Search This Blog

Saturday, December 6, 2025

Epigenetics of autoimmune disorders

Epigenetics of autoimmune disorders is the role that epigenetics (heritable changes that do not involve alterations in DNA sequences) play in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmune disorders are a diverse class of diseases that share a common origin. These diseases originate when the immune system becomes dysregulated and mistakenly attacks healthy tissue rather than foreign invaders. These diseases are classified as either local or systemic based upon whether they affect a single body system or if they cause systemic damage.

Whether someone develops an autoimmune disorder is dependent on genetics as well as environmental factors. Some families show genetic predisposition for these conditions, however genetics alone is often not sufficient to explain whether someone will develop an autoimmune condition. Smoking, stress, and diet can produce epigenetic modifications to the genome that alter the regulation of immune system-specific genes leading to the onset of these conditions.

The main mechanisms of epigenetic alterations are DNA methylation, histone modifications, and regulation by non-coding RNAs. These epigenetic changes regulate the expression of genes, including those involved in the immune system, and therefore these modifications play a role in the onset and symptoms of different systemic and local autoimmune diseases.

Epigenetic mechanisms

DNA methylation

DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that interferes with transcription and causes decreased levels of gene expression. The addition of methyl groups to DNA nucleotides inhibits transcription by creating a surface that transcription factors are unable to bind. Additionally, DNA methylation recruits methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins that signal for the formation of co-repressor complexes that alter chromatin structure and further inhibit transcription. A hypermethylated DNA state is associated with gene silencing while a hypomethylated DNA state is associated with increased levels of transcription and gene expression. DNA methylation is carried out by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) which attach methyl groups at the 5th position of a cytosine nucleotide. In vertebrates, gene expression is modulated in particular by methylation within a region of the genome known as a CpG island, a region near a gene's promoter that contains a high percentage of cytosine and guanine nucleotides. DNA demethylation is carried out by ten-eleven translocation (TET) enzymes which convert 5-methylcytosine (5mC) into hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), leading to the demethylation of that segment of DNA and an increase in gene expression. TET inhibitors have been identified as potential treatments for autoimmune diseases, particularly rheumatic ones.

Histone modification

Histone modification, resulting in conformational changes to protein binding sites, is involved in autoimmune disorders. Histone acetylation leads to increased transcription by promoting gene expression. Primarily, histone acetylation increases gene expression by reducing cross-linking between neighboring nucleosomes. Preventing this interaction between adjacent nucleosomes serves as a key driver of condensation. Additionally, histone acetylation also interferes with the electrostatic interaction between positively charged histones and negatively charged DNA by neutralizing some of the positive charges on the histone tails. This helps further promote gene expression by causing the histones to relax their grip on the DNA. Although acetylation helps to make DNA more accessible for transcription, histone acetylation's ability to make chromatin remodeling more likely to occur is an extremely important part in its ability to alter gene expression. This remodeling allows condensed heterochromatin to transform into a more relaxed euchromatin which is associated with higher levels of gene transcription.

Acetylation also functions as a way of recruiting transcription factors that promote gene expression. One way this recruitment occurs is through the activity of TAF1 (TATA-box binding protein associated factor 1) which contains a double bromodomain and can detect very low levels of histone acetylation. TAF1 detects acetylation and then recruits transcription factors to the acetylated region. Acetylation frequently occurs near promoter regions and is recognized by TAF1 which tethers TFIID to this region in order to increase the likelihood of TFIID locating the core promoter and initiating transcription. TAF1 also behaves as a HAT (histone acetyltransferase) and acetylates nearby histones at an increased frequency. Acetylation also prevents the addition of repressive marks to the DNA.

Normally, histone deacetylases (HDACs) serve to remove acetyl groups from the lysine residue of the histone causing a decrease in gene expression. HDAC activity is involved in the pathology of autoimmune diseases, such as in rheumatoid arthritis where HDAC activity is low in the synovial tissues. Histone methylation is also implicated in autoimmune disorders. This can be by inhibition of histone methylation such as in systemic sclerosis or by elevated histone methylation at certain gene loci in Type I diabetes.

Histone modification can give rise to rheumatic, endocrinological, and gastrointestinal autoimmune disorders. Histone modification leads to either activation or repression of gene expression depending on the disorder. Suberanilohydroxamic acid (SAHA), also known as Vorinostat, inhibits the activity of HDACs. Vorinostat has shown promise as a treatment for immune system dysfunctions. Vorinostat, by inhibiting HDACs, can treat cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Though epigenetics-based treatments for autoimmune rheumatic disorders does not exist yet, Vorinostat's function in treating T cell lymphoma is a basis for a path to epigenetics-based treatment of autoimmune rheumatic disorders.

Non-coding RNAs

Micro-RNAs (miRNAs)

Micro-RNAs (miRNAs) are small RNA fragments, 18–23 nucleotides in length, that act to regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. miRNAs play a critical role in modulating the immune response since they influence whether or not the mRNA transcribed from specific immune related genes will go on to be translated into protein or not. Alteration of different miRNA levels is associated with autoimmune disease pathogenesis and symptoms. Depending on the disorder, upregulation or downregulation of a specific type of miRNA may be observed. miRNAs negatively regulate gene expression by binding to complementary mRNA sequences within the 3' untranslated region (3' UTR). This process of miRNA activity begins with the synthesis of pri-miRNA in the nucleus by RNA polymerase II which is then converted into pre-miRNA. This pre-miRNA exits the nucleus and is cut by Dicer into a double stranded RNA with one of the strands binding to the RISC complex. This binding leads to the association of the miRNA with its target mRNA sequence and encourages the degradation of the mRNA or represses translation of the mRNA, decreasing gene expression. miRNA can also affect gene expression via the binding of RNA-induced transcriptional silencing (RITS) complex. The binding of the RITS complex to miRNA allows for post-transcriptional histone modifications such as methylation to be made further altering gene expression.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs)

Long non-coding RNAs have also been identified as playing an important role in gene expression. These lncRNAs are RNAs that are more than 200 nucleotides in length but are not transcribed into any functional protein. They have been identified to play a role in the epigenetics of diseases such as discoid lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. One method by which lncRNAs regulate gene expression is through the process of X inactivation which functions as a way to provide dosage compensation. In X-inactivation, Xist (X-inactive specific transcript) lncRNA is transcribed and coats the Xi chromosome that will be inactivated, beginning the process of chromosome condensation and repression of genes on that X chromosome. Still, more research is needed to further understand the mechanisms these lncRNAs use in order to regulate gene expression.

Systemic autoimmune diseases

Systemic autoimmune diseases are those that effect multiple organ systems rather than targeting a single type of tissue or organ system.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

Rheumatoid arthritis is a degenerative autoimmune disease that causes damage and inflammation to a patient's joint and can affect bodily systems involving the heart, lungs, nerves, eyes, bones, and skin. Global DNA hypomethylation is a hallmark of Rheumatoid Arthritis and is observed in the early stages of this disease, when joint degeneration begins. Those who suffer from RA have a global decreased level of methylation on many DNA promoter regions including those associated with normal immune system and joint function. This overexpression from hypomethylation is observed in various genes such as ITGAL, CD40LG, PRF1, and more. Taking a closer glance at those who suffer from RA, it can be observed that within the synovial cells, there is a level of hypomethylation which is proposed to cause the expression and overproduction of the cytokines which perpetuate the inflammatory response causing inflammation within the synovial fluid, which is the fluid that exists between the joints. Typically, healthy joints have a thin layer of synovial tissue that lines the cavities of the joints. However, as an increase number of immune cells begins to penetrate the tissue, the synovial tissue begins to form a thick lining layer that consists of different macrophages and synovial cells. Hypomethylation of CD40LG, which will make the T-cells within the immune response, can lead to T-cell overexpression and becomes a contributing factor to how Rheumatoid Arthritis functions within an inflammatory response. Patients with RA often display anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies and have hypomethylation of the retrotransposon gene L1, as well as decreased methylation at the Il6 and ERa promoter. TET proteins, more specifically the TET1-TET3 enzymes and TET2 in T cells can demethylate DNA which helps to set and clarify the early stages of RA. The RA development from demethylation of histones in the patient can lead to expression of high levels of IL-6 which causes destruction in the joints. miRNAs also play an important part in rheumatoid arthritis development as well, particularly the upregulation of miRNA-146a and miRNA-150. Although more research is needed, lncRNAs have been implicated to play a role in this disease since current treatments used for this disorder show altered expression of 85 different lncRNAs in RA patients on tocilizumab and adalimumab.

As a systemic disease, RA can develop other complications and cause damage to tissues and organs besides the joints, which include the heart, lungs, bones, skin, and eyes. In regard to the heart, RA patients typically experience some form of heart disease such as pericarditis, myocarditis, and coronary artery disease. Because the synovial tissue and circulating immune cells release pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6), this leads to systemic inflammation and the overexpression of T-cell and B-cell lymphocytes. Autoantibodies, antibodies that react with self-antigens, in RA then affect the structures of the cardiovascular system, such as the myocardium and heart valves, thus leading to various forms of cardiovascular disease. Osteoporosis is another common systemic disease that can occur along with RA. Systematic inflammation, autoantibody circulation in the body, and the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines work together to contribute to the bone erosion and fragility in RA patients. The inflammatory cytokines decrease osteoblastogenesis while promoting osteoclastogenesis, which is why bone loss is more likely to occur, especially around the joints of those who suffer from RA. Osteoblastogenesis refers to the process by which osteoblasts, the cells responsible for bone formation, are generated and differentiated to develop and maintain the bone. Meanwhile, osteoclasts, cells involved with the dissolution and reabsorption of old bone tissue, are involved in the process of osteoclastogenesis.

There are several environmental risks factors that also contribute to the development of rheumatoid arthritis through epigenetic modifications induced by external stimuli, which include smoking and air pollution. The main source of air pollution has come from heavy traffic, fuel burners, forest fires, and solid fuel combustion, which usually contain a mixture of particles and gases such as nitrate, sulfur dioxide, ozone, and carbon monoxide. These pollutants can release reactive oxygen species that can be easily inhaled into the respiratory tract to activate nuclear factor ƙappa B (NF-ƙB), an important regulator for pro-inflammatory cytokine production in RA. This process leads to an excess production of T helper lymphocyte type 1 (Th1) cytokines that migrate to tissues in the synovial joints, further promoting inflammation. In addition, smoking has been found to be one of the most common environmental risk factor for developing RA as it affects the lung tissue and alters the expression of sirtuins (SIRT) in the body. SIRT is a deacetylase protein that is involved in modifying histone and non-histone proteins, and it is essential for the body's ability to adapt as it helps to maintain the stability of the genome when cells are using epigenetic mechanisms to respond to stress. Other general risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis include sex, age, family history, and excess weight. Women are more likely to develop RA compared to men, and RA typically begins developing in middle-aged adults.

Because rheumatoid arthritis is caused by certain epigenetic mechanisms involved in regulating biological processes, these epigenetic alterations have been found to be reversible and could be altered by diet, drugs, and other environmental factors. For example, inhibition of a of the histone deacetylase HDAC6i can ameliorate collagen type II - induced arthritis. This suggests that prevention and therapy of diseases that target the epigenetic mechanisms could help to treat chronic inflammatory diseases. Efforts have been made to create drugs that either change or restore the original epigenetic mechanisms that occur within the body, and some DNA methyltransferase inhibitors have already been used to treat inflammatory conditions such as pancreatitis. However, more clinical trials and testing still needs to be done before these drugs can be approved.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

Systemic lupus erythematosus is the most common form of lupus and is a condition in which the immune system attacks healthy bodily tissue causing widespread inflammation and tissue damage across many organ systems. Hypomethylation is observed across the epigenome in those with systemic lupus. The promoter regions of many genes including ITGAL, CD40LG, and CD70 are shown to be hypomethylated as well as the 18S and 28S ribosomal gene promoters. In particular, this DNA hypomethylation is thought to alter the chromatin structure of T cells enhancing the immune and inflammatory response observed in those with this condition. Genome wide it has been shown that when comparing the epigenomes of pairs of identical twins in which one twin is afflicted by the condition and one is not, the twin possessing the condition shows global decreases in methylation of their genomes. This hypomethylation causes genes that are traditionally repressed by methylation to be overexpressed particularly in CD4+ T cells. It has been suggested that inhibition of DNMT1 produces the loss of methylation observed in those afflicted by systemic lupus. DNMT1 is a DNA methyltransferase that maintains methylation patterns across the process of DNA replication, ensuring that new copies of DNA contain the methylation pattern observed on the original parent strand. Inhibition of DNMT1 causes methylation patterns to be lost across generations and epigenome-wide hypomethylation is observed as a result. In particular, it has been observed that DNMT1 expression is lower in immune T-cells. Levels of DNMT1 is partly regulated by the ERK signaling pathway in the body. In patients with SLE, ERK activity has been found to be reduced in lupus CD4+ T-cells. When ERK activity is suppressed, it causes there to be a reduction in DNMT1 expression and DNA hypomethylation levels increases. Because of this, the DNA of CD4+ T-cells in SLE patients becomes hypomethylated, which causes them to be autoreactive when encountering self-class MHC II molecules. Because it is a systematic disease, SLE can also affect many other body systems including the kidneys, brain, central nervous system, blood system, lungs, and heart. There is no cure for SLE but treatments aim to control inflammation, alleviate pain and damage to the joints, prevent disease flares, and minimize organ damage.

Several environmental factors such as smoking, viral infections, various chemicals, and UV light, have been found to induce oxidative stress that leads to inhibition or reduction of DNMT1 levels, which reduces DNA methylation in CD4+ T-cells and can prompt autoimmunity. In patients with SLE, the disease can be triggered or induced by exposure to UV light with its effects appearing to be dose dependent. UV-B light can induce apoptosis of dermal cells, and this can release large amounts of autoantigens and pro-inflammatory cytokines, which can trigger systematic inflammation. Additionally, vitamin D has been found to have a role in SLE activity. Vitamin D has a protective role in regulating the immune system and possibly in the regulation of gene expression important for SLE pathogenesis. Deficiency of vitamin D has also been shown to be associated with higher lupus disease activity as there seems to be a decrease in the proliferation and production of the IgG immunoglobulin. Although there is no clear association, smoking and drinking have also been reported as potential environmental risk factors for SLE.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc)

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease characterized by system wide excessive collagen deposits. It can affect several bodily systems including the skin, internal organs, lungs, heart, kidneys, musculoskeletal system, and the gastrointestinal tract. It causes the patient's skin and connective tissues to tighten and harden due to the uncontrolled accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins on the joints and various internal organ system which can lead to premature death in patients. Fli1 is a transcription factor that negatively regulates collagen production such that the higher the Fli gene expression, the less collagen is produced. In SSc patients, hypermethylation of CpG islands in the Fli1 promoter region is observed, inhibiting transcription of the Fli gene and increasing collagen production beyond normal levels causing collagen build-up and an overproduction of fibrous connective tissue. This causes joint damage, scarring, and thickening of the skin. Patients with SSc are also observed to have decreased levels of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) in their CD4+ T cells which play an important role in the immune system. This reduced methylation is associated with immune dysfunction and the progression of SSc and its inflammatory effects, however more research is needed to further understand this implication. Patients with systemic sclerosis also display hypomethylation of the collagen genes COL23A1 and COL4A2. This overexpression of these collagen genes leads an overproduction of collagen characteristic to tissue fibrosis. The TGF-β signaling pathway and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway also play an important role in this disease. The TGF-β signaling pathway is responsible for several cellular responses from cell differentiation and migration in developing cells to regulating homeostasis within an immune response in the body. The TGF-β signaling pathway is involved in that activation of fibroblast which precedes fibrosis. The gene, ITGA9 which codes for alpha integrin 9 and is involved in this pathway, is hypomethylated in those with this condition leading to overexpression of integrins which leads to fibrosis as wells as provides positive feedback to this pathway further encouraging fibroblast activation. An Integrin is a type of receptor that is a transmembrane receptor meaning it is able to communicate from cell to cell and help the cell attach and adhere to nearby cells.

There are several different types of environmental risk factors that can affect autoimmune diseases. Frequency exposure to crystalline silica dust has been recognized as a risk factor for SSc. SSc patients with occupational exposure to silica has been shown to be a factor in the pathogenesis of the disease. Additionally, organic solvent exposure has been found to be a risk factor for the disease, although the specific agents involved have not been identified.

Because epigenetics has been recognized as a contributor to SSc pathogenesis, epi-drugs have been tested as potential therapeutics for the disease. Drugs targeting certain miRNAs in SSc to replace or inhibit them have been found to reduce some fibrosis effects. However, several issues including inconsistent results of epigenetic modifications and problems getting the treatment to the proper tissues means that no definitive epi-drug has been created for the disease.

Local dermatological autoimmune disorders

Local dermatological autoimmune disorders are those that effect skin and mucous membranes.

Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE)

A discoid lupus erythematosus lesion

Discoid lupus erythematosus is one of the most common cutaneous diseases characterized by an attack on healthy epidermal tissue by the immune system leading to lesions on the skin, inflammation, and rashes. Localized DLE lesions will occur on the face, ears, and scalp. Disseminated DLE, below the neck lesions, is unusual if localized DLE lesions are absent. DLE lesions can result in pigment changes, scarring of the skin, potential hair loss, and rare occurrences of squamous cell carcinoma. Differential expression, a significant observed difference in expression levels, of lncRNAs and circRNAs, identified in a study by Xuan et al., alter the mucosa, which is the inner lining and moist part of the epidermis such as inside the mouth and nose; this differential expression affected by DLE causes this tissue to become inflamed and crusty at times. The mucosa serves as a key part in the pathology of this disease. There are transcripts such as lncRNA and circRNAs that have been found to be expressed in affected tissues of those who have DLE. These transcripts were more heavily expressed in the tissue of those affected by DLE as compared to control unaffected healthy tissue. The pattern of expressed lncRNAs and circRNAs helps to discriminate against affected tissue of DLE and healthy unaffected tissues establishing a usable pattern for reference. Additionally,  discovered through analysis of the function and expression of lncRNA, lncRNAs are correlated with the expression of  Il19, CXCL1, CXCL11, and TNFSF15 which all are related to an immune response helping to identify the pathway in which DLE is manifested epigenetically by the abnormal expression of IncRNA. Another key portion of the study performed by Xuan et al. was the identification of STAT4 as a key transcription factor responsible for influencing the regulation of many target genes involved in DLE. STAT4 is a very important transcription factory as it is correlated with the pathogenesis and this the progression of DLE, many of the STAT4 genes targets have been seen to act to enrich various functional pathways involved in progression.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA)

Psoriasis plaque on an elbow

Psoriasis is an inflammatory skin condition characterized by T-cell activation and the development of scaly red patches on the skin caused by the overproduction of skin cells. Psoriasis can be broken down into plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Psoriatic arthritis differs from plaque psoriasis because the psoriatic skin lesions are also accompanied by inflammation, joint pain, and joint stiffness attributed to immune system complication produced by psoriasis. Psoriatic arthritis patients secrete high levels of immune-regulated cytokines and chemokines. It has been shown that epigenetics modifications play a prominent role in the symptoms and pathogenesis of this condition. Alterations in miRNA expression levels are one of many epigenetic modifications that accompany the onset of this disease. In particular, miRNA-203 levels are decreased in those with psoriatic arthritis and this has been linked to psoriasis pathogenesis. miRNA-203 is responsible for targeting suppressors of cytokine signaling 3 (SOC3) and ensures that the immune response is kept in check. However, when miRNA-203 levels are low, cytokine signaling occurs at a high level leading to a heightened immune response. Developing a treatment that can increasing miRNA-203 levels has been implicated as a way to decrease the inflammatory immune response observed in patients with this condition. Abnormal expression of HDACs and HATs have also been observed in patients with psoriasis. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells, which are a collection of immune system cells, exhibit a global decrease in acetylation of histone 4 in psoriasis patients as well as increased HDAC-1 levels. HDAC inhibitors have been identified as a potential treatment for psoriasis as well as many other inflammatory autoimmune disorder.

Sjogren's syndrome

Sjorgen's syndrome is a dermatological autoimmune disorder that targets exocrine glands and attacks lacrimal and salivary glands causing a decrease in the secretion of tears and saliva. This results in inflammation, dry eyes, and dry mouth. Patients with this condition experience a buildup of white blood cells in the salivary glands known as lymphocytic infiltrate. The first confirmed case of Sjogren's syndrome was reported in 1892. Current research is largely focused on the innate immune system's role in the pathogenesis of this diseases. In Sjorgen's patients, miRNA-146a is upregulated in PBMCs and is associated with the pathogenesis of this disease. miRNA-146a plays an important role in regulating the immune system by providing negative feedback to toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling which is used to engage the innate immune response. When miRNA-146a is upregulated, this negative feedback to TLR signaling decreases leading to inflammation and a heightened immune response that can damage healthy cells such as those in the lacrimal and salivary gland. miRNA-150 and miRNA-149 are also upregulated in the salivary glands and lymphocytes of those with Sjorgen's. These miRNAs are targeted to mRNAs that play an important role in immune function and regulating pro-inflammatory cytokine levels. The overexpression of these miRNAs thus leads to a heightened and dysregulated immune response. Epigenetic alterations to the genes of CD4+ T-cell in the immune system are also observed in this condition. Specifically, research has linked hypomethylation of CD70, a T-cell costimulatory gene, to the development of Sjogren's syndrome. Decreased expression of the FOXP3 gene, which leads to DNA hypermethylation, is also observed in these CD4+ T-cells. This causes CpG hypermethylation leading to the downregulation of many cells that are essential for keeping the immune system in check.

Alopecia Areata (AA)

Person with Alopecia areata on the scalp

Alopecia Areata is a dermatological autoimmune condition where the immune system attacks the immune system and causes patchy or total hair loss usually affecting the scalp and face but can cause hair loss on the whole body. The cause of alopecia areata is unknown and typically people with the condition have no other symptoms. Genetic and environmental factors, like stress, are believed to trigger an episode of the condition. This condition was described as "bite alopecia" over 3500 years ago by Cornelius Celsus. The modern term was not used until the early 1700s to late 1800s.

In a study done by Zhou et al. a significant increase in DNA methylation, specifically T-cells, was detected after the analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with AA compared to healthy control cells. Other areas of increased expression included DNA methylation-regulating enzymes, RANTES, E1A binding protein p300, and HDAC1. There were also decreased levels of HDAC2, HDAC7, and LSD1 expression shown in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells. A notable protein in patients with AA is the HDAC1 protein. It has become a more heavily studied protein because of a study with postnatal dermal cells in mice conducted by Park et al. that has shown that a HDAC inhibitor, that is known for upregulating genes that effect hair follicle pathways, is causing HDAC 1 dysregulation in AA patients. This dysregulation is causing patients with AA to have higher serum levels of HDAC1.

Local endocrinological autoimmune disorders

Hashimoto's thyroiditis

Hashimoto's thyroiditis is an endocrine disease in which a patient's immune system attacks their thyroid gland. Hashimoto's thyroiditis usually manifests via hypothyroidism, which is characterized by the build up of white blood cells in the thyroid and the production of thyroid autoantibodies. Research suggests a strong genetic susceptibility when it comes to autoimmune thyroid diseases like Hashimoto's thyroiditis as well as an epigenetic role in the pathology of Hashimoto's thyroiditis. The thyroglobulin (Tg) gene, a gene involved in the synthesis of the thyroid hormones, thyroxine and triiodothyronine, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of Hashimoto's thyroiditis. In those with Hashimoto's, an alteration in the histone methylation pattern at the thyroglobulin (Tg) promoter has observed causing decreased gene expression and thus decreased production of thyroid hormones. IRF-1 is a transcription factor for Tg whose binding is impacted by histone methylation patterns.

Skewed X chromosome inactivation has also been implicated in autoimmune thyroid diseases. X chromosome inactivation is a process by which one of the two X chromosomes in females is silenced by being converted into transcriptionally inactive heterochromatin. Skewed X chromosome inactivation is an imbalance in the amount of inactivation that occurs between maternal and paternal X chromosomes leading to the favoring of expression of one X chromosome over the other. In studies of Graves' and Hashimoto's disease, the skew of X chromosome inactivation towards one X chromosome over another in the same tissue is markedly high compared to the control without Graves' or Hashimoto's disease; however, it is not clear why preferential expression of a single X chromosome increases the risk of these diseases. Skewed X chromosome activation in one study defined it to be an 80:20 ratio of activation of one X chromosome over another in the same tissue. In Turner syndrome, a chromosomal abnormality in which a person exhibits X chromosome monosomy, patients are at a great risk of developing autoimmune thyroid disease since their genotype mimics an extreme form of X chromosome inactivation since there is only one X chromosome that can be expressed. Though there is no definite mechanism by which skewed X chromosome inactivation influences autoimmune thyroid disease, one possibility being studied is that skewed XCI in the thymus may lead to a lack of thymic expression, ultimately leading to inadequate T cell deletion. X chromosome inactivation is a common and widely studied epigenetic phenomenon.

Graves' disease

Graves' disease is an autoimmune disease involving thyrotoxicosis, in which the body is affected by the overproduction of thyroid hormone as a result of the immune system attacking the thyroid gland. The overproduction of thyroid hormone is termed hyperthyroidism. Thyrotoxicosis can be caused by hyperthyroidism, thyroiditis, and other conditions. This is generally due to an increase in immunoglobulin antibodies that activate thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor. Like Hashimoto's thyroiditis, Graves' disease is qualified as an autoimmune thyroid disease. The epigenetic processes involved in Hashimoto's thyroiditis are also involved in Graves' disease. Namely, these are the modification of histone methylation in Tg and skewed X chromosome inactivation. In the specific case of Graves' disease, discoveries have been made showing the involvement of abnormal DNA methylation at certain CpG sites. This abnormal DNA methylation leads to interferon signaling and other dysregulated immune system-related processes in cases of Graves' disease. The CpG promoter regions of many genes expressed in immune cells are shown to be hypomethylated in epigenetic analysis of Graves' disease patients, meaning that these genes are over-expressed in these immune cells. For example, CD40L protein levels are observed to be high in patients recently diagnosed with Graves' disease. It has been shown that hypomethylation is observed at the CD40L gene. This gene codes for the CD40 ligand protein that binds the CD40 receptor and this binding activates an immune response. The over expression of this gene thus has been attributed to the onset of autoimmune-mediated hyperthyroidism. Additionally, histone methylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells is abnormal in individuals with Graves' disease. This abnormality, which manifests as hypermethylation, is observed in epigenetic modifier genes such as the CD3 gene family that regulates T cell behavior as well as the expression of other immune function genes. This results in a decrease of the expression of CD3 gene family members in individuals with Graves' disease. Additionally, the differential expression of certain non-coding RNAs has recently been implicated in the development of Graves' disease, however more research is needed. These non-coding RNAs could potentially serve as biomarkers for Graves' disease diagnosis upon further study.

Type I diabetes

Type I diabetes is an endocrinological disease in which the immune system's T cells attack the beta cells of the pancreas, disrupting the production of insulin. Though the pathology of Type I diabetes is still being studied, certain epigenetic mechanisms have been implicated in Type I diabetes. Type I diabetes is characterized by global hypermethylation that arises as a result of alterations to homocysteine metabolism. Increased methylation of promoter regions is thought to alter gene expression in ways that cause immune cell dysfunction. Homocysteine metabolism occurs via two pathways. One pathway breaks homocysteine into methionine and then into S-adenosylmethuionine (SAM). Another pathway, the transsulfuration pathway, through numerous steps breaks homocysteine down into glutathionine. Type I diabetics demonstrate insulin insufficiency and this decrease in insulin levels inhibits transsulfuration needed for one of the two pathways of homocysteine breakdown. As a result, homocysteine levels rise and the pathway that converts homocysteine → methionine → SAM becomes the primary method of homocysteine breakdown. In order to accommodate this, DNMTs in S-adenomethionine catalyze methionine breakdown and cause enhanced DNMT activity which leads to global hypermethylation which causes widespread changes to gene expression. DNA demethylation is observed at the gene for HOXA9 transcription factor and DNA hypermethylation is observed at the FOXP3 immune response gene promoter region. HOXA9 codes for a protein involved in hematopoietic stem cell generation and is hypomethylated in the case of Type I diabetes. Recently, an enrichment of differentially variable CpG positions has been identified, which indicates the involvement of altered DNA methylation levels in Type I diabetes pathogenesis. More study is needed on this front. Increased DNA methylation variability in immune effector cells in type I diabetes has also demonstrated the involvement of DNA methylation in other processes related to type I diabetes' pathogenesis as well.

Local gastrointestinal autoimmune disorders

Celiac disease

Celiac disease is a disease in which the small intestine is damaged in those whose bodies are unable to process gluten because of a T cell response that is activated when gluten, from foods such as wheat or rye, is present in the intestines. Several epigenetic mechanisms are implicated in celiac disease, such as DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNAs. These epigenetic mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of celiac disease as well as altered in those with a predisposition for celiac disease. Furthermore, unusual methylation in the genes involved in the core NF-κB pathway, a regulator of innate immunity, is implicated in the pathogenesis of celiac disease. A high rate of DNA methylation of CpGs contributes to the development of small bowel adenocarcinomas, which are malignant tumors, in individuals with celiac disease. This CpG hypermethylation is correlated to the loss of expression of the MLH-1 gene, which is involved in DNA repair. Furthermore, hypermethylation of the APC gene, a tumor suppressor gene, has been found to cause defects in the mismatch repair mechanisms in individuals with celiac disease. An increase in histone acetylation, specifically H3K27ac, has also been found in celiac disease biopsies. When comparing the genes of three different cytokines in response to cytotoxic T lymphocytes in celiac biopsies, an increase in H3K27ac in the promoter and enhancer regions was found in the cytokine INFꞵ genes. The regulation of certain microRNAs differs significantly in individuals with celiac disease compared to individuals without celiac disease. These differences were found to come in the form of downregulation of some microRNAs and upregulation of others. This differential regulation likely occurs for microRNAs involved in modulating intestinal barrier function, though more study is needed specific to celiac disease.

Local neurological autoimmune disorders

Multiple sclerosis (MS)

Multiple sclerosis is a neurological disease characterized by the immune system attacking and destroying the myelin sheaths that coat nerve fibers. Destruction of these sheaths leads to the slowing or loss of electrical transmission of messages across nerve cells and as a result, patients experience weakness, pain, and vision loss. It has been shown that vitamin D deficiency is associated with alteration to epigenetic markers and MS pathogenesis. Vitamin D plays an important role in suppressing autoimmunity and in particular Th17 autoimmunity. Th17 is a subset of T helper cells that secrete pro-inflammatory interleukin(IL)-17. Traditionally vitamin D suppresses transcription of IL17 via recruitment of HDAC2 to the IL17A promoter, however in those deficient in vitamin D, IL17 transcription is increased leading to a heightened inflammatory immune response. Increased expression of miRNA-326 in PBMC cells is also prevalent in those with MS and is known to encourage Th17 cell differentiation. Histone H3 citrullination, which alters the methylation of arginine residues and consequently chromatin structure and gene expression, has been shown to be increased in the brains of MS patients as well. Although more research is needed to understand the mechanism of how histone H3 citrullination contributes to demyelination, research demonstrates that inhibitors of the enzymes involved in this citrullination improve the outlook and progression of this disease.

Myasthenia gravis (MG)

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease that causes weakness and dysfunction of the patient's skeletal muscles as a result of extensive neurological damage that destroys the communication between the nerves and the muscles. It has been found that individuals who have Myasthenia Gravis possess high levels of the acetylcholine receptor antibody, AchR-Ab, which recruits the immune system to destroy the ACh receptors present at neuromuscular junctions. A significantly higher levels of methylation in the CTLA-4 region is observed in MG patients compared to controls. CTLA-4 gene expression serves as a negative regulator of T-Reg cells and suppress the immune response. When there is a blockade of expression of the CTLA-4 region, as is seen in those with MG, increased T-cell activation occurs and a heightened immune response is observed. The expression of the CTLA-4 generating cytokines that regulate AchR-Ab autoantibodies require further exploration to better understand their mechanism of action.

Natural rights and legal rights

Some philosophers distinguish two types of rights, natural rights and legal rights.

  • Natural rights are those that are not dependent on the laws or customs of any particular culture or government, and so are universal, fundamental and inalienable (they cannot be repealed by human laws, though one can forfeit their enjoyment through one's actions, such as by violating someone else's rights). Natural law is the law of natural rights.
  • Legal rights are those bestowed onto a person by a given legal system (they can be modified, repealed, and restrained by human laws). The concept of positive law is related to the concept of legal rights.

Natural law first appeared in ancient Greek philosophy, and was referred to by Roman philosopher Cicero. It was subsequently alluded to by Saint Paul, and then developed in the Middle Ages by Catholic philosophers such as Albert the Great, his pupil Thomas Aquinas, and Jean Gerson in his 1402 work "De Vita Spirituali Animae." During the Age of Enlightenment, the concept of natural laws was used to challenge the divine right of kings, and became an alternative justification for the establishment of a social contract, positive law, and government – and thus legal rights – in the form of classical republicanism. Conversely, the concept of natural rights is used by others to challenge the legitimacy of all such establishments.

The idea of human rights derives from theories of natural rights. Those rejecting a distinction between human rights and natural rights view human rights as the successor that is not dependent on natural law, natural theology, or Christian theological doctrine. Natural rights, in particular, are considered beyond the authority of any government or international body to dismiss. The 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights is an important statement of natural rights, but not legally binding on any member state unless its provisions are adopted into that state's laws.

Natural rights were traditionally viewed as exclusively negative rights, whereas human rights also comprise positive rights. Even on a natural rights conception of human rights, the two terms may not be synonymous.

Iusnaturalism, particularly, holds that legal norms follow a human universal knowledge. Thus, it views enacted laws that contradict such universal knowledge as unjust and illegitimate, but some jusnaturalists might attribute the source of natural law to a natural order instead of a divine mandate.

The concept of natural rights is not universally accepted, partly due to its religious associations and perceived incoherence. Some philosophers argue that natural rights do not exist and that legal rights are the only rights; for instance, Jeremy Bentham called natural rights "simple nonsense".

History

The idea that certain rights are natural or inalienable also has a history dating back at least to the Stoics of late Antiquity, through Catholic law of the early Middle Ages, and descending through the Protestant Reformation and the Age of Enlightenment to today.

The existence of natural rights has been asserted by different individuals on different premises, such as a priori philosophical reasoning or religious principles. For example, Immanuel Kant claimed to derive natural rights through reason alone. The United States Declaration of Independence, meanwhile, is based upon the "self-evident" truth that "all men are ... endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights".

Likewise, different philosophers and statesmen have designed different lists of what they believe to be natural rights; almost all include the right to life and liberty as the two highest priorities. H. L. A. Hart argued that if there are any rights at all, there must be the right to liberty, for all the others would depend upon this. T. H. Green argued that "if there are such things as rights at all, then, there must be a right to life and liberty, or, to put it more properly to free life." John Locke emphasized "life, liberty and property" as primary. However, despite Locke's influential defense of the right of revolution, Thomas Jefferson substituted "pursuit of happiness" in place of "property" in the United States Declaration of Independence.

Ancient

Stephen Kinzer, a veteran journalist for The New York Times and the author of the book All The Shah's Men, writes in the latter that:

The Zoroastrian religion taught Iranians that citizens have an inalienable right to enlightened leadership and that the duty of subjects is not simply to obey wise kings but also to rise up against those who are wicked. Leaders are seen as representative of God on earth, but they deserve allegiance only as long as they have farr, a kind of divine blessing that they must earn by moral behavior.


The 40 Principal Doctrines of the Epicureans taught that "in order to obtain protection from other men, any means for attaining this end is a natural good" (PD 6). They believed in a contractarian ethics where mortals agree to not harm or be harmed, and the rules that govern their agreements are not absolute (PD 33), but must change with circumstances (PD 37–38). The Epicurean doctrines imply that humans in their natural state enjoy personal sovereignty and that they must consent to the laws that govern them, and that this consent (and the laws) can be revisited periodically when circumstances change.

The Stoics held that no one was a slave by nature; slavery was an external condition juxtaposed to the internal freedom of the soul (sui juris). Seneca the Younger wrote:

It is a mistake to imagine that slavery pervades a man's whole being; the better part of him is exempt from it: the body indeed is subjected and in the power of a master, but the mind is independent, and indeed is so free and wild, that it cannot be restrained even by this prison of the body, wherein it is confined.

Of fundamental importance to the development of the idea of natural rights was the emergence of the idea of natural human equality. As the historian A.J. Carlyle notes: "There is no change in political theory so startling in its completeness as the change from the theory of Aristotle to the later philosophical view represented by Cicero and Seneca. ... We think that this cannot be better exemplified than with regard to the theory of the equality of human nature." Charles H. McIlwain likewise observes that "the idea of the equality of men is the profoundest contribution of the Stoics to political thought" and that "its greatest influence is in the changed conception of law that in part resulted from it."[20] Cicero argues in De Legibus that "we are born for Justice, and that right is based, not upon opinions, but upon Nature."

Modern

One of the first Western thinkers to develop the contemporary idea of natural rights was French theologian Jean Gerson, whose 1402 treatise De Vita Spirituali Animae is considered one of the first attempts to develop what would come to be called modern natural rights theory.

The Polish-Lithuanian union made a natural rights case at the Council of Constance (1414–1418), led by Paulus Vladimiri, rector of the Jagiellonian University. He challenged legality of the Teutonic Order's crusade against Lithuania, arguing that the Order could only wage a defensive war if pagans violated the natural rights of the Christians. Vladimiri further stipulated that infidels had rights which had to be respected, and neither the Pope nor the Holy Roman Emperor had the authority to violate them. Lithuanians also brought a group of Samogitian representatives to testify to atrocities committed by the Order.

The Stoic doctrine that the "inner part cannot be delivered into bondage" re-emerged centuries later in the Reformation doctrine of liberty of conscience. In 1523, Martin Luther wrote:

Furthermore, every man is responsible for his own faith, and he must see it for himself that he believes rightly. As little as another can go to hell or heaven for me, so little can he believe or disbelieve for me; and as little as he can open or shut heaven or hell for me, so little can he drive me to faith or unbelief. Since, then, belief or unbelief is a matter of everyone's conscience, and since this is no lessening of the secular power, the latter should be content and attend to its own affairs and permit men to believe one thing or another, as they are able and willing, and constrain no one by force.

17th-century English philosopher John Locke discussed natural rights in his work, identifying them as being "life, liberty, and estate (property)", and argued that such fundamental rights could not be surrendered in the social contract. Preservation of the natural rights to life, liberty, and property was claimed as justification for the rebellion of the American colonies. As George Mason stated in his draft for the Virginia Declaration of Rights, "all men are born equally free", and hold "certain inherent natural rights, of which they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity." Another 17th-century Englishman, John Lilburne (known as Freeborn John), who came into conflict with both the monarchy of King Charles I and the military dictatorship of Oliver Cromwell, argued for level human basic rights he called "freeborn rights" which he defined as being rights that every human being is born with, as opposed to rights bestowed by government or by human law.

The distinction between alienable and unalienable rights was introduced by Francis Hutcheson. In his Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue (1725), Hutcheson foreshadowed the Declaration of Independence, stating: "For wherever any Invasion is made upon unalienable Rights, there must arise either a perfect, or external Right to Resistance. ... Unalienable Rights are essential Limitations in all Governments." Hutcheson, however, placed clear limits on his notion of unalienable rights, declaring that "there can be no Right, or Limitation of Right, inconsistent with, or opposite to the greatest public Good." Hutcheson elaborated on this idea of unalienable rights in his A System of Moral Philosophy (1755), based on the Reformation principle of the liberty of conscience. One could not in fact give up the capacity for private judgment (e.g., about religious questions) regardless of any external contracts or oaths to religious or secular authorities so that right is "unalienable". Hutcheson wrote: "Thus no man can really change his sentiments, judgments, and inward affections, at the pleasure of another; nor can it tend to any good to make him profess what is contrary to his heart. The right of private judgment is therefore unalienable."

In the German Enlightenment, Hegel gave a highly developed treatment of this inalienability argument. Like Hutcheson, Hegel based the theory of inalienable rights on the de facto inalienability of those aspects of personhood that distinguish persons from things. A thing, like a piece of property, can in fact be transferred from one person to another. According to Hegel, the same would not apply to those aspects that make one a person:

The right to what is in essence inalienable is imprescriptible, since the act whereby I take possession of my personality, of my substantive essence, and make myself a responsible being, capable of possessing rights and with a moral and religious life, takes away from these characteristics of mine just that externality which alone made them capable of passing into the possession of someone else. When I have thus annulled their externality, I cannot lose them through lapse of time or from any other reason drawn from my prior consent or willingness to alienate them.

In discussion of social contract theory, "inalienable rights" were said to be those rights that could not be surrendered by citizens to the sovereign. Such rights were thought to be natural rights, independent of positive law. Some social contract theorists reasoned, however, that in the natural state only the strongest could benefit from their rights. Thus, people form an implicit social contract, ceding their natural rights to the authority to protect the people from abuse, and living henceforth under the legal rights of that authority.

Many historical apologies for slavery and illiberal government were based on explicit or implicit voluntary contracts to alienate any "natural rights" to freedom and self-determination. The de facto inalienability arguments of Hutcheson and his predecessors provided the basis for the anti-slavery movement to argue not simply against involuntary slavery but against any explicit or implied contractual forms of slavery. Any contract that tried to legally alienate such a right would be inherently invalid. Similarly, the argument was used by the democratic movement to argue against any explicit or implied social contracts of subjection (pactum subjectionis) by which a people would supposedly alienate their right of self-government to a sovereign as, for example, in Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes. According to Ernst Cassirer,

There is, at least, one right that cannot be ceded or abandoned: the right to personality...They charged the great logician [Hobbes] with a contradiction in terms. If a man could give up his personality he would cease being a moral being. ... There is no pactum subjectionis, no act of submission by which man can give up the state of free agent and enslave himself. For by such an act of renunciation he would give up that very character which constitutes his nature and essence: he would lose his humanity.

These themes converged in the debate about American independence. While Jefferson was writing the Declaration of Independence, Welsh nonconformist Richard Price sided with the colonists' claim that King George III was "attempting to rob them of that liberty to which every member of society and all civil communities have a natural and unalienable title." Price again based the argument on the de facto inalienability of "that principle of spontaneity or self-determination which constitutes us agents or which gives us a command over our actions, rendering them properly ours, and not effects of the operation of any foreign cause." Any social contract or compact allegedly alienating these rights would be non-binding and void, wrote Price:

Neither can any state acquire such an authority over other states in virtue of any compacts or cessions. This is a case in which compacts are not binding. Civil liberty is, in this respect, on the same footing with religious liberty. As no people can lawfully surrender their religious liberty by giving up their right of judging for themselves in religion, or by allowing any human beings to prescribe to them what faith they shall embrace, or what mode of worship they shall practise, so neither can any civil societies lawfully surrender their civil liberty by giving up to any extraneous jurisdiction their power of legislating for themselves and disposing their property.

Price raised a furor of opposition so in 1777 he wrote another tract that clarified his position and again restated the de facto basis for the argument that the "liberty of men as agents is that power of self-determination which all agents, as such, possess." In Intellectual Origins of American Radicalism, Staughton Lynd pulled together these themes and related them to the slavery debate:

Then it turned out to make considerable difference whether one said slavery was wrong because every man has a natural right to the possession of his own body, or because every man has a natural right freely to determine his own destiny. The first kind of right was alienable: thus Locke neatly derived slavery from capture in war, whereby a man forfeited his labor to the conqueror who might lawfully have killed him; and thus Dred Scott was judged permanently to have given up his freedom. But the second kind of right, what Price called "that power of self-determination which all agents, as such, possess," was inalienable as long man remained man. Like the mind's quest for religious truth from which it was derived, self-determination was not a claim to ownership which might be both acquired and surrendered, but an inextricable aspect of the activity of being human.

Meanwhile, in America, Thomas Jefferson "took his division of rights into alienable and unalienable from Hutcheson, who made the distinction popular and important", and in the 1776 United States Declaration of Independence, famously condensed this to:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights...

In the 19th century, the movement to abolish slavery seized this passage as a statement of constitutional principle, although the U.S. constitution recognized and protected the institution of slavery. As a lawyer, future Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase argued before the Supreme Court in the case of John Van Zandt, who had been charged with violating the Fugitive Slave Act, that:

The law of the Creator, which invests every human being with an inalienable title to freedom, cannot be repealed by any interior law which asserts that man is property.

The concept of inalienable rights was criticized by Jeremy Bentham and Edmund Burke as groundless. Bentham and Burke claimed that rights arise from the actions of government, or evolve from tradition, and that neither of these can provide anything inalienable. (See Bentham's "Critique of the Doctrine of Inalienable, Natural Rights", and Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France). Presaging the shift in thinking in the 19th century, Bentham famously dismissed the idea of natural rights as "nonsense on stilts". By way of contrast to the views of Burke and Bentham, Patriot scholar and justice James Wilson criticized Burke's view as "tyranny".

The signers of the Declaration of Independence deemed it a "self-evident truth" that all men "are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights". In The Social Contract, Jean-Jacques Rousseau claims that the existence of inalienable rights is unnecessary for the existence of a constitution or a set of laws and rights. This idea of a social contract – that rights and responsibilities are derived from a consensual contract between the government and the people – is the most widely recognized alternative.

One criticism of natural rights theory is that one cannot draw norms from facts. This objection is variously expressed as the is-ought problem, the naturalistic fallacy, or the appeal to nature. G.E. Moore, for example, said that ethical naturalism falls prey to the naturalistic fallacy. Some defenders of natural rights theory, however, counter that the term "natural" in "natural rights" is contrasted with "artificial" rather than referring to nature. John Finnis, for example, contends that natural law and natural rights are derived from self-evident principles, not from speculative principles or from facts.

There is also debate as to whether all rights are either natural or legal. Fourth president of the United States James Madison, while representing Virginia in the House of Representatives, believed that there are rights, such as trial by jury, that are social rights, arising neither from natural law nor from positive law (which are the basis of natural and legal rights respectively) but from the social contract from which a government derives its authority.

Thomas Hobbes

Thomas Hobbes

Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) included a discussion of natural rights in his moral and political philosophy. Hobbes' conception of natural rights extended from his conception of man in a "state of nature". Thus he argued that the essential natural (human) right was "to use his own power, as he will himself, for the preservation of his own Nature; that is to say, of his own Life; and consequently, of doing any thing, which in his own judgement, and Reason, he shall conceive to be the aptest means thereunto." (Leviathan. 1, XIV)

Hobbes sharply distinguished this natural "liberty", from natural "laws", described generally as "a precept, or general rule, found out by reason, by which a man is forbidden to do, that, which is destructive of his life, or taketh away the means of preserving his life; and to omit, that, by which he thinketh it may best be preserved." (Leviathan. 1, XIV)

In his natural state, according to Hobbes, man's life consisted entirely of liberties and not at all of laws – "It followeth, that in such a condition, every man has the right to every thing; even to one another's body. And therefore, as long as this natural Right of every man to every thing endureth, there can be no security to any man... of living out the time, which Nature ordinarily allow men to live." (Leviathan. 1, XIV)

This would lead inevitably to a situation known as the "war of all against all", in which human beings kill, steal and enslave others to stay alive, and due to their natural lust for "Gain", "Safety" and "Reputation". Hobbes reasoned that this world of chaos created by unlimited rights was highly undesirable, since it would cause human life to be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short". As such, if humans wish to live peacefully they must give up most of their natural rights and create moral obligations to establish political and civil society. This is one of the earliest formulations of the theory of government known as the social contract.

Hobbes objected to the attempt to derive rights from "natural law", arguing that law ("lex") and right ("jus") though often confused, signify opposites, with law referring to obligations, while rights refer to the absence of obligations. Since by our (human) nature, we seek to maximize our well being, rights are prior to law, natural or institutional, and people will not follow the laws of nature without first being subjected to a sovereign power, without which all ideas of right and wrong are meaningless – "Therefore before the names of Just and Unjust can have place, there must be some coercive Power, to compel men equally to the performance of their Covenants..., to make good that Propriety, which by mutual contract men acquire, in recompense of the universal Right they abandon: and such power there is none before the erection of the Commonwealth." (Leviathan. 1, XV)

This marked an important departure from medieval natural law theories which gave precedence to obligations over rights.

John Locke

John Locke, "Life, Liberty, Estate (property)"

John Locke (1632–1704) was another prominent Western philosopher who conceptualized rights as natural and inalienable. Like Hobbes, Locke believed in a natural right to life, liberty, and property. It was once conventional wisdom that Locke greatly influenced the American Revolution with his writings of natural rights, but this claim has been the subject of protracted dispute in recent decades. For example, the historian Ray Forrest Harvey declared that Jefferson and Locke were at "two opposite poles" in their political philosophy, as evidenced by Jefferson's use in the Declaration of Independence of the phrase "pursuit of happiness" instead of "property". More recently, the eminent legal historian John Phillip Reid has deplored contemporary scholars' "misplaced emphasis on John Locke", arguing that American revolutionary leaders saw Locke as a commentator on established constitutional principles. Thomas Pangle has defended Locke's influence on the Founding, claiming that historians who argue to the contrary either misrepresent the classical republican alternative to which they say the revolutionary leaders adhered, do not understand Locke, or point to someone else who was decisively influenced by Locke. This position has also been sustained by Michael Zuckert.

According to Locke, there are three natural rights:

  • Life: everyone is entitled to live.
  • Liberty: everyone is entitled to do anything they want to so long as it does not conflict with the first right.
  • Estate: everyone is entitled to own all they create or gain through gift or trade so long as it does not conflict with the first two rights.

In developing his concept of natural rights, Locke was influenced by reports of society among Native Americans, whom he regarded as natural peoples who lived in a "state of liberty" and perfect freedom, but "not a state of license". It also informed his conception of social contract. Although he does not say so explicitly, his position implies that even in light of our unique characteristics we should not be treated differently by our neighbors or our rulers. "Locke is arguing that there is no natural characteristic sufficient to distinguish one person from another... of course, there are plenty of natural differences between us" (Haworth 103). What Haworth takes from Locke is that John Locke was obsessed with supporting equality in society, treating everyone as an equal. He does though highlight our differences with his philosophy showing that we are all unique and important to society. In his philosophy, it is highlighted that the ideal government should also protect everyone, and provide rights and freedom to everyone, because we are all important to society. His ideas then were developed into the movements for freedom from the British creating our government. However, his implied thought of freedom for all is applied most heavily in our culture today. Starting with the civil rights movement, and continuing through women's rights, Locke's call for a fair government can be seen as the influence in these movements. His ideas are typically just seen as the foundation for modern democracy; however, it is not unreasonable to credit Locke with the social activism throughout the history of America.

By founding this sense of freedom for all, Locke was laying the groundwork for the equality that occurs today despite the apparent misuse of his philosophy in early American democracy. The Civil Rights movement and the suffrage movement both called out the state of American democracy during their challenges to the government's view on equality. To them it was clear that when the designers of democracy said all, they meant all people shall receive those natural rights that John Locke cherished so deeply. "a state also of equality, wherein all the power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one having more than another" (Locke II,4). Locke in his papers on natural philosophy clearly states that he wants a government where all are treated equal in freedoms especially. "Locke's views on toleration were very progressive for the time" (Connolly). Authors such as Jacob Connolly confirm that to them Locke was highly ahead of his time with all this progressive thinking. That is that his thought fits our current state of democracy where we strive to make sure that everyone has a say in the government, and everyone has a chance at a good life. Regardless of race, gender, or social standing starting with Locke it was made clear not only that the government should provide rights, but rights to everyone through his social contract.

The social contract is an agreement between members of a country to live within a shared system of laws. Specific forms of government are the result of the decisions made by these persons acting in their collective capacity. Government is instituted to make laws that protect the three natural rights. If a government does not properly protect these rights, it can be overthrown.

Thomas Paine

Thomas Paine

Thomas Paine (1731–1809) further elaborated on natural rights in his influential work Rights of Man (1791),[54] emphasizing that rights cannot be granted by any charter because this would legally imply they can also be revoked and under such circumstances, they would be reduced to privileges:

It is a perversion of terms to say that a charter gives rights. It operates by a contrary effect – that of taking rights away. Rights are inherently in all the inhabitants; but charters, by annulling those rights, in the majority, leave the right, by exclusion, in the hands of a few. ... They ... consequently are instruments of injustice. The fact therefore must be that the individuals themselves, each in his own personal and sovereign right, entered into a compact with each other to produce a government: and this is the only mode in which governments have a right to arise, and the only principle on which they have a right to exist.

American individualist anarchists

Benjamin Tucker

While at first American individualist anarchists adhered to natural rights positions, later in this era led by Benjamin Tucker, some abandoned natural rights positions and converted to Max Stirner's Egoist anarchism. Rejecting the idea of moral rights, Tucker said there were only two rights: "the right of might" and "the right of contract". He also said, after converting to Egoist individualism, "In times past... it was my habit to talk glibly of the right of man to land. It was a bad habit, and I long ago sloughed it off. ... Man's only right to land is his might over it."

According to Wendy McElroy:

In adopting Stirnerite egoism (1886), Tucker rejected natural rights which had long been considered the foundation of libertarianism. This rejection galvanized the movement into fierce debates, with the natural rights proponents accusing the egoists of destroying libertarianism itself. So bitter was the conflict that a number of natural rights proponents withdrew from the pages of Liberty in protest even though they had hitherto been among its frequent contributors. Thereafter, Liberty championed egoism although its general content did not change significantly.

Several periodicals were "undoubtedly influenced by Liberty's presentation of egoism, including I published by C.L. Swartz, edited by W.E. Gordak and J.W. Lloyd (all associates of Liberty); The Ego and The Egoist, both of which were edited by Edward H. Fulton. Among the egoist papers that Tucker followed were the German Der Eigene, edited by Adolf Brand, and The Eagle and The Serpent, issued from London. The latter, the most prominent English-language egoist journal, was published from 1898 to 1900 with the subtitle 'A Journal of Egoistic Philosophy and Sociology'". Among those American anarchists who adhered to egoism include Benjamin Tucker, John Beverley Robinson, Steven T. Byington, Hutchins Hapgood, James L. Walker, Victor Yarros and E.H. Fulton.

Leo Strauss: Critique & Defense of Natural Right

Leo Strauss defends natural right against German critiques of a sort that pave the way to the Third Reich in his Walgreen lectures and in later works also entering into a debate with the Nazi legal theorist Carl Schmitt on related issues. His concern echoes Locke’s fear of the war-of-all-against-all. His defense is multi-faceted and his primary thesis remains largely implicit—without an operative defense of Natural Right society will disintegrate and nihilisms of the sort that gave rise to the Third Reich will predominate. Effectively: Natural Right may be repealed in practice yet what remains will not transcend but rather fall short of any organization that could properly be considered ‘social,’ or 'human'--in which the notion of freedom would be rendered meaningless. Whether or not the argument for Natural Right is plausible in an absolutely decisive or purely formal sense it will nevertheless motivate a sufficiently popular self-defense of liberalism against the (equally false or contingent) transcendentalism of fascism, thought Leo Strauss. Incomplete according to its formal contingency or dependence on popular behavior, Strauss’s argument remains permanently open until such time as liberalism is impracticable or becomes indefensible—seemingly (arguably) supported by the supremacy of liberal republicanism (or representative democratic capitalism) in geopolitics in the later phases of the 20th century, but potentially falling with the failure of the same.

Contemporary

Many documents now echo the phrase used in the United States Declaration of Independence. The preamble to the 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights asserts that rights are inalienable: "recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world." Article 1, § 1 of the California Constitution recognizes inalienable rights and articulated some (not all) of those rights as "defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy." However, there is still much dispute over which "rights" are truly natural rights and which are not, and the concept of natural or inalienable rights is still controversial to some.

Erich Fromm argued that some powers over human beings could be wielded only by God, and that if there were no God, no human beings could wield these powers.

Contemporary political philosophies continuing the classical liberal tradition of natural rights include libertarianism, anarcho-capitalism and Objectivism, and include amongst their canon the works of authors such as Robert Nozick, Ayn Rand and Murray Rothbard. A libertarian view of inalienable rights is laid out in Morris and Linda Tannehill's The Market for Liberty, which claims that a man has a right to ownership over his life and therefore also his property, because he has invested time (i.e. part of his life) in it and thereby made it an extension of his life. However, if he initiates force against and to the detriment of another man, he alienates himself from the right to that part of his life which is required to pay his debt: "Rights are not inalienable, but only the possessor of a right can alienate himself from that right – no one else can take a man's rights from him."

Various definitions of inalienability include non-relinquishability, non-salability, and non-transferability. This concept has been recognized by libertarians as being central to the question of voluntary slavery, which Murray Rothbard dismissed as illegitimate and even self-contradictory. Stephan Kinsella argues that "viewing rights as alienable is perfectly consistent with – indeed, implied by – the libertarian non-aggression principle. Under this principle, only the initiation of force is prohibited; defensive, restitutive, or retaliatory force is not."

Various philosophers have created different lists of rights they consider to be natural. Proponents of natural rights, in particular Hesselberg and Rothbard, have responded that reason can be applied to separate truly axiomatic rights from supposed rights, stating that any principle that requires itself to be disproved is an axiom. Critics have pointed to the lack of agreement between the proponents as evidence for the claim that the idea of natural rights is merely a political tool.

Hugh Gibbons has proposed a descriptive argument based on human biology. His contention is that human beings were other-regarding as a matter of necessity, to avoid the costs of conflict. Over time they developed expectations that individuals would act in certain ways which were then prescribed by society (duties of care etc.) and that eventually crystallized into actionable rights.

Philosopher Alex Naileg argues that if biological parents have parental responsibility towards their born children, then abortion rights entail that persons capable of becoming pregnant have the right to relinquish their future parental responsibility; however, the biological fathers of their born children do not have the same right to relinquish their future parental responsibility, thereby violating equality of rights. Thus, under these premises biologically different people have different rights. The argument extends to natural rights if someone maintains that the right to bodily autonomy is a natural right.

Catholic Church

The Catholic Church considers natural law a dogma. The Church considers that: "The natural law expresses the original moral sense which enables man to discern by reason the good and the evil, the truth and the lie: 'The natural law is written and engraved in the soul of each and every man, because it is human reason ordaining him to do good and forbidding him to sin . . . But this command of human reason would not have the force of law if it were not the voice and interpreter of a higher reason to which our spirit and our freedom must be submitted.'" The natural law consists, for the Catholic Church, of one supreme and universal principle from which are derived all our natural moral obligations or duties. Thomas Aquinas resumes the various ideas of Catholic moral thinkers about what this principle is: since good is what primarily falls under the apprehension of the practical reason, the supreme principle of moral action must have the good as its central idea, and therefore the supreme principle is that good is to be done and evil avoided.

Welfare capitalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ...