Search This Blog

Tuesday, May 19, 2026

Electroweak interaction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroweak_interaction

In particle physics, the electroweak interaction or electroweak force is the unified description of two of the fundamental interactions of nature: electromagnetism (electromagnetic interaction) and the weak interaction. Although these two forces appear very different at everyday low energies, the theory models them as two different aspects of the same force. Above the unification energy, on the order of 246 GeV,[a] they would merge into a single force. Thus, if the temperature is high enough – approximately 1015 K – then the electromagnetic force and weak force merge into a combined electroweak force.

During the quark epoch (shortly after the Big Bang), the electroweak force split into the electromagnetic and weak force. It is thought that the required temperature of 1015 K has not been seen widely throughout the universe since before the quark epoch, and currently the highest human-made temperature in thermal equilibrium is around 5.5×1012 K (from the Large Hadron Collider).

Sheldon GlashowAbdus Salam, and Steven Weinberg were awarded the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physics for their contributions to the unification of the weak and electromagnetic interaction between elementary particles, known as the Weinberg–Salam theory. The existence of the electroweak interactions was experimentally established in two stages, the first being the discovery of neutral currents in neutrino scattering by the Gargamelle collaboration in 1973, and the second in 1983 by the UA1 and the UA2 collaborations that involved the discovery of the W and Z gauge bosons in proton–antiproton collisions at the converted Super Proton Synchrotron. In 1999, Gerardus 't Hooft and Martinus Veltman were awarded the Nobel prize for showing that the electroweak theory is renormalizable.

History

After the Wu experiment in 1956 discovered parity violation in the weak interaction, a search began for a way to relate the weak and electromagnetic interactions. Extending his doctoral advisor Julian Schwinger's work, Sheldon Glashow first experimented with introducing two different symmetries, one chiral and one achiral, and combined them such that their overall symmetry was unbroken. This did not yield a renormalizable theory, and its gauge symmetry had to be broken by hand as no spontaneous mechanism was known, but it predicted a new particle, the Z boson. This received little notice, as it matched no experimental finding.

In 1964, Salam and John Clive Ward had the same idea, but predicted a massless photon and three massive gauge bosons with a manually broken symmetry. Later around 1967, while investigating spontaneous symmetry breaking, Weinberg found a set of symmetries predicting a massless, neutral gauge boson. Initially rejecting such a particle as useless, he later realized his symmetries produced the electroweak force, and he proceeded to predict rough masses for the W and Z bosons. Significantly, he suggested this new theory was renormalizable. In 1971, Gerard 't Hooft proved that spontaneously broken gauge symmetries are renormalizable even with massive gauge bosons.

Formulation

Weinberg's weak mixing angle θW, and relation between coupling constants g, g′, and e. Adapted from Lee (1981).
The pattern of weak isospin, T3, and weak hypercharge, Yw, of the known elementary particles, showing the electric charge, Q, along the weak mixing angle. The neutral Higgs field (circled) breaks the electroweak symmetry and interacts with other particles to give them mass. Three components of the Higgs field become part of the massive W and Z bosons.

Mathematically, electromagnetism is unified with the weak interactions as a Yang–Mills field with an SU(2) × U(1) gauge group, which describes the formal operations that can be applied to the electroweak gauge fields without changing the dynamics of the system. These fields are the weak isospin fields W1, W2, and W3, and the weak hypercharge field B. This invariance is known as electroweak symmetry.

The generators of SU(2) and U(1) are given the name weak isospin (labeled T) and weak hypercharge (labeled Y) respectively. These then give rise to the gauge bosons that mediate the electroweak interactions – the three W bosons of weak isospin (W1, W2, and W3), and the B boson of weak hypercharge, respectively, all of which are "initially" massless. These are not physical fields yet, before spontaneous symmetry breaking and the associated Higgs mechanism.

In the Standard Model, the observed physical particles, the W±
and Z0
bosons
, and the photon, are produced through the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the electroweak symmetry SU(2) × U(1)y to U(1)em, effected by the Higgs mechanism (see also Higgs boson), an elaborate quantum-field-theoretic phenomenon that "spontaneously" alters the realization of the symmetry and rearranges degrees of freedom.

The electric charge arises as the particular linear combination (nontrivial) of Yw (weak hypercharge) and the T3 component of weak isospin () that does not couple to the Higgs boson. That is to say: the Higgs and the electromagnetic field have no effect on each other, at the level of the fundamental forces ("tree level"), while any other combination of the hypercharge and the weak isospin must interact with the Higgs. This causes an apparent separation between the weak force, which interacts with the Higgs, and electromagnetism, which does not. Mathematically, the electric charge is a specific combination of the hypercharge and T3 outlined in the figure.

U(1)em (the symmetry group of electromagnetism only) is defined to be the group generated by this special linear combination, and the symmetry described by the U(1)em group is unbroken, since it does not directly interact with the Higgs.

The above spontaneous symmetry breaking makes the W3 and B bosons coalesce into two different physical bosons with different masses – the Z0
boson, and the photon (γ),

where θw is the weak mixing angle. The axes representing the particles have essentially just been rotated, in the (W3, B) plane, by the angle θw. This also introduces a mismatch between the mass of the Z0
and the mass of the W±
particles (denoted as mz and mw, respectively),

The W1 and W2 bosons, in turn, combine to produce the charged massive bosons W±
:

Lagrangian

Before electroweak symmetry breaking

The Lagrangian for the electroweak interactions is divided into four parts before electroweak symmetry breaking manifests,

The term describes the interaction between the three W vector bosons and the B vector boson,

where () and are the field strength tensors for the weak isospin and weak hypercharge gauge fields.

is the kinetic term for the Standard Model fermions. The interaction of the gauge bosons and the fermions are through the gauge covariant derivative,

where the subscript j sums over the three generations of fermions; Q, u, and d are the left-handed doublet, right-handed singlet up, and right handed singlet down quark fields; and L and e are the left-handed doublet and right-handed singlet electron fields. The Feynman slash means the contraction of the 4-gradient with the Dirac matrices, defined as

and the covariant derivative (excluding the gluon gauge field for the strong interaction) is defined as

Here is the weak hypercharge and the are the components of the weak isospin.

The term describes the Higgs field and its interactions with itself and the gauge bosons,

where is the vacuum expectation value.

The term describes the Yukawa interaction with the fermions,

and generates their masses, manifest when the Higgs field acquires a nonzero vacuum expectation value, discussed next. The for are matrices of Yukawa couplings.

After electroweak symmetry breaking

The Lagrangian reorganizes itself as the Higgs field acquires a non-vanishing vacuum expectation value dictated by the potential of the previous section. As a result of this rewriting, the symmetry breaking becomes manifest. In the history of the universe, this is believed to have happened shortly after the hot big bang, when the universe was at a temperature 159.5±1.5 GeV (assuming the Standard Model of particle physics).

Due to its complexity, this Lagrangian is best described by breaking it up into several parts as follows.

The kinetic term contains all the quadratic terms of the Lagrangian, which include the dynamic terms (the partial derivatives) and the mass terms (conspicuously absent from the Lagrangian before symmetry breaking)

where the sum runs over all the fermions of the theory (quarks and leptons), and the fields and are given as

with to be replaced by the relevant field ( ) and f abc by the structure constants of the appropriate gauge group.

The neutral current and charged current components of the Lagrangian contain the interactions between the fermions and gauge bosons,

where The electromagnetic current is

where is the fermions' electric charges. The neutral weak current is

where is the fermions' weak isospin.

The charged current part of the Lagrangian is given by

where is the right-handed singlet neutrino field, and the CKM matrix determines the mixing between mass and weak eigenstates of the quarks.

contains the Higgs three-point and four-point self interaction terms,

contains the Higgs interactions with gauge vector bosons,

contains the gauge three-point self interactions,

contains the gauge four-point self interactions,

contains the Yukawa interactions between the fermions and the Higgs field,

Lattice gauge theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In physics, lattice gauge theory is the study of gauge theories on a spacetime that has been discretized into a lattice.

Gauge theories are important in particle physics, and include the prevailing theories of elementary particles: quantum electrodynamics, quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and particle physics' Standard Model. Non-perturbative gauge theory calculations in continuous spacetime formally involve evaluating an infinite-dimensional path integral, which is computationally intractable. By working on a discrete spacetime, the path integral becomes finite-dimensional, and can be evaluated by stochastic simulation techniques such as the Monte Carlo method. When the size of the lattice is taken infinitely large and its sites infinitesimally close to each other, the continuum gauge theory is recovered.

Basics

In lattice gauge theory, the spacetime is Wick rotated into Euclidean space and discretized into a lattice with sites separated by distance and connected by links. In the most commonly considered cases, such as lattice QCD, fermion fields are defined at lattice sites (which leads to fermion doubling), while the gauge fields are defined on the links. That is, an element U of the compact Lie group G (not algebra) is assigned to each link. Hence, to simulate QCD with Lie group SU(3), a 3×3 unitary matrix is defined on each link. The link is assigned an orientation, with the inverse element corresponding to the same link with the opposite orientation. And each node is given a value in (a color 3-vector, the space on which the fundamental representation of SU(3) acts), a Dirac spinor, an nf vector, and a Grassmann variable.

Thus, the composition of links' SU(3) elements along a path (i.e. the ordered multiplication of their matrices) approximates a path-ordered exponential (geometric integral), from which Wilson loop values can be calculated for closed paths.

Yang–Mills action

The Yang–Mills action is written on the lattice using Wilson loops (named after Kenneth G. Wilson), so that the limit formally reproduces the original continuum action. Given a faithful irreducible representation ρ of G, the lattice Yang–Mills action, known as the Wilson action, is the sum over all lattice sites of the (real component of the) trace over the n links e1, ..., en in the Wilson loop,

Here, χ is the character. If ρ is a real (or pseudoreal) representation, taking the real component is redundant, because even if the orientation of a Wilson loop is flipped, its contribution to the action remains unchanged.

There are many possible Wilson actions, depending on which Wilson loops are used in the action. The simplest Wilson action uses only the 1×1 Wilson loop, and differs from the continuum action by "lattice artifacts" proportional to the small lattice spacing . By using more complicated Wilson loops to construct "improved actions", lattice artifacts can be reduced to be proportional to , making computations more accurate.

Measurements and calculations

This result of a Lattice QCD computation shows a meson, composed out of a quark and an antiquark. (After M. Cardoso et al.)

Quantities such as particle masses are stochastically calculated using techniques such as the Monte Carlo method. Gauge field configurations are generated with probabilities proportional to , where is the lattice action and is related to the lattice spacing . The quantity of interest is calculated for each configuration, and averaged. Calculations are often repeated at different lattice spacings so that the result can be extrapolated to the continuum, .

Such calculations are often extremely computationally intensive, and can require the use of the largest available supercomputers. To reduce the computational burden, the so-called quenched approximation can be used, in which the fermionic fields are treated as non-dynamic "frozen" variables. While this was common in early lattice QCD calculations, "dynamical" fermions are now standard. Simulating lattice gauge theories is one hypothetical application of quantum computers.

The results of lattice QCD computations show that in a meson not only the particles (quarks and antiquarks), but also the "fluxtubes" of the gluon fields are important.

Quantum triviality

Lattice gauge theory is also important for the study of quantum triviality by the real-space renormalization group. The most important information in the RG flow are the fixed points. The possible macroscopic states of the system, at a large scale, are given by this set of fixed points. If these fixed points correspond to a free field theory, the theory is said to be trivial or noninteracting.

The concept of triviality has been applied to the physics of the Higgs boson. A comparatively simple toy model of the "Higgs sector" of the Standard Model is provided by φ4 theory, i.e., a scalar field theory whose Lagrangian includes an interaction term that is quartic in the field φ. It is conjectured, based on evidence including lattice gauge calculations, that this theory is "trivial": if the regularization cutoff is taken to zero distance or infinite energy, the theory will describe only free particles. Using this as a model for the Higgs boson, the conjectured triviality implies that the cutoff cannot be removed. Because there is an upper bound on how high the cutoff energy can be, there is an upper bound on the interaction strength, which ultimately implies an upper bound on the mass of the Higgs boson.

Other applications

Originally, solvable two-dimensional lattice gauge theories had already been introduced in 1971 as models with interesting statistical properties by the theorist Franz Wegner, who worked in the field of phase transitions.

When only 1×1 Wilson loops appear in the action, lattice gauge theory can be shown to be exactly dual to spin foam models.

Prime number

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number Composite numbers can...