From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Faith, derived from Latin fides and Old French feid, is confidence or trust in a person, thing, or concept. In the context of religion, one can define faith as "belief in God or in the doctrines or teachings of religion".
Religious people often think of faith as confidence based on a perceived degree of warrant,
while others who are more skeptical of religion tend to think of faith as simply belief without evidence.
Etymology
The English word faith is thought to date from 1200–1250, from the Middle English feith, via Anglo-French fed, Old French feid, feit from Latin fidem, accusative of fidēs (trust), akin to fīdere (to trust).[7]
Stages of faith development
James W. Fowler (1940–2015) proposes a series of stages of faith-development (or spiritual development) across the human life-span. His stages relate closely to the work of Piaget, Erikson, and Kohlberg
regarding aspects of psychological development in children and adults.
Fowler defines faith as an activity of trusting, committing, and
relating to the world based on a set of assumptions of how one is
related to others and the world.
Stages of faith
- Intuitive-Projective: a stage of confusion and of high impressionability through stories and rituals (pre-school period).
- Mythic-Literal: a stage where provided information is accepted in order to conform with social norms (school-going period).
- Synthetic-Conventional: in this stage the faith acquired is concreted in the belief system with the forgoing of personification and replacement with authority in individuals or groups that represent one's beliefs (early-late adolescence).
- Individuative-Reflective: in this stage the individual critically
analyzes adopted and accepted faith with existing systems of faith.
Disillusion or strengthening of faith happens in this stage. Based on
needs, experiences and paradoxes (early adulthood).
- Conjunctive faith: in this stage people realize the limits of logic and, facing the paradoxes or transcendence of life,
accept the "mystery of life" and often return to the sacred stories and
symbols of the pre-acquired or re-adopted faith system. This stage is
called negotiated settling in life (mid-life).
- Universalizing faith: this is the "enlightenment" stage where the
individual comes out of all the existing systems of faith and lives life
with universal principles of compassion and love and in service to
others for upliftment, without worries and doubt (middle-late adulthood (45–65 years old and plus).
No hard-and-fast rule requires individuals pursuing faith to go
through all six stages. There is a high probability for individuals to
be content and fixed in a particular stage for a lifetime; stages from
2-5 are such stages. Stage 6 is the summit of faith development. This
state is often considered as "not fully" attainable.
Religious views
Bahá'í Faith
In the Bahá'í Faith, faith is meant, first, conscious knowledge, and second, the practice of good deeds, ultimately the acceptance of the divine authority of the Manifestations of God. In the religion's view, faith and knowledge are both required for spiritual growth.
Faith involves more than outward obedience to this authority, but also
must be based on a deep personal understanding of religious teachings.
Buddhism
Faith in Buddhism (Pali: saddhā, Sanskrit: śraddhā)
refers to a serene commitment in the practice of the Buddha's teaching
and trust in enlightened or highly developed beings, such as Buddhas or bodhisattvas (those aiming to become a Buddha).
Buddhists usually recognize multiple objects of faith, but many are
especially devoted to one particular object of faith, such as one
particular Buddha.
In early Buddhism, faith was focused on the Triple Gem, that is, Gautama Buddha, his teaching (the Dhamma), and the community of spiritually developed followers, or the monastic community seeking enlightenment (the Sangha).
Although offerings to the monastic community were valued highest, early
Buddhism did not morally condemn peaceful offerings to deities. A faithful devotee was called upāsaka or upāsika, for which no formal declaration was required.
In early Buddhism, personal verification was valued highest in
attaining the truth, and sacred scriptures, reason or faith in a teacher
were considered less valuable sources of authority. As important as faith was, it was a mere initial step to the path to wisdom and enlightenment, and was obsolete or redefined at the final stage of that path.
While faith in Buddhism
does not imply "blind faith", Buddhist practice nevertheless requires a
degree of trust, primarily in the spiritual attainment of Gautama Buddha. Faith in Buddhism centers on the understanding that the Buddha is an Awakened being, on his superior role as teacher, in the truth of his Dharma (spiritual teachings), and in his Sangha (community of spiritually developed followers). Faith in Buddhism can be summarised as faith in the Three Jewels: the Buddha, Dharma and Sangha. It is intended to lead to the goal of enlightenment, or bodhi, and Nirvana.
Volitionally, faith implies a resolute and courageous act of will. It
combines the steadfast resolution that one will do a thing with the
self-confidence that one can do it.
In the later stratum of Buddhist history, especially Mahāyāna Buddhism, faith was given a much more important role. The concept of the Buddha Nature was developed, as devotion to Buddhas and bodhisattvas residing in Pure Lands became commonplace. With the arising of the cult of the Lotus Sūtra, faith gained a central role in Buddhist practice, which was further amplified with the development of devotion to the Amitabha Buddha in Pure Land Buddhism. In the Japanese form of Pure Land Buddhism, under the teachers Hōnen and Shinran, only entrusting faith
toward the Amitabha Buddha was believed to be a fruitful form of
practice, as the practice of celibacy, morality and other Buddhist
disciplines were dismissed as no longer effective in this day and age,
or contradicting the virtue of faith. Faith was defined as a state similar to enlightenment, with a sense of self-negation and humility.
Thus, the role of faith increased throughout Buddhist history. However, from the nineteenth century onward, Buddhist modernism
in countries like Sri Lanka and Japan, and also in the West, has
downplayed and criticized the role of faith in Buddhism. Faith in
Buddhism still has a role in modern Asia or the West, but is understood
and defined differently from traditional interpretations. Within the Dalit Buddhist Movement communities, taking refuge is defined not only as a religious, but also a political choice.
Christianity
The word translated as "faith" in English-language editions of the New Testament, the Greek word πίστις (pístis), can also be translated as "belief", "faithfulness", or "trust".
Christianity encompasses various views regarding the nature of faith.
Some see faith as being persuaded or convinced that something is true. In this view, a person believes something when they are presented with adequate evidence that it is true. The theologian Saint Thomas Aquinas
did not hold that faith is mere opinion: on the contrary, he held that
it represents a mean (understood in the Platonic sense) between
excessive reliance on science (i.e. demonstration) and excessive
reliance on opinion.
Numerous views discuss the results of faith. Some believe that
true faith results in good works, while others believe that while faith
in Jesus brings eternal life, it does not necessarily result in good works.
Regardless of which approach to faith a Christian takes, all
agree that the Christian faith is aligned with the ideals and the
example of the life of Jesus. The Christian sees the mystery of God and his grace,
and seeks to know and become obedient to God. To a Christian, faith is
not static but causes one to learn more of God and to grow; Christian
faith has its origin in God.
The definition of faith given by the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews at Hebrews 11:1 carries particular weight with Christians who respect the Bible as the source of divine truth. There the author writes:
"Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." — King James Version
"Now faith is the assurance that what we hope for will come about
and the certainty that what we cannot see exists." — International
Standard Version
“The naive or inexperienced person is easily misled and believes
every word he hears, but the prudent man is discreet and astute.”
(Proverbs 14:15, Amplified Bible) The Christian apostle Paul wrote:
"Test everything that is said to be sure it is true, and if it is, then
accept it." (1 Thessalonians 5:21, Living Bible)
In Christianity, faith causes change as it seeks a greater understanding of God. Faith is not only fideism or simple obedience to a set of rules or statements.
Before Christians have faith, they must understand in whom and in what
they have faith. Without understanding, there cannot be true faith, and
that understanding is built on the foundation of the community of
believers, the scriptures and traditions and on the personal experiences
of the believer. In English translations of the New Testament, the word "faith" generally corresponds to the Greek noun πίστις (pistis) or to the Greek verb πιστεύω (pisteuo), meaning "to trust, to have confidence, faithfulness, to be reliable, to assure".
Christians may recognise different degrees of faith when they encourage each other to and themselves strive to develop, grow, and/or deepen their faith.
This may imply that one can measure faith. Willingness to undergo martyrdom
indicates a proxy for depth of faith, but does not provide an everyday
measurement for the average contemporary Christian. Within the Calvinist tradition the degree of prosperity
may serve as an analog of level of faith.
Other Christian strands may rely on personal self-evaluation to measure
the intensity of an individual's faith, with associated difficulties in
calibrating to any scale. Solemn affirmations of a creed (a statement of faith) provide broad measurements of details. Various tribunals of the Inquisition,
however, concerned themselves with precisely evaluating the orthodoxy
of the faith of those it examined - in order to acquit or to punish in
varying degrees.
Christian apologetic views
In contrast to Richard Dawkins' view of faith as "blind trust, in the absence of evidence, even in the teeth of evidence", Alister McGrath
quotes the Oxford Anglican theologian W. H. Griffith-Thomas
(1861–1924), who states that faith is "not blind, but intelligent" and
that it "commences with the conviction of the mind based on adequate
evidence...", which McGrath sees as "a good and reliable definition,
synthesizing the core elements of the characteristic Christian
understanding of faith".
American biblical scholar Archibald Thomas Robertson stated that the Greek word pistis
used for faith in the New Testament (over two hundred forty times), and
rendered "assurance" in Acts 17:31 (KJV), is "an old verb meaning "to
furnish", used regularly by Demosthenes for bringing forward evidence."
Tom Price (Oxford Centre for Christian Apologetics) affirms that when
the New Testament talks about faith positively it only uses words
derived from the Greek root [pistis] which means "to be persuaded".
British Christian apologist John Lennox
argues that "faith conceived as belief that lacks warrant is very
different from faith conceived as belief that has warrant". He states
that "the use of the adjective 'blind' to describe 'faith' indicates
that faith is not necessarily, or always, or indeed normally, blind".
"The validity, or warrant, of faith or belief depends on the strength of
the evidence on which the belief is based." "We all know how to
distinguish between blind faith and evidence-based faith. We are well
aware that faith is only justified if there is evidence to back it up."
"Evidence-based faith is the normal concept on which we base our
everyday lives."
Peter S Williams
holds that "the classic Christian tradition has always valued
rationality, and does not hold that faith involves the complete
abandonment of reason while believing in the teeth of evidence." Quoting Moreland, faith is defined as "a trust in and commitment to what we have reason to believe is true."
Regarding doubting Thomas
in John 20:24-31, Williams points out that "Thomas wasn't asked to
believe without evidence". He was asked to believe on the basis of the
other disciples' testimony. Thomas initially lacked the first-hand
experience of the evidence that had convinced them... Moreover, the
reason John gives for recounting these events is that what he saw is
evidence... Jesus did many other miraculous signs in the presence of his
disciples...But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is
the Christ, the son of God, and that believing ye might have life in his
name. John 20:30,31.
Concerning doubting Thomas,
Michael R. Allen wrote, "Thomas's definition of faith implies adherence
to conceptual propositions for the sake of personal knowledge,
knowledge of and about a person qua person".
Kenneth Boa and Robert M. Bowman Jr. describe a classic understanding of faith that is referred to as evidentialism, and which is part of a larger epistemological tradition called classical foundationalism, which is accompanied by deontologism, which holds that humans have an obligation to regulate their beliefs in accordance with evidentialist structures.
They show how this can go too far, and Alvin Plantinga
deals with it. While Plantinga upholds that faith may be the result of
evidence testifying to the reliability of the source (of the truth
claims), yet he sees having faith as being the result of hearing the
truth of the gospel with the internal persuasion by the Holy Spirit
moving and enabling him to believe. "Christian belief is produced in the
believer by the internal instigation of the Holy Spirit, endorsing the
teachings of Scripture, which is itself divinely inspired by the Holy
Spirit. The result of the work of the Holy Spirit is faith."
Catholicism
The four-part Catechism of the Catholic Church
(CCC) gives Part One to "The Profession of Faith". This section
describes the content of faith. It elaborates and expands particularly
upon the Apostles' Creed. CCC 144 initiates a section on the "Obedience of Faith".
In the theology of Pope John Paul II,
faith is understood in personal terms as a trusting commitment of
person to person and thus involves Christian commitment to the divine
person of Jesus Christ.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Some alternative, yet impactful, ideas regarding the nature of faith were presented by Joseph Smith in a collection of sermons, but was not the sole author, now presented as Lectures on Faith. Archived from the original on 2018-10-08. Retrieved 2018-10-08.
- Lecture 1 explains what faith is;
- Lecture 2 describes how mankind comes to know about God;
- Lectures 3 and 4 make clear the necessary and unchanging attributes of God;
- Lecture 5 deals with the nature of God the Father, his Son Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost;
- Lecture 6 proclaims that the willingness to sacrifice all earthly things is prerequisite to gaining faith unto salvation;
- Lecture 7 treats the fruits of faith—perspective, power, and eventually perfection.
Hinduism
Bhakti (Sanskrit: भक्ति) literally means "attachment, participation, fondness for, homage, faith, love, devotion, worship, purity". It was originally used in Hinduism, referring to devotion and love for a personal god or a representational god by a devotee. In ancient texts such as the Shvetashvatara Upanishad, the term simply means participation, devotion and love for any endeavor, while in the Bhagavad Gita, it connotes one of the possible paths of spirituality and towards moksha, as in bhakti marga.
Ahimsa, also referred to as nonviolence,
is the fundamental tenet of Hinduism which advocates harmonious and
peaceful co-existence and evolutionary growth in grace and wisdom for
all humankind unconditionally.
In Hinduism, most of the Vedic prayers begins with the chants of Om. Om is the Sanskrit
symbol that amazingly resonates the peacefulness ensconced within one's
higher self. Om is considered to have a profound effect on the body and
mind of the one who chants and also creates a calmness, serenity,
healing, strength of its own to prevail within and also in the
surrounding environment.
Islam
In Islam, a believer's faith in the metaphysical aspects of Islam is called Iman (Arabic: الإيمان), which is complete submission to the will of God, not unquestionable or blind belief. A man must build his faith on well-grounded convictions beyond any reasonable doubt and above uncertainty.
According to the Quran, Iman must be accompanied by righteous deeds and the two together are necessary for entry into Paradise. In the Hadith of Gabriel, Iman in addition to Islam and Ihsan form the three dimensions of the Islamic religion.
Muhammad referred to the six axioms of faith in the Hadith of Gabriel:
"Iman is that you believe in God and His Angels and His Books and His
Messengers and the Hereafter and the good and evil fate [ordained by
your God]." The first five are mentioned together in the Qur'an The Quran states that faith can grow with remembrance of God. The Qur'an also states that nothing in this world should be dearer to a true believer than faith.
Judaism
Judaism recognizes the positive value of Emunah (generally translated as faith, trust in God) and the negative status of the Apikorus (heretic), but faith is not as stressed or as central as it is in other religions, especially compared with Christianity and Islam. It could be a necessary means for being a practicing religious Jew, but the emphasis is placed on true knowledge, true prophecy and practice rather than on faith itself. Very rarely does it relate to any teaching that must be believed. Judaism does not require one to explicitly identify God (a key tenet of Christian faith, which is called Avodah Zarah in Judaism, a minor form of idol worship,
a big sin and strictly forbidden to Jews). Rather, in Judaism, one is
to honour a (personal) idea of God, supported by the many principles
quoted in the Talmud to define Judaism, mostly by what it is not. Thus
there is no established formulation of Jewish principles of faith which are mandatory for all (observant) Jews.
In the Jewish scriptures, trust in God – Emunah – refers
to how God acts toward his people and how they are to respond to him; it
is rooted in the everlasting covenant established in the Torah, notably Deuteronomy 7:9:
Know, therefore, that the Lord,
your God He is God, the faithful God, Who keeps the covenant and loving
kindness with those who love Him and keep His commandments to a thousand
generations.
The specific tenets that compose required belief and their
application to the times have been disputed throughout Jewish history.
Today many, but not all, Orthodox Jews have accepted Maimonides' Thirteen Principles of Belief.
A traditional example of Emunah as seen in the Jewish annals is found in the person of Abraham.
On a number of occasions, Abraham both accepts statements from God that
seem impossible and offers obedient actions in response to direction
from God to do things that seem implausible (see Genesis 12-15).
"The Talmud
describes how a thief also believes in G‑d: On the brink of his forced
entry, as he is about to risk his life—and the life of his victim—he
cries out with all sincerity, 'G‑d help me!' The thief has faith that
there is a G‑d who hears his cries, yet it escapes him that this G‑d may
be able to provide for him without requiring that he abrogate G‑d’s
will by stealing from others. For emunah to affect him in this way he needs study and contemplation."
Sikhism
Faith itself is not a religious concept in Sikhism. However, the five Sikh symbols, known as Kakaars or Five Ks (in Punjabi known as pañj kakkē or pañj kakār), are sometimes referred to as the Five articles of Faith. The articles include kēs (uncut hair), kaṅghā (small wooden comb), kaṛā (circular steel or iron bracelet), kirpān (sword/dagger), and kacchera (special undergarment). Baptised Sikhs are bound to wear those five articles of faith, at all times, to save them from bad company and keep them close to God.
Epistemological validity
There is a wide spectrum of opinion with respect to the epistemological validity of faith - that is, whether it is a reliable way to acquire true beliefs.
Fideism
Fideism is an epistemological theory which maintains that faith is independent of reason, or that reason and faith are hostile to each other and faith is superior at arriving at particular truths (see natural theology).
Fideism is not a synonym for religious belief, but describes a
particular philosophical proposition in regard to the relationship
between faith's appropriate jurisdiction at arriving at truths,
contrasted against reason. It states that faith is needed to determine
some philosophical and religious truths, and it questions the ability of
reason to arrive at all truth. The word and concept had its origin in
the mid- to late-19th century by way of Catholic thought, in a movement called Traditionalism. The Roman Catholic Magisterium has, however, repeatedly condemned fideism.
Support
Religious epistemologists have formulated and defended reasons for the rationality of accepting belief in God without the support of an argument.
Some religious epistemologists hold that belief in God is more
analogous to belief in a person than belief in a scientific hypothesis.
Human relations demand trust and commitment. If belief in God is more
like belief in other persons, then the trust that is appropriate to
persons will be appropriate to God. American psychologist and philosopher William James offers a similar argument in his lecture The Will to Believe. Foundationalism is a view about the structure of justification or knowledge. Foundationalism holds that all knowledge and justified belief are ultimately based upon what are called properly basic beliefs. This position is intended to resolve the infinite regress problem in epistemology.
According to foundationalism, a belief is epistemically justified only
if it is justified by properly basic beliefs. One of the significant
developments in foundationalism is the rise of reformed epistemology.
Reformed epistemology is a view about the epistemology of
religious belief, which holds that belief in God can be properly basic. Analytic philosophers Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Wolterstorff develop this view.
Plantinga holds that an individual may rationally believe in God even
though the individual does not possess sufficient evidence to convince
an agnostic. One difference between reformed epistemology and fideism is that the former requires defence against known objections, whereas the latter might dismiss such objections as irrelevant. Plantinga has developed reformed epistemology in Warranted Christian Belief as a form of externalism that holds that the justification conferring factors for a belief may include external factors. Some theistic philosophers have defended theism by granting evidentialism
but supporting theism through deductive arguments whose premises are
considered justifiable. Some of these arguments are probabilistic,
either in the sense of having weight but being inconclusive, or in the
sense of having a mathematical probability assigned to them. Notable in this regard are the cumulative arguments presented by British philosopher Basil Mitchell and analytic philosopher Richard Swinburne, whose arguments are based on Bayesian probability. In a notable exposition of his arguments, Swinburne appeals to an inference for the best explanation.
Professor of Mathematics and philosopher of science at University of Oxford John Lennox has stated, "Faith is not a leap in the dark; it’s the exact opposite. It’s a commitment based on evidence…
It is irrational to reduce all faith to blind faith and then subject it
to ridicule. That provides a very anti-intellectual and convenient way
of avoiding intelligent discussion.” He criticises Richard Dawkins
as a famous proponent of asserting that faith equates to holding a
belief without evidence, thus that it is possible to hold belief without
evidence, for failing to provide evidence for this assertion.
Criticism
Bertrand Russell wrote:
Christians hold that their faith
does good, but other faiths do harm. At any rate, they hold this about
the communist faith. What I wish to maintain is that all faiths do harm.
We may define “faith” as a firm belief in something for which there is
no evidence. Where there is evidence, no one speaks of “faith.” We do
not speak of faith that two and two are four or that the earth is round.
We only speak of faith when we wish to substitute emotion for evidence.
The substitution of emotion for evidence is apt to lead to strife,
since different groups substitute different emotions. Christians have
faith in the Resurrection; communists have faith in Marx’s Theory of Value. Neither faith can be defended rationally, and each therefore is defended by propaganda and, if necessary, by war.
— Will Religious Faith Cure Our Troubles?
Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins criticizes all faith by generalizing from specific faith in propositions that conflict directly with scientific evidence.
He describes faith as belief without evidence; a process of active
non-thinking. He states that it is a practice that only degrades our
understanding of the natural world by allowing anyone to make a claim
about nature that is based solely on their personal thoughts, and
possibly distorted perceptions, that does not require testing against
nature, has no ability to make reliable and consistent predictions, and
is not subject to peer review.
Philosophy professor Peter Boghossian
argues that reason and evidence are the only way to determine which
"claims about the world are likely true". Different religious traditions
make different religious claims, and Boghossian asserts that faith
alone cannot resolve conflicts between these without evidence. He gives
as an example of the belief held by that Muslims that Muhammad (who died in the year 632) was the last prophet, and the contradictory belief held by Mormons that Joseph Smith
(born in 1805) was a prophet. Boghossian asserts that faith has no
"built-in corrective mechanism". For factual claims, he gives the
example of the belief that the Earth is 4,000 years old. With only faith
and no reason or evidence, he argues, there is no way to correct this
claim if it is inaccurate. Boghossian advocates thinking of faith either
as "belief without evidence" or "pretending to know things you don't
know".