Exoplanetology, or exoplanetary science, is an integrated field of astronomical science dedicated to the search for and study of exoplanets (extrasolar planets). It employs an interdisciplinary approach which includes astrobiology, astrophysics, astronomy, astrochemistry, astrogeology, geochemistry, and planetary science.
Nomenclature
The exoplanet naming convention is an extension of the system used for naming multiple-star systems as adopted by the International Astronomical Union
(IAU). For an exoplanet orbiting a single star, the name is normally
formed by taking the name of its parent star and adding a lowercase
letter. The first planet discovered in a system is given the designation
"b" (the parent star is considered to be "a") and later planets are
given subsequent letters. If several planets in the same system are
discovered at the same time, the closest one to the star gets the next
letter, followed by the other planets in order of orbit size. A
provisional IAU-sanctioned standard exists to accommodate the naming of circumbinary planets. A limited number of exoplanets have IAU-sanctioned proper names. Other naming systems exist.
Definition
IAU
The official definition of "planet" used by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) only covers the Solar System and thus does not apply to exoplanets.
As of April 2011, the only defining statement issued by the IAU that
pertains to exoplanets is a working definition issued in 2001 and
modified in 2003.
That definition contains the following criteria:
- Objects with true masses below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium (currently calculated to be 13 Jupiter masses for objects of solar metallicity) that orbit stars or stellar remnants are "planets" (no matter how they formed). The minimum mass/size required for an extrasolar object to be considered a planet should be the same as that used in the Solar System.
- Substellar objects with true masses above the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are "brown dwarfs", no matter how they formed or where they are located.
- Free-floating objects in young star clusters with masses below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are not "planets", but are "sub-brown dwarfs" (or whatever name is most appropriate).
Alternatives
The IAU's working definition is not always used. One alternate suggestion is that planets should be distinguished from brown dwarfs on the basis of formation. It is widely thought that giant planets form through core accretion, which may sometimes produce planets with masses above the deuterium fusion threshold; massive planets of that sort may have already been observed.
Brown dwarfs form like stars from the direct gravitational collapse of
clouds of gas and this formation mechanism also produces objects that
are below the 13 MJup limit and can be as low as 1 MJup.
Objects in this mass range that orbit their stars with wide separations
of hundreds or thousands of AU and have large star/object mass ratios
likely formed as brown dwarfs; their atmospheres would likely have a
composition more similar to their host star than accretion-formed
planets which would contain increased abundances of heavier elements.
Most directly imaged planets as of April 2014 are massive and have wide
orbits so probably represent the low-mass end of brown dwarf formation.
One study suggests that objects above 10 MJup formed through gravitational instability and should not be thought of as planets.
Also, the 13-Jupiter-mass cutoff does not have precise physical
significance. Deuterium fusion can occur in some objects with a mass
below that cutoff. The amount of deuterium fused depends to some extent on the composition of the object. As of 2011 the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia included objects up to 25 Jupiter masses, saying, "The fact that there is no special feature around 13 MJup in the observed mass spectrum reinforces the choice to forget this mass limit".
As of 2016 this limit was increased to 60 Jupiter masses based on a study of mass–density relationships.
The Exoplanet Data Explorer
includes objects up to 24 Jupiter masses with the advisory: "The 13
Jupiter-mass distinction by the IAU Working Group is physically
unmotivated for planets with rocky cores, and observationally
problematic due to the sin i ambiguity."
The NASA Exoplanet Archive includes objects with a mass (or minimum mass) equal to or less than 30 Jupiter masses.
Another criterion for separating planets and brown dwarfs, rather than
deuterium fusion, formation process or location, is whether the core pressure is dominated by coulomb pressure or electron degeneracy pressure with the dividing line at around 5 Jupiter masses.
Detection methods
Direct imaging
Directly imaged planet Beta Pictoris b
Planets are extremely faint compared with their parent stars. For
example, a Sun-like star is about a billion times brighter than the
reflected light from any exoplanet orbiting it. It is difficult to
detect such a faint light source, and furthermore the parent star causes
a glare that tends to wash it out. It is necessary to block the light
from the parent star in order to reduce the glare while leaving the
light from the planet detectable; doing so is a major technical
challenge which requires extreme optothermal stability. All exoplanets that have been directly imaged are both large (more massive than Jupiter) and widely separated from their parent star.
Specially designed direct-imaging instruments such as Gemini Planet Imager, VLT-SPHERE, and SCExAO
will image dozens of gas giants, but the vast majority of known
extrasolar planets have only been detected through indirect methods. The
following are the indirect methods that have proven useful:
Indirect methods
- When the star is behind a planet, its brightness will seem to dim
- If a planet crosses (or transits) in front of its parent star's disk, then the observed brightness of the star drops by a small amount. The amount by which the star dims depends on its size and on the size of the planet, among other factors. Because the transit method requires that the planet's orbit intersect a line-of-sight between the host star and Earth, the probability that an exoplanet in a randomly oriented orbit will be observed to transit the star is somewhat small. The Kepler telescope uses this method.
Discovered extrasolar planets per year and by detection method (as of September 2014):
| direct imaging microlensing | transit timing | radial velocity |
- As a planet orbits a star, the star also moves in its own small orbit around the system's center of mass. Variations in the star's radial velocity—that is, the speed with which it moves towards or away from Earth—can be detected from displacements in the star's spectral lines due to the Doppler effect. Extremely small radial-velocity variations can be observed, of 1 m/s or even somewhat less.
- Transit timing variation (TTV)
- When multiple planets are present, each one slightly perturbs the others' orbits. Small variations in the times of transit for one planet can thus indicate the presence of another planet, which itself may or may not transit. For example, variations in the transits of the planet Kepler-19b suggest the existence of a second planet in the system, the non-transiting Kepler-19c.
Animation showing difference between planet transit timing of one-planet and two-planet systems
- When a planet orbits multiple stars or if the planet has moons, its transit time can significantly vary per transit. Although no new planets or moons have been discovered with this method, it is used to successfully confirm many transiting circumbinary planets.
- Microlensing occurs when the gravitational field of a star acts like a lens, magnifying the light of a distant background star. Planets orbiting the lensing star can cause detectable anomalies in the magnification as it varies over time. Unlike most other methods which have detection bias towards planets with small (or for resolved imaging, large) orbits, microlensing method is most sensitive to detecting planets around 1–10 AU away from Sun-like stars.
- Astrometry consists of precisely measuring a star's position in the sky and observing the changes in that position over time. The motion of a star due to the gravitational influence of a planet may be observable. Because the motion is so small, however, this method has not yet been very productive. It has produced only a few disputed detections, though it has been successfully used to investigate the properties of planets found in other ways.
- A pulsar (the small, ultradense remnant of a star that has exploded as a supernova) emits radio waves extremely regularly as it rotates. If planets orbit the pulsar, they will cause slight anomalies in the timing of its observed radio pulses. The first confirmed discovery of an extrasolar planet was made using this method. But as of 2011, it has not been very productive; five planets have been detected in this way, around three different pulsars.
- Like pulsars, there are some other types of stars which exhibit periodic activity. Deviations from the periodicity can sometimes be caused by a planet orbiting it. As of 2013, a few planets have been discovered with this method.
- When a planet orbits very close to the star, it catches a considerable amount of starlight. As the planet orbits around the star, the amount of light changes due to planets having phases from Earth's viewpoint or planet glowing more from one side than the other due to temperature differences.
- Relativistic beaming measures the observed flux from the star due to its motion. The brightness of the star changes as the planet moves closer or further away from its host star.
- Massive planets close to their host stars can slightly deform the shape of the star. This causes the brightness of the star to slightly deviate depending how it is rotated relative to Earth.
- With polarimetry method, a polarized light reflected off the planet is separated from unpolarized light emitted from the star. No new planets have been discovered with this method although a few already discovered planets have been detected with this method.
- Disks of space dust surround many stars, thought to originate from collisions among asteroids and comets. The dust can be detected because it absorbs starlight and re-emits it as infrared radiation. Features in the disks may suggest the presence of planets, though this is not considered a definitive detection method.
Orbital parameters
Most
known extrasolar planet candidates have been discovered using indirect
methods and therefore only some of their physical and orbital parameters
can be determined. For example, out of the six independent parameters that define an orbit, the radial-velocity method can determine four: semi-major axis, eccentricity, longitude of periastron, and time of periastron. Two parameters remain unknown: inclination and longitude of the ascending node.
Distance from star, semi-major axis, and orbital period
Log-log
scatterplot showing masses, orbital radii, and period of all extrasolar
planets discovered through September 2014, with colors indicating
method of detection:
For reference, Solar System planets are marked as gray circles. The horizontal axis plots the logarithm of the semi-major axis, and the vertical axis plots the logarithm of the mass.
There are exoplanets that are much closer to their parent star than
any planet in the Solar System is to the Sun, and there are also
exoplanets that are much further from their star. Mercury, the closest planet to the Sun at 0.4 astronomical units (AU), takes 88 days for an orbit, but the smallest known orbits of exoplanets have orbital periods of only a few hours, e.g. Kepler-70b. The Kepler-11 system has five of its planets in smaller orbits than Mercury's. Neptune
is 30 AU from the Sun and takes 165 years to orbit it, but there are
exoplanets that are thousands of AU from their star and take tens of
thousands of years to orbit, e.g. GU Piscium b.
The radial-velocity and transit methods are most sensitive to planets with small orbits. The earliest discoveries such as 51 Peg b were gas giants with orbits of a few days. These "hot Jupiters" likely formed further out and migrated inwards. The Kepler space observatory has found planets with even shorter orbits of only a few hours, which places them within the star's upper atmosphere or corona,
and these planets are Earth-sized or smaller and are probably the
left-over solid cores of giant planets that have evaporated due to being
so close to the star, or even being engulfed by the star in its red-giant phase in the case of Kepler-70b.
As well as evaporation, other reasons why larger planets are unlikely
to survive orbits only a few hours long include orbital decay caused by tidal force, tidal-inflation instability, and Roche-lobe overflow. The Roche limit implies that small planets with orbits of a few hours are likely made mostly of iron.
The direct imaging
method is most sensitive to planets with large orbits, and has
discovered some planets that have planet–star separations of hundreds of
AU. However, protoplanetary disks are usually only around 100 AU in
radius, and core accretion models predict giant planet formation to be within 10 AU, where the planets can coalesce quickly enough before the disk evaporates.
Very-long-period giant planets may have been rogue planets that were captured, or formed close-in and gravitationally scattered outwards, or the planet and star could be a mass-imbalanced wide binary system with the planet being the primary object of its own separate protoplanetary disk. Gravitational instability models might produce planets at multi-hundred AU separations but this would require unusually large disks.
For planets with very wide orbits up to several hundred thousand AU it
may be difficult to observationally determine whether the planet is
gravitationally bound to the star.
Most planets that have been discovered are within a couple of AU
from their host star because the most used methods (radial-velocity and
transit) require observation of several orbits to confirm that the
planet exists and there has only been enough time since these methods
were first used to cover small separations. Some planets with larger
orbits have been discovered by direct imaging but there is a middle
range of distances, roughly equivalent to the Solar System's gas giant
region, which is largely unexplored. Direct imaging equipment for
exploring that region was installed on two large telescopes that began
operation in 2014, e.g. Gemini Planet Imager and VLT-SPHERE. The microlensing method has detected a few planets in the 1–10 AU range.
It appears plausible that in most exoplanetary systems, there are one or
two giant planets with orbits comparable in size to those of Jupiter
and Saturn in the Solar System. Giant planets with substantially larger
orbits are now known to be rare, at least around Sun-like stars.
The distance of the habitable zone
from a star depends on the type of star and this distance changes
during the star's lifetime as the size and temperature of the star
changes.
Eccentricity
The eccentricity of an orbit is a measure of how elliptical (elongated) it is. All the planets of the Solar System except for Mercury have near-circular orbits (e less than 0.1).
Most exoplanets with orbital periods of 20 days or less have
near-circular orbits, i.e. very low eccentricity. That is thought to be
due to tidal circularization:
reduction of eccentricity over time due to gravitational interaction
between two bodies. The mostly sub-Neptune-sized planets found by the Kepler spacecraft with short orbital periods have very circular orbits.
By contrast, the giant planets with longer orbital periods discovered
by radial-velocity methods have quite eccentric orbits. (As of July
2010, 55% of such exoplanets have eccentricities greater than 0.2,
whereas 17% have eccentricities greater than 0.5.) Moderate to high eccentricities (e greater than 0.2) of giant planets are not
an observational selection effect, because a planet can be detected
about equally well regardless of the eccentricity of its orbit. The
statistical significance of elliptical orbits in the ensemble of
observed giant planets is somewhat surprising, because current theories
of planetary formation suggest that low-mass planets should have their orbital eccentricity circularized by gravitational interactions with the surrounding protoplanetary disk.
However, as a planet grows more massive and its interaction with the
disk becomes nonlinear, it may induce eccentric motion of the
surrounding disk's gas, which in turn may excite the planet's orbital
eccentricity.
Low eccentricities are correlated with high multiplicity (number of
planets in the system) based on the analysis of planets observed by the
radial-velocity method.
For weak Doppler
signals near the limits of the current detection ability, the
eccentricity becomes poorly constrained and biased towards higher
values. It is suggested that some of the high eccentricities reported
for low-mass exoplanets may be overestimates, because simulations show
that many observations are also consistent with two planets on circular
orbits. Reported observations of single planets in moderately eccentric
orbits have about a 15% chance of being a pair of planets.
This misinterpretation is especially likely if the two planets orbit
with a 2:1 resonance. With the exoplanet sample known in 2009, a group
of astronomers estimated that "(1) around 35% of the published eccentric
one-planet solutions are statistically indistinguishable from planetary
systems in 2:1 orbital resonance, (2) another 40% cannot be
statistically distinguished from a circular orbital solution" and "(3)
planets with masses comparable to Earth could be hidden in known orbital
solutions of eccentric super-Earths and Neptune mass planets".
Radial velocity surveys found exoplanet orbits beyond 0.1 AU to
be eccentric, particularly for large planets. Transit data obtained by
the Kepler spacecraft, is consistent with the RV surveys and also revealed that smaller planets tend to have less eccentric orbits.
Inclination vs. spin–orbit angle
Orbital inclination is the angle between a planet's orbital plane
and another plane of reference. For exoplanets, the inclination is
usually stated with respect to an observer on Earth: the angle used is
that between the normal to the planet's orbital plane and the line of sight from Earth to the star. Therefore, most planets observed by the transit method are close to 90 degrees.
Because the word 'inclination' is used in exoplanet studies for this
line-of-sight inclination then the angle between the planet's orbit and
the star's rotation must use a different word and is termed the
spin–orbit angle or spin–orbit alignment. In most cases the orientation
of the star's rotational axis is unknown. The Kepler spacecraft
has found a few hundred multi-planet systems and in most of these
systems the planets all orbit in nearly the same plane, much like the
Solar System.
However, a combination of astrometric and radial-velocity measurements
has shown that some planetary systems contain planets whose orbital
planes are significantly tilted relative to each other. More than half of hot Jupiters
have orbital planes substantially misaligned with their parent star's
rotation. A substantial fraction of hot-Jupiters even have retrograde orbits, meaning that they orbit in the opposite direction from the star's rotation.
Rather than a planet's orbit having been disturbed, it may be that the
star itself flipped early in their system's formation due to
interactions between the star's magnetic field and the planet-forming
disk.
Periastron precession
Periastron precession
is the rotation of a planet's orbit within the orbital plane, i.e. the
axes of the ellipse change direction. In the Solar System, perturbations
from other planets are the main cause, but for close-in exoplanets the
largest factor can be tidal forces between the star and planet. For
close-in exoplanets, the general relativistic contribution to the precession is also significant and can be orders of magnitude larger than the same effect for Mercury. Some exoplanets have significantly eccentric orbits,
which makes it easier to detect the precession. The effect of general
relativity can be detectable in timescales of about 10 years or less.
Nodal precession
Nodal precession
is rotation of a planet's orbital plane. Nodal precession is more
easily seen as distinct from periastron precession when the orbital
plane is inclined to the star's rotation, the extreme case being a polar orbit.
WASP-33 is a fast-rotating star that hosts a hot Jupiter in an almost polar orbit. The quadrupole mass moment and the proper angular momentum of the star are 1900 and 400 times, respectively, larger than those of the Sun. This causes significant classical and relativistic deviations from Kepler's laws. In particular, the fast rotation causes large nodal precession because of the star's oblateness and the Lense–Thirring effect.
Rotation and axial tilt
Plot of equatorial spin velocity vs. mass for planets comparing Beta Pictoris b to the Solar System planets.
In April 2014, the first measurement of a planet's rotation period was announced: the length of day for the super-Jupiter gas giant Beta Pictoris b is 8 hours (based on the assumption that the axial tilt of the planet is small.)
With an equatorial rotational velocity of 25 km per second, this is
faster than for the giant planets of the Solar System, in line with the
expectation that the more massive a giant planet, the faster it spins.
Beta Pictoris b's distance from its star is 9 AU. At such distances the
rotation of Jovian planets is not slowed by tidal effects.
Beta Pictoris b is still warm and young and over the next hundreds of
millions of years, it will cool down and shrink to about the size of
Jupiter, and if its angular momentum
is preserved, then as it shrinks, the length of its day will decrease
to about 3 hours and its equatorial rotation velocity will speed up to
about 40 km/s. The images of Beta Pictoris b do not have high enough resolution to directly see details but doppler spectroscopy
techniques were used to show that different parts of the planet were
moving at different speeds and in opposite directions from which it was
inferred that the planet is rotating. With the next generation of large ground-based telescopes it will be possible to use doppler imaging techniques to make a global map of the planet, like the mapping of the brown dwarf Luhman 16B in 2014.
Origin of spin and tilt of terrestrial planets
Giant impacts have a large effect on the spin of terrestrial planets. The last few giant impacts during planetary formation tend to be the main determiner of a terrestrial planet's rotation rate. On average the spin angular velocity will be about 70% of the velocity that would cause the planet to break up and fly apart; the natural outcome of planetary embryo impacts at speeds slightly larger than escape velocity. In later stages terrestrial planet spin is also affected by impacts with planetesimals. During the giant impact stage, the thickness of a protoplanetary disk
is far larger than the size of planetary embryos so collisions are
equally likely to come from any direction in three-dimensions. This
results in the axial tilt of accreted planets ranging from 0 to 180 degrees with any direction as likely as any other with both prograde and retrograde
spins equally probable. Therefore, prograde spin with a small axial
tilt, common for the Solar System's terrestrial planets except Venus, is
not common in general for terrestrial planets built by giant impacts.
The initial axial tilt of a planet determined by giant impacts can be
substantially changed by stellar tides if the planet is close to its
star and by satellite tides if the planet has a large satellite.
Tidal effects
For most planets, the rotation period and axial tilt
(also called obliquity) are not known, but a large number of planets
have been detected with very short orbits (where tidal effects are
greater) that will probably have reached an equilibrium rotation that can be predicted (i.e. tidal lock, spin–orbit resonances, and non-resonant equilibria such as retrograde rotation).
Gravitational tides tend to reduce the axial tilt to zero but
over a longer timescale than the rotation rate reaches equilibrium.
However, the presence of multiple planets in a system can cause axial
tilt to be captured in a resonance called a Cassini state. There are small oscillations around this state and in the case of Mars these axial tilt variations are chaotic.
Hot Jupiters'
close proximity to their host star means that their spin–orbit
evolution is mostly due to the star's gravity and not the other effects.
Hot Jupiters' rotation rate is not thought to be captured into
spin–orbit resonance because of the way in which such a fluid-body
reacts to tides; a planet like this therefore slows down into
synchronous rotation if its orbit is circular, or, alternatively, it
slows down into a non-synchronous rotation if its orbit is eccentric.
Hot Jupiters are likely to evolve towards zero axial tilt even if they
had been in a Cassini state during planetary migration when they were
further from their star. Hot Jupiters' orbits will become more circular
over time, however the presence of other planets in the system on
eccentric orbits, even ones as small as Earth and as far away as the
habitable zone, can continue to maintain the eccentricity of the Hot
Jupiter so that the length of time for tidal circularization can be billions instead of millions of years.
The rotation rate of planet HD 80606 b is predicted to be about 1.9 days.
HD 80606 b avoids spin–orbit resonance because it is a gas giant. The
eccentricity of its orbit means that it avoids becoming tidally locked.
Physical parameters
Mass
When a planet is found by the radial-velocity method, its orbital inclination i is unknown and can range from 0 to 90 degrees. The method is unable to determine the true mass (M) of the planet, but rather gives a lower limit for its mass, M sini.
In a few cases an apparent exoplanet may be a more massive object such
as a brown dwarf or red dwarf. However, the probability of a small value
of i (say less than 30 degrees, which would give a true mass at least
double the observed lower limit) is relatively low (1−√3/2 ≈ 13%) and hence most planets will have true masses fairly close to the observed lower limit.
If a planet's orbit is nearly perpendicular to the line of vision (i.e. i close to 90°), a planet can be detected through the transit method. The inclination will then be known, and the inclination combined with M sini from radial-velocity observations will give the planet's true mass.
Also, astrometric
observations and dynamical considerations in multiple-planet systems
can sometimes provide an upper limit to the planet's true mass.
The mass of a transiting exoplanet can also be determined from
the transmission spectrum of its atmosphere, as it can be used to
constrain independently the atmospheric composition, temperature,
pressure, and scale height.
Transit-timing variation can also be used to find a planet's mass.
Radius, density, and bulk composition
Prior to recent results from the Kepler space observatory, most confirmed planets were gas giants comparable in size to Jupiter or larger because they are most easily detected. However, the planets detected by Kepler are mostly between the size of Neptune and the size of Earth.
If a planet is detectable by both the radial-velocity and the
transit methods, then both its true mass and its radius can be
determined, as well as its density. Planets with low density are inferred to be composed mainly of hydrogen and helium,
whereas planets of intermediate density are inferred to have water as a
major constituent. A planet of high density is inferred to be rocky,
like Earth and the other terrestrial planets of the Solar System.
Sizes of Kepler Planet Candidates – based on 2,740 candidates orbiting 2,036 stars as of 4 November 2013 (NASA).
Comparison of sizes of planets with different compositions.
Gas giants, puffy planets, and super-Jupiters
Gaseous planets that are hot is because they are close to their star,
or because they are still hot from their formation and are expanded by
the heat. For colder gas planets, there is a maximum radius which is
slightly larger than Jupiter which occurs when the mass reaches a few
Jupiter-masses. Adding mass beyond this point causes the radius to
shrink.
Even when taking heat from the star into account, many transiting
exoplanets are much larger than expected given their mass, meaning that
they have surprisingly low density.
Plots of exoplanet density and radius. Top: Density vs. Radius. Bottom: Diffusity=1/Density vs. Radius. Units: Radius in Jupiter radii (RJup). Density in g/cm3. Diffusity in cm3/g. These plots show that there are a wide range of densities for planets between Earth and Neptune size, then the planets of 0.6 RJup size are very low-density and there are very few of them, then the gas giants have a large range of densities.
Besides the inflated hot Jupiters, there is another type of low-density planet: occurring at around 0.6 times the size of Jupiter. The planets around Kepler-51
are far less dense (far more diffuse) than the inflated hot Jupiters as
can be seen in the plots on the right where the three Kepler-51 planets
stand out in the diffusity vs. radius plot. A more detailed study
taking into account star spots may modify these results to produce less extreme values.
Ice giants and super-Neptunes
Kepler-101b was the first super-Neptune
discovered. It has three times Neptune's mass but its density suggests
that heavy elements make up more than 60% of its total mass, unlike
hydrogen–helium-dominated gas giants.
Super-Earths, mini-Neptunes, and gas dwarfs
If a planet has a radius and/or mass between that of Earth and
Neptune, then there is a question about whether the planet is rocky like
Earth, a mixture of volatiles and gas like Neptune, a small planet with
a hydrogen/helium envelope (mini-Jupiter), or of some other
composition.
Some of the Kepler transiting planets with radii in the range of
1–4 Earth radii have had their masses measured by radial-velocity or
transit-timing methods. The calculated densities show that up to 1.5
Earth radii, these planets are rocky and that density increases with
increasing radius due to gravitational compression. However, between 1.5
and 4 Earth radii the density decreases with increasing radius. This
indicates that above 1.5 Earth radii, planets tend to have increasing
amounts of volatiles and gas. Despite this general trend, there is a
wide range of masses at a given radius, which could be because gas
planets can have rocky cores of different masses and compositions, and could also be due to photoevaporation of volatiles.
Thermal evolutionary atmosphere models suggest a radius of 1.75 times
that of Earth as a dividing line between rocky and gaseous planets.
Excluding close-in planets that have lost their gas envelope due to stellar irradiation, studies of the metallicity
of stars suggest a dividing line of 1.7 Earth radii between rocky
planets and gas dwarfs, then another dividing line at 3.9 Earth radii
between gas dwarfs and gas giants. These dividing lines are statistical
trends and do not apply universally, because there are many other
factors besides metallicity that affect planet formation, including
distance from star – there may be larger rocky planets that formed at
larger distances.
An independent reanalysis of the data suggests that there are no such
dividing lines and that there is a continuum of planet formation between
1 and 4 Earth radii and no reason to suspect that the amount of solid
material in a protoplanetary disk determines whether super-Earths or
mini-Neptunes form.
Studies done in 2016 based on over 300 planets suggest that most
objects over approximately two Earth masses collect significant
hydrogen–helium envelopes, meaning rocky super-Earths may be rare.
The discovery of the low-density Earth-mass planet Kepler-138d shows that there is an overlapping range of masses in which both rocky planets and low-density planets occur. A low-mass low-density planets could be an ocean planet or super-Earth
with a remnant hydrogen atmosphere, or a hot planet with a steam
atmosphere, or a mini-Neptune with a hydrogen–helium atmosphere. Another possibility for a low-mass low-density planet is that it has a large atmosphere made up chiefly of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, or nitrogen.
Massive solid planets and giant planets with massive cores
Size comparison of Kepler-10c with Earth and Neptune
In 2014, new measurements of Kepler-10c
found it to be a Neptune-mass planet (17 Earth masses) with a density
higher than Earth's, indicating that Kepler-10c is composed mostly of
rock with possibly up to 20% high-pressure water ice but without a
hydrogen-dominated envelope. Because this is well above the
10-Earth-mass upper limit that is commonly used for the term
'super-Earth', the term mega-Earth has been coined. A similarly massive and dense planet could be Kepler-131b,
although its density is not as well measured as that of Kepler 10c. The
next most massive known solid planets are half this mass: 55 Cancri e and Kepler-20b.
Gas planets can have large solid cores. The Saturn-mass planet HD 149026 b has only two-thirds of Saturn's radius, so it may have a rock–ice core of 60 Earth masses or more. Corot-20b
has 4.24 times Jupiter's mass but a radius of only 0.84 that of
Jupiter; it may have a metal core of 800 Earth masses if the heavy
elements are concentrated in the core, or a core of 300 Earth masses if
the heavy elements are more distributed throughout the planet.
Transit-timing variation
measurements indicate that Kepler-52b, Kepler-52c and Kepler-57b have
maximum masses between 30 and 100 times that of Earth, although the
actual masses could be much lower. With radii about 2 Earth radii in
size, they might have densities larger than that of an iron planet of the same size. They orbit very close to their stars, so they could each be the remnant core (chthonian planet) of an evaporated gas giant or brown dwarf.
If a remnant core is massive enough it could remain in such a state for
billions of years despite having lost the atmospheric mass.
Solid planets up to thousands of Earth masses may be able to form around massive stars (B-type and O-type stars; 5–120 solar masses), where the protoplanetary disk would contain enough heavy elements. Also, these stars have high UV radiation and winds that could photoevaporate the gas in the disk, leaving just the heavy elements.
For comparison, Neptune's mass equals 17 Earth masses, Jupiter has 318 Earth masses, and the 13-Jupiter-mass limit used in the IAU's working definition of an exoplanet equals approximately 4000 Earth masses.
Cold planets have a maximum radius because adding more mass at
that point causes the planet to compress under the weight instead of
increasing the radius. The maximum radius for solid planets is lower
than the maximum radius for gas planets.
Shape
When the
size of a planet is described using its radius, this is approximating
the shape by a sphere. However, the rotation of a planet causes it to be
flattened at the poles; so the equatorial radius is larger than the
polar radius, making it closer to an oblate spheroid. The oblateness of transiting exoplanets will affect the transit light curves. At the limits of current technology it has been possible to show that HD 189733b is less oblate than Saturn.
If the planet is close to its star, then gravitational tides will
elongate the planet in the direction of the star, making the planet
closer to a triaxial ellipsoid.
Because tidal deformation is along a line between the planet and the
star, it is difficult to detect from transit photometry; it will have an
effect on the transit light curves an order of magnitude less than that
caused by rotational deformation even in cases where tidal deformation
is larger than rotational deformation (as is the case for tidally locked
hot Jupiters). Material rigidity of rocky planets and rocky cores of gas planets will cause further deviations from the aforementioned shapes. Thermal tides caused by unevenly irradiated surfaces are another factor.
Atmosphere
Sunset studies on Titan by Cassini help understand exoplanet atmospheres (artist's concept).
As of February 2014, more than fifty transiting and five directly imaged exoplanet atmospheres have been observed,
resulting in detection of molecular spectral features; observation of
day–night temperature gradients; and constraints on vertical atmospheric
structure. Also, an atmosphere has been detected on the non-transiting hot Jupiter Tau Boötis b.
Surface
Surface composition
Surface features can be distinguished from atmospheric features by comparing emission and reflection spectroscopy with transmission spectroscopy.
Mid-infrared spectroscopy of exoplanets may detect rocky surfaces, and
near-infrared may identify magma oceans or high-temperature lavas,
hydrated silicate surfaces and water ice, giving an unambiguous method
to distinguish between rocky and gaseous exoplanets.
Surface temperature
Artist's illustration of temperature inversion in exoplanet's atmosphere.
The temperature of an exoplanet can be estimated by measuring the
intensity of the light it receives from its parent star. For example,
the planet OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb
is estimated to have a surface temperature of roughly −220 °C (50 K).
However, such estimates may be substantially in error because they
depend on the planet's usually unknown albedo, and because factors such as the greenhouse effect
may introduce unknown complications. A few planets have had their
temperature measured by observing the variation in infrared radiation as
the planet moves around in its orbit and is eclipsed by its parent
star. For example, the planet HD 189733b has been estimated to have an average temperature of 1,205 K (932 °C) on its dayside and 973 K (700 °C) on its nightside.
Habitability potential
Habitable zone
The habitable zone around a star is the region where the temperature
is just right to allow liquid water to exist on a planet; that is, not
too close to the star for the water to evaporate and not too far away
from the star for the water to freeze. The heat produced by stars varies
depending on the size and age of the star, so that the habitable zone
can be at different distances for different stars. Also, the atmospheric
conditions on the planet influence the planet's ability to retain heat
so that the location of the habitable zone is also specific to each type
of planet: desert planets
(also known as dry planets), with very little water, will have less
water vapor in the atmosphere than Earth and so have a reduced
greenhouse effect, meaning that a desert planet could maintain oases of
water closer to its star than Earth is to the Sun. The lack of water
also means there is less ice to reflect heat into space, so the outer
edge of desert-planet habitable zones is further out. Rocky planets with a thick hydrogen atmosphere could maintain surface water much further out than the Earth–Sun distance.
Planets with larger mass have wider habitable zones because the gravity
reduces the water cloud column depth which reduces the greenhouse
effect of water vapor, thus moving the inner edge of the habitable zone
closer to the star.
Planetary rotation rate is one of the major factors determining the circulation of the atmosphere and hence the pattern of clouds: slowly rotating planets create thick clouds that reflect
more and so can be habitable much closer to their star. Earth with its
current atmosphere would be habitable in Venus's orbit, if it had
Venus's slow rotation. If Venus lost its water ocean due to a runaway greenhouse effect,
it is likely to have had a higher rotation rate in the past.
Alternatively, Venus never had an ocean because water vapor was lost to
space during its formation and could have had its slow rotation throughout its history.
Tidally locked planets (a.k.a. "eyeball" planets)
can be habitable closer to their star than previously thought due to
the effect of clouds: at high stellar flux, strong convection produces
thick water clouds near the substellar point that greatly increase the
planetary albedo and reduce surface temperatures.
Habitable zones have usually been defined in terms of surface
temperature, however over half of Earth's biomass is from subsurface
microbes,
and the temperature increases with depth, so the subsurface can be
conducive for microbial life when the surface is frozen and if this is
considered, the habitable zone extends much further from the star, even rogue planets could have liquid water at sufficient depths underground. In an earlier era of the universe the temperature of the cosmic microwave background
would have allowed any rocky planets that existed to have liquid water
on their surface regardless of their distance from a star. Jupiter-like planets might not be habitable, but they could have habitable moons.
Ice ages and snowball states
The outer edge of the habitable zone is where planets are completely
frozen, but planets well inside the habitable zone can periodically
become frozen. If orbital fluctuations or other causes produce cooling
then this creates more ice, but ice reflects sunlight causing even more
cooling, creating a feedback loop until the planet is completely or
nearly completely frozen. When the surface is frozen, this stops carbon dioxide weathering, resulting in a build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from volcanic emissions. This creates a greenhouse effect which thaws the planet again. Planets with a large axial tilt
are less likely to enter snowball states and can retain liquid water
further from their star. Large fluctuations of axial tilt can have even
more of a warming effect than a fixed large tilt.
Paradoxically, planets orbiting cooler stars, such as red dwarfs, are
less likely to enter snowball states because the infrared radiation
emitted by cooler stars is mostly at wavelengths that are absorbed by
ice which heats it up.
Tidal heating
If a planet has an eccentric orbit, then tidal heating
can provide another source of energy besides stellar radiation. This
means that eccentric planets in the radiative habitable zone can be too
hot for liquid water. Tides also circularize
orbits over time so there could be planets in the habitable zone with
circular orbits that have no water because they used to have eccentric
orbits.
Eccentric planets further out than the habitable zone would still have
frozen surfaces but the tidal heating could create a subsurface ocean
similar to Europa's. In some planetary systems, such as in the Upsilon Andromedae
system, the eccentricity of orbits is maintained or even periodically
varied by perturbations from other planets in the system. Tidal heating
can cause outgassing from the mantle, contributing to the formation and
replenishment of an atmosphere.
Potentially habitable planets
A review in 2015 identified exoplanets Kepler-62f, Kepler-186f and Kepler-442b as the best candidates for being potentially habitable. These are at a distance of 1200, 490 and 1,120 light-years
away, respectively. Of these, Kepler-186f is in similar size to Earth
with its 1.2-Earth-radius measure, and it is located towards the outer
edge of the habitable zone around its red dwarf star.
When looking at the nearest terrestrial exoplanet candidates, Tau Ceti e is 11.9 light-years away. Its average surface temperature is estimated to be 68 °C (341 K).
Earth-size planets
- In November 2013 it was estimated that 22±8% of Sun-like stars in the Milky Way galaxy may have an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone. Assuming 200 billion stars in the Milky Way, that would be 11 billion potentially habitable Earths, rising to 40 billion if red dwarfs are included.
- Kepler-186f, a 1.2-Earth-radius planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf, reported in April 2014.
- In February 2013, researchers speculated that up to 6% of small red dwarfs may have Earth-size planets. This suggests that the closest one to the Solar System could be 13 light-years away. The estimated distance increases to 21 light-years when a 95% confidence interval is used. In March 2013 a revised estimate gave an occurrence rate of 50% for Earth-size planets in the habitable zone of red dwarfs.
- At 1.63 times Earth's radius Kepler-452b is the first discovered near-Earth-size planet in the "habitable zone" around a G2-type Sun-like star (July 2015).
.jpg)
