https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology (from Greek ψῡχή, psȳkhē, "breath, life, soul"; φύσις, physis, "nature, origin"; and -λογία, -logia) is the branch of psychology that is concerned with the physiological bases of psychological processes. While psychophysiology was a general broad field of research in the 1960s and 1970s, it has now become quite specialized, and has branched into subspecializations such as social psychophysiology, cardiovascular psychophysiology, cognitive psychophysiology, and cognitive neuroscience.
Psychophysiology (from Greek ψῡχή, psȳkhē, "breath, life, soul"; φύσις, physis, "nature, origin"; and -λογία, -logia) is the branch of psychology that is concerned with the physiological bases of psychological processes. While psychophysiology was a general broad field of research in the 1960s and 1970s, it has now become quite specialized, and has branched into subspecializations such as social psychophysiology, cardiovascular psychophysiology, cognitive psychophysiology, and cognitive neuroscience.
Background
Some people have difficulty distinguishing a psychophysiologist from a physiological psychologist, two very different perspectives. Psychologists are interested in why we may fear spiders and physiologists may be interested in the input/output system of the amygdala.
A psychophysiologist will attempt to link the two. Psychophysiologists
generally study the psychological/physiological link in intact human
subjects. While early psychophysiologists almost always examined the
impact of psychological states on physiological system responses, since
the 1970s, psychophysiologists also frequently study the impact of
physiological states and systems on psychological states and processes.
It is this perspective of studying the interface of mind and body that
makes psychophysiologists most distinct.
Historically, most psychophysiologists tended to examine the physiological responses and organ systems innervated by the autonomic nervous system. More recently, psychophysiologists have been equally, or potentially more, interested in the central nervous system, exploring cortical brain potentials such as the many types of event-related potentials (ERPs), brain waves, and utilizing advanced technology such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), MRI, PET, MEG, and other neuroimagery techniques.
Continuing the comparison between a psychophysiologist and a
physiological psychologist, a psychophysiologist may look at how
exposure to a stressful situation will produce a result in the
cardiovascular system such as a change in heart rate (HR),
vasodilation/vasoconstriction, myocardial contractility, or stroke
volume. A physiological psychologist may look at how one cardiovascular
event may influence another cardiovascular or endocrine event, or how
activation of one neural brain structure exerts excitatory activity in
another neural structure which then induces an inhibitory effect in some
other system. Often, physiological psychologists examine the effects
that they study in infrahuman subjects using surgical or invasive
techniques and processes.
Psychophysiology is closely related to the field of neuroscience and social neuroscience, which primarily concerns itself with relationships between psychological events and brain responses. Psychophysiology is also related to the medical discipline known as psychosomatics.
While psychophysiology was a discipline off the mainstream of
psychological and medical science prior to roughly the 1960 and 1970s,
more recently, psychophysiology has found itself positioned at the
intersection of psychological and medical science, and its popularity
and importance have expanded commensurately with the realization of the
inter-relatedness of mind and body.
Measures
Psychophysiology measures exist in three domains; reports, readings, and behavior.
Evaluative reports involve participant introspection and self-ratings
of internal psychological states or physiological sensations, such as
self-report of arousal levels on the self-assessment manikin, or measures of interoceptive visceral awareness such as heartbeat detection.
Merits to self-report are an emphasis on accurately understand the
participants' subjective experience and understanding their perception;
however, its pitfalls include the possibility of participants
misunderstanding a scale or incorrectly recalling events. Physiological responses also can be measured via instruments that read bodily events such as heart rate change, electrodermal activity (EDA),
muscle tension, and cardiac output. Many indices are part of modern
psychophysiology, including brain waves (electroencephalography, EEG), fMRI
(functional magnetic resonance imaging), electrodermal activity (a
standardized term encompassing skin conductance response, SCR, and
galvanic skin response, GSR), cardiovascular measures (heart rate, HR; beats per minute, BPM; heart rate variability, HRV; vasomotor activity), muscle activity (electromyography, EMG), electrogastrogram (EGG) changes in pupil diameter with thought and emotion (pupillometry), eye movements, recorded via the electro-oculogram (EOG) and direction-of-gaze methods, and cardiodynamics, recorded via impedance cardiography. These measures are beneficial because they provide accurate and perceiver-independent objective data recorded by machinery.
The downsides, however, are that any physical activity or motion can
alter responses, and basal levels of arousal and responsiveness can
differ among individuals and even between situations.
Finally, one can measure overt action or behavior, which involves
the observation and recording actual actions, such as running,
freezing, eye movement, and facial expression. These are good response
measures and easy to record in animals, but they are not as frequently
used in human studies.
Uses
Psychophysiological measures are often used to study emotion and attention responses to stimuli, during exertion, and increasingly, to better understand cognitive processes.
Physiological sensors have been used to detect emotions in schools and intelligent tutoring systems.
Emotion
It has long been recognized that emotional episodes are partly constituted by physiological responses.
Early work done linking emotions to psychophysiology started with
research on mapping consistent autonomic nervous system (ANS) responses
to discrete emotional states. For example, anger might be constituted by
a certain set of physiological responses, such as increased cardiac
output and high diastolic blood pressure, which would allow us to better
understand patterns and predict emotional responses. Some studies were
able to detect consistent patterns of ANS responses that corresponded to
specific emotions under certain contexts, like an early study by Paul
Ekman and colleagues in 1983 "Emotion-specific activity in the autonomic
nervous system was generated by constructing facial prototypes of
emotion muscle by muscle and by reliving past emotional experiences. The
autonomic activity produced distinguished not only between positive and
negative emotions, but also among negative emotions".
However, as more studies were conducted, more variability was found in
ANS responses to discrete emotion inductions, not only among individuals
but also over time in the same individuals, and greatly between social
groups.
Some of these differences can be attributed to variables like induction
technique, context of the study, or classification of stimuli, which
can alter a perceived scenario or emotional response. However it was
also found that features of the participant could also alter ANS
responses. Factors such as basal level of arousal at the time of
experimentation or between test recovery, learned or conditioned
responses to certain stimuli, range and maximal level of effect of ANS
action, and individual attentiveness can all alter physiological
responses in a lab setting.
Even supposedly discrete emotional states fail to show specificity. For
example, some emotional typologists consider fear to have subtypes,
which might involve fleeing or freezing, both of which can have distinct
physiological patterns and potentially distinct neural circuitry.
As such no definitive correlation can be drawn linking specific
autonomic patterns to discrete emotions, causing emotion theorists to
rethink classical definitions of emotions.
Psychophysiological inference and physiological computer games
Physiological computing represents a category of affective computing
that incorporates real-time software adaption to the
psychophysiological activity of the user. The main goal of this is to
build a computer that responds to user emotion, cognition and
motivation. The approach is to enable implicit and symmetrical
human-computer communication by granting the software access to a
representation of the user's psychological status.
There are several possible methods to represent the psychological state of the user (discussed in the affective computing
page). The advantages of using psychophysiological indices are that
their changes are continuous, measures are covert and implicit, and only
available data source when the user interacts with the computer without
any explicit communication or input device. These systems rely upon an
assumption that the psychophysiological measure is an accurate
one-to-one representation of a relevant psychological dimension such as
mental effort, task engagement and frustration.
Physiological computing systems all contain an element that may
be termed as an adaptive controller that may be used to represent the
player. This adaptive controller represents the decision-making process
underlying software adaptation. In their simplest form, adaptive
controllers are expressed in Boolean
statements. Adaptive controllers encompass not only the
decision-making rules, but also the psychophysiological inference that
is implicit in the quantification of those trigger points used to
activate the rules. The representation of the player using an adaptive
controller can become very complex and often only one-dimensional. The
loop used to describe this process is known as the biocybernetic loop.
The biocybernetic loop describes the closed loop system that receives
psychophysiological data from the player, transforms that data into a
computerized response, which then shapes the future psychophysiological
response from the player. A positive control loop tends towards
instability as player-software loop strives towards a higher standard of
desirable performance. The physiological computer game may wish to
incorporate both positive and negative loops into the adaptive
controller.