A Medley of Potpourri is just what it says; various thoughts, opinions, ruminations, and contemplations on a variety of subjects.
Search This Blog
Friday, May 22, 2020
Velocity of money
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Chart showing the log of the velocity (green) of the U.S. M2, calculated by dividing nominal GDP by the M2 stock (M1 plus time deposits), 1959–2010. The employment-to-population ratio is displayed in blue, and periods of recession are represented with gray bars.
Similar chart showing the logged velocity (green) of a slightly narrower measure M1 of money consisting of currency and liquid deposits, 1959–2010.
Similar
chart showing the logged velocity (green) of a broader measure of money
M3 that covers M2 plus large institutional deposits. The US no longer
publishes official M3 measures, so the chart only runs through 2005.
The velocity of money (or the velocity of circulation of money)
is a measure of the number of times that the average unit of currency
is used to purchase goods and services within a given time period. The concept relates the size of economic activity to a given money supply and the speed of money exchange is one of the variables that determine inflation. The measure of the velocity of money is usually the ratio of gross national product (GNP) to a country's money supply.
If the velocity of money is increasing, then transactions are occurring between individuals more frequently. The velocity of money changes over time and is influenced by a variety of factors.
Illustration
If, for example, in a very small economy, a farmer and a mechanic, with just $50 between them, buy new goods and services from each other in just three transactions over the course of a year
Farmer spends $50 on tractor repair from mechanic.
then $100 changed hands in the course of a year, even though there is
only $50 in this little economy. That $100 level is possible because
each dollar was spent on new goods and services an average of twice a
year, which is to say that the velocity was .
Note that if the farmer bought a used tractor from the mechanic or
made a gift to the mechanic, it would not go into the numerator of
velocity because that transaction would not be part of this tiny
economy's gross domestic product (GDP).
Relation to money demand
The velocity of money provides another perspective on money demand. Given the nominal flow of transactions using money, if the interest rate
on alternative financial assets is high, people will not want to hold
much money relative to the quantity of their transactions—they try to
exchange it fast for goods or other financial assets, and money is said
to "burn a hole in their pocket" and velocity is high. This situation is
precisely one of money demand being low. Conversely, with a low opportunity cost velocity is low and money demand is high. In money market equilibrium, some economic variables (interest rates, income, or the price level) have adjusted to equate money demand and money supply.
The quantitative relation between velocity and money demand is given by Velocity = Nominal Transactions (however defined) divided by Nominal Money Demand.
Indirect measurement
In practice, attempts to measure the velocity of money are usually indirect. The transactions velocity can be computed as
where
is the velocity of money for all transactions in a given time frame;
is the aggregate real value of transactions in a given time frame; and
is the total nominal amount of money in circulation on average in the economy (see “Money supply” for details).
Thus is the total nominal amount of transactions per period.
Values of and permit calculation of .
Similarly, the income velocity of money may be written as
The determinants and consequent stability of the velocity of money are a subject of controversy across and within schools of economic thought. Those favoring a quantity theory of money have tended to believe that, in the absence of inflationary or deflationary
expectations, velocity will be technologically determined and stable,
and that such expectations will not generally arise without a signal
that overall prices have changed or will change.
Criticism
Ludwig von Mises in a 1968 letter to Henry Hazlitt
said: "The main deficiency of the velocity of circulation concept is
that it does not start from the actions of individuals but looks at the
problem from the angle of the whole economic system. This concept in
itself is a vicious mode of approaching the problem of prices and
purchasing power. It is assumed that, other things being equal, prices
must change in proportion to the changes occurring in the total supply
of money available. This is not true."