear beneficial value in the present situation—for example, sadness at loss, anger at violation, and fear at threat. Sadness is an adaptive response when it motivates people to reconnect with someone or something important that is missing. Anger is an adaptive response when it motivates people to take assertive action to end the violation. Fear is an adaptive response when it motivates people to avoid or escape an overwhelming threat. In addition to emotions that indicate action tendencies (such as the three just mentioned), primary adaptive emotion responses include the feeling of being certain and in control or uncertain and out of control, and/or a general felt sense of emotional pain—these feelings and emotional pain do not provide immediate action tendencies but do provide adaptive information that can be symbolized and worked through in therapy. Primary adaptive emotion responses "are attended to and expressed in therapy in order to access the adaptive information and action tendency to guide problem solving."
- Primary maladaptive emotion responses are also initial emotional responses to a given stimulus; however, they are based on emotion schemes that are no longer useful (and that may or may not have been useful in the person's past) and that were often formed through previous traumatic experiences. Examples include sadness at the joy of others, anger at the genuine caring or concern of others, fear at harmless situations, and chronic feelings of insecurity/fear or worthlessness/shame. For example, a person may respond with anger at the genuine caring or concern of others because as a child he or she was offered caring or concern that was usually followed by a violation; as a result, he or she learned to respond to caring or concern with anger even when there is no violation. The person's angry response is understandable, and needs to be met with empathy and compassion even though his or her angry response is not helpful. Primary maladaptive emotion responses are accessed in therapy with the aim of transforming the emotion scheme through new experiences.
- Secondary reactive emotion responses are complex chain reactions where a person reacts to his or her primary adaptive or maladaptive emotional response and then replaces it with another, secondary emotional response. In other words, they are emotional responses to prior emotional responses. ("Secondary" means that a different emotion response occurred first.) They can include secondary reactions of hopelessness, helplessness, rage, or despair that occur in response to primary emotion responses that are experienced (secondarily) as painful, uncontrollable, or violating. They may be escalations of a primary emotion response, as when people are angry about being angry, afraid of their fear, or sad about their sadness. They may be defenses against a primary emotion response, such as feeling anger to avoid sadness or fear to avoid anger; this can include gender role-stereotypical responses such as expressing anger when feeling primarily afraid (stereotypical of men's gender role), or expressing sadness when primarily angry (stereotypical of women's gender role). "These are all complex, self-reflexive processes of reacting to one's emotions and transforming one emotion into another. Crying, for example, is not always true grieving that leads to relief, but rather can be the crying of secondary helplessness or frustration that results in feeling worse." Secondary reactive emotion responses are accessed and explored in therapy in order to increase awareness of them and to arrive at more primary and adaptive emotion responses.
- Instrumental emotion responses are experienced and expressed by a person because the person has learned that the response has an effect on others, "such as getting them to pay attention to us, to go along with something we want them to do for us, to approve of us, or perhaps most often just not to disapprove of us." Instrumental emotion responses can be consciously intended or unconsciously learned (i.e., through operant conditioning). Examples include crocodile tears (instrumental sadness), bullying (instrumental anger), crying wolf (instrumental fear), and feigned embarrassment (instrumental shame). When a client responds in therapy with instrumental emotion responses, it may feel manipulative or superficial to the therapist. Instrumental emotion responses are explored in therapy in order to increase awareness of their interpersonal function and/or the associated primary and secondary gain.
The therapeutic process with different emotion responses
Emotion-focused
theorists have proposed that each type of emotion response calls for a
different intervention process by the therapist.
Primary adaptive emotion responses need be more fully allowed and
accessed for their adaptive information. Primary maladaptive emotion
responses need to be accessed and explored to help the client identify
core unmet needs (e.g., for validation, safety, or connection), and then
regulated and transformed with new experiences and new adaptive
emotions. Secondary reactive emotion responses need empathic
exploration in order to discover the sequence of emotions that preceded
them. Instrumental emotion responses need to be explored
interpersonally in the therapeutic relationship to increase awareness of them and address how they are functioning in the client's situation.
It is important to note that primary emotion responses are not
called "primary" because they are somehow more real than the other
responses; all of the responses feel real to a person, but therapists
can classify them into these four types in order to help clarify the
functions of the response in the client's situation and how to intervene
appropriately.
Therapeutic tasks
A
therapeutic task is an immediate problem that a client needs to resolve
in a psychotherapy session. In the 1970s and 1980s, researchers such as
Laura North Rice (a former colleague of Carl Rogers) applied task analysis
to transcripts of psychotherapy sessions in an attempt to describe in
more detail the process of clients' cognitive and emotional change, so
that therapists might more reliably provide optimal conditions for
change.
This kind of psychotherapy process research eventually led to a
standardized (and evolving) set of therapeutic tasks in emotion-focused
therapy for individuals.
The following table summarizes the standard set of these therapeutic tasks as of 2012. The tasks are classified into five broad groups: empathy-based, relational, experiencing, reprocessing, and action. The task marker is an observable sign that a client may be ready to work on the associated task. The intervention process is a sequence of actions carried out by therapist and client in working on the task. The end state is the desired resolution of the immediate problem.
In addition to the task markers listed below, other markers and
intervention processes for working with emotion and narrative have been
specified: same old stories, empty stories, unstoried emotions, and broken stories.
|
|
Task marker | Intervention process | End state |
|---|---|---|---|
| Empathy-based tasks | Problem-relevant experience (e.g., interesting, troubling, intense, puzzling) | Empathic exploration | Clear marker, or new meaning explicated |
| Vulnerability (painful emotion related to self) | Empathic affirmation | Self-affirmation (feels understood, hopeful, stronger) | |
| Relational tasks | Beginning of therapy | Alliance formation | Productive working environment |
| Therapy complaint or withdrawal difficulty (questioning goals or tasks; persistent avoidance of relationship or work) | Alliance dialogue (each explores own role in difficulty) | Alliance repair (stronger therapeutic bond or investment in therapy; greater self-understanding) | |
| Experiencing tasks | Attentional focus difficulty (e.g., confused, overwhelmed, blank) | Clearing a space | Therapeutic focus; ability to work productively with experiencing (working distance) |
| Unclear feeling (vague, external or abstract) | Experiential focusing | Symbolization of felt sense; sense of easing (feeling shift); readiness to apply outside of therapy (carrying forward) | |
| Difficulty expressing feelings (avoiding feelings, difficulty answering feeling questions) | Allowing and expressing emotion (also experiential focusing, systematic evocative unfolding, chairwork) | Successful, appropriate expression of emotion to therapist and others | |
| Reprocessing tasks [situational-perceptual] | Difficult/traumatic experiences (narrative pressure to tell painful life stories) | Trauma retelling | Relief, validation, restoration of narrative gaps, understanding of broader meaning |
| Problematic reaction point (puzzling over-reaction to specific situation) | Systematic evocative unfolding | New view of self in-the-world-functioning | |
| Meaning protest (life event violates cherished belief) | Meaning creation work | Revision of cherished belief | |
| Action tasks [action tendency] | Self-evaluative split (self-criticism, tornness) | Two-chair dialogue | Self-acceptance, integration |
| Self-interruption split (blocked feelings, resignation) | Two-chair enactment | Self-expression, empowerment | |
| Unfinished business (lingering bad feeling regarding significant other) | Empty-chair work | Let go of resentments, unmet needs regarding other; affirm self; understand or hold other accountable | |
| Stuck, disregulated anguish | Compassionate self-soothing | Emotional/bodily relief, self-empowerment |
Emotion-focused therapy for trauma
The interventions and the structure of emotion-focused therapy have been adapted for the specific needs of psychological trauma survivors. A manual of emotion-focused therapy for individuals with complex trauma (EFTT) has been published. For example, modifications of the traditional Gestalt empty chair technique have been developed.
Other versions of EFT for individuals
Brubacher (2017) proposed an emotionally focused approach to individual therapy that focuses on attachment,
while integrating the experiential focus of empathic attunement for
engaging and reprocessing emotional experience and tracking and
restructuring the systemic aspects and patterns of emotion regulation. The therapist follows the attachment model by addressing deactivating and hyperactivating strategies.
Individual therapy is seen as a process of developing secure
connections between therapist and client, between client and past and
present relationships, and within the client.
Attachment principles guide therapy in the following ways: forming the
collaborative therapeutic relationship, shaping the overall goal for
therapy to be that of "effective dependency" (following John Bowlby) upon one or two safe others, depathologizing emotion by normalizing separation distress responses, and shaping change processes.
The change processes are: identifying and strengthening patterns of
emotion regulation, and creating corrective emotional experiences to
transform negative patterns into secure bonds.
Couples therapy
.jpg)
A couple
A systemic
perspective is important in all approaches to EFT for couples. Tracking
conflictual patterns of interaction, often referred to as a "dance" in
Johnson's popular literature, has been a hallmark of the first stage of Johnson and Greenberg's approach since its inception in 1985.
In Goldman and Greenberg's newer approach, therapists help clients
"also work toward self-change and the resolution of pain stemming from
unmet childhood needs that affect the couple interaction, in addition to
working on interactional change."
Goldman and Greenberg justify their added emphasis on self-change by
noting that not all problems in a relationship can be solved only by
tracking and changing patterns of interaction:
In addition, in our observations of psychotherapeutic work with couples, we have found that problems or difficulties that can be traced to core identity concerns such as needs for validation or a sense of worth are often best healed through therapeutic methods directed toward the self rather than to the interactions. For example, if a person's core emotion is one of shame and they feel "rotten at the core" or "simply fundamentally flawed," soothing or reassuring from one's partner, while helpful, will not ultimately solve the problem, lead to structural emotional change, or alter the view of oneself.
In Greenberg and Goldman's approach to EFT for couples, although they "fully endorse"
the importance of attachment, attachment is not considered to be the
only interpersonal motivation of couples; instead, attachment is
considered to be one of three aspects of relational functioning, along
with issues of identity/power and attraction/liking.
In Johnson's approach, attachment theory is considered to be the
defining theory of adult love, subsuming other motivations, and it
guides the therapist in processing and reprocessing emotion.
In Greenberg and Goldman's approach, the emphasis is on working
with core issues related to identity (working models of self and other)
and promoting both self-soothing and other-soothing for a better
relationship, in addition to interactional change.
In Johnson's approach, the primary goal is to reshape attachment bonds
and create "effective dependency" (including secure attachment).
Stages and steps
EFT for couples features a nine-step model of restructuring the attachment bond between partners.
In this approach, the aim is to reshape the attachment bond and create
more effective co-regulation and "effective dependency", increasing
individuals' self-regulation and resilience.
In good-outcome cases, the couple is helped to respond and thereby meet
each other's unmet needs and injuries from childhood. The newly shaped
secure attachment bond may become the best antidote to traumatic
experience from within and outside of the relationship.
Adding to the original three-stage, nine-step EFT framework developed by Johnson and Greenberg, Greenberg and Goldman's emotion-focused therapy for couples has five stages and 14 steps.
It is structured to work on identity issues and self-regulation prior
to changing negative interactions. It is considered necessary, in this
approach, to help partners experience and reveal their own underlying
vulnerable feelings first, so they are better equipped to do the intense
work of attuning to the other partner and to be open to restructuring
interactions and the attachment bond.
Johnson (2008)
summarizes the nine treatment steps in Johnson's model of EFT for
couples: "The therapist leads the couple through these steps in a spiral
fashion, as one step incorporates and leads into the other. In mildly
distressed couples, partners usually work quickly through the steps at a
parallel rate. In more distressed couples, the more passive or
withdrawn partner is usually invited to go through the steps slightly
ahead of the other."
Stage 1. Stabilization (assessment and de-escalation phase)
- Step 1: Identify the relational conflict issues between the partners
- Step 2: Identify the negative interaction cycle where these issues are expressed
- Step 3: Access attachment emotions underlying the position each partner takes in this cycle
- Step 4: Reframe the problem in terms of the cycle, unacknowledged emotions, and attachment needs
During this stage the therapist creates a comfortable and stable
environment for the couple to have an open discussion about any
hesitations the couples may have about the therapy, including the
trustworthiness of the therapist. The therapist also gets a sense of the
couple's positive and negative interactions from past and present and
is able to summarize and present the negative patterns for them.
Partners soon no longer view themselves as victims of their negative
interaction cycle; they are now allies against it.
Stage 2. Restructuring the bond (changing interactional positions phase)
- Step 5: Access disowned or implicit needs (e.g., need for reassurance), emotions (e.g., shame), and models of self
- Step 6: Promote each partner's acceptance of the other's experience
- Step 7: Facilitate each partner's expression of needs and wants to restructure the interaction based on new understandings and create bonding events
This stage involves restructuring and widening the emotional
experiences of the couple. This is done through couples recognizing
their attachment needs, and then changing their interactions based on
those needs. At first their new way of interacting may be strange and
hard to accept, but as they become more aware and in control of their
interactions they are able to stop old patterns of behavior from
reemerging.
Stage 3. Integration and consolidation
- Step 8: Facilitate the formulation of new stories and new solutions to old problems
- Step 9: Consolidate new cycles of behavior
This stage focuses on reflection of new emotional experiences and
self-concepts. It integrates the couple's new ways of dealing with
problems within themselves and in the relationship.
Styles of attachment
Johnson & Sims (2000) described four attachment styles that affect the therapy process:
- People who are secure and trusting perceive themselves as lovable, able to trust others and themselves within a relationship. They give clear emotional signals, and are engaged, resourceful and flexible in unclear relationships. Secure partners express feelings, articulate needs, and allow their own vulnerability to show.
- People who have a diminished ability to articulate feelings, tend not to acknowledge their need for attachment, and struggle to name their needs in a relationship. They tend to adopt a safe position and solve problems dispassionately without understanding the effect that their safe distance has on their partners.
- People who are psychologically reactive and who exhibit anxious attachment. They tend to demand reassurance in an aggressive way, demand their partner's attachment and tend to use blame strategies (including emotional blackmail) in order to engage their partner.
- People who have been traumatized and have experienced little to no recovery from it vacillate between attachment and hostility.
Family therapy
A family
The emotionally focused family therapy (EFFT) of Johnson and her
colleagues aims to promote secure bonds among distressed family members. It is a therapy approach consistent with the attachment-oriented experiential–systemic emotionally focused model
in three stages: (1) de-escalating negative cycles of interaction that
amplify conflict and insecure connections between parents and children;
(2) restructuring interactions to shape positive cycles of parental
accessibility and responsiveness to offer the child or adolescent a safe
haven and a secure base; (3) consolidation of the new responsive cycles
and secure bonds.
Its primary focus is on strengthening parental responsiveness and
care giving, to meet children and adolescents' attachment needs.
It aims to "build stronger families through (1) recruiting and
strengthening parental emotional responsiveness to children, (2)
accessing and clarifying children's attachment needs, and (3)
facilitating and shaping care giving interactions from parent to child". Some clinicians have integrated EFFT with play therapy.
One group of clinicians, inspired in part by Greenberg's approach
to EFT, developed a treatment protocol specifically for families of
individuals struggling with an eating disorder.
The treatment is based on the principles and techniques of four
different approaches: emotion-focused therapy, behavioral family
therapy, motivational enhancement therapy, and the New Maudsley family
skills-based approach.
It aims to help parents "support their child in the processing of
emotions, increasing their emotional self-efficacy, deepening the
parent–child relationships and thereby making ED [eating disorder]
symptoms unnecessary to cope with painful emotional experiences".
The treatment has three main domains of intervention, four core
principles, and five steps derived from Greenberg's emotion-focused
approach and influenced by John Gottman:
(1) attending to the child's emotional experience, (2) naming the
emotions, (3) validating the emotional experience, (4) meeting the
emotional need, and (5) helping the child to move through the emotional
experience, problem solving if necessary.
Efficacy
Johnson,
Greenberg, and many of their colleagues have spent their long careers
as academic researchers publishing the results of empirical studies of
various forms of EFT.
The American Psychological Association considers emotion-focused therapy for individuals to be an empirically supported treatment for depression.
Studies have suggested that it is effective in the treatment of
depression, interpersonal problems, trauma, and avoidant personality
disorder.
Practitioners of EFT have claimed that studies have consistently shown clinically significant improvement post therapy.
Studies, again mostly by EFT practitioners, have suggested that
emotionally focused therapy for couples is an effective way to
restructure distressed couple relationships into safe and secure bonds
with long-lasting results. Johnson et al. (1999)
conducted a meta-analysis of the four most rigorous outcome studies
before 2000 and concluded that the original nine-step, three-stage
emotionally focused therapy approach to couples therapy
had a larger effect size than any other couple intervention had
achieved to date, but this meta-analysis was later harshly criticized by
psychologist James C. Coyne,
who called it "a poor quality meta-analysis of what should have been
left as pilot studies conducted by promoters of a therapy in their own
lab". A study with an fMRI
component suggested that emotionally focused couples therapy reduces
the brain's response to threat in the presence of a romantic partner, but this study too was later harshly criticized by Coyne.
Strengths
Some of the strengths of EFT approaches can be summarized as follows:
- EFT aims to be collaborative and respectful of clients, combining experiential person-centered therapy techniques with systemic therapy interventions.
- Change strategies and interventions are specified through intensive analysis of psychotherapy process.
- EFT has been validated by 30 years of empirical research. There is also research on the change processes and predictors of success.
- EFT has been applied to different kinds of problems and populations, although more research on different populations and cultural adaptations is needed.
- EFT for couples is based on conceptualizations of marital distress and adult love that are supported by empirical research on the nature of adult interpersonal attachment.
Criticism
Psychotherapist Campbell Purton, in his 2014 book The Trouble with Psychotherapy, criticized a variety of approaches to psychotherapy, including behavior therapy, person-centered therapy, psychodynamic therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, emotion-focused therapy, and existential therapy;
he argued that these psychotherapies have accumulated excessive and/or
flawed theoretical baggage that deviates too much from an everyday
common-sense understanding of personal troubles.
With regard to emotion-focused therapy, Purton argued that "the
effectiveness of each of the 'therapeutic tasks' can be understood
without the theory"
and that what clients say "is not well explained in terms of the
interaction of emotion schemes; it is better explained in terms of the
person's situation, their response to it, and their having learned the
particular language in which they articulate their response."
In 2014, psychologist James C. Coyne criticized some EFT research for lack of rigor (for example, being underpowered and having high risk of bias), but he also noted that such problems are common in the field of psychotherapy research.
In a 2015 article in Behavioral and Brain Sciences on "memory reconsolidation,
emotional arousal and the process of change in psychotherapy", Richard
D. Lane and colleagues summarized a common claim in the literature on
emotion-focused therapy that "emotional arousal is a key ingredient in
therapeutic change" and that "emotional arousal is critical to
psychotherapeutic success". In a response accompanying the article, Bruce Ecker and colleagues (creators of coherence therapy)
disagreed with this claim and argued that the key ingredient in
therapeutic change involving memory reconsolidation is not emotional
arousal but instead a perceived mismatch between an expected pattern and
an experienced pattern; they wrote:
The brain clearly does not require emotional arousal per se for inducing deconsolidation. That is a fundamental point. If the target learning happens to be emotional, then its reactivation (the first of the two required elements) of course entails an experience of that emotion, but the emotion itself does not inherently play a role in the mismatch that then deconsolidates the target learning, or in the new learning that then rewrites and erases the target learning (discussed at greater length in Ecker 2015). [...] The same considerations imply that "changing emotion with emotion" (stated three times by Lane et al.) inaccurately characterizes how learned responses change through reconsolidation. Mismatch consists most fundamentally of a direct, unmistakable perception that the world functions differently from one's learned model. "Changing model with mismatch" is the core phenomenology.
Other responses to Lane et al. (2015)
argued that their emotion-focused approach "would be strengthened by
the inclusion of predictions regarding additional factors that might
influence treatment response, predictions for improving outcomes for
non-responsive patients, and a discussion of how the proposed model
might explain individual differences in vulnerability for mental health
problems", and that their model needed further development to account for the diversity of states called "psychopathology" and the relevant maintaining and worsening processes.
