From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
International drug routes
The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime's
World Drug Report 2005 estimates the size of the global illicit drug market at US$321.6
billion in 2003 alone. With a
world GDP
of US$36 trillion in the same year, the illegal drug trade may be
estimated as nearly 1% of total global trade. Consumption of illegal
drugs is widespread globally and remains very difficult for local
authorities to thwart its popularity.
History
Chinese authorities issued edicts against opium smoking in 1729, 1796 and 1800.
The West prohibited addictive drugs throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
In the early 19th century, an
illegal drug trade in China emerged. As a result, by 1838 the number of Chinese opium-addicts had grown to between four and twelve million. The Chinese government responded by enforcing a ban on the import of
opium; this led to the
First Opium War (1839-1842) between the
United Kingdom and
Qing-dynasty
China. The United Kingdom won and forced China to allow British
merchants to sell Indian-grown opium. Trading in opium was lucrative,
and smoking opium had become common in the 19th century, so British merchants increased trade with the Chinese. The
Second Opium War broke out in 1856, with the British joined this time by the
French. After the two Opium Wars, the British Crown, via the treaties of
Nanking (1842), and
Tianjin
(1858), obligated the Chinese government to pay large sums of money for
opium they had seized and destroyed, which were referred to as "reparations".
In 1868, as a result of the increased use of opium, the UK restricted the sale of opium in Britain by implementing the
1868 Pharmacy Act. In the United States, control of opium remained under the control of individual
US states until the introduction of the
Harrison Act in 1914, after 12 international powers signed the
International Opium Convention in 1912.
The beginning of the 21st century saw drug use increase in North America and Europe, with a particularly increased demand for
marijuana and
cocaine. As a result, international
organized crime syndicates such as the
Sinaloa Cartel and
'Ndrangheta have increased cooperation among each other in order to facilitate trans-Atlantic drug-trafficking. Use of another illicit drug,
hashish, has also increased in Europe.
Drug trafficking is widely regarded by lawmakers as a serious offense
around the world. Penalties often depend on the type of drug (and its
classification in the country into which it is being trafficked), the
quantity trafficked, where the drugs are sold and how they are
distributed. If the drugs are sold to underage people, then the
penalties for trafficking may be harsher than in other circumstances.
Drug smuggling carries severe penalties in many countries. Sentencing may include lengthy periods of incarceration,
flogging and even the
death penalty (in Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and elsewhere). In December 2005,
Van Tuong Nguyen, a 25-year-old Australian drug smuggler, was hanged in Singapore after being convicted in March 2004. In 2010, two people were sentenced to death in Malaysia for trafficking 1 kilogram (2.2 lb) of
cannabis into the country.
Execution is mostly used as a deterrent, and many have called upon much
more effective measures to be taken by countries to tackle drug
trafficking;
for example, targeting specific criminal organisations (which are often
also active in the smuggling of other goods (i.e. wildlife) and even
people In some cases, even links between politicians and the criminal organisations have been proven to exist.
Effects of the illegal drug trade on societies
The
countries of drug production and transit are some of the most affected
by the drug trade, though countries receiving the illegally imported
substances are also adversely affected. For example, Ecuador has
absorbed up to 300,000 refugees from Colombia who are running from
guerrillas, paramilitaries and drug lords. While some applied for
asylum, others are still illegal immigrants. The drugs that pass from
Colombia through Ecuador to other parts of South America create economic
and social problems.
Honduras, through which an estimated 79% of cocaine passes on its way to the United States, has the highest
murder rate in the world. According to the
International Crisis Group,
the most violent regions in Central America, particularly along the
Guatemala–Honduras border, are highly correlated with an abundance of
drug trafficking activity.
Violent crime
In many countries worldwide, the illegal drug trade is thought to be directly linked to
violent crimes such as murder. This is especially true in all developing
countries, such as
Honduras, but is also an issue for many developed countries worldwide. In the late 1990s in the United States the
Federal Bureau of Investigation estimated that 5% of murders were drug-related.
In Colombia, Drug violence can be caused by factors such as, the
economy, poor governments, and no authority within the law enforcement.
After a crackdown by US and Mexican authorities in the first
decade of the 21st century as part of tightened border security in the
wake of the
September 11 attacks, border violence inside Mexico surged. The Mexican government estimates that 90% of the killings are drug-related.
A report by the UK government's Drug Strategy Unit that was
leaked to the press, stated that due to the expensive price of highly
addictive drugs
heroin
and cocaine, drug use was responsible for the great majority of crime,
including 85% of shoplifting, 70-80% of burglaries and 54% of robberies.
It concluded that "[t]he cost of crime committed to support illegal
cocaine and heroin habits amounts to £16 billion a year in the UK"
Drug trafficking routes
The nephews of President Nicolás Maduro, Efraín Antonio Campo Flores and Francisco Flores de Freitas, after their arrest by the DEA on 10 November 2015.
South America
According to the
United Nations, there was an increase of cocaine trafficking through Venezuela since 2002. In 2005 Venezuela severed ties with the United States
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), accusing its representatives of spying.
Following the departure of the DEA from Venezuela and the expansion of
DEA's partnership with Colombia in 2005, Venezuela became more
attractive to drug traffickers.
Between 2008 and 2012, Venezuela's cocaine seizure ranking among other
countries declined, going from being ranked fourth in the world for
cocaine seizures in 2008 to sixth in the world in 2012.
On 18 November 2016, following what was known as the
Narcosobrinos incident, Venezuelan President
Nicolás Maduro's
two nephews were found guilty of trying to ship drugs into the United
States so they could "obtain a large amount of cash to help their family
stay in power".
West Africa
According to the Africa Economic Institute, the value of illicit
drug smuggling in Guinea-Bissau is almost twice the value of the
country's
GDP.
Police officers are often bribed. A police officer's normal monthly
wage of $93 is less than 2% of the value of 1 kilogram (2.2 lb) of
cocaine (€7000 or $8750).
The money can also be laundered using real estate. A house is built
using illegal funds, and when the house is sold, legal money is earned.
When drugs are sent over land, through the Sahara, the drug traders
have been forced to cooperate with terrorist organizations, such as
Al Qaida in Islamic
Maghreb.
Eastern and southern Africa
Heroin
is increasingly trafficked from Afghanistan to Europe and America
through eastern and southern African countries. This path is known as
the “southern route” or “smack track.” Repercussions of this trade
include burgeoning heroin use and political corruption among
intermediary African nations.
Asia
Drugs in Asia
traditionally traveled the southern routes - the main caravan axes of
Southeast Asia and Southern China - and include the former
opium-producing countries of
Thailand,
Iran, and
Pakistan. After the 1990s, particularly after the
Cold War
ended, borders were opened and trading and customs agreements were
signed so that the routes expanded to include China, Central Asia, and
Russia.
There is, therefore, a diversified drug trafficking routes available
today, particularly in the heroin trade and these thrive due to the
continuous development of new markets. A large amount of drugs are
smuggled into Europe from Asia. The main sources of these drugs are
Afghanistan,
along with countries that constituted the so-called Golden Crescent.
From these producers, drugs are smuggled into the West and Central Asia
to its destinations in Europe and the United States.
Iran is now the route for smugglers, having been previously a primary
trading route, due to its large-scale and costly war against drug
trafficking.
The Border Police Chief of Iran said that his country "is a strong
barrier against the trafficking of illegal drugs to Caucasus, especially
the Republic of Azerbaijan."
The drugs produced by the Golden Triangle of Myanmar, Laos, and
Thailand, on the other hand, pass through the southern routes to feed
the Australian, U.S., and Asian markets.
Online
Profits
US$207 million and additional amounts in other currencies were confiscated from Mexican Zhenli Ye Gon in 2007.
Hashish seized in Operation Albatross, a joint operation of Afghan officials, NATO, and the DEA
Statistics about profits from the drug trade are largely unknown due
to its illicit nature. In its 1997 World Drugs Report the United Nations
Office on Drugs and Crime estimated the value of the market at $4
trillion, ranking drugs alongside arms and oil among the world's largest
traded goods. An online report published by the UK Home Office in 2007 estimated the illicit drug market in the UK at £4–6.6 billion a year.
In December 2009
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Executive Director
Antonio Maria Costa
claimed illegal drug money saved the banking industry from collapse. He
claimed he had seen evidence that the proceeds of organized crime were
"the only liquid investment capital" available to some banks on the
brink of collapse during 2008. He said that a majority of the $352
billion (£216bn) of drug profits was absorbed into the economic system
as a result:
"In many instances, the money from drugs
was the only liquid investment capital. In the second half of 2008,
liquidity was the banking system's main problem and hence liquid capital
became an important factor...Inter-bank loans were funded by money that
originated from the drugs trade and other illegal activities...there
were signs that some banks were rescued that way".
Costa
declined to identify countries or banks that may have received any drug
money, saying that would be inappropriate because his office is
supposed to address the problem, not apportion blame.
Though street-level drug sales are widely viewed as lucrative, a study by
Sudhir Venkatesh
suggested that many low-level employees receive low wages. In a study
he made in the 1990s working closely with members of the
Black Gangster Disciple Nation in
Chicago, he found that one gang (essentially a
franchise)
consisted of a leader (a college graduate named J.T.), three senior
officers, and 25 to 75 street level salesmen ('foot soldiers') depending
on season. Selling
crack cocaine,
they took in approximately $32,000 per month over a six-year period.
This was spent as follows: $5,000 to the board of twenty directors of
the Black Gangster Disciple Nation, who oversaw 100 such gangs for
approximately $500,000 in monthly income. Another $5,000 monthly was
paid for cocaine, and $4,000 for other non-wage expenses. J.T. took
$8,500 monthly for his own salary. The remaining $9,500 monthly went to
pay the employees a $7 per hour wage for officers and a $3.30 per hour
wage for foot soldiers. Contrary to a popular image of drug sales as a
lucrative profession, many of the employees were living with their
mothers by necessity. Despite this, the gang had four times as many
unpaid members who dreamed of becoming foot soldiers.
Free trade link
There
are several arguments on whether or not free trade has a correlation to
an increased activity in the illicit drug trade. Currently, the
structure and operation of the illicit drug industry is described mainly
in terms of an international division of labor.
Free trade can open new markets to domestic producers who would
otherwise resort to exporting illicit drugs. Additionally, extensive
free trade among states increases cross-border drug enforcement and
coordination between law enforcement agencies in different countries.
However, free trade also increases the sheer volume of legal
cross-border trade and provides cover for drug smuggling—by providing
ample opportunity to conceal illicit cargo in legal trade. While
international free trade continues to expand the volume of legal trade,
the ability to detect and interdict drug trafficking is severely
diminished. Towards the late 1990s, the top ten seaports in the world
processed 33.6 million containers.
Free trade has fostered integration of financial markets and has
provided drug traffickers with more opportunities to launder money and
invest in other activities. This strengthens the drug industry while
weakening the efforts of law enforcement to monitor the flow of drug
money into the legitimate economy. Cooperation among cartels expands
their scope to distant markets and strengthens their abilities to evade
detection by local law enforcement.
Additionally, criminal organizations work together to coordinate
money-laundering activities by having separate organizations handle
specific stages of laundering process.
One organization structures the process of how financial transactions
will be laundered, while another criminal group provides the “dirty”
money to be cleaned.
By fostering expansion of trade and global transportation networks,
free trade encourages cooperation and formation of alliances among
criminal organizations across different countries.
The drug trade in Latin America emerged in the early 1930s. It saw significant growth in the Andean countries, including Peru, Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, Colombia and Venezuela.
The underground market in the early half of the 20th century mainly had
ties to Europe. After World War II, the Andean countries saw an
expansion of trade, specifically with cocaine.
Drug trafficking by country
United States
Background
The
effects of the illegal drug trade in the United States can be seen in a
range of political, economic and social aspects. Increasing drug
related violence can be tied to the racial tension that arose during the
late 20th century along with the political upheaval prevalent
throughout the 1960s and 70s.
The second half of the 20th century was a period when increased wealth,
and increased discretionary spending, increased the demand for illicit
drugs in certain areas of the United States. Large-scale drug
trafficking is one of the few
capital crimes, and may result in a
death sentence prescribed at the federal level.
Political impact
A large generation, the
baby boomers,
came of age in the 1960s. Their social tendency to confront the law on
specific issues, including illegal drugs, overwhelmed the understaffed
judicial system. The federal government attempted to enforce the law,
but with meager effect.
Marijuana was a popular drug seen through the Latin American
trade route in the 1960s. Cocaine became a major drug product in the
later decades. Much of the cocaine is smuggled from Colombia and Mexico via Jamaica.
This led to several administrations combating the popularity of these
drugs. Due to the influence of this development on the U.S. economy, the
Reagan administration began "certifying" countries for their attempts
at controlling drug trafficking.
This allowed the United States to intervene in activities related to
illegal drug transport in Latin America. Continuing into the 1980s, the
United States instated stricter policy pertaining to drug transit
through sea. As a result, there was an influx in drug-trafficking across
the
Mexico–U.S. border.
This increased the drug cartel activity in Mexico. By the early 1990s,
so much as 50% of the cocaine available in the United States market
originated from Mexico, and by the 2000s, over 90% of the cocaine in the
United States was imported from Mexico.
In Colombia, however, there was a fall of the major drug cartels in the
mid-1990s. Visible shifts occurred in the drug market in the United
States. Between the 1996 and 2000,
U.S. cocaine consumption dropped by 11%.
In 2008, the U.S. government initiated another program, known as the
Merida Initiative,
to help combat drug trafficking in Mexico. This program increased U.S.
security assistance to $1.4 billion over several years, which helped
supply Mexican forces with "high-end equipment from helicopters to
surveillance technology". Despite U.S. aid, Mexican "narcogangs" continue to outnumber and outgun the
Mexican Army, allowing for continued activities of drug cartels across the
U.S.–Mexico border.
Social impacts
War on drugs in Arizona, October 2011
Although narcotics are illegal in the US, they have become integrated
into the nation's culture and are seen as a recreational activity by
sections of the population.
Illicit drugs are considered to be a commodity with strong demand, as
they are typically sold at a high value. This high price is caused by a
combination of factors that include the potential legal ramifications
that exist for suppliers of illicit drugs and their high demand. Despite the constant effort by politicians to win the
war on drugs, the US is still the world's largest importer of illegal drugs.
Throughout the 20th century, narcotics other than cocaine also
crossed the Mexican border, meeting the US demand for alcohol during the
1920s
Prohibition, opiates in the 1940s, marijuana in the 1960s, and heroin in the 1970s.
Most of the U.S. imports of drugs come from Mexican drug cartels. In
the United States, around 195 cities have been infiltrated by drug
trafficking that originated in Mexico.
An estimated $10bn of the Mexican drug cartel's profits come from the
United States, not only supplying the Mexican drug cartels with the
profit necessary for survival, but also furthering America's economic
dependence on drugs.
Demographics
With a large wave of immigrants in the 1960s and onwards, the United States saw an increased heterogeneity in its public.
In the 1980s and 90s, drug related homicide was at a record high. This
increase in drug violence became increasingly tied to these ethnic
minorities. Though the rate of violence varied tremendously among cities
in America, it was a common anxiety in communities across urban
America. An example of this could be seen in Miami, a city with a host
of ethnic enclaves.
Between 1985 and 1995, the homicide rate in Miami was one of the
highest in the nation—four times the national homicide average. This
crime rate was correlated with regions with low employment and was not
entirely dependent on ethnicity.
The baby boomer generation also felt the effects of the drug trade in their increased drug use from the 1960s to 80s.
Along with substance abuse, criminal involvement, suicide and murder
were also on the rise. Due to the large amount of baby boomers,
commercial marijuana use was on the rise. This increased the supply and
demand for marijuana during this time period.
Mexico
Political influences
Corruption in Mexico
has contributed to the domination of Mexican cartels in the illicit
drug trade. Since the beginning of the 20th century, Mexico's political
environment allowed the growth of drug-related activity. The loose
regulation over the transportation of illegal drugs and the failure to
prosecute known drug traffickers and gangs increased the growth of the
drug industry. Toleration of drug trafficking has undermined the
authority of the Mexican government and has decreased the power of law
enforcement officers in regulation over such activities. These policies
of tolerance fostered the growing power of drug cartels in the Mexican
economy and have made drug traders wealthier.
Many states in Mexico lack policies that establish stability in
governance. There also is a lack of local stability, as mayors cannot be
re-elected. This requires electing a new mayor each term. Drug gangs
have manipulated this, using vacuums in local leadership to their own
advantage.
In 1929, the
Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) was formed to resolve the chaos resulting from the
Mexican Revolution. Over time, this party gained political influence and had a major impact on Mexico's social and economic policies.
The party created ties with various groups as a power play in order to
gain influence, and as a result created more corruption in the
government. One such power play was an alliance with drug traffickers.
This
political corruption obscured justice, making it difficult to identify violence when it related to drugs.
By the 1940s, the tie between the drug cartels and the PRI had
solidified. This arrangement created immunity for the leaders of the
drug cartels and allowed drug trafficking to grow under the protection
of the government officials. During the 1990s, the PRI lost some
elections to the new
National Action Party(PAN). Chaos again emerged as elected government in Mexico changed drastically.
As the PAN party took control, drug cartel leaders took advantage of
the ensuing confusion and used their existing influence to further gain
power.
Instead of negotiating with the central government as was done with the
PRI party, drug cartels utilized new ways to distribute their supply
and continued operating through force and intimidation. As Mexico became more democratized, the corruption fell from a centralized power to the local authorities.
Cartels began to bribe local authorities, thus eliminating the
structure and rules placed by the government—giving cartels more
freedom. As a response, Mexico saw an increase in violence caused by drug trafficking.
The corruption cartels created resulted in distrust of government by the Mexican public. This distrust became more prominent after the collapse of the PRI party. In response, the
presidents of Mexico,
in the late twentieth century and early twenty-first century,
implemented several different programs relating to law enforcement and
regulation. In 1993, President Salinas created the National Institute
for the Combat of Drugs in Mexico. From 1995–1998, President Zedillo
established policies regarding increased punishment of organized crime,
allowing "[wire taps], protected witnesses, covert agents and seizures
of goods", and increasing the quality of law enforcement at the federal
level. From 2001–2005, President
Vicente Fox created the
Federal Agency of Investigation.
These policies resulted in the arrests of major drug-trafficking bosses:
Arrested Drug Traffickers
| Year
|
Person
|
Cartel
|
| 1989 |
Miguel Angel Felix Gallardo |
Sinaloa Cartel
|
| 1993 |
Joaquín Guzmán Loera |
Sinaloa Cartel
|
| 1995 |
Héctor Luis Palma |
|
| 1996 |
Juan Garcia Abrego |
Gulf Cartel
|
| 2002 |
Ismael Higuera Guerrero |
Tijuana Cartel
|
| Jesus Labra |
Tijuana Cartel
|
| Adan Amezcua |
Colima Cartel
|
| Benjamin Arellano Felix |
Tijuana Cartel
|
| 2003 |
Osiel Cardenas |
Gulf Cartel
|
Mexico's economy
Over
the past few decades drug cartels have become integrated into Mexico's
economy. Approximately 500 cities are directly engaged in drug
trafficking and nearly 450,000 people are employed by drug cartels. Additionally, the livelihood of 3.2 million people is dependent on the drug cartels.
Between local and international sales, such as to Europe and the United
States, drug cartels in Mexico see a $25–30bn yearly profit, a great
deal of which circulates through international banks such as
HSBC.
Drug cartels are fundamental in local economics. A percentage of the
profits seen from the trade are invested in the local community. Such profits contribute to the education and healthcare of the community. While these cartels bring violence and hazards into communities, they create jobs and provide income for its many members.
Culture of drug cartels
Major
cartels saw growth due to a prominent set culture of Mexican society
that created the means for drug capital. One of the sites of origin for
drug trafficking within Mexico, was the state of
Michoacán.
In the past, Michoacán was mainly an agricultural society. This
provided an initial growth of trade. Industrialization of rural areas of
Mexico facilitated a greater distribution of drugs, expanding the drug
market into different provinces. Once towns became industrialized, cartels such as the
Sinaloa Cartel
started to form and expand. The proliferation of drug cartel culture
largely stemmed from the ranchero culture seen in Michoacán. Ranchero
culture values the individual as opposed to the society as a whole.
This culture fostered the drug culture of valuing the family that is
formed within the cartel. This ideal allowed for greater organization
within the cartels.
Gangs play a major role in the activity of drug cartels.
MS-13 and the
18th Street gang
are notorious for their contributions and influence over drug
trafficking throughout Latin America. MS-13 has controlled much of the
activity in the drug trade spanning from Mexico to Panama
Female involvement is present in the Mexican drug culture. Although
females are not treated as equals to males, they typically hold more
power than their culture allows and acquire some independence. The
increase in power has attracted females from higher social classes.
Financial gain has also prompted women to become involved in the
illegal drug market. Many women in the lower levels of major drug
cartels belong to a low economic class. Drug trafficking offers women an
accessible way to earn income.
Females from all social classes have become involved in the trade due
to outside pressure from their social and economic environments.
Colombia
Seized drugs in Bogota, Colombia, April 2013
Political ties
It was common for smugglers in Colombia to import liquor, alcohol, cigarettes and textiles, while exporting cocaine. Personnel with knowledge of the terrain were able to supply the local market while also exporting a large amount of product.
The established trade that began in the 1960s involved Peru, Bolivia,
Colombia, Venezuela and Cuba. Peasant farmers produced coca paste in
Peru and Bolivia, while Colombian smugglers would process the coca paste
into cocaine in Colombia, and trafficked product through Cuba.
This trade route established ties between Cuban and Colombian organized
crime. From Cuba, cocaine would be transported to Miami, Florida; and
Union City, New Jersey. Quantities of the drug were then smuggled
throughout the US.
The international drug trade created political ties between the
involved countries, encouraging the governments of the countries
involved to collaborate and instate common policies to eradicate drug
cartels. Cuba stopped being a center for transport of cocaine following
the establishment of a communist government in 1959. As a result, Miami
and Union City became the sole locations for trafficking.
The relations between Cuban and Colombian organized crime remained
strong until the 1970s, when Colombian cartels began to vie for power.
In the 1980s and 90s, Colombia emerged as a key contributor of the drug
trade industry in the Western Hemisphere. While the smuggling of drugs
such as marijuana, poppy, opium and heroin became more ubiquitous during
this time period, the activity of cocaine cartels drove the development
of the Latin American drug trade. The trade emerged as a multinational
effort as supplies (i.e. coca plant substances) were imported from
countries such as Bolivia and Peru, were refined in Colombian cocaine
labs and smuggled through Colombia, and exported to countries such as
the US.
Colombia's economy
Colombia
has had a significant role in the illegal drug trade in Latin America.
While active in the drug trade since the 1930s, Colombia's role in the
drug trade did not truly become dominant until the 1970s.
When Mexico eradicated marijuana plantations, demand stayed the same.
Colombia met much of the demand by growing more marijuana. Grown in the
strategic northeast region of Colombia, marijuana soon became the
leading cash crop in Colombia. This success was short-lived due to anti-marijuana campaigns that were enforced by the US military throughout the Caribbean. Instead, drug traffickers in Colombia continued their focus on the exportation of cocaine.
Having been an export of Colombia since the early 1950s, cocaine
remained popular for a host of reasons. Colombia's location facilitated
its transportation from South America into Central America, and then to
its destination of North America. This continued into the 1990s, when
Colombia remained the chief exporter of cocaine.
The business of drug trafficking can be seen in several stages in
Colombia towards the latter half of the 20th century. Colombia served as
the dominant force in the distribution and sale of cocaine by the
1980s. As drug producers gained more power, they became more centralized
and organized into what became drug cartels.
Cartels controlled the major aspects of each stage in the traffic of
their product. Their organization allowed cocaine to be distributed in
great amounts throughout the United States. By the late 1980s,
intra-industry strife arose within the cartels.
This stage was marked by increased violence as different cartels fought
for control of export markets. Despite this strife, this power struggle
led to then having multiple producers of coca leaf farms. This in turn
caused an improvement in quality control and reduction of police
interdiction in the distribution of cocaine. This also led to cartels attempting to repatriate their earnings which would eventually make up 5.5% of Colombia's GDP.
This drive to repatriate earnings led to the pressure of legitimizing
their wealth, causing an increase in violence throughout Colombia.
Throughout the 1980s, estimates of illegal drug value in Colombia ranged from $2bn to $4bn.
This made up about 7-10% of the $36bn estimated GNP of Colombia during
this decade. In the 1990s, the estimates of the illegal drug value
remained roughly within the same range (~$2.5bn). As the Colombian GNP rose throughout the 90's ($68.5bn in 1994 and $96.3bn in 1997), illegal drug values began to comprise a decreasing fraction of the national economy.
By the early 1990s, although Colombia led in the exportation of cocaine,
it found increasing confrontations within its state. These
confrontations were primarily between cartels and government
institutions. This led to a decrease in the drug trade's contribution to
the GDP of Colombia; dropping from 5.5% to 2.6%.
Though a contributor of wealth, the distribution of cocaine has had
negative effects on the socio-political situation of Colombia and has
weakened its economy as well.
Social impacts
By the 1980s, Colombian cartels became the dominant cocaine distributors in the US. This led to the spread of increased violence throughout both Latin America and Miami.
In the 1980s, two major drug cartels emerged in Colombia: the Medellin
and Cali groups. Throughout the 90's however, several factors led to the
decline of these major cartels and to the rise of smaller Colombian
cartels.
The U.S. demand for cocaine dropped while Colombian production rose,
pressuring traffickers to find new drugs and markets. In this time
period, there was an increase in activity of Caribbean cartels that led
to the rise of an alternate route of smuggling through Mexico. This led
to the increased collaboration between major Colombian and Mexican drug
traffickers. Such drastic changes in the execution of drug trade in
Colombia paired with the political instabilities and rise of drug wars
in Medellin and Cali, gave way for the rise of the smaller Colombian
drug trafficking organizations (and the rise of heroin trade).
As the drug trade's influence over the economy increased, drug lords
and their networks grew in their power and influence in society. The
occurrences in drug-related violence increased during this time period
as drug lords fought to maintain their control in the economy.
Typically a drug cartel had support networks that consisted of a number
of individuals. These people individuals ranged from those directly
involved in the trade (such as suppliers, chemists, transporters,
smugglers, etc.) as well as those involved indirectly in the trade (such
as politicians, bankers, police, etc.). As these smaller Colombian drug
cartels grew in prevalence, several notable aspects of the Colombian
society gave way for further development of the Colombian drug industry.
For example, until the late 1980s, the long-term effects of the drug
industry were not realized by much of society. Additionally, there was a
lack of regulation in prisons where captured traffickers were sent.
These prisons were under-regulated, under-funded, and under-staffed,
which allowed for the formation of prison gangs, for the smuggling of
arms/weapons/etc., for feasible escapes, and even for captured drug
lords to continue running their businesses from prison.
Trade in specific drugs
Cannabis
While the recreational use of (and consequently the distribution of)
cannabis
is illegal in most countries throughout the world, it is available by
prescription or recommendation in many places, including Canada and 10
of the 50 US states (although importation and distribution is still
federally prohibited). Beginning in 2014,
Uruguay became the first country to legalize cultivation, sale, and consumption of cannabis for recreational use for adult residents.
In 2018, Canada became the only second country to legalize use, sale
and cultivation of cannabis. The first few weeks were met with extremely
high demand, most shops being out of stock after operating for only
four days.
Cannabis use is tolerated in some areas, most notably the
Netherlands which has legalized the possession and licensed sale (but
not cultivation) of the drug. Many nations have decriminalized the
possession of small amounts of marijuana. Due to the hardy nature of the
cannabis plant, marijuana is grown all across the world and is today
the world's most popular illegal drug with the highest level of
availability. Cannabis is grown legally in many countries for industrial, non-drug use (known as
hemp) as well. Cannabis-hemp may also be planted for other non-drug domestic purposes, such as seasoning that occurs in
Aceh.
The demand for cannabis around the world, coupled with the drug's
relative ease of cultivation, makes the illicit cannabis trade one of
the primary ways in which organized criminal groups finance many of
their activities. In Mexico, for example, the illicit trafficking of
cannabis is thought to constitute the majority of many of the cartels'
earnings,
and the main way in which the cartels finance many other illegal
activities; including the purchase of other illegal drugs for
trafficking, and for acquiring weapons that are ultimately used to
commit murders (causing a burgeoning in the homicide rates of many areas
of the world, but particularly Latin America).
Some studies show that the increased legalization of cannabis in the United States (beginning in 2012 with
Washington Initiative 502 and
Colorado Amendment 64) has led Mexican cartels to smuggle less cannabis in exchange for more heroin.
Alcohol
Heroin
Up until around 2004 the majority of the world's heroin was produced in an area known as the
Golden Triangle. However, by 2007, 93% of the opiates on the world market originated in
Afghanistan.
This amounted to an export value of about US$64 billion, with a quarter
being earned by opium farmers and the rest going to district officials,
insurgents, warlords and drug traffickers. Another significant area where poppy fields are grown for the manufacture of heroin is Mexico.
According to the
United States Drug Enforcement Administration,
the price of heroin is typically valued 8 to 10 times that of cocaine
on American streets, making it a high-profit substance for smugglers and
dealers.
In Europe (except the transit countries Portugal and the Netherlands),
for example, a purported gram of street heroin, usually consisting of
700–800 mg of a light to dark brown powder containing 5-10% heroin base,
costs €30-70, making the effective value per gram of pure heroin
€300-700. Heroin is generally a preferred product for smuggling and
distribution—over unrefined opium due to the cost-effectiveness and
increased
efficacy of heroin.
Because of the high cost per volume, heroin is easily smuggled. A
US quarter-sized (2.5 cm) cylindrical vial can contain hundreds of
doses. From the 1930s to the early 1970s, the so-called
French Connection supplied the majority of US demand. Allegedly, during the
Vietnam War, drug lords such as
Ike Atkinson used to smuggle hundreds of kilograms of heroin to the US in coffins of dead American soldiers.
Since that time it has become more difficult for drugs to be imported
into the US than it had been in previous decades, but that does not stop
the heroin smugglers from getting their product across US borders.
Purity levels vary greatly by region with Northeastern cities having the
most pure heroin in the United States. On 17 October 2018 police in
Genoa Italy, discovered 270 kg of heroin hidden in a ship coming from the
Iranian southern port of
Bandar Abbas. The ship had already passed and stopped at
Hamburg in
Germany and
Valencia in
Spain.
Penalties for smuggling heroin or morphine are often harsh in most
countries. Some countries will readily hand down a death sentence (e.g.
Singapore) or life in prison for the illegal smuggling of heroin or
morphine, which are both internationally Schedule I drugs under the
Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs.
Methamphetamine
Methamphetamine is another popular drug among distributors. Three common
street names are "crystal meth", "meth", and "ice".
According to the Community Epidemiology Work Group, the number of
clandestine methamphetamine laboratory
incidents reported to the National Clandestine Laboratory Database
decreased from 1999 to 2009. During this period, methamphetamine lab
incidents increased in mid-western States (Illinois, Michigan, Missouri,
and Ohio), and in Pennsylvania. In 2004, more lab incidents were
reported in Missouri (2,788) and Illinois (1,058) than in California
(764). In 2003, methamphetamine lab incidents reached new highs in
Georgia (250), Minnesota (309), and Texas (677). There were only seven
methamphetamine lab incidents reported in Hawaii in 2004, though nearly
59 percent of substance abuse treatment admissions (excluding alcohol)
were for primary methamphetamine abuse during the first six months of
2004. As of 2007, Missouri leads the United States in drug-lab seizures,
with 1,268 incidents reported. Often canine units are used for detecting
rolling meth labs
which can be concealed on large vehicles, or transported on something
as small as a motorcycle. These labs are more difficult to detect than
stationary ones, and can often be obscured among legal cargo in big
trucks.
Methamphetamine is sometimes used intraveneously, placing users and their partners at risk for transmission of
HIV and
hepatitis C.
"Meth" can also be inhaled, most commonly vaporized on aluminum foil or
in a glass pipe. This method is reported to give "an unnatural high"
and a "brief intense rush".
In South Africa methamphetamine is called "tik" or
"tik-tik"."Known locally as "tik," the drug was virtually unknown as
late as 2003. Now, it is the country's main drug of abuse, even when
alcohol is included. " Children as young as eight are abusing the substance, smoking it in crude glass vials made from light bulbs. Since methamphetamine is easy to produce, the substance is manufactured locally in staggering quantities.
The government of
North Korea
currently operates methamphetamine production facilities. There, the
drug is used as medicine because no alternatives are available; it also
is smuggled across the
Chinese border.
The Australian Crime Commission's illicit drug data report for
2011–2012 stated that the average strength of crystal methamphetamine
doubled in most Australian jurisdictions within a 12-month period, and
the majority of domestic laboratory closures involved small
"addict-based" operations.
Temazepam
Temazepam, a strong hypnotic
benzodiazepine, is illicitly manufactured in clandestine laboratories (called
jellie labs) to supply the increasingly high demand for the drug internationally. Many clandestine temazepam labs are in
Eastern Europe. The labs manufacture temazepam by chemically altering diazepam, oxazepam or lorazepam. "Jellie labs" have been identified and shut down in Russia, the Ukraine, Czech Republic, Latvia and Belarus.
Cocaine
Cocaine is a highly prominent drug among many drug dealers and
manufacturers. The cocaine black market distribution industry is worth
more than 85 billion dollars. It has been a heavily fought over and
massively produced. Around 1.1 million kilograms of cocaine were made in
2009 and it is believed to have been consumed by around 17 million
people worldwide. This drug's mass trade is believed to have been
possible by notorious drug dealing kingpin
Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán who ran the
Sinaloa Cartel.
.jpg)
