Alternative fuels, known as non-conventional and advanced fuels, are any materials or substances that can be used as fuels, other than conventional fuels like; fossil fuels (petroleum (oil), coal, and natural gas), as well as nuclear materials such as uranium and thorium, as well as artificial radioisotope fuels that are made in nuclear reactors.
Some well-known alternative fuels include biodiesel, bioalcohol (methanol, ethanol, butanol), refuse-derived fuel, chemically stored electricity (batteries and fuel cells), hydrogen, non-fossil methane, non-fossil natural gas, vegetable oil, propane and other biomass sources.
Background
The main purpose of fuel is to store energy, which should be in a stable form and can be easily transported to the place of use.
Almost all fuels are chemical fuels. The user employs this fuel
to generate heat or perform mechanical work, such as powering an engine.
It may also be used to generate electricity, which is then used for
heating, lighting, or other purpose.
Biofuel
Biofuels are also considered a renewable source. Although renewable
energy is used mostly to generate electricity, it is often assumed that
some form of renewable energy or a percentage is used to create
alternative fuels.
Research is ongoing into finding more suitable biofuel crops and
improving the oil yields of these crops. Using the current yields, vast
amounts of land and fresh water would be needed to produce enough oil to
completely replace fossil fuel usage.
Biomass
Biomass in the energy production industry is living and recently dead biological material
which can be used as fuel or for industrial production.
It has become popular among coal power stations, which switch from coal
to biomass in order to convert to renewable energy generation without
wasting existing generating plant and infrastructure. Biomass most often
refers to plants or plant-based materials that are not used for food or
feed, and are specifically called lignocellulosic biomass.[2] As an
energy source, biomass can either be used directly via combustion to
produce heat, or indirectly after converting it to various forms of
biofuel.
Algae-based fuels
Algae-based biofuels have been promoted in the media as a potential
panacea to crude oil-based transportation problems. Algae could yield
more than 2000 gallons of fuel per acre per year of production. Algae based fuels are being successfully tested by the U.S. Navy
Algae-based plastics show potential to reduce waste and the cost per
pound of algae plastic is expected to be cheaper than traditional
plastic prices.
Biodiesel
Biodiesel
is made from animal fats or vegetable oils, renewable resources that
come from plants such as jatropha, soybean, sunflowers, corn, olive,
peanut, palm, coconut, safflower, canola, sesame, cottonseed, etc. Once
these fats or oils are filtered from their hydrocarbons and then
combined with alcohol like methanol, biodiesel is brought to life
from this chemical reaction. These raw materials can either be mixed
with pure diesel to make various proportions, or used alone. Despite
one’s mixture preference, biodiesel will release smaller number of
pollutants (carbon monoxide particulates and hydrocarbons) than
conventional diesel, because biodiesel burns both cleanly and more
efficiently. Even with regular diesel’s reduced quantity of sulfur from
the ULSD (ultra-low sulfur diesel) invention, biodiesel exceeds those
levels because it is sulfur-free.
Alcohol fuels
Methanol and ethanol fuel are primary sources of energy; they are
convenient fuels for storing and transporting energy. These alcohols
can be used in internal combustion engines as alternative fuels. Butanol
has another advantage: it is the only alcohol-based motor fuel that can
be transported readily by existing petroleum-product pipeline networks,
instead of only by tanker trucks and railroad cars.
Ammonia
Ammonia (NH3) can be used as fuel.
Benefits of ammonia include no need for oil, zero emissions, low cost,
and distributed production reducing transport and related pollution.
Carbon-neutral and negative fuels
Carbon neutral fuel is synthetic fuel—such as methane, gasoline, diesel fuel or jet fuel—produced from renewable or nuclear energy used to hydrogenate waste carbon dioxide recycled from power plant flue exhaust gas or derived from carbonic acid in seawater. Such fuels are potentially carbon neutral because they do not result in a net increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases. To the extent that carbon neutral fuels displace fossil fuels, or if they are produced from waste carbon or seawater carbonic acid, and their combustion is subject to carbon capture at the flue or exhaust pipe, they result in negative carbon dioxide emission and net carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere, and thus constitute a form of greenhouse gas remediation. Such carbon neutral and negative fuels can be produced by the electrolysis of water to make hydrogen used in the Sabatier reaction to produce methane which may then be stored to be burned later in power plants as synthetic natural gas, transported by pipeline, truck, or tanker ship, or be used in gas to liquids processes such as the Fischer–Tropsch process to make traditional transportation or heating fuels.
Carbon-neutral fuels have been proposed for distributed storage for renewable energy, minimizing problems of wind and solar intermittency,
and enabling transmission of wind, water, and solar power through
existing natural gas pipelines. Such renewable fuels could alleviate the
costs and dependency issues of imported fossil fuels without requiring
either electrification of the vehicle fleet or conversion to hydrogen or other fuels, enabling continued compatible and affordable vehicles. Germany has built a 250-kilowatt synthetic methane plant which they are scaling up to 10 megawatts. Audi has constructed a carbon neutral liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant in Werlte, Germany. The plant is intended to produce transportation fuel to offset LNG used in their A3 Sportback g-tron automobiles, and can keep 2,800 metric tons of CO2 out of the environment per year at its initial capacity. Other commercial developments are taking place in Columbia, South Carolina, Camarillo, California, and Darlington, England.
The least expensive source of carbon for recycling into fuel is flue-gas emissions from fossil-fuel combustion, where it can be extracted for about US $7.50 per ton.
Automobile exhaust gas capture has also been proposed to be economical
but would require extensive design changes or retrofitting. Since carbonic acid in seawater is in chemical equilibrium with atmospheric carbon dioxide, extraction of carbon from seawater has been studied. Researchers have estimated that carbon extraction from seawater would cost about $50 per ton. Carbon capture from ambient air is more costly, at between $600 and $1000 per ton and is considered impractical for fuel synthesis or carbon sequestration.
Nighttime wind power is considered the most economical form of electrical power with which to synthesize fuel, because the load curve
for electricity peaks sharply during the warmest hours of the day, but
wind tends to blow slightly more at night than during the day.
Therefore, the price of nighttime wind power is often much less
expensive than any alternative. Off-peak wind power prices in high wind
penetration areas of the U.S. averaged 1.64 cents per kilowatt-hour in 2009, but only 0.71 cents/kWh during the least expensive six hours of the day. Typically, wholesale electricity costs 2 to 5 cents/kWh during the day. Commercial fuel synthesis companies suggest they can produce fuel for less than petroleum fuels when oil costs more than $55 per barrel.
The U.S. Navy estimates that shipboard production of jet fuel from
nuclear power would cost about $6 per gallon. While that was about twice
the petroleum fuel cost in 2010, it is expected to be much less than
the market price in less than five years if recent trends continue.
Moreover, since the delivery of fuel to a carrier battle group costs about $8 per gallon, shipboard production is already much less expensive. However, U.S. civilian nuclear power is considerably more expensive than wind power.
The Navy's estimate that 100 megawatts can produce 41,000 gallons of
fuel per day indicates that terrestrial production from wind power would
cost less than $1 per gallon.
Hydrogen & formic acid
Hydrogen is an emissionless fuel. The byproduct of hydrogen burning is water, although some mono-nitrogen oxides NOx are produced when hydrogen is burned with air.
Another fuel is formic acid. The fuel is used by converting it first to hydrogen, and using that in a fuel cell. Formic acid is much more easy to store than hydrogen.
Hydrogen/compressed natural gas mixture
Liquid nitrogen
Liquid nitrogen is another type of emissionless and efficient fuel.
Compressed air
The air engine is an emission-free piston engine using compressed air
as fuel. Unlike hydrogen, compressed air is about one-tenth as
expensive as fossil fuel, making it an economically attractive
alternative fuel.
Propane autogas
Propane
is a cleaner burning, high performance fuel derived from multiple
sources. It is known by many names including propane, LPG (liquified
propane gas), LPA (liquid propane autogas), Autogas and others. Propane
is a hydrocarbon fuel and is a member of the natural gas family.
Propane as an automotive fuel shares many of the physical
attributes of gasoline while reducing tailpipe emissions and well to
wheel emissions overall. Propane is the number one alternative fuel in
the world and offers an abundance of supply, liquid storage at low
pressure, an excellent safety record and large cost savings when
compared to traditional fuels.
Propane delivers an octane rating between 104 and 112
depending on the composition of the butane/propane ratios of the
mixture. Propane autogas in a liquid injection format captures the phase
change from liquid to gas state within the cylinder of the combustion
engine producing an "intercooler" effect, reducing the cylinder
temperature and increasing air density. The resultant effect allows more advance on the ignition cycle and a more efficient engine combustion.
Propane lacks additives, detergents or other chemical
enhancements further reducing the exhaust output from the tailpipe. The
cleaner combustion also has fewer particulate emissions, lower NOx
due to the complete combustion of the gas within the cylinder, higher
exhaust temperatures increasing the efficiency of the catalyst and
deposits less acid and carbon inside the engine which extends the useful
life of the lubricating oil.
Propane autogas is generated at the well alongside other natural
gas and oil products. It is also a by-product of the refining processes
which further increase the supply of Propane to the market.
Propane is stored and transported in a liquid state at roughly
5 bar (73 psi) of pressure. Fueling vehicles is similar to gasoline in
speed of delivery with modern fueling equipment. Propane filling
stations only require a pump to transfer vehicle fuel and does not
require expensive and slow compression systems when compared to compressed natural gas which is usually kept at over 3,000 psi (210 bar).
In a vehicle format, propane autogas can be retrofitted to almost
any engine and provide fuel cost savings and lowered emissions while
being more efficient as an overall system due to the large, pre-existing
propane fueling infrastructure that does not require compressors and
the resultant waste of other alternative fuels in well to wheel
lifecycles.
Natural gas vehicles
Compressed natural gas (CNG) and liquified natural gas (LNG) are two cleaner combusting alternatives to conventional liquid automobile fuels.
Compressed natural gas fuel types
Compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles can use both renewable CNG and non-renewable CNG.
Conventional CNG is produced from the many underground natural
gas reserves are in widespread production worldwide today. New
technologies such as horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing to
economically access unconventional gas resources, appear to have
increased the supply of natural gas in a fundamental way.
Renewable natural gas or biogas is a methane‐based gas with
similar properties to natural gas that can be used as transportation
fuel. Present sources of biogas are mainly landfills, sewage, and
animal/agri‐waste. Based on the process type, biogas can be divided
into the following: biogas produced by anaerobic digestion, landfill gas collected from landfills, treated to remove trace contaminants, and synthetic natural gas (SNG).
Practicality
Around the world, this gas powers more than 5 million vehicles, and just over 150,000 of these are in the U.S. American usage is growing at a dramatic rate.
Environmental analysis
Because
natural gas emits little pollutant when combusted, cleaner air quality
has been measured in urban localities switching to natural gas vehicles Tailpipe CO2 can be reduced by 15–25% compared to gasoline, diesel. The greatest reductions occur in medium and heavy duty, light duty and refuse truck segments.
CO2 reductions of up to 88% are possible by using biogas.
Similarities to hydrogen
Natural gas, like hydrogen, is another fuel that burns cleanly; cleaner
than both gasoline and diesel engines. Also, none of the smog-forming
contaminates are emitted. Hydrogen and natural gas are both lighter
than air and can be mixed together.
Nuclear power and radiothermal generators
Nuclear reactors
Nuclear power is any nuclear technology designed to extract usable energy from atomic nuclei via controlled nuclear reactions. The only controlled method now practical uses nuclear fission in a fissile fuel (with a small fraction of the power coming from subsequent radioactive decay). Use of the nuclear reaction nuclear fusion for controlled power generation is not yet practical, but is an active area of research.
Nuclear power is usually used by using a nuclear reactor
to heat a working fluid such as water, which is then used to create
steam pressure, which is converted into mechanical work for the purpose
of generating electricity or propulsion in water. Today, more than 15%
of the world's electricity comes from nuclear power, and over 150
nuclear-powered naval vessels have been built.
In theory, electricity from nuclear reactors could also be used for propulsion in space, but this has yet to be demonstrated in a space flight. Some smaller reactors, such as the TOPAZ nuclear reactor,
are built to minimize moving parts, and use methods that convert
nuclear energy to electricity more directly, making them useful for
space missions, but this electricity has historically been used for
other purposes. Power from nuclear fission has been used in a number of spacecraft, all of them unmanned. The Soviets up to 1988 orbited 33 nuclear reactors in RORSAT
military radar satellites, where electric power generated was used to
power a radar unit that located ships on the Earth's oceans. The U.S.
also orbited one experimental nuclear reactor in 1965, in the SNAP-10A mission. No nuclear reactor has been sent into space since 1988.
Thorium fuelled nuclear reactors
Thorium-based nuclear power
reactors have also become an area of active research in recent years.
It is being backed by many scientists and researchers, and Professor
James Hansen, the former Director at NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies has reportedly said, “After studying climate change
for over four decades, it’s clear to me that the world is heading for a
climate catastrophe unless we develop adequate energy sources to
replace fossil fuels. Safer, cleaner and cheaper nuclear power can replace coal and is desperately needed as an essential part of the solution”. Thorium is 3-4 times more abundant within nature than uranium, and its ore, monazite,
is commonly found in sands along bodies of water. Thorium has also
gained interest because it could be easier to obtain than uranium. While
uranium mines are enclosed underground and thus very dangerous for the miners, thorium is taken from open pits.
Monazite is present in countries such as Australia, the United States
and India, in quantities large enough to power the earth for thousands
of years. As an alternative to uranium fuelled nuclear reactors, thorium has been proven to add to proliferation, produces radioactive waste for deep geological repositories like technetium-99 (half-life over 200,000 years), and has a longer fuel cycle.
Radiothermal generators
In addition, radioisotopes
have been used as alternative fuels, on both land and in space. Their
use on land is declining due to the danger of theft of isotope and
environmental damage if the unit is opened. The decay of radioisotopes
generates both heat and electricity in many space probes, particularly
probes to outer planets where sunlight is weak, and low temperatures is a
problem. Radiothermal generators
(RTGs) which use such radioisotopes as fuels do not sustain a nuclear
chain reaction, but rather generate electricity from the decay of a
radioisotope which has (in turn) been produced on Earth as a
concentrated power source (fuel) using energy from an Earth-based nuclear reactor.