From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OutsourcingOutsourcing is an agreement in which one company hires another
company to be responsible for a planned or existing activity that is or
could be done internally,
and sometimes involves transferring employees and assets from one firm to another.
The term outsourcing, which came from the phrase outside resourcing, originated no later than 1981. The concept, which The Economist says has "made its presence felt since the time of the Second World War", often involves the contracting of a business process (e.g., payroll processing, claims processing), operational, and/or non-core functions, such as manufacturing, facility management, call centre/call centre support.
The practice of handing over control of public services to private enterprises, even if on a short-term limited basis, may also be described as "outsourcing".
Outsourcing includes both foreign and domestic contracting, and sometimes includes offshoring (relocating a business function to a distant country) or nearshoring (transferring a business process to a nearby country).
Offshoring
and outsourcing are not mutually inclusive: there can be one without
the other. They can be intertwined (offshore outsourcing), and can be
individually or jointly, partially or completely reversed, involving terms such as reshoring, inshoring, and insourcing.
Terminology
- Offshoring
is moving the work to a distant country. If the distant workplace is a
foreign subsidiary/owned by the company, then the offshore operation is a
captive, sometimes referred to as in-house offshore.
- Offshore outsourcing
is the practice of hiring an external organization to perform some
business functions ("Outsourcing") in a country other than the one where
the products or services are actually performed, developed or
manufactured ("Offshore").
- Insourcing entails bringing processes handled by third-party firms in-house, and is sometimes accomplished via vertical integration.
- Nearshoring refers to outsource to a nearby country.
- Farmshoring refers to outsourcing to companies in more rural locations within the same country.
- Homeshoring (also known as Homesourcing) is a form of IT-enabled "transfer of service industry employment from offices to home-based ... with appropriate telephone and Internet facilities". These remote work positions may be customer-facing or back office, and the workers may be employees or independent contractors.
- In-housing refers to hiring employees or using existing employees/resources to undo an outsourcing.
- An Intermediary is a business which provides a contract service to another organization while contracting out that same service.
Acronyms
Some of the acronyms related to BPO (Business Process Outsourcing) are:
Overview
Motivations
Global labor arbitrage
can provide major financial savings from lower international labor
rates, which could be a major motivation for offshoring. Cost savings
from economies of scale
and specialization can also motivate outsourcing, even if not
offshoring. Since about 2015 indirect revenue benefits have increasingly
become additional motivators.
Another motivation is speed to market. To make this work, a new process was developed: "outsource the outsourcing process". Details of managing DuPont's CIO Cinda Hallman's $4 billion 10-year outsourcing contract with Computer Sciences Corporation and Accenture
were outsourced, thus avoiding "inventing a process if we'd done it
in-house". A term subsequently developed to describe this is midsourcing.
Outsourcing can offer greater budget flexibility and control by
allowing organizations to pay for the services and business functions
they need, when they need them. It is often perceived to reduce hiring
and training specialized staff, to make available specialized expertise,
and to decrease capital, operating expenses, and risk.
"Do what you do best and outsource the rest" has become an
internationally recognized business tagline first "coined and developed" in the 1990s by management consultant Peter Drucker.
The slogan was primarily used to advocate outsourcing as a viable
business strategy. Drucker began explaining the concept of "Outsourcing"
as early as 1989 in his Wall Street Journal article entitled "Sell the Mailroom".
The biggest difference between outsourcing and in-house is with
regards to the difference in ownership - where the former usually
presupposes integration of business processes under a different
ownership, of which the client business has minimal to no control over.
This requires the use of Outsourcing Relationship Management.
Sometimes the effect of what looks like outsourcing from one side
and insourcing from the other side can be unexpected: The New York
Times reported in 2001 that "6.4 million Americans .. worked for foreign
companies as of 2001, [but] more jobs are being outsourced than" [the
reverse].
Agreements
Two organizations may enter into a contractual agreement involving an exchange of services, expertise, and payments. Outsourcing is said to help firms to perform well in their core competencies, fuel innovation, and mitigate a shortage of skill or expertise in the areas where they want to outsource.
History
20th century
Following
the adding of management layers in the 1950s and 1960s to support
expansion for the sake of economy of scale, corporations found that
agility and added profits could be obtained by focusing on core
strengths; the 1970s and 1980s were the beginnings of what later was
named outsourcing. Kodak's 1989 "outsourcing most of its information technology systems" was followed by others during the 1990s.
In 2013, the International Association of Outsourcing Professionals gave recognition to Electronic Data Systems Corporation's Morton H. Meyerson who, in 1967, proposed the business model that eventually became known as outsourcing.
IT-enabled services offshore outsourcing
Growth of offshoring of IT-enabled services, although not universally accepted,
both to subsidiaries and to outside companies (offshore outsourcing) is
linked to the availability of large amounts of reliable and affordable
communication infrastructure following the telecommunication and
Internet expansion of the late 1990s. Services making use of low-cost countries included
- back-office and administrative functions, such as finance and accounting, HR, and legal
- call centers and other customer-facing departments, such as marketing and sales services
- IT infrastructure and application development
- knowledge services, including engineering support, product design, research and development, and analytics.
Early 21st century
In
the early 21st century, businesses increasingly outsourced to suppliers
outside their own country, sometimes referred to as offshoring or offshore outsourcing. Other options subsequently emerged: nearshoring, crowdsourcing, multisourcing, strategic alliances/strategic partnerships, strategic outsourcing.
From Drucker's perspective, a company should only seek to
subcontract in those areas in which it demonstrated no special ability.
The business strategy outlined by his slogan recommended that companies
should take advantage of a specialist provider's knowledge and
economies of scale to improve performance and achieve the service
needed.
In 2009, by way of recognition, Peter Drucker posthumously
received a significant honor when he was inducted into the Outsourcing
Hall of Fame for his outstanding work in the field.
Limitations due to growth
Inflation,
high domestic interest rates, and economic growth pushed India's IT
salaries 10 - 15%, making some jobs relatively "too" expensive, compared
to other offshoring destinations. Areas for advancing within the value
chain included research and development, equity analysis, tax-return
processing, radiological analysis, and medical transcription.
Offshore alternatives
Japanese companies outsourced to China, particularly to formerly Japanese-occupied cities. German companies have outsourced to Eastern European countries with German-language affiliation, such as Poland and Romania. French companies outsource to North Africa for similar reasons.
For Australian IT companies, Indonesia
is one of the major choice of offshoring destination. Near-shore
location, common time zone and adequate IT work force are the reasons
for offshoring IT services to Indonesia.
Growth of white-collar outsourcing
Although offshoring initially focused on manufacturing, white-collar offshoring/outsourcing has grown rapidly since the early 21st century. The digital workforce of countries like India and China are only paid a fraction of what would be minimum wage in the US. On average, software engineers
are getting paid between 250,000 and 1,500,000 rupees (US$4,000 to
US$23,000) in India as opposed to $40,000–$100,000 in countries such as
the US and Canada. Closer to the US, Costa Rica
has become a big source for the advantages of a highly educated labor
force, a large bilingual population, stable democratic government, and
similar time zones with the United States. It takes only a few hours to
travel between Costa Rica and the US. Companies such as Intel, Procter & Gamble, HP, Gensler, Amazon and Bank of America have big operations in Costa Rica.
Unlike outsourced manufacturing, outsourced white collar workers have flextime and can choose their working hours, and for which companies to work. Clients benefit from remote work, reduced office space, management salary, and employee benefits as these individuals are independent contractors.
However, ending a government oursourcing arrangement has its difficulties too.
Reasons for outsourcing
While U.S. companies do not outsource to reduce high top level executive or managerial costs, they primarily outsource to reduce peripheral and "non-core" business expenses. Further reasons are higher taxes, high energy costs, and excessive government regulation or mandates.
Mandated benefits like social security, Medicare, and safety protection (OSHA regulations) are also motivators. By contrast, executive pay in the United States in 2007, which could exceed 400 times more than average workers — a gap 20 times bigger than it was in 1965 is not a factor.
Other reasons include reducing and controlling operating costs, improving company focus, gaining access to world-class capabilities, tax credits,
freeing internal resources for other purposes, streamlining or
increasing efficiency for time-consuming functions, and maximizing use
of external resources. For small businesses,
contracting/subcontracting/"outsourcing" might be done to improve work-life balance
Outsourcing models
There are many outsourcing models, with variations by country, year and industry.
Another approach is to differentiate between tactical and strategic outsourcing models. Tactical models include:
- Staff augmentation
- Project-based
- To gain expertise not available in-house.
Strategic consultancy includes for Business process improvement.
Innovation outsourcing
When
offshore outsourcing knowledge work, firms heavily rely on the
availability of technical personnel at offshore locations. One of the
challenges in offshoring engineering innovation is a reduction in
quality.
Co-sourcing
Co-sourcing is a hybrid of internal staff supplemented by an external service provider. Co-sourcing can minimize sourcing risks, increase transparency, clarity and lend toward better control than fully outsourced.
Co-sourcing services can supplement internal audit staff with specialized skills such as information risk management
or integrity services, or help during peak periods, or similarly for
other areas such as software development or human resources.
Identity management co-sourcing
Identity management co-sourcing is when on-site hardware interacts with outside identity services.
This contrasts with an "all in-the-cloud" service scenario, where
the identity service is built, hosted and operated by the service
provider in an externally hosted, cloud computing infrastructure.
Offshore Software R&D Co-sourcing
Offshore Software R&D is the provision of software development
services by a supplier (whether external or internal) located in a
different country from the one where the software will be used. The
global software R&D services market, as contrasted to Information Technology Outsourcing (ITO) and BPO, is rather young and currently is at a relatively early stage of development.
Countries involved in outsourced software R&D
Canada, India, Ireland, and Israel were the four leading countries as of 2003.
Although many countries have participated in the Offshore outsourcing
of software development, their involvement in co-sourced and outsourced
Research & Development (R&D) was somewhat limited. Canada, the
second largest by 2009, had 21%
As of 2018, the top three were deemed by one "research-based
policy analysis and commentary from leading economists" as China, India
and Israel."
Gartner Group adds in Russia, but does not make clear whether this is pure R&D or run-of-the-mill IT outsourcing.
Usability issues in offshore development
The
main driver for offshoring development work has been the greater
availability of developers at a lower cost than in the home country.
However, the rise in offshore development has taken place in parallel
with an increased awareness of the importance of usability, and the user
experience, in software. Outsourced development poses special problems
for development, i.e. the more formal, contractual relationship between
the supplier and client, and geographical separation place greater
distance between the developers and users, which makes it harder to
reflect the users' needs in the final product. This problem is
exacerbated if the development is offshore. Further complications arise
from cultural differences, which apply even if the development is
carried out by an in-house offshore team.
Historically offshore development concentrated on back office
functions but, as offshoring has grown, a wider range of applications
have been developed. Offshore suppliers have had to respond to the
commercial pressures arising from usability issues by building up their
usability expertise. Indeed, this problem has presented an attractive
opportunity to some suppliers to move up market and offer higher value
services.
Legal issues
Offshore
Software R&D means that company A turns over responsibility, in
whole or in part, of an in-house software development to company B whose
location is outside of company A's national jurisdiction. Maximizing
the economic value of an offshore software development asset critically
depends on understanding how best to use the available forms of legal
regulations to protect intellectual rights. If the vendor cannot be
trusted to protect trade secrets, then the risks of an offshoring
software development may outweigh its potential benefits. Hence, it is
critical to review the intellectual property policy of the potential
offshoring supplier. The intellectual property protection policy of an
offshore software development company must be reflected in these crucial
documents: General Agreement; Non-Disclosure Agreement; Employee
Confidentiality Contract.
2000-2012 R&D
As forecast in 2003, R&D is outsourced. Ownership of intellectual property
by the outsourcing company, despite outside development, was the goal.
To defend against tax-motivated cost-shifting, the US government passed
regulations in 2006 to make outsourcing research harder. Despite many R&D contracts given to Indian universities and labs, only some research solutions were patented.
While Pfizer moved some of its R&D from the UK to India, a Forbes
article suggested that it is increasingly more dangerous to offshore IP
sensitive projects to India, because of India's continued ignorance of
patent regulations. In turn, companies such as Pfizer and Novartis, have lost rights to sell many of their cancer medications in India because of lack of IP protection.
Future trends
A 2018 "The Future of Outsourcing" report began with "The future of outsourcing is digital." The ""Do what you do best and outsource the rest" approach means that "integration with retained systems" is the new transition challenge - people training still exists, but is merely an "also."
There is more complexity than before, especially when the outside company may be an integrator.
While the number of technically skilled labor grows in India,
Indian offshore companies are increasingly tapping into the skilled
labor already available in Eastern Europe to better address the needs of
the Western European R&D market.
Changed government outsourcing focus
Forbes considered the US Presidential election of 2016 "the most disruptive change agent for the outsourcing industry",
especially the renewed "invest in America" goal highlighted in
campaigning, but the magazine tepidly reversed direction in 2019 as to
the outcome for employment.
Furthermore, there are growing legal requirements for data protection, where obligations and implementation details must be understood by both sides. This includes dealing with customer rights.
Implications
Performance measurement
Focusing on software quality metrics is a good way to maintain track of how well a project is performing.
Management processes
Globalization and complex supply chains,
along with greater physical distance between higher management and the
production-floor employees often requires a change in management
methodologies, as inspection and feedback may not be as direct and
frequent as in internal processes. This often requires the assimilation
of new communication methods such as voice over IP, instant messaging, and Issue tracking systems, new time management methods such as time tracking software, and new cost- and schedule-assessment tools such as cost estimation software.
The term Transition methodology describes the process of migrating knowledge, systems, and operating capabilities between the two sides.
Communications and customer service
In the area of call center outsourcing, especially when combined with offshoring, agents may speak with different linguistic features such as accents, word use and phraseology, which may impede comprehension.
Governance
In 1979, Nobel laureate Oliver E. Williamson wrote that the governance
structure is the "framework within which the integrity of a transaction
is decided." Adding further that "because contracts are varied and
complex, governance structures vary with the nature of the transaction." University of Tennessee
researchers have been studying complex outsourcing relationships since
2003. Emerging thinking regarding strategic outsourcing is focusing on
creating a contract structure in which the parties have a vested
interest in managing what are often highly complex business arrangements
in a more collaborative, aligned, flexible, and credible way.
Security
Reduced security, sometimes related to lower loyalty
may occur, even when "outsourced" staff change their legal status but
not their desk. While security and compliance issues are supposed to be
addressed through the contract between the client and the suppliers,
fraud cases have been reported.
In April 2005, a high-profile case involved the theft of $350,000 from four Citibank
customers when call-center workers acquired the passwords to customer
accounts and transferred the money to their own accounts opened under
fictitious names. Citibank did not find out about the problem until the
American customers noticed discrepancies with their accounts and
notified the bank.
Information Technology
Richard Baldwin's 2006 The Great Unbundling work was followed in 2012 by Globalization's Second Acceleration (the Second Unbundling) and in 2016 by The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization.
It is here, rather than in manufacturing, that the bits economy can
advance in ways that the economy of atoms and things can't: an early
1990s Newsweek had a half page cartoon showing someone who had just
ordered a pizza online, and was seeking help to download it.
Step-in rights
If both sides have a contract clause permitting step-in rights, then there is a right, though not an obligation, to take over a task that is not going well, or even the entire project.
Issues and reversals
Demonstrating need to ensure outsourcing gains are realised and losses avoided at a summit in London in 2009
A number of outsourcings and offshorings that were deemed failures led to reversals signaled by use of terms such as Insourcing and reshoring.
The New York Times reported in 2017 that IBM "plans to hire 25,000 more
workers in the United States over the next four years," overlapping
India-based Infosys's "10,000 workers in the United States over the next two years." A clue to a tipping point having been reached was a short essay titled "Maybe You Shouldn't Outsource Everything After All" and the longer "That Job Sent to India May Now Go to Indiana."
Among problems encountered were supply-and-demand induced raises
in salaries and lost benefits of similar-time-zone. Other issues were
differences in language and culture.
Another reason for a decrease in outsourcing is that many jobs that
were subcontracted abroad have been replaced by technological advances.
According to a 2005 Deloitte Consulting survey, a quarter of the companies which had outsourced tasks reversed their strategy.
These reversals, however, did not undo the damage. New factories often:
- were in different locations
- needed different skill sets
- used more automation.
Public opinion in the US and other Western powers opposing
outsourcing was particularly strengthened by the drastic increase in
unemployment as a result of the 2007–2008 financial crisis. From 2000 to
2010, the US experienced a net loss of 687,000 jobs due to outsourcing,
primarily in the computers and electronics sector. Public
disenchantment with outsourcing has not only stirred political
responses, as seen in the 2012 US presidential campaigns, but it has also made companies more reluctant to outsource or offshore jobs.
A counterswing depicted by a 2016 Deloitte survey suggested that companies are no longer reluctant to outsource. Deloitte's survey identified three trends:
- Companies are broadening their approach to outsourcing as they begin to view it as more than a simple cost-cutting play
- Organizations are "redefining the ways they enter into outsourcing relationships and manage the ensuing risks".
- Organizations are changing the way they are managing their
relationships with outsourcing providers to "maximize the value of those
relationships".
Insourcing
Insourcing is the process of reversing an outsourcing, possibly using help from those not currently part of the inhouse staff.
Outsourcing has gone through many iterations and reinventions,
and some outsourcing contracts have been partially or fully reversed.
Often the reason is to maintain control of critical production or
competencies, and insourcing is used to reduce costs of taxes, labor and
transportation.
Regional insourcing, a related term, is when a company assigns work to a subsidiary that is within the same country. This differs from onshoring and reshoring: these may be either inside or outside the company.
Regional insourcing
Regional insourcing
is a process in which a company establishes satellite locations for
specific entities of their business, making use of advantages one state
may have over another
This concept focuses on the delegating or reassigning of procedures,
functions, or jobs from production within a business in one location to
another internal entity that specializes in that operation. This allows
companies to streamline production, boost competency, and increase their
bottom line.
This competitive strategy applies the classical argument of Adam Smith,
which posits that two nations would benefit more from one another by
trading the goods that they are more proficient at manufacturing.
Net effect on jobs
To those who are concerned that nations may be losing a net number of jobs due to outsourcing, some point out that insourcing also occurs. A 2004 study
in the United States, the United Kingdom, and many other industrialized
countries more jobs are insourced than outsourced. The New York Times
disagreed, and wrote that free trade with low-wage countries is win-lose
for many employees who find their jobs offshored or with stagnating
wages.
The impact of offshore outsourcing, according to two estimates published by The Economist showed unequal effect during the period studied 2004 to 2015, ranging from 150,000 to as high as 300,000 jobs lost per year.
In 2010, a group of manufacturers started the Reshoring
Initiative, focusing on bringing manufacturing jobs for American
companies back to the country. Their data indicated that
140,000 American jobs were lost in 2003 due to offshoring. Eleven years
later in 2014, the United States recovered 10,000 of those offshored
positions; this marked the highest net gain in 20 years. More than 90% of the jobs that American companies "offshored" and outsourced manufacturing to low cost countries such as China, Malaysia and Vietnam did not return.
Insourcing crossbreeds
The
fluctuation of prefixes and names give rise to many more "cross-breeds"
of insourcing. For example, "offshore insourcing" is "when companies
set up their own "captive" process centers overseas, sometimes called a Captive Service, taking advantage of their cheaper surroundings while maintaining control of their back-office work and business processes." "Remote insourcing" refers to hiring developers to work in-house from virtual (remote) facilities.
In the United States
A 2012 series of articles in Atlantic Magazine
highlighted a turning of the tide for parts of the USA's manufacturing
industry. Specific causes identified include rising third-world wages,
recognition of hidden off-shoring costs, innovations in
design/manufacture/assembly/time-to-market, increasing fuel and
transportation costs, falling energy costs in the US, increasing US
labor productivity, and union flexibility. Hiring at GE's giant Appliance Park in Louisville increased 90% during 2012.
Standpoint of labor
From
the standpoint of labor, outsourcing may represent a new threat,
contributing to worker insecurity, and is reflective of the general
process of globalization and economic polarization.
- Low-skilled work: Low-skill work outsourced to contractors who tend to employ migrant labor is causing a revival of radical trade union activity. In the UK, major hospitals, universities, ministries and corporations are being pressured.
- In-housing: In January 2020, Tim Orchard, the CEO of Imperial College Healthcare Trust stated that the in-housing of over 1,000 Sodexo cleaners, caterers and porters across five NHS
hospitals in London "will create additional cost pressures next year
but we are confident that there are also benefits to unlock, arising
from better team working, more co-ordinated planning and improved
quality."
- USA base: On June 26, 2009, Jeff Immelt, the CEO of General Electric,
called for the United States to increase its manufacturing base
employment to 20% of the workforce, commenting that the U.S. has
outsourced too much and can no longer rely on consumer spending to drive
demand.
Standpoint of government
Western
governments may attempt to compensate workers affected by outsourcing
through various forms of legislation. In Europe, the Acquired Rights Directive attempts to address the issue. The Directive is implemented differently in different nations. In the United States, the Trade Adjustment Assistance
Act is meant to provide compensation for workers directly affected by
international trade agreements. Whether or not these policies provide
the security and fair compensation they promise is debatable.
Government response
In response to the recession, President Obama launched the SelectUSA
program in 2011. In January 2012, President Obama Issued a Call to
Action to Invest in America at the White House "Insourcing American
Jobs" Forum. Obama met with representatives of Otis Elevator, Apple, DuPont, Master Lock, and others which had recently brought jobs back or made significant investments in the United States.
Policy-making strategy
A main feature of outsourcing influencing policy-making is the unpredictability
it generates regarding the future of any particular sector or
skill-group. The uncertainty of future conditions influences governance
approaches to different aspects of long-term policies.
In particular, distinction is needed between
- cyclical unemployment – for which pump it up solutions have worked in the past, and
- structural unemployment – when "businesses and industries that employed them no longer exist, and their skills no longer have the value they once did."
Competitiveness
A
governance that attempts adapting to the changing environment will
facilitate growth and a stable transition to new economic structures until the economic structures become detrimental to the social, political and cultural structures.
Automation increases output and allows for reduced cost per item.
When these changes are not well synronized, unemployment or
underemployment is a likely result. When transportation costs remain
unchanged, the negative effect may be permanent; jobs in protected sectors may no longer exist.
USA outsourcing's effect on Mexico, studies suggest, is that for every 10% increase in US wages, north Mexico cities along the border experienced wage rises of 2.5%, about 0.69% higher than in inner cities.
By contrast, higher rates of saving and investment in Asian
countries, along with rising levels of education, studies suggest,
fueled the ‘Asian miracle’ rather than improvements in productivity and
industrial efficiency. There was also an increase in patenting and
research and development expenditures.
Industrial policy
Outsourcing results from an internationalization of labor markets as more tasks become tradable. According to leading economist Greg Mankiw,
the labour market functions under the same forces as the market of
goods, with the underlying implication that the greater the number of
tasks available to being moved, the better for efficiency under the
gains from trade. With technological progress, more tasks can be
offshored at different stages of the overall corporate process.
The tradeoffs are not always balanced, and a 2004 viewer of the
situation said "the total number of jobs realized in the United States
from insourcing is far less than those lost through outsourcing."
Environmental policy
Import
competition has caused a de facto ‘race-to-the-bottom’ where countries
lower environmental regulations to secure a competitive edge for their
industries relative to other countries.
As Mexico competes with China over Canadian and American markets, its national Commission for Environmental Cooperation
has not been active in enacting or enforcing regulations to prevent
environmental damage from increasingly industrialized Export Processing
Zones. Similarly, since the signing of NAFTA,
heavy industries have increasingly moved to the US which has a
comparative advantage due to its abundant presence of capital and
well-developed technology. A further example of environmental
de-regulation with the objective of protecting trade incentives have
been the numerous exemptions to carbon taxes in European countries
during the 1990s.
Although outsourcing can influence environmental de-regulatory
trends, the added cost of preventing pollution does not majorly
determine trade flows or industrialization.
Success stories
Companies such as ET Water Systems (now a Jain Irrigation Systems company), GE Appliances and Caterpillar
found that with the increase of labor costs in Japan and China, the
cost of shipping and custom fees, it cost only about 10% more to
manufacture in America. Advances in technology and automation such as 3D printing technologies have made bringing manufacturing back to the United States, both cost effective and possible. Adidas, for example, plans producing highly customized shoes with 3D printers in the U.S.
Globalization and socio-economic implications
Industrialization
Outsourcing
has contributed to further levelling of global inequalities as it has
led to general trends of industrialization in the Global South and
deindustrialization in the Global North.
Not all manufacturing should return to the U.S.
The rise of the middle class in China, India and other countries has
created markets for the products made in those countries. Just as the
U.S. has a "Made in U.S.A." program, other countries support products
made in their countries as well. Localization, the process of
manufacturing products for the local market, is an approach to keeping
some manufacturing offshore and bringing some of it back. Besides the
cost savings of manufacturing closer to the market, the lead time for
adapting to changes in the market is faster.
The rise in industrial efficiency which characterized development
in developed countries has occurred as a result of labor-saving
technological improvements. Although these improvements do not directly
reduce employment levels but rather increase output per unit of work,
they can indirectly diminish the amount of labor required for fixed
levels of output.
Growth and income
It
has been suggested that "workers require more education and different
skills, working with software rather than drill presses" rather than
rely on limited growth labor requirements for non-tradable services.
By location
United States
Protection of some data involved in outsourcing, such as about patients (HIPAA) is one of the few federal protections.
"Outsourcing" is a continuing political issue in the United States, having been conflated with offshoring during the 2004 U.S. presidential election. The political debate centered on outsourcing's consequences for the domestic U.S. workforce. Democratic U.S. presidential candidate John Kerry called U.S. firms that outsource jobs abroad or that incorporate overseas in tax havens to avoid paying their "fair share" of U.S. taxes "Benedict Arnold corporations".
A Zogby International
August 2004 poll found that 71% of American voters believed
"outsourcing jobs overseas" hurt the economy while another 62% believed
that the U.S. government should impose some legislative action against
these companies, possibly in the form of increased taxes.
President Obama promoted the 'Bring Jobs Home Act' to help reshore jobs
by using tax cuts and credits for moving operations back to the USA. The same bill was reintroduced in the 113th United States Congress as the Bring Jobs Home Act (S. 2569; 113th Congress).
While labor advocates claim union busting as one possible cause of outsourcing, another claim is high corporate income tax rate in the U.S. relative to other OECD nations,
and the practice of taxing revenues earned outside of U.S.
jurisdiction, a very uncommon practice. Some counterclaim that the
actual taxes paid by US corporations may be considerably lower than
"official" rates due to the use of tax loopholes, tax havens, and
"gaming the system".
Sarbanes-Oxley has also been cited as a factor.
Europe
Council
Directive 77/187 of 14 February 1977 protects employees' rights in the
event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of businesses
(as amended 29 June 1998, Directive 98/50/EC & 12 March 2001's
Directive 2001/23). Rights acquired by employees with the former
employer are to be safeguarded when they, together with the undertaking
in which they are employed, are transferred to another employer, i.e.,
the contractor.
Case subsequent to the European Court of Justice's Christel
Schmidt v. Spar- und Leihkasse der früheren Ämter Bordesholm, Kiel und
Cronshagen, Case C-392/92 [1994] have disputed whether a particular
contracting-out exercise constituted a transfer of an undertaking (see,
for example, Ayse Süzen v. Zehnacker Gebäudereinigung GmbH Krankenhausservice, Case C-13/95 [1997]). In principle, employees may benefit from the protection offered by the directive.
Asia
Countries
that have been the focus of outsourcing include India, Pakistan, and the
Philippines for American and European companies, and China and Vietnam for Japanese companies.
The Asian IT service market is still in its infancy, but in 2008
industry think tank Nasscom-McKinsey predicted a $17 billion IT service
industry in India alone.
A China-based company, Lenovo, outsourced/reshored manufacturing of some time-critical customized PCs to the U.S. since "If it made them in China they would spend six weeks on a ship."
Article 44 of Japan's Employment Security Act implicitly bans the
domestic/foreign workers supplied by unauthorized companies regardless
of their operating locations. The law will apply if at least one party
of suppliers, clients, labors reside in Japan, and if the labors are the
integral part of the chain of command by the client company, or the
supplier.
- No person shall carry out a labor supply business or have
workers supplied by a person who carries out a labor supply business
work under his/her own directions or orders, except in cases provided
for in the following Article.
- A person who falls under any of the following items shall be
punished by imprisonment with work for not more than one year or a fine
of not more than one million yen. (Article 64)
- Unless permitted by act, no person shall obtain profit by intervening, as a business, in the employment of another.
Victims can lodge a criminal complaint against the CEO of the
suppliers and clients. The CEO risks arrest, and the Japanese company
may face a private settlement with financial package in the range
between 20 and 100 million JPY (200,000 - million USD).
Nearshoring
When the New York Times headlined "Near Source of Supplies the Best Policy" their main focus was on "cost of production."
Although transportation cost was addressed, they did not choose among:
- transporting supplies to place of production
- transporting finished goods to place(s) of sale
- cost and availability of labor
Nearshoring or Nearsourcing is having business processes, especially information technology
processes such as application maintenance and development or testing,
in a nearby country, often sharing a border with the target country.
Commonalities usually include: geographic, temporal (time zone),
cultural, social, linguistic, economic, political, or historical
linkages.
The term Nearshoring is a derivative of the business term offshoring. The hybrid term "nearshore outsourcing" is sometimes used as an alternative for nearshoring,
since nearshore workers are not employees of the company for which the
work is performed. It can also be a reversal, by contracting a
development partner in a different country but in close proximity (same
or nearby time zone), facilitating communication and allowing frequent
visits. This is a business strategy to place some or all of its
operations close to where its products are sold. Typically, this is
contrasted with the trend to outsource low-wage manufacturing operations
to developing nations (offshoring), and reflects a reversal of that
trend. Sometime, the work is done by an outside contracted company
rather than internally (insourcing),
but unlike offshore outsourcing, the work is done in fairly close
proximity to either the company headquarters or its target market.
In Europe, nearshore outsourcing relationships are between
clients in larger European economies and various providers in smaller
European nations. The attraction is lower-cost skilled labor forces, and
a less stringent regulatory environment, but crucially they allow for
more day to day physical oversight. These countries also have strong
cultural ties to the major economic centers in Europe as they are part
of EU. For example, as of 2020 Portugal is considered to be the most
trending outsourcing destination as big companies like Mercedes, Google,
Jaguar, Sky News, Natixis and BNP Paribas opening development centers
in Lisbon and Porto, where labor costs are lower, talent comes from
excellent Universities, there's availability of skills and the time zone
is GMT (the same as London).
In the US, American clients nearshore to Canada and Mexico, as well as to many nations in Central and South America.
Reasons to nearshore
Culture
Cultural
alignment with the business is often more readily achieved through
near-sourcing due to there being similarities between the cultures in
which the business is located and in which services are sub-contracted,
including for example proficiency with the language used in that
culture.
Communication
Constraints
imposed by time zones can complicate communication; near-sourcing or
nearshoring offers a solution. English language skills are the
cornerstone of Nearshore and IT services. Collaboration by universities,
industry, and government has slowly produced improvements. Proximity
also facilitates in-person interaction regularly and/or when required.
Other Advantages
Software development nearshoring is mainly due to flexibility when it comes to upscale or downscale teams or availability of low cost
skilled developers. The nearshoring of call centers, shared services centers, and Business Process Outsourcing
(BPO) rose as offshore outsourcing was seen to be relatively less
valuable. More recently, companies have explored nearshoring as a risk
mitigation strategy for operational and supply chain weaknesses
uncovered during the COVID-19 global pandemic crisis, when offshore BPOs
experienced sudden closures and disruptive quarantine restrictions
which hampered their ability to conduct day-to-day business operations.
The complexities of offshoring stem from language and cultural
differences, travel distances, workday/time zone mismatches, and greater
effort for needed for establishing trust and long-term relationships.
Many nearshore providers attempted to circumvent communication and
project management barriers by developing new ways to align
organizations. As a result, concepts such as remote insourcing were
created to give clients more control in managing their own projects.
Nearshoring still hasn't overcome all barriers, but proximity allows
more flexibility to align organizations.
Visa requirements
The United States has a special visa, the H-1B, which enables American companies to temporarily (up to three years, or by extension, six) hire foreign workers
to supplement their employees or replace those holding existing
positions. In hearings on this matter, a United States senator called
these "their outsourcing visa."
Examples
- In 2003 Procter & Gamble outsourced their facilities' management support, but it did not involve offshoring.
- Dell offshored to India in 2001 but reversed since "customers were not happy with the prior arrangement ..."
Print and mail outsourcing
Print and mail outsourcing is the outsourcing of document printing and distribution.
The Print Services & Distribution Association was formed in 1946, and its members provide services that today might involve the word outsource. Similarly, members of the Direct Mail Marketing Association were the "outsourcers" for advertising agencies and others doing mailings. DMMA celebrated their 100th anniversary in 2017.
The term "outsourcing" became very common in the print and mail
business during the 1990s, and later expanded to be very broad and
inclusive of most any process by 2000. Today, there are web based print
to mail solutions for small to mid-size companies which allow the user
to send one to thousands of documents into the mail stream, directly
from a desktop or web interface.
Marketing outsourcing
The term outsource marketing has been used in Britain to mean the outsourcing of the marketing function. The motivation for this has been:
- cost reduction.
- specialized expertise.
- speed of execution
- short term staff augmentation
While much of this work is the "bread and butter" of specialized
departments within advertising agencies, sometimes specialist are used,
such as when The Guardian outsourced most of its marketing design in May 2010.
Business Process Outsourcing
Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) is a subset of outsourcing that involves the contracting of the operations and responsibilities of a specific business process to a third-party service provider. Originally, this was associated with manufacturing firms, such as Coca-Cola that outsourced large segments of its supply chain.
BPO is typically categorized into back office and front office outsourcing.
BPO can be offshore outsourcing, near-shore outsourcing to a nearby country, or onshore outsource to the same country. Information Technology-enabled service (ITES-BPO), knowledge process outsourcing (KPO) and legal process outsourcing (LPO) are some of the sub-segments of BPO.
Although BPO began as a cost-reducer, changes (specifically the
move to more service-based rather than product-based contracts),
companies now choose to outsource their back-office increasingly for
time flexibility and direct quality control. Business process outsourcing enhances the flexibility of an organization in different ways:
BPO vendor charges are project-based or fee-for-service, using
business models such as remote in-sourcing or similar software
development and outsourcing models. This can help a company to become more flexible by transforming fixed into variable costs.
A variable cost structure helps a company responding to changes in
required capacity and does not require a company to invest in assets,
thereby making the company more flexible.
BPO also permits focusing on a company's core competencies.
Supply chain management with effective use of supply chain
partners and business process outsourcing can increase the speed of
several business processes.
BPO caveats
Even
various contractual compensation strategies may leave the company as
having a new "single point of failure" (where even an after the fact
payment is not enough to offset "complete failure of the customer's
business").
Unclear contractual issues are not the only risks; there's also
changing requirements and unforeseen charges, failure to meet service
levels, and a dependence on the BPO which reduces flexibility. The
latter is called lock-in; flexibility may be lost due to penalty clauses and other contract terms. Also, the selection criteria may seem vague and undifferentiated
Security risks can arise regarding both from physical
communication and from a privacy perspective. Employee attitude may
change, and the company risks losing independence.
Risks and threats of outsourcing must therefore be managed, to
achieve any benefits. In order to manage outsourcing in a structured
way, maximising positive outcome, minimising risks and avoiding any
threats, a business continuity management
(BCM) model is set up. BCM consists of a set of steps, to successfully
identify, manage and control the business processes that are, or can be
outsourced.
Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is a framework of BPO focused on identifying potential outsourceable information systems.. Willcocks, M. Lacity and G. Fitzgerald identify several contracting
problems companies face, ranging from unclear contract formatting, to a
lack of understanding of technical IT processes.
Technological pressures
Industry analysts have identified robotic process automation (RPA) software and in particular the enhanced self-guided RPAAI based on artificial intelligence as a potential threat to the industry and speculate as to the likely long-term impact.
In the short term, however, there is likely to be little impact as
existing contracts run their course: it is only reasonable to expect
demand for cost efficiency and innovation to result in transformative
changes at the point of contract renewals. With the average length of a
BPO contract being 5 years or more – and many contracts being longer – this hypothesis will take some time to play out.
On the other hand, an academic study by the London School of Economics was at pains to counter the so-called "myth" that RPA will bring back many jobs from offshore.
One possible argument behind such an assertion is that new technology
provides new opportunities for increased quality, reliability,
scalability and cost control, thus enabling BPO providers to
increasingly compete on an outcomes-based model rather than competing on
cost alone. With the core offering potentially changing from a "lift
and shift" approach based on fixed costs to a more qualitative, service
based and outcomes-based model, there is perhaps a new opportunity to
grow the BPO industry with a new offering.
Industry size
One
estimate of the worldwide BPO market from the BPO Services Global
Industry Almanac 2017, puts the size of the industry in 2016 at about
US$140 billion.
India, China and the Philippines are major powerhouses in the
industry. In 2017, in India, the BPO industry generated US$30 billion in
revenue according to the national industry association.
The BPO industry is a small segment of the total outsourcing industry
in India. The BPO industry workforce in India is expected to shrink by
14% in 2021.
The BPO industry and IT services industry in combination are worth a total of US$154 billion in revenue in 2017. The BPO industry in the Philippines generated $26.7 billion in revenues in 2020, while around 700 thousand medium and high skill jobs would be created by 2022.
In 2015, official statistics put the size of the total
outsourcing industry in China, including not only the BPO industry but
also IT outsourcing services, at $130.9 billion.