Audism is a set of beliefs that include: hearing people are
superior to Deaf people; Deaf people should be pitied for having futile
and miserable lives; Deaf people should become like hearing people as
far as possible; and shunning of sign languages. Tom L. Humphries coined the term in his doctoral dissertation in 1975, but it did not start to catch on until Harlan Lane
used it in his own writings. Humphries originally applied audism to
individual attitudes and practices; whereas Lane broadened the term to
include oppression of deaf people.
Types of audism
Linguistic
audism can occur by banning use of sign languages. Many schools
throughout the world engaged in such prohibition and many continue to do
so. Audism may also be found in deaf education and in other corporate
institutions and groups that deal with deafness. In these cases, it is
believed
that the educators, administrators, and professionals within these
organizations behave in a way that is meant to dominate or marginalize
the Deaf community.
Dysconscious audism favors what is normal for hearing people.
This limits Deaf culture and pride, by creating an environment in which
deaf people must conform to the ways of hearing people. It greatly
impacts Deaf education in terms of shunning sign languages in favor of
communication that is based on spoken languages, and more acceptable to
hearing people.
Additionally, deaf people can practice forms of discrimination
against members of their own community, based on what they believe is
acceptable behavior, use of language, or social association. Dr. Genie
Gertz explored examples of such audism in American society in her
published dissertation. Audism can also occur between groups of deaf people, with some who choose not to use a sign language and not to identify with Deaf culture
considering themselves to be superior to those who do, or members of
the Deaf community asserting superiority over deaf people who use
listening and spoken language to communicate.
Active audism is when a person knowingly engages in audist
behavior. The person knows the effects of audism, yet still engages in
this behavior and has an audist attitude. Passive audism is when a
person is engaging in audist behavior, yet does not have knowledge about
the Deaf community's values. Passive audists do not think about how
their actions or words concern deaf individuals, hearing individuals, or
sign language. Passive audists act due to their lack of knowledge of
the Deaf community and its culture.
Ben Bahan describes audism in two forms: overt and covert audism.
Overt audism is a term used to define Deaf people and their culture as
inferior to hearing culture. In the medical field, this idea can
manifest by looking at deafness as something to be fixed, but can also
be applied to practices such as audiology, speech therapy, medicine
psychology, social work and other fields. This does not mean that all
institutions inherently practice audism but that they are revert to
audiological tendencies. These two forms illustrate the exclusion of
Deaf people from specific institutions or practices. Bahan notes
inventions such as telephones, radios, or a lunch bell can be considered
audist because they are sound-based technologies.
History
The
principles and ideas behind audism have been experienced by the Deaf
community for many centuries, but the term "audism" was first coined in
1975 by Deaf scholar Tom Humphries in his unpublished essay. Humphries
originally defined audism as, "the notion that one is superior based on
one's ability to hear or behave in the manner of one who hears". Since then, other scholars, such as Harlan Lane in his book, Mask of Benevolence,
have attempted to further expand on Humphries' definition to include
different levels of audism: individual, institutional, metaphysical, and
laissez-faire.
As Humphries' definition stands, it only incorporates individual
audism, which includes Deaf jokes, hate crimes, and low classroom
expectations of Deaf people.
The idea that there is systemic, or institutional, audism within society was originally proposed in Harlan Lane's Mask of Benevolence, as an extension of David T. Wellman's concept of institutional racism. It was further expanded by H-Dirksen Bauman, in Audism: Exploring the Metaphysics of Oppression, and again, by Richard Eckert and Amy Rowley, in Audism: A Theory and Practice of Audiocentric Privilege,
and institutional audism is now described as, "a structural system of
exploitative advantage that focuses on and perpetuates the subordination
of Deaf Communities of origin, language, and culture".
Despite scholars' best efforts to incorporate all aspects of
audism, still, there is another important facet of audism. Scholars have
noted that deaf people who used their voice had more societal rights
than those deaf people who did not have the ability to speak. In attempt
to quantify this relationship, Bauman extended the concept of
phonocentrism proposed by Jacques Derrida, "the supremacy of speech and
repression of nonphonetic forms of communication", and developed the
term, metaphysical audism. Metaphysical audism refers to the idea of
language being a distinguishing factor in what makes us human; however,
with metaphysical audism, language becomes confused with speech, and in
turn, speech becomes linked to being human.
Origins of audism
The
seeds of audism were reflected in the lack of early documentation and a
misunderstanding of deaf people and their language. Limited evidence
can be provided about the treatment of deaf individuals by ancient
civilizations. However, the documentation that is provided shows a
resistance towards deaf people as a functioning part of society.
Aristotle's Poetics alluded that those labeled as "disabled" would be
put to death for the benefit of the rest of society. During the time of
the Renaissance, efforts to educate deaf individuals posed complications
due to the lack of literacy from the vast majority of society, deaf and
hearing alike. In New England during the pilgrimage to America, any
variant from the category of the norm was grounds for witchcraft or
sorcery.
Richard Eckert coined the term laissez-faire audism to
indicate the modern state of acknowledging members the Deaf community's
humanity, but denying their independence, for example through pediatric
cochlear implantation.
Audism in the educational system
Audiological ideologies have shaped curriculum within Deaf Education. Because Deaf people make up 1% of the American population,
teachers are less equipped to work with the needs of Deaf or hard of
hearing students. In the USA, the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA) and the Education for all Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA)
allow deaf children to more easily participate in mainstream public
education if their families so choose. These acts provide education
policies that reinforced integration of deaf individuals into hearing
society. Signed languages were generally replaced with Manually Coded
English as a method of communication and Deaf/Hard of Hearing students
were placed with hearing students in hopes that this would further
speech development.
Institutions such as the National Association of the Deaf
(NAD) continue to work with U.S. Officials to improve these policies,
claiming these educational practices were audist and create precedence
of one language over another by implementing English as the primary
language for instruction.
Audism in the legal system
Lack
of access to communication in trials of deaf individuals has resulted
in mistrials attributed to factors including interpreter and CART
provider error and unqualified interpretation, all contributing to an
overall lack of understanding or misunderstanding by the judge and
members of the jury. These factors have also led to unlawful sentences
in some criminal cases. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
requires Deaf individuals be given equal access in the courtroom through
a qualified interpreter. The law establishes stricter guidelines for
interpreting licensure, aiming to reduce the number of errors in the
courtroom.
Conversely, a deaf man convicted of rape in Norway successfully
appealed for a shorter sentence by arguing his deafness constituted a
mitigating circumstance, reducing his degree of culpability for the
crime. The court's decision angered the Norwegian Deaf community, which
perceived the rationale behind the reduced sentence as patronizing,
ignoring the capacity of deaf individuals to reason and thus to be held
fully accountable and to receive the same sentences as other, hearing,
Norwegian citizens.
Domestic crimes committed among and against deaf individuals tend
to have a lower investigation rate than domestic crime between hearing
individuals. A study shows that deaf women have a higher rate of abuse
than hearing women, although the disparity has attracted little
attention for further research.
Among deaf individuals incarcerated in Texas in 2004, 20% were
judged "linguistically incompetent", unable to either understand the
charges they faced or to meaningfully participate in the creation of
their defense, while another 30% were "adjudicatively incompetent,
unable to understand the legal proceedings without targeted
instructional intervention. These statuses were the results of either
lack of fluency in any language or functional illiteracy, respectively.
As a result, it is unlikely that these deaf inmates had received their
constitutional right to due process of law. However, all deaf inmates
studied had nevertheless been convicted and incarcerated, possible
violations of their constitutional rights. Notably, deaf individuals who
were either ASL-dominant bilinguals equally comfortable in both ASL and
English were the least likely to fall into either category and
therefore the most likely to have received due process.
Audism in linguistics
Audism can be closely linked to the term linguicism,
or ideologies that pertain to the way in which an institution is
facilitated and regulated in favor of a dominant culture through the
basis of language. Linguicism highlights spoken language to be a part of
the dominant culture and signed languages to be of the minority
culture, expanding that those who use spoken language are provided with
more accessible economic, social and political resources which give them
an advantage over those who use signed languages.
Audism is linked to phonocentric values in defining linguistics.
Linguistic terminology has been determined by sound based methodologies,
for instance the concept of linearity in spoken languages fails to
recognize the grammatical structures of visual-manual-kinesthetic based
languages. Additionally, early twentieth century linguists determined
those without sound-based languages did not possess any capacity for
language while others romanticized sign languages or believed them to be
primitive. However, additional linguists argue this claim minimizes the
advances in Deaf Studies and the recognition of signed languages as a part of the linguistic lexicon.
For centuries, there has been controversy over whether linguistic
theory pertains to signed languages. It was not until William Stokoe
contested this argument and found structural evidence that linked ASL to
linguistic rules that ASL was finally recognized as a language. These
claims, however, are still contested by some lawmakers and educators due
to the inability to recognize the rules of visual-modal languages and
misconceptions of their origins outside of sound-based languages.
Additional resources pertaining to audism
Personal accounts of audism have been documented from documentaries such as Audism Unveiled,
a movie that discusses the oppression of deaf people and their personal
struggles with audism. Other accounts can be seen through the research
of academics such as Peter Hauser whose TedTalk illustrated the
detriments audism has on the identity. His studied illustrated a
connection between the lack of exposure to Deaf culture and a deaf
person's self esteem.
Controversy
Activists
in the Deaf community claim that audists harm Deaf culture by
considering deafness a disability, rather than as a cultural difference. Some Deaf activists call cochlear implants the audists' tool of cultural genocide that is wiping out the Deaf community.
As many as 95% of deaf children in the US are born to hearing parents,
and research shows that deaf children who listen and speak to
communicate, but do not use sign language have better communication
outcomes and social well-being than Deaf children who use sign language.
Advocates for audist ideology
Alexander Graham Bell – inventor of the telephone. An avid supporter of eugenics, he published the essay Memoir Upon the Formation of a Deaf Variety of the Human Race
which condemned intermarriage between Deaf individuals. He championed
the oralist movement, his associated endeavors including pushing for the
removal of sign language from Deaf schools to be replaced with his own
alphabet called "Visible Speech", and striving to cure deafness.
Horace Mann
founded the first school for the Deaf in Connecticut but whose policies
educational reform that pushed the oralist methods, such as a focus on
lipreading and articulation in the education of deaf children.
Garrick Mallery
studied Indian culture and sign language for the Bureau of Ethnology in
the Smithsonian Institution. Although he recognized the validity of
modal languages, he argued that signed languages were inferior to oral
languages on the basis that they could not be written down.