The term was first used by the agricultural and environmental
communities. Starting from the late 1990s in response to the threat of biological terrorism,
biosecurity encompasses the prevention of the intentional removal
(theft) of biological materials from research laboratories. These
preventative measures are a combination of systems and practices put
into its place at bioscience laboratories to prevent the use of
dangerous pathogens and toxins for malicious use, as well as by customs
agents and agricultural and natural resource managers to prevent the
spread of these biological agents.
Advances in technology have meant that many civilian research projects in medicine have the potential to be used in military applications (dual-use research) and biosecurity protocols are used to prevent dangerous biological materials from falling into the hands of malevolent parties. The National Academy of Sciences define biosecurity as "security against the inadvertent, inappropriate, or intentional malicious or malevolent use of potentially dangerous biological agents or biotechnology, including the development, production, stockpiling, or use of biological weapons as well as outbreaks of newly emergent and epidemic disease". Biosecurity requires the cooperation of scientists, technicians, policy makers, security engineers, and law enforcement officials.
Advances in technology have meant that many civilian research projects in medicine have the potential to be used in military applications (dual-use research) and biosecurity protocols are used to prevent dangerous biological materials from falling into the hands of malevolent parties. The National Academy of Sciences define biosecurity as "security against the inadvertent, inappropriate, or intentional malicious or malevolent use of potentially dangerous biological agents or biotechnology, including the development, production, stockpiling, or use of biological weapons as well as outbreaks of newly emergent and epidemic disease". Biosecurity requires the cooperation of scientists, technicians, policy makers, security engineers, and law enforcement officials.
As international security issue
Controversial experiments in synthetic biology, including the synthesis of poliovirus from its genetic sequence, and the modification of H5N1
for airborne transmission in mammals, have led to calls for tighter
controls on the materials and information used to perform similar feats.
Ideas include better enforcement by national governments and private
entities concerning shipments and downloads of such materials, and
registration or background check requirements for anyone handling such
materials.
Initially, health security or biosecurity issues have not been
considered as an international security issue especially in the
traditional view of international relations. However, some changes in
trend have contributed to inclusion of biosecurity (health security) in
discussions of security (Koblentz, 2010).
As time progressed, there was a movement towards securitization.
Non-traditional security issues such as climate change, organized crime,
terrorism, and landmines came to be included in the definition of
international security (Koblentz, 2010). There was a general realization
that the actors in the international system not only involved
nation-states but also included international organizations,
institutions, and individuals (Koblentz, 2010). Therefore, ensuring the
security of various actors within each nation became an important
agenda. Biosecurity is one of the issues to be securitized under this
trend. In fact, on January 10, 2000, the UN Security Council convened to
discuss HIV/AIDS as a security issue in Africa and designated it a
threat in the following month. The UNDP Millennium Development Goals
also recognize health issues as international security issue (Koblentz,
2010).
Several instances of epidemics that followed such as SARS increased
awareness of health security (biosecurity). Recently several factors
have rendered biosecurity issues more severe. There is a continuing
advancement of biotechnology which increases the possibility for
malevolent use, evolution of infectious diseases, and globalizing force
which is making the world more interdependent and more susceptible to
spread of epidemics (Koblentz, 2010).
Some uncertainties about the policy implementation for
biosecurity remain for future. In order to carefully plan out
preventative policies, policy makers need to be able to somewhat predict
the probability and assess the risks; however, as the uncertain nature
of the biosecurity issue goes it is largely difficult to predict and
also involves a complex process as it requires a multidisciplinary
approach(Koblentz, 2010). The policy choices they make to address an
immediate threat could pose another threat in the future, facing an
unintended trade-off. Policy makers are also constantly looking for a
more effective way to coordinate international actors- governmental
organizations and NGOs- and actors from different nations so that they
could tackle the problem of resource overlap (Koblentz, 2010).
Laboratory program
Components of a laboratory biosecurity program include:
- Physical security
- Personnel security
- Material control & accountability
- Transport security
- Information security
- Program management
Animal
Animal
biosecurity is the product of all actions undertaken by an entity to
prevent introduction of disease agents into a specific area. Animal
biosecurity differs from biosecurity which are measures taken to reduce
the risk of infectious agent theft and dispersal by means of
bioterrorism.
Animal biosecurity is a comprehensive approach, encompassing different
means of prevention and containment. A critical element in animal
biosecurity, biocontainment, is the control of disease agents already
present in a particular area, and works to prevent novel transmissions.
Animal biosecurity may protect organisms from infectious agents or
noninfectious agents such as toxins or pollutants, and can be executed
in areas as large as a nation or as small as a local farm.
Animal biosecurity takes into account the epidemiological triad
for disease occurrence: the individual host, the disease, and the
environment in contributing to disease susceptibility. It aims to
improve nonspecific immunity of the host to resist the introduction of
an agent, or limit the risk that an agent will be sustained in an
environment at adequate levels. Biocontainment, an element of animal
biosecurity, works to improve specific immunity towards already present
pathogens.
Biosecurity means the prevention of the illicit use of pathogenic bioorganisms by laboratory staff or others.
Biosafety means the protection of laboratory staff from being infected by pathogenic bioorganisms.
Medical countermeasures
Medical countermeasures
("MCMs") are products such as biologics and pharmaceutical drugs that
can protect from or treat the effects of a chemical, biological,
radiological, or nuclear ("CBRN") attack. MCMs can also be used for
prevention and diagnosis of symptoms associated with CBRN attacks or
threats.
The FDA runs a program called the FDA Medical Countermeasures Initiative ("MCMi"). The program helps support "partner" agencies and organizations prepare for public health emergencies that could require MCMs.
The federal government provides funding for MCM-related programs.
In June 2016, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee approved a bill that
would continue funding four specific medical countermeasure programs:
- $512 million for the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)
- $510 million for BioShield Special Reserve Fund (SRF)
- $575 million for the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS)
- $72 million for pandemic influenza
Challenges
The destruction of the World Trade Center in Manhattan on September 11, 2001 by terrorists and subsequent wave of anthrax attacks on U.S. media and government outlets (both real and hoax)
led to increased attention on the risk of bioterrorism attacks in the
United States. Proposals for serious structural reforms, national and/or
regional border controls, and a single co-ordinated system of biohazard response abounded.
One of the major challenges of biosecurity is that harmful technology is becoming more available and accessible.
Biomedical advances and the globalization of scientific and technical
expertise have made it possible to greatly improve public health.
However, there is also the risk that these advances can make it easier
for terrorists to produce biological weapons.
The proliferation of high biosafety level laboratories around the
world has many experts worried about availability of targets for those
that might be interested in stealing dangerous pathogens. Emerging and
re-emerging disease is also a serious biosecurity concern. The recent
growth in containment laboratories is often in response to emerging
diseases, many new containment labs' main focus is to find ways to
control these diseases. By strengthening national disease surveillance,
prevention, control and response systems, these labs are raising
international public health to new heights.
Research into biosecurity & biosafety conducted by the United
Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability
(UNU-IAS) emphasizes "long-term consequences of the development and use
of biotechnology" and need for "an honest broker to create avenues and forums to unlock the impasses.
In the October 2011 Bio-Response Report Card, the WMD Center stated that the major challenges to biosecurity are:
- attribution
- communication
- detection and diagnosis
- environmental cleanup
- medical countermeasure availability
- medical countermeasure development and approval process
- medical countermeasure dispensing
- medical management
Communication between the citizen and law enforcement officials is
imperative. Indicators of agro-terrorism at a food processing plant may
include persons taking notes or photos of a business,theft of employee
uniforms,employees changing working hours,or persons attempting to gain
information about security measures and personnel. Unusual activity
should be reported to law enforcement personnel promptly.
Communication between policymakers and life sciences scientists is also important.
The MENA region, with its socio-political unrest, diverse
cultures and societies, and recent biological weapons programs, faces
particular challenges.
Role of education
The
advance of the life sciences and biotechnology has the potential to
bring great benefits to humankind through responding to societal
challenges. However, it is also possible that such advances could be
exploited for hostile purposes, something evidenced in a small number of
incidents of bioterrorism, but more particularly by the series of
large-scale offensive biological warfare
programmes carried out by major states in the last century. Dealing
with this challenge, which has been labelled the 'dual-use' dilemma
requires a number of different activities such as those identified above
as being require for biosecurity. However, one of the essential
ingredients in ensuring that the life sciences continue to generate
great benefits and do not become subject to misuse for hostile purposes
is a process of engagement between scientists and the security community
and the development of strong ethical and normative frameworks to
compliment legal and regulatory measures that are being developed by
states.
Regulations
- US Select Agent Regulations
- Facility registration if it possesses one of 81 Select Agents
- Facility must designate a Responsible Official
- Background checks for individuals with access to Select Agents
- Access controls for areas and containers that contain Select Agents
- Detailed inventory requirements for Select Agents
- Security, safety, and emergency response plans
- Safety and security training
- Regulation of transfers of Select Agents
- Extensive documentation and recordkeeping
- Safety and security inspections
- Biological Weapons Convention addresses three relevant issues:
- National Implementing Legislation
- National Pathogen Security (biosecurity)
- International Cooperation
- States Parties agree to pursue national implementation of laboratory and transportation biosecurity (2003)
- UN 1540
- urges States to take preventative measures to mitigate the threat of WMD proliferation by non-state actors
- "Take and enforce effective measures to establish domestic controls to prevent the proliferation of ... biological weapons ...; including by establishing appropriate controls over related materials"
- European Commission Green Paper on Bio-Preparedness (November 2007)
- recommends developing European standards on laboratory biosecurity including Physical protection, access controls, accountability of pathogens, and registration of researchers
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
- published "Best Practice Guidelines for Biological Resource Centers" including a section on biosecurity in February 2007
- Kampala Compact (October 2005) and the Nairobi Announcement (July 2007)
- stress importance of implementing laboratory biosafety and biosecurity in Africa