Search This Blog

Sunday, March 22, 2015

Human spaceflight


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


ISS crewmember Tracy Caldwell Dyson views the Earth, 2010

Human spaceflight (also referred to as manned spaceflight) is space travel with a crew aboard the spacecraft.
When a spacecraft is crewed, it can be operated directly, as opposed to being remotely operated or autonomous.

The first human spaceflight was launched by the Soviet Union on 12 April 1961 as a part of the Vostok program, with cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin aboard. Humans have been continually present in space for 14 years and 139 days on the International Space Station.

Since the retirement of the US Space Shuttle in 2011, only Russia and China have maintained domestic human spaceflight capability with the Soyuz program and Shenzhou program. Currently, all crewed flights to the International Space Station use Soyuz vehicles, which remain attached to the station to allow quick return if needed. The United States is developing commercial crew transportation to facilitate domestic access to ISS and low Earth orbit, as well as the Orion vehicle for beyond-low Earth orbit applications.

While spaceflight has typically been a government-directed activity, commercial spaceflight has gradually been taking on a greater role. The first private human spaceflight took place on 21 June 2004, when SpaceShipOne conducted a suborbital flight, and a number of non-governmental companies have been working to develop a space tourism industry. NASA has also played a role to stimulate private spaceflight through programs such as Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) and Commercial Crew Development (CCDev). With its 2011 budget proposals released in 2010,[1] the Obama administration moved towards a model where commercial companies would supply NASA with transportation services of both crew and cargo to low Earth orbit. The vehicles used for these services could then serve both NASA and potential commercial customers. Commercial resupply of ISS began two years after the retirement of the Shuttle, and commercial crew launches could begin by 2017.[2]

History

Orbital human spaceflight
Name Debut Launches
Vostok 1961 6
Mercury 1962 4
Voskhod 1964 2
Gemini 1965 10
Soyuz 1967 120
Apollo/Skylab 1968 15
Shuttle 1981 135
Shenzhou 2003 5
Suborbital human spaceflight
Name Debut Flights
Mercury 1961 2
X-15 1963 2
(Soyuz 18a, Soyuz T-10-1) 1975, 1983 2
SpaceShipOne 2004 3

First human spaceflights

The first human spaceflight took place on 12 April 1961, when cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin made one orbit around the Earth aboard the Vostok 1 spacecraft, launched by the Soviet space program. Valentina Tereshkova became the first woman in space aboard Vostok 6 on 16 June 1963. Both spacecraft were launched by Vostok 3KA launch vehicles. Alexei Leonov made the first spacewalk when he left Voskhod 2 on 8 March 1965.
Svetlana Savitskaya became the first woman to do so on 25 July 1984.

The United States became the second nation to put a human in space with the suborbital flight of astronaut Alan Shepard aboard Freedom 7 as part of Project Mercury. The spacecraft was launched on 5 May 1961 on a Redstone rocket. The first U.S. orbital flight was that of John Glenn aboard Friendship 7, launched 20 February 1962 on an Atlas rocket. From 1981 to 2011, the U.S. conducted all its human spaceflight missions with reusable space shuttles. Sally Ride became the first American woman in space in 1983. Eileen Collins was the first female shuttle pilot, and with shuttle mission STS-93 in 1999 she became the first woman to command a U.S. spacecraft.

China became the third nation to achieve independent human spaceflight capability when Yang Liwei launched into space on a Chinese-made vehicle, the Shenzhou 5, on 15 October 2003. The first Chinese woman, Liu Yang, was launched in June 2012 aboard Shenzhou 9. Previous European (Hermes) and Japanese (HOPE-X) domestic human spaceflight programs were abandoned after years of development, as was the first Chinese attempt, the Shuguang spacecraft.

The farthest destination for a human spaceflight mission has been the Moon. The only manned missions to the Moon have been those conducted by NASA as part of the Apollo program. The first such mission, Apollo 8, orbited the Moon but did not land. The first Moon landing mission was Apollo 11, during which—on 20 July 1969—Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin became the first people to set foot on the Moon. Six missions landed in total, numbered Apollo 11–17, excluding Apollo 13. Altogether 12 men walked on the Moon, the only humans to have been on an extraterrestrial body. The Soviet Union discontinued its program for lunar orbiting and landing of human spaceflight missions in 1974 when Valentin Glushko became General Designer of NPO Energiya.[3]

The longest single human spaceflight is that of Valeriy Polyakov, who left Earth on 8 January 1994, and did not return until 22 March 1995 (a total of 437 days 17 hr. 58 min. 16 sec.). Sergei Krikalyov has spent the most time of anyone in space, 803 days, 9 hours, and 39 minutes altogether. The longest period of continuous human presence in space is 14 years and 139 days on the International Space Station, exceeding the previous record of almost 10 years (or 3,634 days) held by Mir, spanning the launch of Soyuz TM-8 on 5 September 1989 to the landing of Soyuz TM-29 on 28 August 1999.

For many years beginning in 1961, only two countries, the USSR (later Russia) and the United States, had their own astronauts. Citizens of other nations flew in space, beginning with the flight of Vladimir Remek, a Czech, on a Soviet spacecraft on 2 March 1978. As of 2010, citizens from 38 nations (including space tourists) have flown in space aboard Soviet, American, Russian, and Chinese spacecraft.

Post-shuttle gap in United States human spaceflight capability

Under the Bush administration, the Constellation Program included plans for retiring the Shuttle program and replacing it with the capability for spaceflight beyond low Earth orbit. In the 2011 United States federal budget, the Obama administration cancelled Constellation for being over budget and behind schedule while not innovating and investing in critical new technologies.[4] For beyond low earth orbit human spaceflight NASA is developing the Orion spacecraft to be launched by the Space Launch System. Under the Commercial Crew Development plan,
NASA will rely on transportation services provided by the private sector to reach low earth orbit, such as Space X's Falcon 9/Dragon V2, Sierra Nevada Corporation's Dream Chaser, or Boeing's CST-100. The period between the retirement of the shuttle in 2011 and the initial operational capability of new systems in 2017, similar to the gap between the end of Apollo in 1975 and the first space shuttle flight in 1981, is referred to by a presidential Blue Ribbon Committee as the U.S. human spaceflight gap.[5] Commercial sub-orbital spacecraft aimed at the space tourism market such as Scaled Composites SpaceshipTwo to be operated by Virgin Galactic, and XCOR's Lynx spaceplane are under development and could reach space before 2017.[6]

Space programs


Countries that have had human spaceflight agendas (dark blue)

An Apollo spacecraft with docking equipment, as photographed by the Soyuz crew during the Apollo-Soyuz mission. Human spaceflight has been a forum for both competition and cooperation.

Human spaceflight programs have been conducted by the former Soviet Union/Russian Federation, the United States, the People's Republic of China and by private spaceflight company Scaled Composites.

The Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) begun work on pre project activities of human space flight mission programme.[7] The objective of Human Spaceflight Programme is to undertake a human spaceflight mission to carry a crew of two to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and return them safely to a predefined destination on earth. The programme is proposed to be implemented in defined phases. Currently, the pre project activities are progressing with a focus on the development of critical technologies for subsystems such as Crew Module (CM), Environmental control and Life Support System (ECLSS), Crew Escape System, etc. A study for undertaking human space flight to carry human beings to low earth orbit and ensure their safe return has been made by the department. The department has initiated pre-project activities to study technical and managerial issues related to undertaking manned mission with an aim to build and demonstrate the country’s capability. The programme envisages the development of a fully autonomous orbital vehicle carrying 2 or 3 crew members to about 300 km low earth orbit and their safe return.

Several other countries and space agencies have announced and begun human spaceflight programs by their own technology, Japan (JAXA), Iran (ISA) and Malaysia (MNSA).

Currently the following spacecraft and spaceports are used for launching human spaceflights:
Historically, the following spacecraft and spaceports have also been used for human spaceflight launches:

Mir, a former space station where many human spaceflight records were achieved orbiting the Earth

International Space Station under construction

Numerous private companies attempted human spaceflight programs in an effort to win the $10 million Ansari X Prize. The first private human spaceflight took place on 21 June 2004, when SpaceShipOne conducted a suborbital flight. SpaceShipOne captured the prize on 4 October 2004, when it accomplished two consecutive flights within one week. SpaceShipTwo, launching from the carrier aircraft White Knight Two, is planned to conduct regular suborbital space tourism.

Most of the time, the only humans in space are those aboard the ISS, whose crew of six spends up to six months at a time in low Earth orbit.

NASA and ESA use the term "human spaceflight" to refer to their programs of launching people into space. These endeavors have also been referred to as "manned space missions."
Aleksandr Skvortsov (cosmonaut) Soichi Noguchi Timothy Creamer Oleg Kotov Maksim Surayev Jeffrey Williams Nicole Stott Robert Thirsk Roman Romanenko Frank De Winne Timothy Kopra Michael R. Barratt Gennady Padalka Koichi Wakata Sandra Magnus Yuri Lonchakov Michael Fincke Gregory Chamitoff Oleg Kononenko Sergey Volkov Garrett Reisman Léopold Eyharts Daniel Tani Yuri Malenchenko Peggy Whitson Clayton Anderson Oleg Kotov Fyodor Yurchikhin Sunita Williams Mikhail Tyurin Michael Lopez-Alegria Thomas Reiter Jeffrey Williams Pavel Vinogradov Valery Tokarev William McArthur John Philips Sergei Krikalev Salizhan Sharipov Leroy Chiao Michael Fincke Gennady Padalka Alexander Kaleri Michael Foale Edward Lu Yuri Malenchenko Donald Pettit Nikolai Budarin Kenneth Bowersox Sergei Treshchev Peggy Whitson Valery Korzun Carl Walz Daniel Bursch Yury Onufrienko Vladimir Dezhurov Mikhail Tyurin Frank Culbertson James Voss Susan Helms Yuri Usachev Yuri Gidzenko Sergei Krikalev William Shepherd Aleksandr Kaleri Sergei Zalyotin Jean-Pierre Haigneré Viktor Afanasyev Sergei Avdeyev Gennady Padalka Nikolai Budarin Talgat Musabayev Andrew Thomas David Wolf Pavel Vinogradov Anatoly Solovyev Michael Foale Aleksandr Lazutkin Vasili Tsibliyev Jerry Linenger John Blaha Aleksandr Kaleri Valery Korzun Shannon Lucid Yury Usachev Yuri Onufrienko Thomas Reiter Sergei Avdeyev Yuri Gidzenko Nikolai Budarin Anatoly Solovyev Norman Thagard Gennady Strekalov Vladimir Dezhurov Yelena Kondakova Aleksandr Viktorenko Talgat Musabayev Yuri Malenchenko Valeri Polyakov Yury Usachev Viktor Afanasyev Aleksandr Serebrov Vasili Tsibliyev Aleksandr Poleshchuk Gennadi Manakov Sergei Avdeyev Anatoly Solovyev Aleksandr Kaleri Aleksandr Viktorenko Aleksandr Volkov Sergei Krikalev Anatoly Artsebarsky Musa Manarov Viktor Afanasyev Gennady Strekalov Gennadi Manakov Aleksandr Balandin Anatoly Solovyev Aleksandr Serebrov Aleksandr Viktorenko Sergei Krikalev Aleksandr Volkov Valeri Polyakov Musa Manarov Vladimir Titov Aleksandr Aleksandrov Yuri Romanenko Aleksandr Laveykin Vladimir Solovyov Leonid Kizim Vladimir Solovyov Leonid Kizim Alexander Volkov Vladimir Vasyutin Vladimir Dzhanibekov Viktor Savinykh Oleg Atkov Vladimir Solovyov Leonid Kizim Aleksandr Pavlovich Aleksandrov Vladimir Lyakhov Valentin Lebedev Anatoli Berezovoy Viktor Savinykh Vladimir Kovalyonok Valery Ryumin Leonid Popov Valery Ryumin Vladimir Lyankhov Aleksandr Ivanchenkov Vladimir Kovalyonok Gerogi Grencho Yuri Romanenko Yuri Glazkov Viktor Gorbatko Vitali Zholobov Boris Volynov Vitali Sevastyanov Pyotr Klimuk Aleksei Gubarev Georgi Grechko Pavel Popovich Yuri Artyukhin Edward Gibson William Pogue Gerald Carr Owen Garriot Jack Lousma Alan Bean Joeseph Kerwin Paul Weitz Pete Conrad Vladislav Volkov Viktor Patsayev Georgi Dobrovolski ISS Tiangong-1 Skylab Mir Salyut 7 Salyut 6 Salyut 5 Salyut 4 Salyut 3 Salyut 1 SpaceShipOne SpaceShipOne flight 17P SpaceShipOne flight 16P SpaceShipOne flight 15P Shenzhou program Shenzhou 10 Shenzhou 9 Shenzhou 7 Shenzhou 6 Shenzhou 5 Space Shuttle Atlantis STS-135 STS-132 STS-129 STS-125 STS-122 STS-117 STS-115 STS-112 STS-110 STS-104 STS-98 STS-106 STS-101 STS-86 STS-84 STS-81 STS-79 STS-76 STS-74 STS-71 STS-66 STS-46 STS-45 STS-44 STS-43 STS-37 STS-38 STS-36 STS-34 STS-30 STS-27 STS-61-B STS-51-J X-15 X-15 Flight 91 X-15 Flight 90 Space Shuttle Discovery STS-133 STS-131 STS-128 STS-119 STS-124 STS-120 STS-116 STS-121 STS-114 STS-105 STS-102 STS-92 STS-103 STS-96 STS-95 STS-91 STS-85 STS-82 STS-70 STS-63 STS-64 STS-60 STS-51 STS-56 STS-53 STS-42 STS-48 STS-39 STS-41 STS-31 STS-33 STS-29 STS-26 STS-51-I STS-51-G STS-51-D STS-51-C STS-51-A STS-41-D Apollo Program Apollo-Soyuz Test Project Apollo 17 Apollo 16 Apollo 15 Apollo 14 Apollo 13 Apollo 12 Apollo 11 Apollo 10 Apollo 9 Apollo 8 Apollo 7 Space Shuttle Endeavour STS-134 STS-130 STS-127 STS-126 STS-123 STS-118 STS-113 STS-111 STS-108 STS-100 STS-97 STS-99 STS-88 STS-89 STS-77 STS-72 STS-69 STS-67 STS-68 STS-59 STS-61 STS-57 STS-54 STS-47 STS-49 Space Shuttle Challenger STS-51-L STS-61-A STS-51-F STS-51-B STS-41-G STS-41-C STS-41-B STS-8 STS-7 STS-6 Project Gemini Gemini XII Gemini XI Gemini X Gemini IX-A Gemini VIII Gemini VI-A Gemini VII Gemini V Gemini IV Gemini III Gemini 2 Gemini 1 Space Shuttle Columbia STS-107 STS-109 STS-93 STS-90 STS-87 STS-94 STS-83 STS-80 STS-78 STS-75 STS-73 STS-65 STS-62 STS-58 STS-55 STS-52 STS-50 STS-40 STS-35 STS-32 STS-28 STS-61-C STS-9 STS-5 STS-4 STS-3 STS-2 STS-1 Skylab Skylab 4 Skylab 3 Skylab 2 Project Mercury Mercury-Atlas 9 Mercury-Atlas 8 Mercury-Atlas 7 Mercury-Atlas 6 Mercury-Redstone 4 Mercury-Redstone 3 Soyuz programme Soyuz TMA-12M Soyuz TMA-11M Soyuz TMA-10M Soyuz TMA-09M Soyuz TMA-08M Soyuz TMA-07M Soyuz TMA-06M Soyuz TMA-05M Soyuz TMA-04M Soyuz TMA-03M Soyuz TMA-22 Soyuz TMA-02M Soyuz TMA-21 Soyuz TMA-20 Soyuz TMA-01M Soyuz TMA-19 Soyuz TMA-18 Soyuz TMA-17 Soyuz TMA-16 Soyuz TMA-15 Soyuz TMA-14 Soyuz TMA-13 Soyuz TMA-12 Soyuz TMA-11 Soyuz TMA-10 Soyuz TMA-9 Soyuz TMA-8 Soyuz TMA-7 Soyuz TMA-6 Soyuz TMA-5 Soyuz TMA-4 Soyuz TMA-3 Soyuz TMA-2 Soyuz TMA-1 Soyuz TM-34 Soyuz TM-33 Soyuz TM-32 Soyuz TM-31 Soyuz TM-30 Soyuz TM-29 Soyuz TM-28 Soyuz TM-27 Soyuz TM-26 Soyuz TM-25 Soyuz TM-24 Soyuz TM-23 Soyuz TM-22 Soyuz TM-21 Soyuz TM-20 Soyuz TM-19 Soyuz TM-18 Soyuz TM-17 Soyuz TM-16 Soyuz TM-15 Soyuz TM-14 Soyuz TM-13 Soyuz TM-12 Soyuz TM-11 Soyuz TM-10 Soyuz TM-9 Soyuz TM-8 Soyuz TM-7 Soyuz TM-6 Soyuz TM-5 Soyuz TM-4 Soyuz TM-3 Soyuz TM-2 Soyuz T-15 Soyuz T-14 Soyuz T-13 Soyuz T-12 Soyuz T-11 Soyuz T-10 Soyuz T-10-1 Soyuz T-9 Soyuz T-8 Soyuz T-7 Soyuz T-6 Soyuz T-5 Soyuz 40 Soyuz 39 Soyuz T-4 Soyuz T-3 Soyuz 38 Soyuz 37 Soyuz T-2 Soyuz 36 Soyuz 35 Soyuz 34 Soyuz 33 Soyuz 32 Soyuz 31 Soyuz 30 Soyuz 29 Soyuz 28 Soyuz 27 Soyuz 26 Soyuz 25 Soyuz 24 Soyuz 23 Soyuz 22 Soyuz 21 Soyuz 19 Soyuz 18 Soyuz 18a Soyuz 17 Soyuz 16 Soyuz 15 Soyuz 14 Soyuz 13 Soyuz 12 Soyuz 11 Soyuz 10 Soyuz 9 Soyuz 8 Soyuz 7 Soyuz 6 Soyuz 5 Soyuz 4 Soyuz 3 Soyuz 1 Voskhod programme Vostok programme

National spacefaring attempts

This section lists all nations which have explored human spaceflight programs. This should not to be confused with nations with citizens who have traveled into space including space tourists, flown or intended to fly by foreign country's or non-domestic private space systems – these are not counted as national spacefaring attempts in this list.
Nation/Organization Space agency Term(s) for space traveler First launched astronaut Date Spacecraft Launcher Type
 Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
(1922–1991)
Soviet space program
(OKB-1 Design Bureau)
космонавт (same word in:) (Russian)(Ukrainian)
kosmonavt
cosmonaut
Ғарышкер(Kazakh)
Yuri Gagarin 12 April 1961 Vostok spacecraft Vostok Orbital
 United States of America National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) astronaut
spaceflight participant
Alan Shepard (suborbital) 5 May 1961 Mercury spacecraft Redstone Suborbital
 United States of America National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) astronaut
spaceflight participant
John Glenn (orbital) 20 February 1962 Mercury spacecraft Atlas LV-3B Orbital
 People's Republic of China Space program of the People's Republic of China 宇航员 (Chinese)
yǔhángyuán
航天员 (Chinese)
hángtiānyuán
taikonaut
... 1973 (abandoned) Shuguang 1 Long March 2A
 People's Republic of China Space program of the People's Republic of China 宇航员 (Chinese)
yǔhángyuán
航天员 (Chinese)
hángtiānyuán
... 1981 (abandoned) Piloted FSW Long March 2
Not the esa logo.png European Space Agency CNES / European Space Agency (ESA) spationaute (French)
astronaut
... 1992 (abandoned) Hermes Ariane V
 Russia Russian Federal Space Agency (Roscosmos) космонавт (Russian)
kosmonavt
cosmonaut
Alexander Viktorenko, Alexander Kaleri 17 March 1992 Soyuz-TM Soyuz-U2 Soyuz TM-14 to MIR
Iraq Ba'athist Iraq
(1968–2003)[9]
... رجل فضاء (Arabic)
rajul faḍāʼ
رائد فضاء (Arabic)
rāʼid faḍāʼ
ملاح فضائي (Arabic)
mallāḥ faḍāʼiy
... 2001 (abandoned) ... Tammouz 2 or 3
Japan State of Japan National Space Development Agency of Japan (NASDA) 宇宙飛行士 (Japanese)
uchūhikōshi or
アストロノート
astoronoto
... 2003 (abandoned) HOPE-X H-II
 People's Republic of China China National Space Administration (CNSA) 太空人 (Chinese)
tàikōng rén
宇航员 (Chinese)
yǔhángyuán
航天员 (Chinese)
hángtiānyuán
Yang Liwei 15 October 2003 Shenzhou spacecraft Long March 2F Orbital
India India Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) Vyomanaut
 (Sanskrit)
... after 2017 [10] Orbital Vehicle (OV) GSLV Mk III
Iran Islamic Republic of Iran Iranian Space Agency (ISA) کیهان نورد (Persian)
kayhan navard [11]
... 2017 (planned)[12][13] ISA manned spacecraft ...
Not the esa logo.png European Space Agency European Space Agency (ESA) astronaut ... 2020 (approved conceptually but full development not begun)[14][15][16][17] ARV phase-2 Ariane V
Japan State of Japan Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) 宇宙飛行士 (Japanese)
uchūhikōshi or
アストロノート
astoronoto
... 2025 (planned)[citation needed] HTV-based spacecraft H-IIB

Safety concerns

Planners of human spaceflight missions face a number of safety concerns.

Life support

The immediate needs for breathable air and drinkable water are addressed by the life support system of the spacecraft.

Medical issues

Medical consequences such as possible blindness and bone loss have been associated with human space flight.[18][19]
On 31 December 2012, a NASA-supported study reported that spaceflight may harm the brain of astronauts and accelerate the onset of Alzheimer's disease.[20][21][22]

Effects of microgravity

Bruce McCandless floating free in orbit with a space suit and Manned Maneuvering Unit.

Medical data from astronauts in low earth orbits for long periods, dating back to the 1970s, show several adverse effects of a microgravity environment: loss of bone density, decreased muscle strength and endurance, postural instability, and reductions in aerobic capacity. Over time these deconditioning effects can impair astronauts’ performance or increase their risk of injury.[23]

In a weightless environment, astronauts put almost no weight on the back muscles or leg muscles used for standing up. Those muscles then start to weaken and eventually get smaller. If there is an emergency at landing, the loss of muscles, and consequently the loss of strength can be a serious problem. Sometimes, astronauts can lose up to 25% of their muscle mass on long term flights. When they get back to ground, they will be considerably weakened and will be out of action for a while.[citation needed]

Astronauts experiencing weightlessness will often lose their orientation, get motion sickness, and lose their sense of direction as their bodies try to get used to a weightless environment. When they get back to Earth, or any other mass with gravity, they have to readjust to the gravity and may have problems standing up, focusing their gaze, walking and turning. Importantly, those body motor disturbances after changing from different gravities only get worse the longer the exposure to little gravity.[citation needed] These changes will affect operational activities including approach and landing, docking, remote manipulation, and emergencies that may happen while landing. This can be a major roadblock to mission success.[citation needed]

In addition, after long space flight missions, male astronauts may experience severe eyesight problems.[24][25][26][27][28] Such eyesight problems may be a major concern for future deep space flight missions, including a manned mission to the planet Mars.[24][25][26][27][29]

Radiation

Without proper shielding, the crews of missions beyond low Earth orbit (LEO) might be at risk from high-energy protons emitted by solar flares. Lawrence Townsend of the University of Tennessee and others have studied the most powerful solar flare ever recorded. That flare was seen by the British astronomer Richard Carrington in September 1859. Radiation doses astronauts would receive from a Carrington-type flare could cause acute radiation sickness and possibly even death.[30]

Another type of radiation, galactic cosmic rays, presents further challenges to human spaceflight beyond LEO.[31]
Radiation damage to the immune system

The Earth at night and a person inside the ISS Cupola

There is also some scientific concern that extended spaceflight might slow down the body’s ability to protect itself against diseases.[32] Some of the problems are a weakened immune system and the activation of dormant viruses in the body. Radiation can cause both short and long term consequences to the bone marrow stem cells which create the blood and immune systems. Because the interior of a spacecraft is so small, a weakened immune system and more active viruses in the body can lead to a fast spread of infection.[citation needed]

Isolation

During long missions, astronauts are isolated and confined into small spaces. Depression, cabin fever and other psychological problems may impact the crew's safety and mission success.[citation needed]

Astronauts may not be able to quickly return to Earth or receive medical supplies, equipment or personnel if a medical emergency occurs. The astronauts may have to rely for long periods on their limited existing resources and medical advice from the ground.

Launch safety

Reentry safety

Reliability

Fatality risk

As of 2010, 18 crew members have died during actual spaceflight missions (see table). Over 100 others have died in accidents during activity directly related to spaceflight missions or testing.

Year #of
Deaths
Mission Known or likely cause Accident description
1967 1 Soyuz 1 Trauma from crash landing Spacecraft parachutes malfunctioned during descent, resulting in a crash landing.
1971 3 Soyuz 11 Asphyxia Valve opened upon Orbital Module separation before re-entry, causing descent module to depressurize. The crew are considered to be the only humans to have died in space - all other disasters on this list occurred during phases of the flight well below the Kármán line that marks the edge of space.
1986 7 Space Shuttle Challenger (Mission STS-51L) Asphyxia from cabin breach or trauma from water impact[33] An O-ring in the right Solid Rocket Booster failed, allowing hot gases to penetrate the casing of the booster. The escaping hot rocket exhaust led to failures of the External Tank and a strut connecting the booster to the tank. The result was a rapid burn of the fuel in the external tank which gave the appearance of an explosion. The orbiter itself did not explode, but rather broke up due to abnormal aerodynamic forces.
2003 7 Space Shuttle Columbia (Mission STS-107) Asphyxia from cabin breach, trauma from dynamic load environment as orbiter broke up[34] During launch, a piece of insulation foam broke off of the External Tank and struck the left wing, causing damage to a reinforced carbon-carbon panel on the wing's leading edge. Although the foam strike was detected after the launch, it was not seen as a concern, and the extent of the damage went undetected. When the shuttle re-entered the atmosphere, hot atmospheric gases penetrated through the hole in the left wing. Eventually, the shuttle lost control and subsequently disintegrated.

Human mission to Mars


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Crewmembers setting up weather monitoring equipment on the surface of Mars (artist's concept).

A human mission to Mars has been the subject of science fiction, engineering, and scientific proposals throughout the 20th century and into the 21st century. The plans comprise proposals to land on Mars, eventually settling on and terraforming the planet, while exploiting its moons, Phobos and Deimos.

Exploration of Mars has been a goal of national space programs for decades. Preliminary work for missions that would involve human explorers has been undertaken since the 1950s, with planned missions typically being cited as taking place 10 to 30 years in the future when they are drafted. The list of manned Mars mission plans in the 20th century shows the various mission proposals that have been put forth by multiple organizations and space agencies in this field of space exploration.

In terms of the current U.S. space program, NASA's long-term program Orion has a projected pace of development such that, as of late 2014, human spaceflight to Mars is anticipated in about 2035. That mission will be preceded by shorter flights for the up to four-person capsule involved, with experiments taking place to better the technologies protecting Mars-bound astronauts from the radiation of deep space.[1]

In fiction, the concept of humans traveling to and terraforming Mars has been explored in books, graphic novels, and films. Examples include: Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy, Total Recall, Red Planet, and Ghosts of Mars. The appeal of space-travel to the planet is a major aspect to Mars in fiction.

Travel to Mars


Closest approaches of Mars to Earth, 2014-2061. Communication times are slightly shorter when it is closest.

In interplanetary travel the energy needed for transfer between planetary orbits is lowest at intervals fixed by the synodic period. For Earth / Mars trips, this is every 26 months (2 years and 2 months),[2] so missions are typically planned to coincide with one of these launch windows. The energy needed in the low-energy windows varies on roughly a 15-year cycle[2] with the easiest windows needing only half the energy of the peaks.[3] In the 20th century, there was a minimum in the 1969 and 1971 launch windows and another low in 1986 and 1988, then the cycle repeated.[2]

Several types of mission plans have been proposed, such as the opposition class and conjunction class,[3] or the Crocco flyby.[4] However, typical Mars mission plans have round-trip flight times of 400 to 450 days.[5] A fast Mars mission of 245 days round trip could be possible with on-orbit staging.[6] Using Hohmann transfer orbits is a common plan. In 2014 Ballistic capture was proposed, which may reduce fuel cost and provide more flexible launch windows compared to the Hohmann.[7]

Challenges


Comparison of radiation doses - includes the amount detected on the trip from Earth to Mars by the RAD inside the MSL (2011 - 2013).[8][9][10] The vertical axis is in logarithmic scale. The dose over a Mars year is about 15 times the DOE limit, not less than twice, as a quick glance might suggest.

There are several key challenges for human missions to Mars:
  1. Costs of sending people to Mars. Estimates have ranged from $6 billion to $500 billion for crewed programs.[11][12][13]
  2. Health threats from exposure to high-energy cosmic rays and other ionizing radiation.[14][15][16] On 31 May 2013, NASA scientists reported that a possible manned mission to Mars may involve a great radiation risk based on the amount of energetic particle radiation detected by the RAD on the Mars Science Laboratory while traveling from the Earth to Mars in 2011-2012. The calculated radiation dose was 0.66 sieverts round-trip. The agency's career radiation limit for astronauts is 1 sievert.[8][9][10][17]
  3. Negative effects of a prolonged low-gravity environment on human health, including eyesight loss.[18][19][20]
  4. Psychological effects of isolation from Earth and, by extension, the lack of community due to impossibility of real-time connections with Earth.
  5. Social effects of several humans living under crowded conditions for more than one Earth year, possibly two or three years, on the mission to Mars, and a comparable length of time on the return to Earth.
  6. Inaccessibility of terrestrial medical facilities.
  7. Equipment failure of propulsion or life-support systems.
  8. Forward contamination of potential habitable zones.[21]
  9. Back contamination of Earth with possible Martian microbes.
Some of these issues were estimated statistically in the HUMEX study.[22] Ehlmann and others have reviewed political and economic concerns, as well as technological and biological feasibility aspects.[23] While fuel for roundtrip travel could be a challenge, methane and oxygen can be produced using Martian H2O (preferably as water ice instead of liquid water) and atmospheric CO2 with mature technology.[24]

Mission proposals

20th century

Over the last century, a number of mission concepts for such an expedition have been proposed. David Portree's history volume Humans to Mars: Fifty Years of Mission Planning, 1950 - 2000 discusses many of these.[2]

Wernher von Braun proposal (1947 through 1950s)

Wernher von Braun was the first person to make a detailed technical study of a Mars mission.[2][25] Details were published in his book Das Marsprojekt (1952); published in English as The Mars Project[26] (1962) and several subsequent works,[27] and featured in Collier's magazine in a series of articles beginning March 1952. A variant of the Von Braun mission concept was popularized in English by Willy Ley in the book The Conquest of Space (1949), featuring illustrations by Chesley Bonestell. Von Braun's Mars project envisioned nearly a thousand three-stage vehicles launching from Earth to ferry parts for the Mars mission to be constructed at a space station in Earth orbit.[25][28] The mission itself featured a fleet of ten spacecraft with a combined crew of 70 heading to Mars, bringing three winged surface excursion ships that would land horizontally on the surface of Mars. (Winged landing was considered possible because at the time of his proposal, the Martian atmosphere was believed to be much denser than was later found to be the case.)

In the 1956 revised vision of the Mars Project plan, published in the book The Exploration of Mars by Wernher Von Braun and Willy Ley, the size of the mission was trimmed, requiring only 400 launches to put together two ships, still carrying a winged landing vehicle.[29] Later versions of the mission proposal, featured in the Disney "Man In Space" film series,[30] showed nuclear-powered ion-propulsion vehicles for the interplanetary cruise.

U.S. proposals (1950s and 1960s)


Artist's conception of the Mars Excursion Module (MEM) proposed in a NASA study in 1963.

In 1962, Aeronutronic Ford,[31] General Dynamics and the Lockheed Missiles and Space Company made studies of Mars mission designs as part of NASA Marshall Spaceflight Center "Project EMPIRE".[25] These studies indicated that a Mars mission (possibly including a Venus fly-by) could be done with a launch of eight Saturn V boosters and assembly in low Earth orbit, or possibly with a single launch of a hypothetical "post Saturn" heavy-lift vehicle. Although the EMPIRE missions were only studies, and never proposed as funded projects, these were the first detailed analyses of what it would take to accomplish a human voyage to Mars using data from the actual NASA spaceflight, and laid much of the basis for future studies, including significant mission studies by TRW, North American, Philco, Lockheed, Douglas, and General Dynamics, along with several in-house NASA studies.[25]

Following the success of the Apollo Program, von Braun advocated a manned mission to Mars as a focus for NASA's manned space program.[32] Von Braun's proposal used Saturn V boosters to launch nuclear-powered (NERVA) upper stages that would power two six-crew spacecraft on a dual mission in the early 1980s. The proposal was considered by (then president) Richard Nixon but passed over in favor of the Space Shuttle.

Soviet mission proposals (1956 through 1970)

The Martian Piloted Complex or "'MPK'" was a proposal by Mikhail Tikhonravov of the Soviet Union for a manned Mars expedition, using the (then proposed) N-1 rocket, in studies from 1956 to 1962.

Artist's depiction of TMK-MAVR

Heavy Interplanetary Spacecraft (known by the Russian acronym TMK) was the designation of a Soviet Union space exploration proposal in the 1960s to send a manned flight to Mars and Venus (TMK-MAVR design) without landing. The TMK spacecraft was due to launch in 1971 and make a three-year-long flight including a Mars fly-by at which time probes would have been dropped. The TMK project was planned as an answer from the Soviet Union to the United States manned moon landings. The project was never completed because the required N1 rocket never flew successfully.

The Mars Expeditionary Complex, or "'MEK"' (1969) was another Soviet proposal for a Mars expedition that would take a crew from three to six to Mars and back with a total mission duration of 630 days.

Case for Mars (1981–1996)

Following the Viking missions to Mars, between 1981 and 1996 a series of conferences named The Case for Mars were held at the University of Colorado at Boulder. These conferences advocated human exploration of Mars, presented concepts and technologies, and held a series of workshops to develop a baseline concept for the mission. The baseline concept was notable in that it proposed use of In Situ Resource Utilization to manufacture rocket propellant for the return trip using the resources of Mars. The mission study was published in a series of proceedings volumes[33][34] published by the American Astronautical Society. Later conferences in the series presented a number of alternative concepts, including the "Mars Direct" concept of Robert Zubrin and David Baker; the "Footsteps to Mars" proposal of Geoffrey A. Landis,[35] which proposed intermediate steps before the landing on Mars, including human missions to Phobos; and the "Great Exploration" proposal from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, among others.

NASA Space Exploration Initiative (1989)

Artist's conception of a human mission on the surface of Mars
1989 painting by Les Bossinas of Lewis Research Center for NASA

In response to a presidential initiative, NASA made a study of a project for human lunar- and Mars exploration as a proposed follow-on to the International Space Station project. This resulted in a report, called the 90-day study,[36] in which the agency proposed a long-term plan consisting of completing the Space Station as "a critical next step in all our space endeavors," returning to the moon and establishing a permanent base, and then sending astronauts to Mars. This report was widely criticized as too elaborate and expensive, and all funding for human exploration beyond Earth orbit was canceled by Congress.[37]

Mars Direct (early 1990s)

Because of the distance between Mars and Earth, the Mars mission would be much more risky and more expensive than past manned flights to the Moon. Supplies and fuel would have to be prepared for a 2-3 year round trip and the spacecraft would have to be designed with at least partial shielding from intense solar radiation. A 1990 paper by Robert Zubrin and David A. Baker, then of Martin Marietta, proposed reducing the mission mass (and hence the cost) with a mission design using In Situ Resource Utilization to manufacture propellant from the Martian Atmosphere.[38][39] This proposal drew on a number of concepts developed by the former "Case for Mars" conference series. Over the next decade, this proposal was developed by Zubrin into a mission concept, Mars Direct, which he developed in a book, The Case for Mars (1996). The mission is advocated by the Mars Society, which Zubrin founded in 1998, as a practical and affordable plan for a manned Mars mission.

International Space University (1991)

In 1991 in Toulouse, France, the International Space University studied an international human Mars mission.[40] They proposed a crew of 8 traveling to Mars in a nuclear-powered vessel with artificial gravity provided by rotation.[40] On the surface, 40 tonne habitats pressurized to 10 psi were powered by a 40 kW photovoltaic array.[40]

NASA Design reference missions (1990s)

NASA Mars habitat concept for DRA 1.0, derived from the Mars Direct Architecture. (1995)

In the 1990s NASA developed several conceptual level human Mars exploration architectures. One of these was NASA Design reference mission 3.0 (DRM 3.0). It was a study performed by the NASA Mars Exploration Team at the NASA's Johnson Space Center (JSC) in the 1990s. Personnel representing several NASA field centers formulated a "Reference Mission" addressing human exploration of Mars. The plan describes a human mission to Mars with concepts of operations and technologies to be used as a first cut at an architecture. The architecture for the Mars Reference Mission builds on previous work, principally on the work of the Synthesis Group (1991) and Zubrin's (1991) concepts for the use of propellants derived from the Martian atmosphere. The primary purpose of the Reference Mission was to stimulate further thought and development of alternative approaches, which can improve effectiveness, reduce risks, and reduce cost. Improvements can be made at several levels; for example, in the architectural, mission, and system levels.

Selected other US/NASA plans (1988–2009):[41]
1) 1988 "Mars Expedition"
2) 1989 "Mars Evolution"
3) 1990 "90-Day Study"
4) 1991 "Synthesis Group"
5) 1995 "DRM 1"
6) 1997 "DRM 3"
7) 1998 "DRM 4"
8) 1999 "Dual Landers"

21st Century

NASA Design reference missions (2000+)


Concept for NASA Design Reference Mission Architecture 5.0 (2009)

Development of reference missions continued in the 21st century Selected other US/NASA plans (1988–2009):[41]
11) 2000 SERT (SSP)
12) 2002 NEP Art. Gravity
13) 2001 DPT/NEXT
14) 2009 DRA 5

MARPOST (2000/2005)

The Mars Piloted Orbital Station (or MARPOST) is a Russian proposed manned orbital mission to Mars, using a nuclear reactor to run an electric rocket engine. Proposed in October 2000 by Yuri Karash from the Russian Academy of Cosmonautics as the next step for Russia in space along with the Russian participation in the International Space Station, a 30-volume draft project for MARPOST has been confirmed as of 2005.[42] Design for the ship proposed to be ready in 2012, and the ship itself in 2021.[43]

ESA Aurora programme (2001+)

The European Space Agency had a long-term vision of sending a human mission to Mars in 2033.[44] Laid out in 2001, the project's proposed timeline would begin with robotic exploration, a proof of concept simulation of sustaining humans on Mars, and eventually a manned mission; however, objections from the participating nations of ESA and other delays have put the timeline into question.

ESA/Russia plan (2002)

Another proposal for a joint ESA mission with Russia is based on two spacecraft being sent to Mars, one carrying a six-person crew and the other the expedition's supplies. The mission would take about 440 days to complete with three astronauts visiting the surface of the planet for a period of two months. The entire project would cost $20 billion and Russia would contribute 30% of these funds.[45]

USA Vision for Space Exploration (2004)

Vsfe ship.jpg

Project Constellation included an Orion Mars Mission. United States President George W. Bush announced an initiative of manned space exploration on January 14, 2004, known as the Vision for Space Exploration. It included developing preliminary plans for a lunar outpost by 2012[46] and establishing an outpost by 2020. Precursor missions that would help develop the needed technology during the 2010-2020 decade were tentatively outlined by Adringa and others.[47] On September 24, 2007, Michael Griffin, then NASA Administrator, hinted that NASA may be able to launch a human mission to Mars by 2037.[48] The needed funds were to be generated by diverting $11 billion[49] from space science missions to the vision for human exploration.

NASA has also discussed plans to launch Mars missions from the Moon to reduce traveling costs.[50]

Mars Society Germany - European Mars Mission (EMM) (2005)

The Mars Society Germany proposed a manned Mars mission using several launches of an improved heavy-lift version of the Ariane 5.[51] Roughly 5 launches would be required to send a crew of 5 on a 1200 days mission, with a payload of 120,000 kg (260,000 lb).[51]

China National Space Administration (CNSA) (2006)

Sun Laiyan, administrator of the China National Space Administration, said on July 20, 2006 that China would start deep space exploration focusing on Mars over the next five years, during the Eleventh Five-Year Plan (2006–2010) Program period.[52] The first uncrewed Mars exploration program could take place between 2014–2033, followed by a crewed phase in 2040-2060 in which crew members would land on Mars and return home.[53] The Mars 500 study of 2011 prepared for this manned mission.

The One-Way Trip Option (2006); Mars to Stay (2006)

The idea of a one-way trip to Mars has been proposed several times. Space activist Bruce Mackenzie, for example, proposed a one-way trip to Mars in a presentation "One Way to Mars - a Permanent Settlement on the First Mission" at the 1998 International Space Development Conference,[54] arguing that since the mission could be done with less difficulty and expense if the astronauts were not required to return to Earth, the first mission to Mars should be a settlement, not a visit. In 2006, former NASA engineer James C. McLane III proposed a scheme to initially colonize Mars via a one way trip by only one human. Papers discussing this concept appeared in The Space Review,[55] Harper's Magazine,[56] SEARCH Magazine[57] and The New York Times.[58]
Mars to Stay proposes that astronauts sent to Mars for the first time should stay there indefinitely, both to reduce mission cost and to ensure permanent settlement of Mars. Among many notable Mars to Stay advocates, former Apollo astronaut Buzz Aldrin is a particularly outspoken promoter who has suggested in numerous forums "Forget the Moon, Let's Head to Mars!"[59] In June 2013, Aldrin wrote an opinion published in The New York Times supporting a manned mission to Mars and views the moon "not as a destination but more a point of departure, one that places humankind on a trajectory to homestead Mars and become a two-planet species."[60]

NASA Design Reference Mission 5.0 (2007)

NASA released initial details of the latest version conceptual level human Mars exploration architecture in this presentation. The study further developed concepts developed in previous NASA DRM and updated it to more current launchers and technology.

MarsDrive mission design (2008)

The MarsDrive Organization has been working at a series of new human mission designs starting with Mars for Less. Their current design program under Director of Engineering Ron Cordes has discarded many of the Mars for Less elements and was reviewed as MarsDrive DRM 2.5 in June 2008. Some of their design philosophy is focused on using current or near term existing launch vehicle systems, permanent human settlement, conceptual EDL systems and enhanced surface ISRU. Their current design in 2012 is titled "Ready For Mars" and focuses on use of small Viking heritage landers to solve the Entry, Descent and Landing challenge. Their proposed methods of funding the mission are also an alternative to the current government funded plans with a private consortium approach being investigated.

NASA Design Reference Mission Architecture 5.0 (2009)


DRMA 5.0 "commuter" Mars base, Chemical Propulsion Option (2009)

NASA released an updated version of NASA DRM 5.0 in early 2009, featuring use of the Ares V launcher, Orion CEV, and updated mission planning. In this document.[61]

NASA Austere Human Missions to Mars (2009)

Extrapolated from the DRMA 5.0, plans for a manned Mars expedition with chemical propulsion. Austere Human Missions to Mars

USA's Mars orbit by the mid-2030s (2010)

In a major space policy speech at Kennedy Space Center on April 15, 2010, U.S. President Barack Obama predicted a manned Mars mission to orbit the planet by the mid-2030s, followed by a landing:
By the mid-2030s, I believe we can send humans to orbit Mars and return them safely to Earth. And a landing on Mars will follow. And I expect to be around to see it.
The United States Congress has mostly approved a new direction for NASA that includes canceling Bush's planned return to the Moon by 2020 and instead proposes asteroid exploration in 2025 and orbiting Mars in the 2030s.[62]

Russian mission proposals (2011)

A number of Mars mission concepts and proposals have been put forth by Russian scientists. Stated dates were for a launch sometime between 2016 and 2020. The Mars probe would carry a crew of four to five cosmonauts, who would spend close to two years in space.[citation needed]

In late 2011, Russian and European space agencies successfully completed the ground-based MARS-500.[63] The biomedical experiment simulating manned flight to Mars was completed in Russia in July 2000.[64]

2-4-2 concept (2011-2012)

In 2011, Jean-Marc Salotti published a new proposal for a manned Mars mission, with a release in 2012.[65][66] The 2-4-2 concept is based on a reduction of the crew size to only 2 astronauts and the duplication of the entire mission. There are 2 astronauts in each space vehicle, there are 4 on the surface of Mars and there are 2 once again in each return vehicle. In addition, at every step of the mission, there are 2 astronauts ready to help the 2 others (2 for 2).
This architecture simplifies the entry, descent and landing procedures, which are known to be very risky, thanks to a significant reduction of the size of the landing vehicles. It also avoids the assembly of huge vehicles in LEO. The author claims that his proposal is much cheaper than the NASA reference mission without compromising the risks and can be undertaken before 2030.

NASA/SpaceX 'Red Dragon' (2012)

Red Dragon is a proposed concept for a low-cost Mars lander mission that would use a SpaceX Falcon Heavy launch vehicle, and a modified Dragon capsule to enter the Martian atmosphere. The concept was slated to be proposed for funding in 2012/2013 as a NASA Discovery mission, for launch in 2018.[67][68] However, it was never proposed for that funding. The primary objective would be the search for evidence of life on Mars (biosignatures), past or present; a substantially unmodified version of the crewed Dragon capsule could be used for payload transport to Mars, and would be a precursor to the ambitious long-term plans of a manned mission to Mars.[67][68]

Conceptual Space Vehicle Architecture for Human Exploration of Mars (2012)

In 2012, Conceptual Space Vehicle Architecture for Human Exploration of Mars, with Artificial Gravity and Mini-Magnetosphere Crew Radiation Shield was released, outlaying a possible design for a human Mars mission.[69] Components of the architecture include various spacecraft for the Earth-to-Mars journey, landing, and surface stay as well as return.[69] Some features include a several unmanned cargo landers assembled into a base on the surface of Mars.[69] The crew would land at this base in the "Mars Personnel Lander", which could also take them back into Mars orbit.[69] The design for the manned interplanetary spacecraft included artificial-gravity and an artificial magnetic field.[69] Overall, the architecture was modular and to allow for incremental R&D.[69]

Mars One (2012)

In 2012, a Dutch entrepreneur group revealed plans of a fund-raising campaign for a human Mars base to begin in 2023.[70] One difference from other projects is that 'Mars One' is organized as a not-for-profit organization, strives to use worldwide suppliers, with no politics involved. It would be a "one-way" mission, i.e., there will be no return trip to Earth. Astronaut applications are invited from the public all over the world.

In 2018, a telecom orbiter would be sent, a rover in 2020, and after that the base components and its settlers.[70] The base would be powered by 3,000 square meters of solar panels.[71] The SpaceX Heavy rocket would launch flight hardware.[70] The first crew of 4 astronauts would land on Mars in 2025. Then, every two years, a new crew of 4 astronauts would arrive. Current plans specify that the entire mission is to be filmed and broadcast back to Earth as a media event, revenues from which would help fund the program.

Inspiration Mars Foundation (2013)

In 2013, the Inspiration Mars Foundation founded by Dennis Tito plans a manned mission to fly by Mars in 2018.[72][73]

Boeing Affordable Mission (2014)

On December 2, 2014, NASA's Advanced Human Exploration Systems and Operations Mission Director Jason Crusan and Deputy Associate Administrator for Programs James Reuthner announced tentative support for the Boeing "Affordable Mars Mission Design" including radiation shielding, centrifugal artificial gravity, in-transit consumable resupply, and a lander which can return.[74][75] Reuthner suggested that if adequate funding was forthcoming, the proposed mission would be expected in the early 2030s.[76]

Current intentions

A number of nations and organisations have long-term intentions to send humans to Mars.

Planting a U.S. flag on Mars

Artist's rendering of the planned Orion/DSH/Cryogenic Propulsion Module assembly.
  • The United States has a number of robotic missions currently exploring Mars, with a sample-return planned for the future. On December 5, 2014 NASA successfully launched and tested the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV), the first component of NASA's planned Mars mission program. The Orion MPCV will serve as the launch/ splashdown crew delivery vehicle, in combination with a Deep Space Habitat module, which will provide additional living-space for the crew on the 16-month-long journey from Earth to Mars and back. The first manned Mars Mission, which will include sending astronauts to Mars, orbiting Mars, and a return to Earth, is currently scheduled for the 2030s.[77][78][79] One possible means of propulsion for such interplanetary transport ships has been proposed by New Scientist. In its proposal, New Scientist outlines an argon plasma-based VASIMR rocket which the group claims could reduce the interplanetary transit time.[80] As a training venue for future Mars missions, NASA has used the Haughton impact crater on Devon Island due to the crater's similarity with Martian geology.[81]
  • The European Space Agency has sent robotic probes, and has long-term plans to send humans but has not yet built a manned spacecraft. It plans to launch an unmanned mission to Mars, ExoMars, in 2016.
  • Russia (and previously the Soviet Union) has sent a large number of probes. It can send humans into Earth orbit and has extensive experience with long-term manned orbital space flight due to its space station programs. A simulation of a manned Mars mission, called Mars-500, was completed in Russia in November 2011.
  • India successfully placed an unmanned Mars Orbiter Mission (also called Mangalyaan) satellite in Mars orbit on 23 September 2014.[82]
  • Japan has sent one robotic mission to Mars, the Nozomi, but it failed to achieve Mars orbit.
  • China's mission to Mars, the Yinghuo-1 space probe, was lost with Russia's sample return mission to Phobos, Fobos-Grunt. China claims to have built and tested an EmDrive prototype, which could reduce Mars' interplanetary transit time. The EmDrive spacecraft propulsion technology is also being investigated in the United States.[83][84]

Technological innovations and hurdles


Fuel is mined from Phobos with the help of a nuclear reactor.[85]

Various technologies may aid a human mission to Mars.

One of the medical supplies that may be needed is intravenous fluid, which is mostly water but contains other things so it can be added directly to the human blood stream. If it can be created on the spot from existing water then it could spare the weight of hauling earth-produced units, whose weight is mostly water.[86] A prototype for this capability was tested on the International Space Station in 2010.[86]

While it is possible for humans to breathe pure oxygen, a pure oxygen atmosphere was implicated in the Apollo 1 fire. As such, Mars habitats may have a need for additional gases. One possibility is to take nitrogen and argon from the atmosphere of Mars; however, they are hard to separate from each other.[87] As a result, a Mars habitat may use 40% argon, 40% nitrogen, and 20% oxygen.[87]

Precursor missions

Mars sample return missions


Sample return mission concept

An unmanned Mars sample return mission (MSR) is often considered to be an essential precursor to crewed missions to Mars' surface.

Crewed orbital missions

Landis[88] and Lupisella proposed to explore Mars via telepresence from human astronauts in orbit.[89]

A similar idea, was the proposed "Human Exploration using Real-time Robotic Operations" (HERRO) mission.[90][91]

Another proposed mission was the Russian Mars Piloted Orbital Station.

Lockheed Martin as part of their "Stepping stones to Mars" project, called the "Red Rocks Project" proposed to explore Mars robotically from Deimos.[35][92][93]

Mars analogs


Crew for a Mars research mission practice techniques on Devon Island, in the Canadian arctic

Mars analogs are experiments that often use environments that simulate aspects of the conditions people could experience during a hypothetical mission to Mars. These efforts have received major interest by non-governmental organizations interested in spaceflight as well as notable media coverage.

Late Pleistocene extinctions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ...