From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The theology of the body has a long history and tradition within the Catholic Church. Early
Church fathers wrote on the role of the body and its relation to the
soul,
often elevating soul over body. But like the soul, it is also created
by God in his image. This is considered important even today, as the
existence of a soul is the basis for much Church teachings on the human
body, in areas such as
abortion.
Ambrose of Milan and
Augustine of Hippo applied these views in their teachings on the human body,
virginity and
celibacy.
Thomas Aquinas developed a systematic view, which dominated Church teachings and
ecumenical councils including
Vatican II. All recent
popes
contributed from different angles to the theology of the body. Current
issues include the dignity of the body in light of its divine origin and
destination, its eventual resurrection; virginity, the Christian
sacrament of
marriage, and derived issues such as faithfulness and
contraception. Official Church teaching on the subject was stated in the
encyclical Deus caritas est (
On Christian Love) from
Pope Benedict XVI, promulgated on
Christmas, December 25, 2005.
Church fathers
Some early Church fathers, like
Origen were preoccupied with the body and its impediments. The theology of early Church fathers focused on the body in terms of its origin, condition before the
fall of man, and destination and relation to the soul.
Questions were raised as to whether the body may impede the soul in its
attempt to be the image of God. These questions, addressed by the
ancient Church, are relevant to a modern theology of the body, because
they relate to concerns and definitions on the beginning and nature of
human life.
Clement of Alexandria
Clement of Alexandria
(140?-220) viewed the body as the inferior partner in the body-soul
relationship. The body tends to be sinful. The soul has three advantages
over the body: it gives unity and life to the body; allows the body to
reason; and is oriented towards God, while the body is oriented towards
food and sex. The body is the grave of the soul, but also its residence,
home and its vehicle. Clement believed that the first humans were innocent until they got trapped by the pleasures of the body. The first humans, by misusing their body, misused their free will and decided to sin.
Origen
Like Clement,
Origen
(185-254?) was an African. Also like Clement, Origen considers the
human body a prison of the soul. Only the soul existed in paradise,
according to Origen, the body was taken on by Adam and Eve; as they
were cast out of paradise.
The body tends to be oriented toward lust and sin, but it is also a
creation of God. God created the body like a work of art in his image.
This creation reflects God’s intelligence. The human body is (eikon)
somehow similar to God. To be completed as a mirror of him, is the task
for every Christian. Unlike the human body, the soul is an image of
God. The body cannot be an image of God, otherwise God would look like a
human being with a human body.
Only the soul can see God, but it is caught between the flesh and
spirit. It constantly has to make a choice between the two. Origen
suggests, that Christians should free themselves from bodily
restrictions as much as possible in this life. The body is important
however, in the context of resurrection.
Origen believes that only the resurrection of the body makes any
sense. While he heeds Saint Paul, that the resurrection of the body will
mean a new body, he insists, its identity must be recognizable. Yet,
he states, our hope for resurrection is not one for worms, and our
souls do not yearn for another decayable body.
Irenaeus
Irenaeus The
body, formed in the image of God, and the soul, which has adopted the
Spirit of the Father, in harmony, make up the perfect human being
The body, formed in the image of God, and the soul, which has adopted
the Spirit of the Father, in harmony, make up the perfect human being,
according to
Irenaeus (died around 202). The Greek
Gnosis
and some Christians had looked down on the human body as inferior.
Irenaeus defends the body because it is the creation of God and a
negative view would cast shadows both over God and his creation. The
story of creation in the book Genesis (later quoted by Pope John Paul in
his lectures on the body) shows, that the first human being, Adam, was
indeed an image of God. Adam had supernatural life, immortality,
super-natural sanctity and a closeness to God. Since he was free of the
human need to sleep, he could see God without interruption. By giving in
to temptation, he lost all these attributes.
The importance of
Christ
for the human body is the restoration of the original status before the
fall. Those who accept Christ are redeemed and become children of God,
regaining eternal life. However those who live only by their body and
its needs, will not share eternal life.
The resurrected bodies will show beauty beyond human imagination. To
show the way to this destination, the Son of God became human, and
accepted the human body, thus helping human beings to recognize their
destination in God. Only by subjugating one’s will to the will of God,
can this destination be reached, according to Irenaeus.
Irenaeus believed that the first humans,
Adam and Eve had a childlike relation to their body. They had no idea of evil,
concupiscence and
lust. They enjoyed a balanced
sexuality, not ashamed as they kissed or hugged each other. According to Irenaeus, the fall was a result of a childish lack of discretion, which made Adam susceptible to the
devil and led him into disobedience to God. The fall was a result of naïveté, not of bad intention, according to Irenaeus.
Didymus the Blind
Didymus the Blind
(died around 398), who lived and taught in Alexandria, was blinded at
the age of five. God, according to Didymus, created the human being
with body and soul, both good, until the fall by Adam and Eve. Didymus
believed that the soul continues to be an image of God, while the body
does not.
The unity of body and soul is therefore for Didymus a degradation for
the soul. Limited by the body, it cannot develop. Whenever something
higher mixes with something lower, an
inferior mix is the consequence according to Didymus. He compares this with wine being mixed with water.
The body has some functions for the soul. The body informs the
soul of the sensual world around them. Didymus called the body the outer
person and the soul the inner person. The outer person is perishable.
The inner person is eternal. The heart of the person leads the person
as a whole towards good or bad deeds. Didymus maintains freedom of
will, which is however weakened through the fall of Adam of Eve. A
person who uses his free will to be a spiritual person, dominating all
subordinate material instincts, becomes similar to God. This similarity
must be goal of all human undertaking.
Gregory of Nazianzus
Gregory of Nazianzus
(330-390) contemplated on the origin of the human body. Man was
created by God with body and soul, a visible and invisible part, like
the angels. He was created to praise God like they did.
The body was given to man, so he may suffer and eventually die, and
thus not consider himself to be God. The material essence of the body
separates us from God, like a cloud, or, as Gregory stated, like the
cloud between the Egyptians and the Israelites.
By giving man a perishable body, man was saved from the deep fall of
Lucifer
into eternal damnation. Gregory does not describe the human body before
the fall, but he states that the bodily existence of man was free of
any illness, needs or problems. The human body was related to God and
free of sin towards him. The fall consisted in false pride, a revolt
against God.
Regarding the relation between body and soul, Gregory states, the
body is related to the soul, like the way in which the soul is related
to God. To explain human existence, Gregory uses the concept of light:
God is the most sublime light, He cannot be penetrated or defined. He is
followed by the angels, and then by human beings. Man is the image of
God but only in his soul, not in his body.
He is therefore also a mixture of eternal and temporal. The grace of
God created the soul of man. His body was created for suffering, to
overcome his pride. The soul is destined to lead the body and be
purified like gold in a fire. The soul is oriented towards God and
yearns to communicate with him. The human body is the lower element of
the human person. Through the body, man experiences his temporal
existence. But Gregory also admired human beauty and the bodily
abilities to dream, sleep and memorize. The body can be both a friend
and enemy of a person, according to Gregory. The final goal is a unity
of the soul with God, which is possible with Grace and the assistance of
the Holy Spirit according to Gregory.
Gregory of Nyssa
Gregory of Nyssa (335-394) was a bishop who wrote, among others, about the creation of the human body. Unlike
Irenaeus, Gregory states, that the soul does not need to acquire the vision of God; it has this vision from the beginning.
The mixing with body and material things let the soul deviate from its
divine vision and fall. Human efforts must therefore be oriented toward
recreating this vision and thus participating in the Divine life. This
can be done, so Gregory, by turning away from evil, and returning to
God. A human being is defined not by his/her body but by his/her soul,
with its spiritual and intellectual capacities.
The soul alone is in the image of God. Gregory also has a positive
image of man by stating his freedom and independence. God is truly free
and the freedom of man, even if limited, is an image of God. Not only
his freedom, but also his ability to love - God is love - and his
immortality, make man an image of God.
Regarding the human body, Gregory opines that it is created for
procreation. In that, humans are like animals; however, the human body
also has the capacity for reasoning and perception. The body has three
forms of life: the vegetative, sensual and intellectual. The human body
derives its dignity from the fact that the Son of God had adopted it.
But Gregory also considers the human body a heavy weight on the soul.
The destination of man is to achieve similarity to God, through
purification. Sin, passion and ambition must be renounced. The
sacraments of the Church are a great help. Gregory argues that God’s
grace, not man’s efforts, determines an individual's ability to see God. God draws man upwards towards him.
He climbs step by step, without knowing where he is going. The soul is
driven by its love for him, whom it has not found. The love of God, so
Gregory, increases in the soul, the more it knows him.
Ambrose of Milan wrote that perpetual virginity is a noble gift which the Christian religion has bestowed on the world.
Ambrose of Milan
To
Ambrose of Milan,
the body lives in a duality with the soul and must be subjugated.
Control of the body is essential for Christian life. Total control is
virginity. Virginity and perfect
chastity consecrated
to the service of God allows the body to become the image of God. It is
to Ambrose one of the most precious treasures which Christ has left
as his heritage to the Church. He asserted that perpetual virginity is a
noble gift which the Christian religion has bestowed on the world.
Virginity is not new or even Christian.
Pagans imposed this way of life on the
Vestals for a certain time. Ambrose writes, "We read that also in the temple of Jerusalem there were virgins. But what does the
Apostle say? 'Now all these things happened to them in figure', that this might be a foreshadowing of what was to come."
"Mary is the model of virginity: No wonder that the Lord, wishing to
rescue the world, began his work with Mary. Thus she, through whom
salvation was being prepared for all people, would be the first to
receive the promised fruit of salvation."
"To sow the seeds of perfect purity and to arouse a desire for virginity has always belonged to the function of the priesthood."
Augustine of Hippo
Augustine
is the father of many contemporary theological views on the body. He
dwelled at length on the condition of the human body before and after
the fall. He was convinced that the heavenly state consisted in complete
control of mind over body, especially in the area of sexuality. To illustrate this point, he notes, that some people can wiggle with their ears, nose or even hair, completely at their will. This condition of complete freedom and absence of lust existed for human sexuality too before the fall.
The body must be controlled, and therefore Augustine like his teacher
Ambrose considered virginity of the human body the superior way of
Christ. He considered matrimony a triple blessing in light of its
offspring, conjugal faith and being a sacrament: "In conjugal faith it
is provided that there should be no carnal intercourse outside the
marriage bond with another man or woman; with regard to offspring, that
children should be begotten of love, tenderly cared for and educated in a
religious atmosphere; finally, in its sacramental aspect that the
marriage bond should not be broken and that a husband or wife, if
separated, should not be joined to another even for the sake of
offspring. This we regard as the law of marriage by which the
fruitfulness of nature is adorned and the evil of incontinence is
restrained."
He quoted
St Paul saying that young girls should marry, arguing that they "should bear children to be mothers of families". Augustine was one of the first and most important Church fathers who wrote, that
contraception
is wrong: "Intercourse even with one's legitimate wife is unlawful and
wicked where the conception of the offspring is prevented.
Onan, the son of
Juda, did this and the Lord killed him for it."
Thomas Aquinas
Man the image of God
Thomas Aquinas deals with a number of questions, most importantly, the question of man as image of God.
Since man is said to be the image of God by reason of his
intellectual nature, he is the most perfectly like God according to
that in which he can best imitate God in his intellectual nature. Now
the intellectual nature imitates God chiefly in this, that God
understands and loves Himself. Wherefore we see that the image of God is
in man in three ways.
This means, according to Thomas, that man has a natural aptitude for
recognizing, understanding and loving God. However, he requires His
grace to do those things perfectly so he can finally attain "the
likeness of glory".
Animals, the likeness of God
But
are animals also created in the image of God? Thomas has a unique
answer:
in all creatures there is some kind of likeness to God, he argued. But
in the thinking person, whom he called "the rational creature," there is
a likeness of "image"; whereas in other creatures we find a likeness by
way of a "trace." Thomas explains the difference between trace and image. "An 'image' represents something by likeness in
species,
...; while a 'trace' represents something by way of an effect, which
represents the cause in such a way as not to attain to the likeness of
species."
Pope Pius XI
Catholic doctrine from early on and supported by the
Council of Trent,
considered virginity to be the holiest state for humans; however,
marriage was allowed for those without the fortitude required to live an
abstinent life. In
Casti connubii,
Pius XI
repeatedly quotes Augustine, who teaches, that among the blessings of
marriage, the child holds the first place. Pius XI also followed
Augustine in upholding the indissolubility of marriage and the
wrongfulness of sexual acts that impede conception:
Small wonder, therefore, if Holy Writ bears witness that
the Divine Majesty regards with greatest detestation this horrible crime
and at times has punished it with death. As St. Augustine notes,
"Intercourse, even with one's legitimate wife, is unlawful and wicked
where the conception of the offspring is prevented.
Following this argument, Pius XI repeats that the conjugal act is
intrinsically tied with procreation, but also acknowledges the unitive
aspect of intercourse as licit. The encyclical affirms the Church's
opposition to adultery and divorce, and speaks out against the
eugenics laws, popular at that time, that forbade those deemed "unfit" from marrying and having children.
Pope Pius XII
Pope Pius XII in the years 1939-1942 delivered a series of lectures to the newly
married couples of
Rome which for decades became the basis for marital instruction in the
US. Like Popes before him, and following the teachings of the
Council of Trent, Pope Pius explained in
Sacra virginitas that virginity is superior to marriage.
He also rejects the view that the human body needs fulfillment of the
sexual instinct for the sake of one's mental or physical health, or for
the harmony of one’s personality. In this context he criticized the cult of the body and disorderly love of oneself.
Ethics
In a 1951 speech to
midwives,
Pius XII stressed the inviolability of the human body as a creation of
God and stated his opposition to all forms of genetic mercy killings.
The right to life comes directly from God, not from the parents.
He rejected any kind of sterilization as well. Like Pius XI, he
extolled the sanctity of the sacrament of marriage, a place for peace
and love, requiring often heroism by both partners. Parents have a role,
not only to give physical love, but also to give spiritual life to
their offspring. Pius criticized the traditional male role in marriage,
stating that while the male member is head of the family, he should also
participate in domestic chores. especially within families, where the mother is working full-time. Pius XII demands
equal pay for equal work.
Family planning
Regarding
natural family planning
methods, Pope Pius XII distinguished between engaging in sexual
intercourse during infertile days and the specific selection of these
days for intercourse. He argued that, if a marital partner entered
marriage with the intention to have intercourse only during infertile
days in order to avoid having offspring, the marriage contract itself
would be invalid. If, on the other hand, the marital partner has
intercourse during infertile days only occasionally but not exclusively,
then the marriage is legitimate. The intention, not the actual use of
marital rights, is decisive. Pius XII illustrates this with the notion
that marriage includes both rights and obligations.
Abstinence
within marriage is also highlighted in his teachings. Pius took issue
with the argument that abstinence is an impossibly heroic act. Citing
Augustine, he argued that if natural union is not possible, abstinence
is required. And, he added, in the time of
World War II,
so many acts of real heroism were required of men and women in so many
countries, against which sexual abstinence paled in comparison.
The human body and its needs should not be the centre of gratification
but need to be sublimated to spiritual priorities that reflect the
divine design and destiny. Marriage is not the highest value and human
dignity must be preserved and applied in the marital act.
The teachings of the Church reject a hedonistic view of the human body,
while recognizing and valuing its divine origin and dignity. The Church
thus protects the dignity of men against an over-emphasis on
sensuality.
Body and soul
Early
Church writers, while defining the position of the body within
theology, had focused a great deal of attention on the creation of
body and soul. "The body of man was created by God" (
de fide) according to the teachings of two ecumenical councils
Lateran IV and
Vatican I.
Pope Pius XII
taught that the question of the origin of man's body from pre-existing
and living matter is a legitimate matter of inquiry for natural science.
Catholics are free to form their own opinions, but they should do so
cautiously; they should not confuse fact with conjecture, and they
should respect the Church's right to define matters touching on
Revelation.
For these reasons, the Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid
that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred
theology, research and discussions, on the part of men experienced in
both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as
far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from
pre-existent and living matter - for the Catholic faith obliges us to
hold that
souls are immediately created by God. In an October 22, 1996, address to the
Pontifical Academy of Sciences,
Pope John Paul II repeated the position of Pius XII adding:
In his encyclical Humani generis (1950), my
predecessor Pius XII has already affirmed that there is no conflict
between evolution and the doctrine of the faith regarding man and his
vocation, provided that we do not lose sight of certain fixed
points....Today, more than a half-century after the appearance of that
encyclical, some new findings lead us toward the recognition of
evolution as more than an hypothesis.
Mary and the resurrection of the body
To
the Catholic Church, Pius XII's 1950 dogma of the Assumption is proof
for the resurrection of the body from the dead. Pius was confident that
the solemn proclamation and definition of the Assumption would
contribute in no small way to the advantage of human society and
individuals. He hoped that those who meditate upon the Assumption of
Mary will be better able to withstand the pressures of a material life
style, and look instead at the true destination of their own bodies:
...in this magnificent way all may see clearly to what a
lofty goal our bodies and souls are destined. Finally it is our hope
that belief in Mary's bodily Assumption into heaven will make our belief
in our own resurrection stronger and render it more effective.
...by the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ, of the
Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul, and by our own authority, we pronounce,
declare, and define it to be a divinely revealed dogma: that the
Immaculate Mother of God, the ever Virgin Mary, having completed the
course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly
glory.
Hence
if anyone, which God forbid, should dare willfully to deny or to call
into doubt that which we have defined, let him know that he has fallen
away completely from the divine and Catholic Faith.
Pope Paul VI
The central document of
Pope Paul VI is
Humanae vitae.
The Pope begins with the statement that "the transmission of human
life is a most serious role in which married people collaborate freely
and responsibly with God the Creator." He claims that this is a source
of great joy to them, although it means many difficulties and hardships.
But there are global perspectives. A rapid increase in population has
created the spectre of a world without food and other resources for all,
and a temptation for State authorities to clamp down on population
increase with drastic measures. The role of woman in society has been
changing drastically; but most importantly, according to the encyclical,
the advent of birth control devices requires a position on the part of
the magisterium of the Church.
Limited rights over the body
The Pope points to some
Catholic dogma.
Human procreation, like all questions of life, is a part of God's
loving design. Married life takes its origin from God, who "is love."
Husband and wife cooperate with God in the generation and rearing of new
lives.
Married love must therefore be more than a question of natural instinct
or emotional drive. It is faithful and exclusive until death.
Parents are not free to act as they choose in the service of
transmitting life, as if it were wholly up to them to decide what is the
right course to follow.
Observing the Natural Law means that each and every marital act must of
necessity retain its intrinsic relationship to the procreation of human
life.
Faithfulness to God's Design means to experience
married love while respecting the laws of conception and to acknowledge
that one is not the master of the sources of life but rather the
minister of the design established by the Creator.
All artificial birth control methods are unlawful as are all
specifically intended to prevent procreation—whether as an end or as a
means. Lawful Therapeutic Means
are permitted if necessary to cure bodily diseases, even if a
foreseeable impediment to procreation should result, provided such
impediment is not directly intended for any motive whatsoever. Recourse to Infertile Periods
applies to the spacing of births, arising from the physical or
psychological condition of the husband or wife, or from external
circumstances. The Church teaches that married people may then take
advantage of the natural cycle. Scientists, as already requested by Pius XII, should study natural rhythms as a secure basis for the limitation of offspring.
Control of the body
Pope Paul fully realizes that Humanae vitae
is not easy to follow. Some may argue that it teaches the impossible.
He discusses the value of self-discipline of the body and self-denial of
bodily pleasures as a source of family tranquility, peace, and
personality development within the family.
He recommends chastity within marriage and appeals to public
authorities not to tolerate any legislation that would introduce into
the family practices that are opposed to the natural law of God.
Social and economic development
The Pope is fully aware of the developmental implications of this teaching. Regarding worldwide development he quotes
Pope John XXIII
that no solution is acceptable which violates man's essential dignity
by reducing him to a materialistic concept. The only possible solution
is social and economic progress of individuals and society, which
respects and promotes true human values. This excludes misguided
governmental policies, a lack of social justice, a selfish accumulation
of material goods, and a failure raise the standard of living
of people and their children. The Pope sees a great potential for governments, national aid programs and especially for international aid organizations.
Christian compassion
Christian
couples face great difficulties at times: husbands and wives should
take up the burden appointed to them: married couples should communicate
their own experience to others. Thus the lay vocation will be included
a novel and outstanding form of the apostolate.
Christian Compassion must be the guiding light. The Pope teaches that
this doctrine of Christ on love and the uses of the body must always be
joined with tolerance and charity:
As Christ Himself showed in His conversations and
dealings with men. For when He came, not to judge, but to save the
world, was He not bitterly severe toward sin, but patient and abounding
in mercy toward sinners?
Pope John Paul II
John Paul II continued on the Catholic theology of the body of his predecessors with a series of lectures, entitled the
Theology of the Body, in which he talked about an
original unity between man and women, purity of heart (on the
Sermon on the Mount),
marriage and
celibacy and reflections on
Humane Vitae, focusing largely on responsible parenthood and marital chastity. He links "the original unity of man and women" with the
book of Genesis,
and raises in this context questions such as why Christ put so much
emphasis on human beings as male and female. He argues, Man becomes the
Image of God in the moment of
holy communion.
Pope Benedict XVI
In 2005,
Pope Benedict XVI took up the concerns of his predecessors in his first encyclical,
Deus caritas est, where he raises some questions regarding Eros, body and the Church. (Did Christianity destroy Eros?
Doesn't the Church, with all her commandments and prohibitions, turn to
bitterness the most precious thing in life? Doesn't she blow the
whistle just when the joy which is the Creator's gift offers us a
happiness which is itself a certain foretaste of the Divine?)
Nature of love
Benedict accepts that events in real life often just happen, rather than being planned nor willed. What is imposed, is not
voluntary.
The encyclical does not mention the teachings of the Popes Pius XI
through John Paul II on birth control and natural family planning. The
late Pope, "my great predecessor" is, however, praised for his social
teachings, on poverty and so on.
The encyclical focuses on a broad concept of love and not on
prohibitions and definitions, which may anger some segments of the
public. Benedict distances himself from "my sinful body, my enemy"
views, but goes further when he warns against radical distinctions of
“good love”,
Agape, and “bad” or “dirty” love,
Eros and
Sex.
Benedict, while clearly recognizing degrading sexual misuses, complains
that in the past these good-bad distinctions have often been
radicalized within the
Catholic Church. This is dangerous, because:
Were this... to be taken to extremes, the essence of
Christianity would be detached from the vital relations fundamental to
human existence, and would become a world apart, admirable perhaps, but
decisively cut off from the complex fabric of human life.
40th anniversary of Humanae vitae
The
principles of Catholic faith are old as the scriptures, Benedict
states. The Pope intends to focus on these eternal principles of
Catholic faith. On May 12, 2008, he accepted an invitation to talk
participants in the International Congress organized by the
Pontifical Lateran University on the 40th anniversary of
Humanae vitae.
He put the encyclical, which in his view, was very poorly understood,
in the broader view of love in a global context, a topic, which he
called – "so controversial, yet so crucial for humanity's future."
Humanae vitae
became "a sign of contradiction but also of continuity of the Church's
doctrine and tradition... What was true yesterday is true also today".
The Church continues to reflect "in an ever new and deeper way on the
fundamental principles that concern marriage and procreation”. The key
message of
Humanae vitae is love. Benedict states, that the
fullness of a person is achieved by a unity of soul and body, but
neither spirit nor body alone can love, only the two together. If this
unity is broken, if only the body is satisfied, love becomes a
commodity. Ultimately, Benedict says, Christian love grows out the love of Christ.
