The Miller–Urey experiment was a chemical experiment that simulated the conditions thought at the time to be present on the early Earth, and tested the chemical origin of life under those conditions. The experiment supported Alexander Oparin's and J. B. S. Haldane's hypothesis that putative conditions on the primitive Earth favoured chemical reactions that synthesized more complex organic compounds from simpler inorganic precursors. Considered to be the classic experiment investigating abiogenesis, it was conducted in 1952 by Stanley Miller, with assistance from Harold Urey, at the University of Chicago and later the University of California, San Diego and published the following year.
After Miller's death in 2007, scientists examining sealed vials
preserved from the original experiments were able to show that there
were actually well over 20 different amino acids
produced in Miller's original experiments. That is considerably more
than what Miller originally reported, and more than the 20 that
naturally occur in life.
More recent evidence suggests that Earth's original atmosphere might
have had a composition different from the gas used in the Miller
experiment, but prebiotic experiments continue to produce racemic mixtures of simple to complex compounds under varying conditions.
Experiment
The experiment used water (H2O), methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3), and hydrogen (H2).
The chemicals were all sealed inside a sterile 5-liter glass flask
connected to a 500 ml flask half-full of water. The water in the
smaller flask was heated to induce evaporation,
and the water vapour was allowed to enter the larger flask. Continuous
electrical sparks were fired between the electrodes to simulate lightning
in the water vapour and gaseous mixture, and then the simulated
atmosphere was cooled again so that the water condensed and trickled
into a U-shaped trap at the bottom of the apparatus.
After a day, the solution collected at the trap had turned pink in colour.
At the end of one week of continuous operation, the boiling flask was
removed, and mercuric chloride was added to prevent microbial
contamination. The reaction was stopped by adding barium hydroxide and
sulfuric acid, and evaporated to remove impurities. Using paper
chromatography, Miller identified five amino acids present in the
solution: glycine, α-alanine and β-alanine were positively identified, while aspartic acid and α-aminobutyric acid (AABA) were less certain, due to the spots being faint.
In a 1996 interview, Stanley Miller recollected his lifelong
experiments following his original work and stated: "Just turning on the
spark in a basic pre-biotic experiment will yield 11 out of 20 amino
acids."
The original experiment remains today under the care of Miller and Urey's former student Jeffrey Bada, a professor at the UCSD, Scripps Institution of Oceanography. The apparatus used to conduct the experiment is on display at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science.
Chemistry of experiment
One-step reactions among the mixture components can produce hydrogen cyanide (HCN), formaldehyde (CH2O), and other active intermediate compounds (acetylene, cyanoacetylene, etc.):
- CO2 → CO + [O] (atomic oxygen)
- CH4 + 2[O] → CH2O + H2O
- CO + NH3 → HCN + H2O
- CH4 + NH3 → HCN + 3H2 (BMA process)
The formaldehyde, ammonia, and HCN then react by Strecker synthesis to form amino acids and other biomolecules:
- CH2O + HCN + NH3 → NH2-CH2-CN + H2O
- NH2-CH2-CN + 2H2O → NH3 + NH2-CH2-COOH (glycine)
Furthermore, water and formaldehyde can react, via Butlerov's reaction to produce various sugars like ribose.
The experiments showed that simple organic compounds of building
blocks of proteins and other macromolecules can be formed from gases
with the addition of energy.
Other experiments
This experiment inspired many others. In 1961, Joan Oró found that the nucleotide base adenine could be made from hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and ammonia
in a water solution. His experiment produced a large amount of adenine,
the molecules of which were formed from 5 molecules of HCN.
Also, many amino acids are formed from HCN and ammonia under these conditions.
Experiments conducted later showed that the other RNA and DNA nucleobases could be obtained through simulated prebiotic chemistry with a reducing atmosphere.
There also had been similar electric discharge experiments related to the origin of life contemporaneous with Miller–Urey. An article in The New York Times (March 8, 1953:E9), titled "Looking Back Two Billion Years" describes the work of Wollman (William) M. MacNevin at The Ohio State University, before the Miller Science
paper was published in May 1953. MacNevin was passing 100,000 volt
sparks through methane and water vapor and produced "resinous solids"
that were "too complex for analysis." The article describes other early
earth experiments being done by MacNevin. It is not clear if he ever
published any of these results in the primary scientific literature.
K. A. Wilde submitted a paper to Science on December 15,
1952, before Miller submitted his paper to the same journal on February
10, 1953. Wilde's paper was published on July 10, 1953. Wilde used voltages up to only 600 V on a binary mixture of carbon dioxide (CO2)
and water in a flow system. He observed only small amounts of carbon
dioxide reduction to carbon monoxide, and no other significant reduction
products or newly formed carbon compounds.
Other researchers were studying UV-photolysis of water vapor with carbon monoxide. They have found that various alcohols, aldehydes and organic acids were synthesized in reaction mixture.
More recent experiments by chemists Jeffrey Bada, one of Miller's graduate students, and Jim Cleaves at Scripps Institution of Oceanography of the University of California, San Diego
were similar to those performed by Miller. However, Bada noted that in
current models of early Earth conditions, carbon dioxide and nitrogen (N2) create nitrites,
which destroy amino acids as fast as they form. When Bada performed
the Miller-type experiment with the addition of iron and carbonate
minerals, the products were rich in amino acids. This suggests the
origin of significant amounts of amino acids may have occurred on Earth
even with an atmosphere containing carbon dioxide and nitrogen.
Earth's early atmosphere
Some
evidence suggests that Earth's original atmosphere might have contained
fewer of the reducing molecules than was thought at the time of the
Miller–Urey experiment. There is abundant evidence of major volcanic
eruptions 4 billion years ago, which would have released carbon dioxide,
nitrogen, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) into the atmosphere.
Experiments using these gases in addition to the ones in the original
Miller–Urey experiment have produced more diverse molecules. The
experiment created a mixture that was racemic (containing both L and D enantiomers) and experiments since have shown that "in the lab the two versions are equally likely to appear";
however, in nature, L amino acids dominate. Later experiments have
confirmed disproportionate amounts of L or D oriented enantiomers are
possible.
Originally it was thought that the primitive secondary atmosphere contained mostly ammonia and methane. However, it is likely that most of the atmospheric carbon was CO2 with perhaps some CO and the nitrogen mostly N2. In practice gas mixtures containing CO, CO2, N2, etc. give much the same products as those containing CH4 and NH3 so long as there is no O2.
The hydrogen atoms come mostly from water vapor. In fact, in order to
generate aromatic amino acids under primitive earth conditions it is
necessary to use less hydrogen-rich gaseous mixtures. Most of the
natural amino acids, hydroxyacids, purines, pyrimidines, and sugars have been made in variants of the Miller experiment.
More recent results may question these conclusions. The
University of Waterloo and University of Colorado conducted simulations
in 2005 that indicated that the early atmosphere of Earth could have
contained up to 40 percent hydrogen—implying a much more hospitable
environment for the formation of prebiotic organic molecules. The escape
of hydrogen from Earth's atmosphere into space may have occurred at
only one percent of the rate previously believed based on revised
estimates of the upper atmosphere's temperature.
One of the authors, Owen Toon notes: "In this new scenario, organics
can be produced efficiently in the early atmosphere, leading us back to
the organic-rich soup-in-the-ocean concept... I think this study makes
the experiments by Miller and others relevant again." Outgassing
calculations using a chondritic model for the early earth complement the
Waterloo/Colorado results in re-establishing the importance of the
Miller–Urey experiment.
In contrast to the general notion of early earth's reducing atmosphere, researchers at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
in New York reported the possibility of oxygen available around 4.3
billion years ago. Their study reported in 2011 on the assessment of
Hadean zircons from the earth's interior (magma) indicated the presence of oxygen traces similar to modern-day lavas. This study suggests that oxygen could have been released in the earth's atmosphere earlier than generally believed.
Extraterrestrial sources
Conditions similar to those of the Miller–Urey experiments are present in other regions of the solar system, often substituting ultraviolet light for lightning as the energy source for chemical reactions. The Murchison meteorite that fell near Murchison, Victoria, Australia in 1969 was found to contain over 90 different amino acids, nineteen of which are found in Earth life. Comets and other icy outer-solar-system bodies are thought to contain large amounts of complex carbon compounds (such as tholins) formed by these processes, darkening surfaces of these bodies.
The early Earth was bombarded heavily by comets, possibly providing a
large supply of complex organic molecules along with the water and other
volatiles they contributed. This has been used to infer an origin of life outside of Earth: the panspermia hypothesis.
In recent years, studies have been made of the amino acid
composition of the products of "old" areas in "old" genes, defined as
those that are found to be common to organisms from several widely
separated species, assumed to share only the last universal ancestor
(LUA) of all extant species. These studies found that the products of
these areas are enriched in those amino acids that are also most readily
produced in the Miller–Urey experiment. This suggests that the original
genetic code was based on a smaller number of amino acids – only those
available in prebiotic nature – than the current one.
Jeffrey Bada,
himself Miller's student, inherited the original equipment from the
experiment when Miller died in 2007. Based on sealed vials from the
original experiment, scientists have been able to show that although
successful, Miller was never able to find out, with the equipment
available to him, the full extent of the experiment's success. Later
researchers have been able to isolate even more different amino acids,
25 altogether. Bada has estimated that more accurate measurements could
easily bring out 30 or 40 more amino acids in very low concentrations,
but the researchers have since discontinued the testing. Miller's
experiment was therefore a remarkable success at synthesizing complex
organic molecules from simpler chemicals, considering that all known
life uses just 20 different amino acids.
In 2008, a group of scientists examined 11 vials left over from
Miller's experiments of the early 1950s. In addition to the classic
experiment, reminiscent of Charles Darwin's envisioned "warm little pond", Miller had also performed more experiments, including one with conditions similar to those of volcanic eruptions. This experiment had a nozzle spraying a jet of steam at the spark discharge. By using high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry,
the group found more organic molecules than Miller had. They found that
the volcano-like experiment had produced the most organic molecules, 22
amino acids, 5 amines and many hydroxylated molecules, which could have been formed by hydroxyl radicals
produced by the electrified steam. The group suggested that volcanic
island systems became rich in organic molecules in this way, and that
the presence of carbonyl sulfide there could have helped these molecules form peptides.
The main problem of theories based around amino acids is the difficulty in obtaining spontaneous formation of peptides. Since John Desmond Bernal's suggestion that clay surfaces could have played a role in abiogenesis, scientific efforts have been dedicated to investigating clay-mediated peptide bond
formation, with limited success. Peptides formed remained
over-protected and shown no evidence of inheritance or metabolism. In
December 2017 a theoretical model developed by Erastova and
collaborators suggested that peptides could form at the interlayers of layered double hydroxides such as green rust
in early earth conditions. According to the model, drying of the
intercalated layered material should provide energy and co-alignment
required for peptide bond formation in a ribosome-like
fashion, while re-wetting should allow mobilising the newly formed
peptides and repopulate the interlayer with new amino acids. This
mechanism is expected to lead to the formation of 12+ amino acid-long
peptides within 15-20 washes. Researches also observed slightly
different adsorption preferences for different amino acids, and
postulated that, if coupled to a diluted solution of mixed amino acids,
such preferences could lead to sequencing.
In October 2018, researchers at McMaster University on behalf of the Origins Institute announced the development of a new technology, called a Planet Simulator, to help study the origin of life on planet Earth and beyond.
Amino acids identified
Below is a table of amino acids produced and identified in the "classic" 1952 experiment, as published by Miller in 1953, the 2008 re-analysis of vials from the volcanic spark discharge experiment, and the 2010 re-analysis of vials from the H2S-rich spark discharge experiment.
Amino acid | Produced in experiment | Proteinogenic | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Miller–Urey (1952) |
Volcanic spark discharge (2008) |
H2S-rich spark discharge (2010) | ||
Glycine | Yes | |||
α-Alanine | Yes | |||
β-Alanine | No | |||
Aspartic acid | Yes | |||
α-Aminobutyric acid | No | |||
Serine | Yes | |||
Isoserine | No | |||
α-Aminoisobutyric acid | No | |||
β-Aminoisobutyric acid | No | |||
β-Aminobutyric acid | No | |||
γ-Aminobutyric acid | No | |||
Valine | Yes | |||
Isovaline | No | |||
Glutamic acid | Yes | |||
Norvaline | No | |||
α-Aminoadipic acid | No | |||
Homoserine | No | |||
2-Methylserine | No | |||
β-Hydroxyaspartic acid | No | |||
Ornithine | No | |||
2-Methylglutamic acid | No | |||
Phenylalanine | Yes | |||
Homocysteic acid | No | |||
S-methylcysteine | No | |||
Methionine | Yes | |||
Methionine sulfoxide | No | |||
Methionine sulfone | No | |||
Isoleucine | Yes | |||
Leucine | Yes | |||
Ethionine | No | |||
Cysteine | Yes | |||
Histidine | Yes | |||
Lysine | Yes | |||
Asparagine | Yes | |||
Pyrrolysine | Yes | |||
Proline | Yes | |||
Glutamine | Yes | |||
Arginine | Yes | |||
Threonine | Yes | |||
Selenocysteine | Yes | |||
Tryptophan | Yes | |||
Tyrosine | Yes |