Parties to the convention
Signed, but not ratified
Non-signatory
| |
| Signed | 30 November 1989 |
|---|---|
| Location | New York City |
| Effective | 2 September 1990 |
| Condition | 20 ratifications |
| Signatories | 140 |
| Parties | 196 (all eligible states except the United States) |
| Depositary | UN Secretary-General |
| Languages | Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, Spanish |
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (commonly abbreviated as the CRC or UNCRC) is a human rights treaty which sets out the civil, political, economic, social, health and cultural rights of children. The Convention defines a child as any human being under the age of eighteen, unless the age of majority is attained earlier under national legislation.
Nations that ratify this convention are bound to it by international law. Compliance is monitored by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, which is composed of members from countries around the world. Once a year, the Committee submits a report to the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly, which also hears a statement from the CRC Chair, and the Assembly adopts a Resolution on the Rights of the Child.
Governments of countries that have ratified the Convention are required to report to, and appear before, the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child periodically to be examined on their progress with regards to the advancement of the implementation of the Convention and the status of child rights in their country. Their reports and the committee's written views and concerns are available on the committee's website.
The UN General Assembly adopted the Convention and opened it for signature on 20 November 1989 (the 30th anniversary of its Declaration of the Rights of the Child). It came into force on 2 September 1990, after it was ratified by the required number of nations. Currently, 196 countries are party to it, including every member of the United Nations except the United States.
Two optional protocols were adopted on 25 May 2000. The First Optional Protocol restricts the involvement of children in military conflicts, and the Second Optional Protocol prohibits the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. Both protocols have been ratified by more than 170 states.
A third optional protocol relating to communication of complaints was adopted in December 2011 and opened for signature on 28 February 2012. It came into effect on 14 April 2014.
Contents
The
Convention deals with the child-specific needs and rights. It requires
that the "nations that ratify this convention are bound to it by
international law". Ratifying states must act in the best interests of the child.
In all jurisdictions implementing the Convention requires compliance with child custody and guardianship laws as that every child has basic rights, including the right to life, to their own name and identity, to be raised by their parents within a family or cultural grouping, and to have a relationship with both parents, even if they are separated.
The Convention obliges states to allow parents to exercise their
parental responsibilities. The Convention also acknowledges that
children have the right to express their opinions and to have those
opinions heard and acted upon when appropriate, to be protected from
abuse or exploitation, and to have their privacy protected, and it requires that their lives not be subject to excessive interference.
The Convention also obliges signatory states to provide separate
legal representation for a child in any judicial dispute concerning
their care and asks that the child's viewpoint be heard in such cases.
The Convention forbids capital punishment
for children. In its General Comment 8 (2006) the Committee on the
Rights of the Child stated that there was an "obligation of all state
parties to move quickly to prohibit and eliminate all corporal
punishment and all other cruel or degrading forms of punishment of
children".
Article 19 of the Convention states that state parties must "take all
appropriate legislative, administrative, social and educational measures
to protect the child from all forms of physical or mental violence", but it makes no reference to corporal punishment.
The Committee's interpretation of this section to encompass a
prohibition on corporal punishment has been rejected by several state
parties to the Convention, including Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom.
The European Court of Human Rights has referred to the Convention when interpreting the European Convention on Human Rights.
Global standards and cultural relativism
Global human rights standards were challenged at the World Conference on Human Rights
in Vienna (1993) when a number of governments (prominently China,
Indonesia, Malaysia and Iran) raised serious objections to the idea of universal human rights.
There are unresolved tensions between "universalistic" and
"relativistic" approaches in the establishment of standards and
strategies designed to prevent or overcome the abuse of children's
capacity to work.
Child marriage and slavery
Some scholars link slavery and slavery-like practices for many child marriages. Child marriage as slavery is not directly addressed by the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
States party and signatories
Currently
196 countries are parties to the treaty (some with stated reservations
or interpretations). This includes every member of the United Nations
(except the United States), plus the Cook Islands, Niue, the State of Palestine, and the Holy See. The United States has not ratified it. South Sudan did not sign the convention, however ratification was complete in January 2015. Somalia's domestic ratification finished in January 2015 and the instrument was deposited with the United Nations in October 2015.
All successor states of Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia (Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Croatia, Czech Republic, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia,
Slovenia, and Slovakia) made declarations of succession to the treaty
and currently apply it.
The convention does not apply in the territories of Akrotiri and Dhekelia, Gibraltar, Guernsey and Tokelau.
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan ratified Convention on the Rights of the Child on 21 July 1992.
In terms of the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the
Child, a significant number of laws, decrees and resolutions were
approved in Azerbaijan by the President and the Cabinet of Ministers
focusing on the development of the child welfare system.
In this regard, the Convention №182 on "Elimination of the worst forms
of child labour" and Recommendation №190 of the International Labour
Organization and the Hague Convention on International adoption of
children were ratified by Milli Majlis in 2004.
There is a concern over the administration of juvenile justice in
Azerbaijan, mostly regarding compliance with articles 37, 39 and 40 of
the Convention on the Rights of the Child, as well as other relevant
standards such as the Beijing Rules, the Riyadh Guidelines and the
United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their
Liberty. Therefore, international organizations assisted Azerbaijan to improve the situation in the field of juvenile justice. Juvenile offenders have been added to the Presidential pardons on a regular basis.
Azerbaijan has built cooperation with many international
organizations, in particular with UNICEF in the field of child
protection. In 1993, UNICEF began its activity in Azerbaijan. In 2005,
Azerbaijan and UNICEF signed a 5-year country program. The country
program for 2005-2009 was implemented in the field of child protection,
children's health and nutrition, children's education and youth health,
their development and participation. In addition, UNICEF supports
Azerbaijan in developing juvenile justice system, establishing
alternative care system and raising awareness among youth about
HIV/AIDS.
Canada
Canada became a signatory to the Convention on 28 May 1990 and ratified in 1991. Youth criminal laws in Canada underwent major changes resulting in the Youth Criminal Justice Act
(YCJA) which went into effect on 1 April 2003. The Act specifically
refers to Canada's different commitments under the Convention. The
convention was influential in the administrative Law decision of Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration).
India
India
ratified UNCRC on 11 December 1992, agreeing in principles all articles
except with certain reservations on issues relating to child labor.
In India there is law that children under the age of 18 should not
work, but there is no outright ban on child labor, and the practice is
generally permitted in most industries except those deemed "hazardous".
Although a law in October 2006 banned child labor in hotels,
restaurants, and as domestic servants, there continues to be high demand
for children as hired help in the home. Current estimates as to the
number of child laborers in the country range from the government's
conservative estimate of 4 million children under 14 years of age.
In 2016, the Child and Adolescent Labour (Amendment) Act was
introduced, which prohibited economic employment of children under the
age of 14 years, and prohibited employment of adolescent (14-17 years of
age) in hazardous occupations. Few exceptions exist in case of children
under 14 years - they can aid in the family enterprise, and participate
in the entertainment industry, provided that it doesn't harm their
school education, and is not in between 7 pm to 8 am.
Iran
Iran has adhered to the convention (except for alleged child slavery) since 1991 and ratified it in the Parliament
in 1994. Upon ratification, Iran made the following reservation: "If
the text of the Convention is or becomes incompatible with the domestic
laws and Islamic standards at any time or in any case, the Government of
the Islamic Republic shall not abide by it."
Iran has also signed both optional protocols which relate to the
special protection of children against involvement in armed conflict and
the sale of children and sexual exploitation.
Although Iran is a state party to the Convention, international human rights organisations and foreign governments
routinely denounced executions of Iranian child offenders as a
violation of the treaty. But on 10 February 2012, Iran's parliament
changed the controversial law of executing juveniles. In the new law,
the age of 18 (solar year) would be considered the minimum age for
adulthood and offenders under this age will be sentenced under a
separate law.
Based on the previous Islamic law, which was revised, girls at the age
of 9 and boys at 15 (lunar year, 11 days shorter than a solar year)
were fully responsible for their crimes.
"According to Islamic sources, the criterion for criminal
responsibility is reaching the age of maturity which, according to the
Shi'ite School of the IRI, is 9 lunar years (8 years and 9 months) for
girls and 15 lunar years (14 years and 7 months) for boys."
Ireland
Ireland
signed the Convention on the Rights of the Child on 30 September 1990
and ratified it, without reservation, on 28 September 1992.
In response to criticisms expressed in the 1998 review by the UN
Committee on the Rights of the Child in Geneva, the Irish government
established the office of Ombudsman for Children and drew up a national
children's strategy. In 2006, following concerns expressed by the
committee that the wording of the Irish Constitution does not allow the
State to intervene in cases of abuse other than in very exceptional
cases, the Irish government undertook to amend the constitution to make a
more explicit commitment to children's rights.
Israel
Israel
ratified the Convention in 1991. In 2010, UNICEF criticized Israel for
its failure to create a government-appointed commission on children's
rights or to adopt a national children's rights strategy or program in
order to implement various Israeli laws addressing children's rights.
The report criticizes Israel for holding that the Convention does not
apply in the West Bank and for defining as Palestinians under the age of
16 in the occupied territories as children, even though Israeli law
defines a child as being under 18, in line with the Convention. A
contemporaneous report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
found that Israel's investment in children is below the international
average and the actual investment had fallen between 1995 and 2006. In 2012, the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child criticized Israel for its bombing attacks on Palestinians in the Gaza Strip,
stating, "Destruction of homes and damage to schools, streets and other
public facilities gravely affect children" and called them "gross
violations of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, its Optional
Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict and
international humanitarian law". It also criticized Palestinian rocket
attacks from Gaza on southern Israel which traumatized Israeli children,
calling on all parties to protect children.
New Zealand
New
Zealand ratified the Convention on 6 April 1993 with reservations
concerning the right to distinguish between persons according to the
nature of their authority to be in New Zealand, the need for legislative
action on economic exploitation—which it argued was adequately
protected by existing law, and the provisions for the separation of
juvenile offenders from adult offenders.
In 1994, the Court of Appeal of New Zealand
dismissed the suggestion that the Minister for Immigration and his
department were at liberty to ignore the convention, arguing that this
would imply that the country's adherence was "at least partly
window-dressing".
The Children's Commissioner Act 2003 enhanced the office of Children's Commissioner, giving it significantly stronger investigative powers.
The Office of the Children's Commissioner is responsible for convening
the UNCROC Monitoring Group, which monitors the New Zealand Government's
implementation of the Children's Convention, it's Optional Protocols
and the Government's response to recommendations from the United Nations
Committee on the Rights of the Child. The monitoring group comprises
members from the Human Rights Commission (New Zealand), UNICEF New Zealand, Action for Children and Youth Aotearoa and Save the Children New Zealand.
In May 2007, New Zealand passed the Crimes (Substituted Section 59) Amendment Act 2007,
which removed the defence of "reasonable force" for the purpose of
correction. In its third and final vote, Parliament voted 113 to eight
in favour of the legislation.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi
Arabia ratified the Convention in 1996, with a reservation "with
respect to all such articles as are in conflict with the provisions of
Islamic law"
which is the national law. The Committee on the Rights of the Child,
which reviewed Saudi Arabia's treatment of children under the Convention
in January 2005, strongly condemned the government for its practice of
imposing the death penalty on juveniles, calling it "a serious violation
of the fundamental rights". The committee said it was "deeply alarmed"
over the discretionary power judges hold to treat juveniles as adults:
In its 2004 report the Saudi Arabian government had stated that it
"never imposes capital punishment on persons ... below the age of 18".
The government delegation later acknowledged that a judge could impose
the death penalty whenever he decided that the convicted person had
reached his or her majority, regardless of the person's actual age at
the time of the crime or at the time of the scheduled execution.
United Kingdom
The United Kingdom ratified the Convention on 16 December 1991, with several declarations and reservations,
and made its first report to the Committee on the Rights of the Child
in January 1995. Concerns raised by the Committee included the growth in
child poverty and inequality, the extent of violence towards children,
the use of custody for young offenders, the low age of criminal
responsibility, and the lack of opportunities for children and young
people to express views.
The 2002 report of the Committee expressed similar concerns, including
the welfare of children in custody, unequal treatment of asylum seekers,
and the negative impact of poverty on children's rights. In September
2008, the UK government decided to withdraw its reservations and agree
to the Convention in these respects.
The 2002 report's criticism of the legal defence of "reasonable
chastisement" of children by parents, which the Committee described as
"a serious violation of the dignity of the child",
was rejected by the UK Government. The Minister for Children, Young
People and Families commented that while fewer parents are using
smacking as a form of discipline, the majority said they would not
support a ban.
In evidence to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights,
the Committee was criticised by the Family Education Trust for
"adopting radical interpretations of the UN Convention on the Rights of
the Child in its pursuit of an agenda".
The Joint Committee's report recommended that "the time has come for
the Government to act upon the recommendations of the UN Committee on
the Rights of the Child concerning the corporal punishment of children
and the incompatibility of the defence of reasonable chastisement with
its obligations under the Convention." The UK Government responded that "the use of physical punishment is a matter for individual parents to decide".
Although child slavery is difficult to gauge within the UK, child slaves are imported into the UK and sold.
United States
The United States government played an active role in the drafting of
the Convention and signed it on 16 February 1995, but has not ratified
it. It has been claimed that American opposition to the Convention stems
primarily from political and religious conservatives. For example, The Heritage Foundation
sees "a civil society in which moral authority is exercised by
religious congregations, family, and other private associations is
fundamental to the American order". and the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) argues that the CRC threatens homeschooling.
The United States had in the past permitted the execution and life imprisonment of juvenile offenders, in contravention of the Article 37 of the Convention. The 2005 Supreme Court landmark decision in Roper v. Simmons declared juvenile executions to be unconstitutional as "cruel and unusual punishment"; in 2012, the Court held that mandatory sentences of life without the possibility of parole are unconstitutional for juvenile offenders.
State laws regarding the practice of closed adoption may also require overhaul in light of the Convention's position that children have a right to identity from birth.
During his 2008 campaign for President, Senator Barack Obama described the failure to ratify the Convention as "embarrassing" and promised to review the issue but he never did. No President of the United States has submitted the treaty to the United States Senate requesting its advice and consent to ratification since the US signed it in 1995.
The United States has ratified two of the optional protocols to the Convention,
the Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict,
and the Optional Protocol on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution
and Child Pornography.
Optional protocols
Two optional protocols were adopted by the UN General Assembly. The first, the Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict
requires parties to ensure that children under the age of 18 are not
recruited compulsorily into their armed forces, and calls on governments
to do everything feasible to ensure that members of their armed forces
who are under 18 years do not take part in hostilities. This protocol entered into force on 12 July 2002. As of 20 January 2020, 170 states are party to the protocol and another 10 states have signed but not ratified it.
The second, the Optional Protocol on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography, requires parties to prohibit the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. It entered into force on 18 January 2002. As of 20 January 2020, 176 states are party to the protocol and another 7 states have signed but not ratified it.
A third, the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communications Procedure,
which would allow children or their representatives to file individual
complaints for violation of the rights of children, was adopted in
December 2011
and opened for signature on 28 February 2012. The protocol currently
has 51 signatures and 46 ratifications: it entered into force on 14
April 2014 following the tenth ratification three months beforehand
