From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/None_of_the_above
"None of the above", or NOTA for short, also known as "against all" or a "scratch" vote, is a ballot option in some jurisdictions or organizations, designed to allow the voter to indicate disapproval of the candidates in a voting system. It is based on the principle that consent requires the ability to withhold consent in an election, just as they can by voting "No" on ballot questions.
Entities that include "None of the Above" on ballots as standard procedure include India ("None of the above"), Greece (λευκό, white), the U.S. state of Nevada (None of These Candidates), Ukraine (Проти всіх, "against all"), Belarus, Spain (voto en blanco, "white vote"), North Korea and Colombia (voto en blanco). Russia had such an option on its ballots (Против всех, "against all") until it was abolished in 2006. Bangladesh introduced this option ("না ভোট" , "No Vote") in 2008. Pakistan introduced this option on ballot papers for the 2013 Pakistan elections, but the Election Commission of Pakistan later rejected it. Beginning with the 2016 presidential election, Bulgaria introduced a 'none of the above' option, which received 5.59% of the vote in the first round and 4.47% in the run-off.
When "None of the Above" is listed on a ballot, there is the possibility of NOTA receiving a majority or plurality
of the vote, and so "winning" the election. In such a case, a variety
of formal procedures may be invoked, including having the office remain
vacant, having the office filled by appointment, re-opening nominations or holding another election (in a body operating under parliamentary procedure), or it may have no effect, as in India and the US state of Nevada, where the next highest total wins regardless.
Soviet Union
In the 1990 elections that led to the break-up of the Soviet Union, the Soviet version of "none of above" led to new elections with new candidates in 200 races of the 1,500-seat Congress of People's Deputies. More than 100 incumbents representing the Communist Party of the Soviet Union were defeated in the run-off, leading to Boris Yeltsin
to later say the "none of the above" option "helped convince the people
they had real power even in a rigged election, and [it] played a role
in building true democracy."
Spain
Blank ballot
Due to the Spanish voting regulations (legislación electoral española), (in Spanish) the blank ballot is recognized as 'none of the above' (voto en blanco)
but has very little chance to influence the distribution of seats
within a democratic election. It is mostly considered as a statistical
indicator of candidatures' disapproval. The blank ballots only increase
the amount of valid votes, raising the threshold of votes (3% and 5%
depending on the election) which every political party has to overcome
to be fully considered. The parties over the threshold get their seats
according to the D'Hondt method.
Blank seats (Escaños en blanco)
Since 1999, several political parties
have arisen in order to make visible the 'none of the above' option in
the parliaments and force empty seats. "Blank Seats" ran for the
Congress and Senate elections of 20 November 2011. Its programme is to
leave empty the corresponding assigned seats by not taking full
possession of their duties as congressperson, senator, etc. According to
law, the seat remains assigned to the elected candidate until the
possession act takes place, the elected candidate explicitly refuses or
new elections are called. In this way, the political party and its
candidates stay free from obligations and are not entitled to receive
any money from the public funding scheme for politics.
By voting such option at the local elections in May 2011, the
citizens of the villages of Gironella (Barcelona) and Foixà (Girona)
were able to reduce the number of politicians in their councils by one
and two respectively.
Overall, citizenship supported Blank Seats at different municipalities,
including Barcelona, with 15,582 votes (averaging 1.71% of valid
votes).
The Ciudadanos En Blanco
(Citizens for Blank Votes) party aims to give blank ballots the meaning
of representing empty seats if the votes indicate so as for any other
party, disbanding the party when such law would be approved.
United States
The origins of the ballot option "None of the Above" in the United States can be traced to when the State of Nevada adopted "None of These Candidates" as a ballot option in 1976.
In 1998 in California, citizen proponents of Proposition 23, titled the
"None of the Above Act", qualified a new State ballot initiative through
circulated petitions submitted to the Secretary of State, but the measure was defeated in the March 2000 general election 64% to 36%.
Were it to be passed by the voters, it was meant to require this new
ballot option for all state and federal elective offices, exempting only
local judicial races; in determining official election results, the
"none of the above" voter tally would be discarded in favor of the
candidate with the greatest number of votes.
No similar options were known to have been permitted, much less
approved, on any other state levels, least of all the federal level, as
of the middle of August 2016.
India
Symbol used with NOTA option on ballot papers and electronic voting machines in India
The Election Commission of India told the Supreme Court in 2009 that it wished to offer the voter a "none of the above" option on ballots, which the government had generally opposed. The People's Union for Civil Liberties, a non-governmental organisation, filed a public-interest litigation statement in support of this.
On 27 September 2013, the Supreme Court of India
ruled that the right to register a "none of the above" vote in
elections should apply, and ordered the Election Commission to provide
such a button in the electronic voting machines, noting that it would increase participation.
The Election Commission also clarified that even though votes
cast as NOTA are counted, they are considered as invalid votes so they
will not change the outcome of the election process. They are not taken
into account for calculating the total valid votes and will not be
considered for determining the forfeiture of deposit.
In the 2014 general election, NOTA polled 1.1% of the votes, counting to over 6,000,000.
The specific symbol for NOTA, a ballot paper with a black cross
across it, was introduced on 18 September 2015. The symbol is designed
by National Institute of Design, Ahmedabad.
Indonesia
A sample ballot for the uncontested 2018 mayoral elections in
Tangerang.
The Indonesian Law 10 of 2016 regulates local elections, and includes
provisions for elections in which there is only one candidate. In such
cases, the candidate contests the election against a NOTA option
(commonly referred to as kotak kosong/empty box), and is declared
the winner if they manage to secure a majority of the valid votes.
Otherwise, the election will be postponed to the next occurrence; the
government of Indonesia appoints an acting office holder until the new
election, in which the losing candidate is eligible to stand again.
There were 3 uncontested seats in the 2015 local elections, nine in the 2017 local elections, and at least 13 in the 2018 local elections (including the mayoral elections for Tangerang and Makassar). In the 2018 election for mayor of Makassar, the NOTA option received over 300,000 votes, 35,000 more than the sole candidate, forcing a repeat election in 2020.
United Kingdom
UK
electoral counting procedures require that all votes be counted and
announced, including 'rejected' votes. 'Rejected votes' are classified
into four categories, protest votes are recorded with others rejected as 'voter's intention uncertain'.
NOTA UK
NOTA UK
is a voluntary organisation set up in 2010 to campaign for a formal
None Of The Above (NOTA) option to be added to ballot papers for all
future UK elections. It has made numerous written evidence submissions to the parliamentary Political & Constitutional Reform Committee (PCRC)
making the case for NOTA 'with teeth' i.e.: formalised consequences for
the election result in the event of a NOTA 'win' (as opposed to 'faux'
NOTA, whereby the next placed candidate takes office anyway as happens
in India and elsewhere). As a result of these representations, the PCRC
explicitly recommended in its final report on 'voter engagement',
published February 2015,
that the next UK government should hold a public consultation before
May 2016 solely on inclusion of NOTA on UK ballot papers. This in turn
has led to increased support for and awareness of NOTA UK's campaign and
its founder, recording artist and music producer Jamie Stanley (aka: Mailman), being asked to give a number of media interviews.
No public consultation materialised as the incoming Conservative
government scrapped the PCRC, effectively disregarding all of its
recommendations.
Since 2015, in part thanks to NOTA UK's lobbying, it has been a Green Party of England and Wales policy to get a form of NOTA (RON - Re-Open Nominations) on UK ballot papers.
In the run-up to the 2017 UK general election, NOTA UK wrote to the
Green party suggesting that they should reword the policy so that,
instead of RON, it refers specifically to the more self-explanatory
NOTA, and that they should also place the policy centre stage in their
next manifesto.
Above and Beyond
The Above and Beyond Party was founded in 2015 and fielded eight candidates in the 2015 general election, none of whom were elected. Their sole stated policy was to introduce a "none of the above" option on all UK ballot papers. The party's logo is based on the West African Adinkra symbol "Aya", "derived from a fern tree which famously grows in difficult-to-survive places", and a symbol of resilience.
Critics pointed out that their website and Facebook page at the time
indicated that they had policy ideas and a political agenda beyond the
single issue of NOTA and appeared to be jumping on the bandwagon of
other NOTA campaigns.
Inception and officers
The party registered with the Electoral Commission
on 18 March 2015. The Electoral Commission listed the party leader,
nominating officer and campaigns officer as Mark Flanagan and the
treasurer was Karen Stanley. The party chairman was Michael Ross. The party was de-registered by the Electoral Commission on 3 November 2016.
Electoral history
Above and Beyond fielded four candidates in the 2015 general election. The candidates stood in Clwyd West, Cheadle, Sheffield Central and Leeds North West. In Sheffield Hallam the party endorsed Carlton Reeve, an independent candidate. No Above and Beyond candidate received 5% or more of the votes cast, therefore all lost their deposit.
Finance
The party raised funds partially through "AboveBeyond" music nights.
No Candidate Deserves My Vote! party
No Candidate Deserves My Vote! was registered as a political party with the UK Electoral Commission on 23 November 2000.
The No Candidate Deserves My Vote party's single objective is to
introduce a bill to Parliament to have a "none of the above" option
added to every local and general election ballot paper of the future.
They feel this will allow the UK electorate to exercise their democratic
right to vote to say that none of the parties currently represents
them, which will encourage their democratic responsibility to turn out
to vote. If a candidate wins an election it is the intention to stay as a
Member of Parliament until the change in the law is enacted. Only then will the candidate step down and the party be disbanded.
It is the intention of the party that, if a NOTA gains the majority vote, it should cause an automatic by-election, the idea being that the majority will have given a Vote of No Confidence
in the candidates. If the same candidates stand under the same
policies, then the electorate simply votes NOTA until the candidates
change their policies to something that the electorate can vote for.
In 2010, Stephen Phillips of Stevenage ran for the UK general election on behalf of No Candidate Deserves My Vote. Phillips received 327 votes, or 0.7% of the vote, placing 7th out of 9 candidates.
NOTA party
The
NOTA Party, in recent years also known as Notavote, was registered as a
political party with the UK Electoral Commission on 2 March 2009.
It was the intention of the NOTA party to field candidates in every UK
parliamentary constituency. The respective NOTA candidates would not
have continued in office had they received the most votes, this was
merely a mechanism to simulate the recording of a formal NOTA vote. The
party was registered as 'NOTA' and not 'None of the Above' as the latter
is a prohibited expression regarding registration as a party name. A subsequent attempt to re-register the NOTA party in 2014 was blocked by the Electoral Commission
on the grounds that the acronym 'NOTA' is as good as the phrase 'None
of the Above', the logic being that it would confuse voters into
thinking it is possible to cast a formal vote for 'None of the Above'
when they would in fact just be voting for another party, albeit one
standing on a single issue NOTA platform.
Zero, None Of the Above
None Of The Above Zero was a candidate at the 2010 general election in Filton and Bradley Stoke.
Previously known as Eric Mutch, he changed his name by deed poll to
stand under that name. As candidates are listed by surname first he
appeared on the ballot paper as "Zero, None Of The Above", in effect giving voters a none of the above option since had he been elected he would have resigned immediately. He came last with 172 votes.
Others
In the British parliamentary elections of 2010, a former boxer changed his name by deed poll from Terry Marsh to "None Of The Above X", in order to run as a parliamentary candidate under that name in the constituency of South Basildon and East Thurrock.
Claiming that he will not take the seat if he wins, he told BBC Essex:
"I don't take it for one moment that it would be a vote for me. [..] I'm
doing what I think the Electoral Commission should be doing and what
should be on every ballot paper in any electoral process." BBC News
reported that, while the Registration of Political Parties (Prohibited
Words and Expressions) (Amendment) Order 2005 stipulates that no
political party can be registered in the UK under the name "None of the
Above", there is no legislation against a person changing their name by
deed poll and appearing on the ballot paper as "None Of the Above". In the event he polled 0.3% of the vote, the lowest of any candidate standing.
- Another individual changed his name by deed poll to "None Of The Above" in order to stand as a candidate in Chingford and Woodford Green in 2010. With the surname Above, he was listed first on the ballot paper in alphabetical order, with all the other candidates listed below.
- The South Wales Anarchists group has run a campaign urging people to "Vote Nobody" since 2008 and many other anarchist groups worldwide have promoted similar slogans.
- The Landless Peasant Party, which advocates the ownership of land by
those who live on it and the replacement of income tax by a flat land
tax,
and whose leader Derek Jackson gained publicity for standing against
then- Prime Minister Gordon Brown in his home constituency in the 2010
elections, include a pledge to add a "None of the above" option to the ballot in all UK elections.
Canada
No
electoral jurisdiction in Canada formally lists "none of the above" as a
ballot option. However, in some provincial elections it is effectively
possible to vote for "none of the above", by attending the polling
station and formally "declining to vote". These declined votes are actually counted and become part of the electoral record.
A businessman in Prince George, British Columbia ran in the 1997 federal election in the district of Prince George—Bulkley Valley
under the name Zznoneoff, Thea Bove (Thea Bove Zznoneoff); ballots
listing candidates alphabetically by surname, he appeared at the bottom.
He came sixth of seven candidates with 0.977 percent of votes cast.
A resident of Oshawa, Ontario, formerly known as Sheldon Bergson, has legally changed his name to "Above Znoneofthe", and has registered under that name as a candidate in several provincial and federal by-elections, most recently the Markham—Thornhill
by-election of 3 March 2017. His name order was chosen so that his name
would always appear at the bottom of the ballot as "Znoneofthe, Above",
although this only works federally as provincial election ballots do
not list the candidates in surname order.
In Ontario, the None of the Above Party of Ontario is a registered political party, although its stated mandate is for its candidates to serve in the legislature as independent
representatives who reflect the views and interests of their
constituents, rather than simply as a "reject all of the candidates"
placeholder.
Norway
The
Norwegian election regulation makes it mandatory to present voters with
blank ballots in addition to all of the approved parties and election
lists. In the parliamentary election of 2013, 12874 votes, which is 0.45% of the total votes given, were blank.
None of the Above candidates and parties in other countries
- In Serbia,
None of the above (Ниједан од понуђених одговора, НОПО) is a
parliamentary political party, legally formed in 2010, which was mostly
popularized on Facebook and less on other social networking websites. In 2012 Serbian parliamentary election they received 22,905 votes, and thus won one seat in the National Assembly of Serbia.
- Geoff Richardson changed his full name to "Of The Above None" and stood as an independent for the seat of Gilmore at the 2007 Australian federal election. His name appeared as NONE, Of the Above on the ballot.
- In 2010 Ukrainian presidential election, a candidate Vasiliy Humeniuk changed his name to Vasily Protyvsih (Vasily Against-all). "Against all candidates" is the name of the "none of the above" vote used in Russia and Ukraine.
- In 2000, Michael Moore advocated a write-in candidate Ficus (the plant) for Congress as a unified vote for none of the above in congressional seats where the incumbent was running unopposed.
- David Gatchell of Tennessee ran for governor in 2002 and for Senate in 2006 as a protest, officially changing his middle name from Leroy to None of the Above. In 2006, he got 3,738 votes (0.2 percent).
- For the 2013 Pakistani general election, the Election Commission of Pakistan unilaterally decided that a 'none of the above' box would be available as a voting option on ballot papers. However, they subsequently decided against it owing to the short amount of time remaining till the elections.
The concept was suggested to the Election Commission by Abid Hassan
Manto, a constitutional expert and a senior lawyer of the Supreme Court
of Pakistan.
- Elections in South Ossetia have an "against all" option.
- Elections in Abkhazia have an "None of the above" option.
Procedures that function like "none of the above"
Most ballots do not have a formal "none of the above" option, but do have procedures that work in a similar way.
Argentina
In Argentina casting an envelope without a ballot in a ballot box counts as a blank vote.
Poland
In 1989 legislative election in Poland voters were able to vote against the only candidate running, often from the ruling Polish United Workers' Party by crossing out the candidate's name on the ballot.
As a result, voters defeated the sitting prime minister and dozens of
leading Communists because they failed to get the required majority.
Re-open Nominations (RON)
Many students' unions in Britain, Ireland, and others use a similar ballot option called 're-open nominations' (RON) in IRV and single transferable vote (STV) elections. These include the National Union of Students in the UK and UCD Student's Union in Ireland. The difference is that RON is a vote against all candidates in FPTP (first-past-the-post) and all subsequent candidates in an IRV or STV election.
RON is not strictly a none of the above candidate in
transferable vote elections, as when RON is eliminated during the count
its votes are transferred to other candidates if those preferences
exist.
Illegal ballots in Robert's Rules of Order
The American Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised (RONR)
describes various forms of illegal ballots, which are ballots which do
not count for any candidate. Blanks are treated as "scrap paper", and
are of no effect, but "unintelligible ballots or ballots cast for an
unidentifiable candidate or a fictional character are treated as illegal
votes. All illegal votes cast by legal voters… are taken into account
in determining the number of votes cast for purposes of computing the
majority." RONR always requires a majority for election; thus, casting
an illegal ballot or one for a hopeless candidate, whether on the ballot
or as a write-in, is equivalent to voting No for all other candidates.
"The principle is that a choice has no mandate from the voting body
unless approval is expressed by more than half of those entitled to vote
and registering any evidence of having some opinion."
No award
Voting for the Hugo Awards
is by instant runoff voting, in which nominees for a category are
ranked. There are normally seven options: six nominees, plus "No Award".
A first preference vote for no award implies that the voter believes
that either the category should be abolished, or that none of the
nominees are worthy of an award. A second or subsequent preference
implies that any higher-ranked nominees are worthy of an award, while
those ranked lower are not.
Cultural references
- In the film Brewster's Millions, the protagonist Brewster (played by Richard Pryor) is required, under certain conditions, to spend 30 million dollars in 30 days. He joins the race for Mayor of New York City
and throws most of his money at a protest campaign urging a vote for
None of the Above. The two major candidates sue Brewster for his
confrontational rhetoric, leading to a massive settlement which of
course furthers their competitor's goal. Brewster is forced to end his
campaign when he learns that he is leading in the polls as a write-in
candidate and has to publicly announce that he if he won the mayoralty
he wants to decline it but is surprised his "None of the Above" campaign
became so popular. Neither candidate wins the election, and a new
election with different candidates must be held.
- In the sixth-season episode of Captain Planet
called "Dirty Politics" three of the Eco-Villains are running for
president and kidnap the fourth candidate, who is the most popular.
Despite this over seventy percent vote None of the Above resulting in
the need for a new election.
- L. Neil Smith's novel The Probability Broach has an alternate history in which the United States becomes a libertarian state after a successful Whiskey Rebellion and the overthrowing and execution of George Washington by firing squad for treason in 1794, where None of the Above (which is always an option on the ballot) has received the most votes for President of the North American Confederacy on two occasions. The first time was in 1968, defeating Lucy Kropotkin by only one vote and would serve until 1972 as the NAC's 24th President. The second time was in 2000 and again in 2004 and being elected "President for Life" in 2008, serving as the 28th President and essentially abolishing the office of the presidency.
- Wavy Gravy has run a "Nobody for President" campaign during several different election years in the United States.
