Some speech recognition systems require "training" (also called "enrollment") where an individual speaker reads text or isolated vocabulary into the system. The system analyzes the person's specific voice and uses it to fine-tune the recognition of that person's speech, resulting in increased accuracy. Systems that do not use training are called "speaker independent" systems. Systems that use training are called "speaker dependent".
Speech recognition applications include voice user interfaces such as voice dialing (e.g. "call home"), call routing (e.g. "I would like to make a collect call"), domotic appliance control, search (e.g. find a podcast where particular words were spoken), simple data entry (e.g., entering a credit card number), preparation of structured documents (e.g. a radiology report), determining speaker characteristics, speech-to-text processing (e.g., word processors or emails), and aircraft (usually termed direct voice input).
The term voice recognition or speaker identification refers to identifying the speaker, rather than what they are saying. Recognizing the speaker can simplify the task of translating speech in systems that have been trained on a specific person's voice or it can be used to authenticate or verify the identity of a speaker as part of a security process.
From the technology perspective, speech recognition has a long history with several waves of major innovations. Most recently, the field has benefited from advances in deep learning and big data. The advances are evidenced not only by the surge of academic papers published in the field, but more importantly by the worldwide industry adoption of a variety of deep learning methods in designing and deploying speech recognition systems.
History
The key areas of growth were: vocabulary size, speaker independence and processing speed.
Pre-1970
- 1952 – Three Bell Labs researchers, Stephen Balashek, R. Biddulph, and K. H. Davis built a system called "Audrey" for single-speaker digit recognition. Their system located the formants in the power spectrum of each utterance.
- 1960 – Gunnar Fant developed and published the source-filter model of speech production.
- 1962 – IBM demonstrated it's 16-word "Shoebox" machine's speech recognition capability at the 1962 World's Fair.
- 1969 – Funding at Bell Labs dried up for several years when, in 1969, the influential John Pierce wrote an open letter that was critical of and defunded speech recognition research. This defunding lasted until Pierce retired and James L. Flanagan took over.
Raj Reddy was the first person to take on continuous speech recognition as a graduate student at Stanford University
in the late 1960s. Previous systems required users to pause after each
word. Reddy's system issued spoken commands for playing game chess.
Around this time Soviet researchers invented the dynamic time warping (DTW) algorithm and used it to create a recognizer capable of operating on a 200-word vocabulary.
DTW processed speech by dividing it into short frames, e.g. 10ms
segments, and processing each frame as a single unit. Although DTW would
be superseded by later algorithms, the technique carried on. Achieving
speaker independence remained unsolved at this time period.
1970–1990
- 1971 – DARPA funded five years for Speech Understanding Research, speech recognition research seeking a minimum vocabulary size of 1,000 words. They thought speech understanding would be key to making progress in speech recognition;, this later proved to untrue. BBN, IBM, Carnegie Mellon and Stanford Research Institute all participated in the program. This revived speech recognition research post John Pierce's letter.
- 1972 - The IEEE Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing group held a conference in Newton, Massachusetts.
- 1976 The first ICASSP was held in Philadelphia, which since then has been a major venue for the publication of research on speech recognition.
During the late 1960s Leonard Baum developed the mathematics of Markov chains at the Institute for Defense Analysis. A decade later, at CMU, Raj Reddy's students James Baker and Janet M. Baker began using the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) for speech recognition. James Baker had learned about HMMs from a summer job at the Institute of Defense Analysis during his undergraduate education.
The use of HMMs allowed researchers to combine different sources of
knowledge, such as acoustics, language, and syntax, in a unified
probabilistic model.
- By the mid-1980s IBM's Fred Jelinek's team created a voice activated typewriter called Tangora, which could handle a 20,000-word vocabulary Jelinek's statistical approach put less emphasis on emulating the way the human brain processes and understands speech in favor of using statistical modeling techniques like HMMs. (Jelinek's group independently discovered the application of HMMs to speech.) This was controversial with linguists since HMMs are too simplistic to account for many common features of human languages. However, the HMM proved to be a highly useful way for modeling speech and replaced dynamic time warping to become the dominant speech recognition algorithm in the 1980s.
- 1982 – Dragon Systems, founded by James and Janet M. Baker, was one IBM's few competitors.
Practical speech recognition
The 1980s also saw the introduction of the n-gram language model.
- 1987 – The back-off model allowed language models to use multiple length n-grams, and CSELT used HMM to recognize languages.
Much of the progress in the field is owed to the rapidly increasing
capabilities of computers. At the end of the DARPA program in 1976, the
best computer available to researchers was the PDP-10 with 4 MB ram. It could take up to 100 minutes to decode just 30 seconds of speech.
Two practical products were:
- 1987 – a recognizer from Kurzweil Applied Intelligence
- 1990 – Dragon Dictate, a consumer product released in 1990 AT&T deployed the Voice Recognition Call Processing service in 1992 to route telephone calls without the use of a human operator. The technology was developed by Lawrence Rabiner and others at Bell Labs.
By this point, the vocabulary of the typical commercial speech recognition system was larger than the average human vocabulary. Raj Reddy's former student, Xuedong Huang, developed the Sphinx-II
system at CMU. The Sphinx-II system was the first to do
speaker-independent, large vocabulary, continuous speech recognition and
it had the best performance in DARPA's 1992 evaluation. Handling
continuous speech with a large vocabulary was a major milestone in the
history of speech recognition. Huang went on to found the speech recognition group at Microsoft in 1993. Raj Reddy's student Kai-Fu Lee joined Apple where, in 1992, he helped develop a speech interface prototype for the Apple computer known as Casper.
Lernout & Hauspie,
a Belgium-based speech recognition company, acquired several other
companies, including Kurzweil Applied Intelligence in 1997 and Dragon
Systems in 2000. The L&H speech technology was used in the Windows XP
operating system. L&H was an industry leader until an accounting
scandal brought an end to the company in 2001. The speech technology
from L&H was bought by ScanSoft which became Nuance in 2005. Apple originally licensed software from Nuance to provide speech recognition capability to its digital assistant Siri.
2000s
In the 2000s DARPA sponsored two speech recognition programs: Effective Affordable Reusable Speech-to-Text (EARS) in 2002 and Global Autonomous Language Exploitation (GALE). Four teams participated in the EARS program: IBM, a team led by BBN with LIMSI and Univ. of Pittsburgh,
Cambridge University, and a team composed of ICSI, SRI and University of Washington.
EARS funded the collection of the Switchboard telephone speech corpus
containing 260 hours of recorded conversations from over 500 speakers. The GALE program focused on Arabic and Mandarin broadcast news speech. Google's first effort at speech recognition came in 2007 after hiring some researchers from Nuance. The first product was GOOG-411,
a telephone based directory service. The recordings from GOOG-411
produced valuable data that helped Google improve their recognition
systems. Google Voice Search is now supported in over 30 languages.
In the United States, the National Security Agency has made use of a type of speech recognition for keyword spotting since at least 2006.
This technology allows analysts to search through large volumes of
recorded conversations and isolate mentions of keywords. Recordings can
be indexed and analysts can run queries over the database to find
conversations of interest. Some government research programs focused on
intelligence applications of speech recognition, e.g. DARPA's EARS's
program and IARPA's Babel program.
In the early 2000s, speech recognition was still dominated by traditional approaches such as Hidden Markov Models combined with feedforward artificial neural networks.
Today, however, many aspects of speech recognition have been taken over by a deep learning method called Long short-term memory (LSTM), a recurrent neural network published by Sepp Hochreiter & Jürgen Schmidhuber in 1997. LSTM RNNs avoid the vanishing gradient problem and can learn "Very Deep Learning" tasks that require memories of events that happened thousands of discrete time steps ago, which is important for speech.
Around 2007, LSTM trained by Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) started to outperform traditional speech recognition in certain applications.
In 2015, Google's speech recognition reportedly experienced a dramatic
performance jump of 49% through CTC-trained LSTM, which is now available
through Google Voice to all smartphone users.
The use of deep feedforward (non-recurrent) networks for acoustic modeling was introduced during later part of 2009 by Geoffrey Hinton and his students at University of Toronto and by Li Deng
and colleagues at Microsoft Research, initially in the collaborative
work between Microsoft and University of Toronto which was subsequently
expanded to include IBM and Google (hence "The shared views of four
research groups" subtitle in their 2012 review paper). A Microsoft research executive called this innovation "the most dramatic change in accuracy since 1979".
In contrast to the steady incremental improvements of the past few
decades, the application of deep learning decreased word error rate by
30%.
This innovation was quickly adopted across the field. Researchers have
begun to use deep learning techniques for language modeling as well.
In the long history of speech recognition, both shallow form and
deep form (e.g. recurrent nets) of artificial neural networks had been
explored for many years during 1980s, 1990s and a few years into the
2000s.
But these methods never won over the non-uniform internal-handcrafting Gaussian mixture model/Hidden Markov model (GMM-HMM) technology based on generative models of speech trained discriminatively.
A number of key difficulties had been methodologically analyzed in the 1990s, including gradient diminishing and weak temporal correlation structure in the neural predictive models.
All these difficulties were in addition to the lack of big training data
and big computing power in these early days. Most speech recognition
researchers who understood such barriers hence subsequently moved away
from neural nets to pursue generative modeling approaches until the
recent resurgence of deep learning starting around 2009–2010 that had
overcome all these difficulties. Hinton et al. and Deng et al. reviewed
part of this recent history about how their collaboration with each
other and then with colleagues across four groups (University of
Toronto, Microsoft, Google, and IBM) ignited a renaissance of
applications of deep feedforward neural networks to speech recognition.
2010s
By early 2010s speech recognition, also called voice recognition was clearly differentiated from speaker
recognition, and speaker independence was considered a major
breakthrough. Until then, systems required a "training" period. A 1987
ad for a doll had carried the tagline "Finally, the doll that
understands you." – despite the fact that it was described as "which
children could train to respond to their voice".
Models, methods, and algorithms
Both acoustic modeling and language modeling
are important parts of modern statistically-based speech recognition
algorithms. Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are widely used in many systems.
Language modeling is also used in many other natural language
processing applications such as document classification or statistical machine translation.
Hidden Markov models
Modern general-purpose speech recognition systems are based on Hidden
Markov Models. These are statistical models that output a sequence of
symbols or quantities. HMMs are used in speech recognition because a
speech signal can be viewed as a piecewise stationary signal or a
short-time stationary signal. In a short time-scale (e.g., 10
milliseconds), speech can be approximated as a stationary process. Speech can be thought of as a Markov model for many stochastic purposes.
Another reason why HMMs are popular is because they can be
trained automatically and are simple and computationally feasible to
use. In speech recognition, the hidden Markov model would output a
sequence of n-dimensional real-valued vectors (with n being a small integer, such as 10), outputting one of these every 10 milliseconds. The vectors would consist of cepstral coefficients, which are obtained by taking a Fourier transform of a short time window of speech and decorrelating the spectrum using a cosine transform,
then taking the first (most significant) coefficients. The hidden
Markov model will tend to have in each state a statistical distribution
that is a mixture of diagonal covariance Gaussians, which will give a
likelihood for each observed vector. Each word, or (for more general
speech recognition systems), each phoneme,
will have a different output distribution; a hidden Markov model for a
sequence of words or phonemes is made by concatenating the individual
trained hidden Markov models for the separate words and phonemes.
Described above are the core elements of the most common,
HMM-based approach to speech recognition. Modern speech recognition
systems use various combinations of a number of standard techniques in
order to improve results over the basic approach described above. A
typical large-vocabulary system would need context dependency for the phonemes (so phonemes with different left and right context have different realizations as HMM states); it would use cepstral normalization
to normalize for different speaker and recording conditions; for
further speaker normalization it might use vocal tract length
normalization (VTLN) for male-female normalization and maximum likelihood linear regression (MLLR) for more general speaker adaptation. The features would have so-called delta and delta-delta coefficients to capture speech dynamics and in addition might use heteroscedastic linear discriminant analysis (HLDA); or might skip the delta and delta-delta coefficients and use splicing and an LDA-based projection followed perhaps by heteroscedastic linear discriminant analysis or a global semi-tied co variance transform (also known as maximum likelihood linear transform,
or MLLT). Many systems use so-called discriminative training techniques
that dispense with a purely statistical approach to HMM parameter
estimation and instead optimize some classification-related measure of
the training data. Examples are maximum mutual information (MMI), minimum classification error (MCE) and minimum phone error (MPE).
Decoding of the speech (the term for what happens when the system
is presented with a new utterance and must compute the most likely
source sentence) would probably use the Viterbi algorithm
to find the best path, and here there is a choice between dynamically
creating a combination hidden Markov model, which includes both the
acoustic and language model information, and combining it statically
beforehand (the finite state transducer, or FST, approach).
A possible improvement to decoding is to keep a set of good
candidates instead of just keeping the best candidate, and to use a
better scoring function (re scoring)
to rate these good candidates so that we may pick the best one
according to this refined score. The set of candidates can be kept
either as a list (the N-best list approach) or as a subset of the models (a lattice). Re scoring is usually done by trying to minimize the Bayes risk
(or an approximation thereof): Instead of taking the source sentence
with maximal probability, we try to take the sentence that minimizes the
expectancy of a given loss function with regards to all possible
transcriptions (i.e., we take the sentence that minimizes the average
distance to other possible sentences weighted by their estimated
probability). The loss function is usually the Levenshtein distance,
though it can be different distances for specific tasks; the set of
possible transcriptions is, of course, pruned to maintain tractability.
Efficient algorithms have been devised to re score lattices represented as weighted finite state transducers with edit distances represented themselves as a finite state transducer verifying certain assumptions.
Dynamic time warping (DTW)-based speech recognition
Dynamic time warping is an approach that was historically used for
speech recognition but has now largely been displaced by the more
successful HMM-based approach.
Dynamic time warping is an algorithm for measuring similarity
between two sequences that may vary in time or speed. For instance,
similarities in walking patterns would be detected, even if in one video
the person was walking slowly and if in another he or she were walking
more quickly, or even if there were accelerations and deceleration
during the course of one observation. DTW has been applied to video,
audio, and graphics – indeed, any data that can be turned into a linear
representation can be analyzed with DTW.
A well-known application has been automatic speech recognition,
to cope with different speaking speeds. In general, it is a method that
allows a computer to find an optimal match between two given sequences
(e.g., time series) with certain restrictions. That is, the sequences
are "warped" non-linearly to match each other. This sequence alignment
method is often used in the context of hidden Markov models.
Neural networks
Neural networks emerged as an attractive acoustic modeling approach
in ASR in the late 1980s. Since then, neural networks have been used in
many aspects of speech recognition such as phoneme classification, isolated word recognition, audiovisual speech recognition, audiovisual speaker recognition and speaker adaptation.
neural networks
make fewer explicit assumptions about feature statistical properties
than HMMs and have several qualities making them attractive recognition
models for speech recognition. When used to estimate the probabilities
of a speech feature segment, neural networks allow discriminative
training in a natural and efficient manner. However, in spite of their
effectiveness in classifying short-time units such as individual
phonemes and isolated words,
early neural networks were rarely successful for continuous recognition
tasks because of their limited ability to model temporal dependencies.
One approach to this limitation was to use neural networks as a
pre-processing, feature transformation or dimensionality reduction, step prior to HMM based recognition. However, more recently, LSTM and related recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and Time Delay Neural Networks(TDNN's) have demonstrated improved performance in this area.
Deep feedforward and recurrent neural networks
Deep Neural Networks and Denoising Autoencoders are also under investigation. A deep feedforward neural network (DNN) is an artificial neural network with multiple hidden layers of units between the input and output layers.
Similar to shallow neural networks, DNNs can model complex non-linear
relationships. DNN architectures generate compositional models, where
extra layers enable composition of features from lower layers, giving a
huge learning capacity and thus the potential of modeling complex
patterns of speech data.
A success of DNNs in large vocabulary speech recognition occurred
in 2010 by industrial researchers, in collaboration with academic
researchers, where large output layers of the DNN based on context
dependent HMM states constructed by decision trees were adopted.
See comprehensive reviews of this development and of the state of the
art as of October 2014 in the recent Springer book from Microsoft
Research.
See also the related background of automatic speech recognition and the
impact of various machine learning paradigms including notably deep learning in
recent overview articles.
One fundamental principle of deep learning is to do away with hand-crafted feature engineering
and to use raw features. This principle was first explored successfully
in the architecture of deep autoencoder on the "raw" spectrogram or
linear filter-bank features,
showing its superiority over the Mel-Cepstral features which contain a
few stages of fixed transformation from spectrograms.
The true "raw" features of speech, waveforms, have more recently been
shown to produce excellent larger-scale speech recognition results.
End-to-end automatic speech recognition
Since 2014, there has been much research interest in "end-to-end" ASR. Traditional phonetic-based (i.e., all HMM-based model) approaches required separate components and training for the pronunciation, acoustic and language model.
End-to-end models jointly learn all the components of the speech
recognizer. This is valuable since it simplifies the training process
and deployment process. For example, a n-gram language model
is required for all HMM-based systems, and a typical n-gram language
model often takes several gigabytes in memory making them impractical to
deploy on mobile devices. Consequently, modern commercial ASR systems from Google and Apple (as of 2017) are deployed on the cloud and require a network connection as opposed to the device locally.
The first attempt of end-to-end ASR was with Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) based systems introduced by Alex Graves of Google DeepMind and Navdeep Jaitly of the University of Toronto in 2014. The model consisted of recurrent neural networks
and a CTC layer. Jointly, the RNN-CTC model learns the pronunciation
and acoustic model together, however it is incapable of learning the
language due to conditional independence
assumptions similar to a HMM. Consequently, CTC models can directly
learn to map speech acoustics to English characters, but the models make
many common spelling mistakes and must rely on a separate language
model to clean up the transcripts. Later, Baidu expanded on the work with extremely large datasets and demonstrated some commercial success in Chinese Mandarin and English. In 2016, University of Oxford presented LipNet,
the first end-to-end sentence-level lip reading model, using
spatiotemporal convolutions coupled with an RNN-CTC architecture,
surpassing human-level performance in a restricted grammar dataset. A large-scale CNN-RNN-CTC architecture was presented in 2018 by Google DeepMind achieving 6 times better performance than human experts.
An alternative approach to CTC-based models are attention-based
models. Attention-based ASR models were introduced simultaneously by
Chan et al. of Carnegie Mellon University and Google Brain and Bahdanaua et al. of the University of Montreal in 2016.
The model named "Listen, Attend and Spell" (LAS), literally "listens"
to the acoustic signal, pays "attention" to different parts of the
signal and "spells" out the transcript one character at a time. Unlike
CTC-based models, attention-based models do not have
conditional-independence assumptions and can learn all the components of
a speech recognizer including the pronunciation, acoustic and language
model directly. This means, during deployment, there is no need to carry
around a language model making it very practical for deployment onto
applications with limited memory. By the end of 2016, the
attention-based models have seen considerable success including
outperforming the CTC models (with or without an external language
model). Various extensions have been proposed since the original LAS model. Latent Sequence Decompositions (LSD) was proposed by Carnegie Mellon University, MIT and Google Brain to directly emit sub-word units which are more natural than English characters; University of Oxford and Google DeepMind extended LAS to "Watch, Listen, Attend and Spell" (WLAS) to handle lip reading surpassing human-level performance.
Applications
In-car systems
Typically
a manual control input, for example by means of a finger control on the
steering-wheel, enables the speech recognition system and this is
signalled to the driver by an audio prompt. Following the audio prompt,
the system has a "listening window" during which it may accept a speech
input for recognition.
Simple voice commands may be used to initiate phone calls, select
radio stations or play music from a compatible smartphone, MP3 player
or music-loaded flash drive. Voice recognition capabilities vary between
car make and model. Some of the most recent
car models offer natural-language speech recognition in place of a
fixed set of commands, allowing the driver to use full sentences and
common phrases. With such systems there is, therefore, no need for the
user to memorize a set of fixed command words.
Health care
Medical documentation
In the health care
sector, speech recognition can be implemented in front-end or back-end
of the medical documentation process. Front-end speech recognition is
where the provider dictates into a speech-recognition engine, the
recognized words are displayed as they are spoken, and the dictator is
responsible for editing and signing off on the document. Back-end or
deferred speech recognition is where the provider dictates into a digital dictation
system, the voice is routed through a speech-recognition machine and
the recognized draft document is routed along with the original voice
file to the editor, where the draft is edited and report finalized.
Deferred speech recognition is widely used in the industry currently.
One of the major issues relating to the use of speech recognition in healthcare is that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)
provides for substantial financial benefits to physicians who utilize
an EMR according to "Meaningful Use" standards. These standards require
that a substantial amount of data be maintained by the EMR (now more
commonly referred to as an Electronic Health Record
or EHR). The use of speech recognition is more naturally suited to the
generation of narrative text, as part of a radiology/pathology
interpretation, progress note or discharge summary: the ergonomic gains
of using speech recognition to enter structured discrete data (e.g.,
numeric values or codes from a list or a controlled vocabulary) are relatively minimal for people who are sighted and who can operate a keyboard and mouse.
A more significant issue is that most EHRs have not been
expressly tailored to take advantage of voice-recognition capabilities. A
large part of the clinician's interaction with the EHR involves
navigation through the user interface using menus, and tab/button
clicks, and is heavily dependent on keyboard and mouse: voice-based
navigation provides only modest ergonomic benefits. By contrast, many
highly customized systems for radiology or pathology dictation implement
voice "macros", where the use of certain phrases – e.g., "normal
report", will automatically fill in a large number of default values
and/or generate boilerplate, which will vary with the type of the exam –
e.g., a chest X-ray vs. a gastrointestinal contrast series for a
radiology system.
As an alternative to this navigation by hand, cascaded use of speech recognition and information extraction has been studied
as a way to fill out a handover form for clinical proofing and
sign-off. The results are encouraging, and the paper also opens data,
together with the related performance benchmarks and some processing
software, to the research and development community for studying
clinical documentation and language-processing.
Therapeutic use
Prolonged use of speech recognition software in conjunction with word processors has shown benefits to short-term-memory restrengthening in brain AVM patients who have been treated with resection.
Further research needs to be conducted to determine cognitive benefits
for individuals whose AVMs have been treated using radiologic
techniques.
Military
High-performance fighter aircraft
Substantial efforts have been devoted in the last decade to the test and evaluation of speech recognition in fighter aircraft. Of particular note have been the US program in speech recognition for the Advanced Fighter Technology Integration (AFTI)/F-16 aircraft (F-16 VISTA), the program in France for Mirage
aircraft, and other programs in the UK dealing with a variety of
aircraft platforms. In these programs, speech recognizers have been
operated successfully in fighter aircraft, with applications including:
setting radio frequencies, commanding an autopilot system, setting
steer-point coordinates and weapons release parameters, and controlling
flight display.
Working with Swedish pilots flying in the JAS-39 Gripen cockpit, Englund (2004) found recognition deteriorated with increasing g-loads.
The report also concluded that adaptation greatly improved the results
in all cases and that the introduction of models for breathing was shown
to improve recognition scores significantly. Contrary to what might
have been expected, no effects of the broken English of the speakers
were found. It was evident that spontaneous speech caused problems for
the recognizer, as might have been expected. A restricted vocabulary,
and above all, a proper syntax, could thus be expected to improve
recognition accuracy substantially.
The Eurofighter Typhoon, currently in service with the UK RAF,
employs a speaker-dependent system, requiring each pilot to create a
template. The system is not used for any safety-critical or
weapon-critical tasks, such as weapon release or lowering of the
undercarriage, but is used for a wide range of other cockpit functions.
Voice commands are confirmed by visual and/or aural feedback. The system
is seen as a major design feature in the reduction of pilot workload,
and even allows the pilot to assign targets to his aircraft with two
simple voice commands or to any of his wingmen with only five commands.
Speaker-independent systems are also being developed and are under test for the F35 Lightning II (JSF) and the Alenia Aermacchi M-346 Master lead-in fighter trainer. These systems have produced word accuracy scores in excess of 98%.
Helicopters
The problems of achieving high recognition accuracy under stress and noise pertain strongly to the helicopter
environment as well as to the jet fighter environment. The acoustic
noise problem is actually more severe in the helicopter environment, not
only because of the high noise levels but also because the helicopter
pilot, in general, does not wear a facemask, which would reduce acoustic noise in the microphone.
Substantial test and evaluation programs have been carried out in the
past decade in speech recognition systems applications in helicopters,
notably by the U.S. Army Avionics Research and Development Activity (AVRADA) and by the Royal Aerospace Establishment (RAE) in the UK. Work in France has included speech recognition in the Puma helicopter. There has also been much useful work in Canada. Results have been encouraging, and voice applications have included: control of communication radios, setting of navigation systems, and control of an automated target handover system.
As in fighter applications, the overriding issue for voice in
helicopters is the impact on pilot effectiveness. Encouraging results
are reported for the AVRADA tests, although these represent only a
feasibility demonstration in a test environment. Much remains to be done
both in speech recognition and in overall speech technology in order to consistently achieve performance improvements in operational settings.
Training air traffic controllers
Training
for air traffic controllers (ATC) represents an excellent application
for speech recognition systems. Many ATC training systems currently
require a person to act as a "pseudo-pilot", engaging in a voice dialog
with the trainee controller, which simulates the dialog that the
controller would have to conduct with pilots in a real ATC situation.
Speech recognition and synthesis
techniques offer the potential to eliminate the need for a person to
act as pseudo-pilot, thus reducing training and support personnel. In
theory, Air controller tasks are also characterized by highly structured
speech as the primary output of the controller, hence reducing the
difficulty of the speech recognition task should be possible. In
practice, this is rarely the case. The FAA document 7110.65 details the
phrases that should be used by air traffic controllers. While this
document gives less than 150 examples of such phrases, the number of
phrases supported by one of the simulation vendors speech recognition
systems is in excess of 500,000.
The USAF, USMC, US Army, US Navy, and FAA as well as a number of
international ATC training organizations such as the Royal Australian
Air Force and Civil Aviation Authorities in Italy, Brazil, and Canada
are currently using ATC simulators with speech recognition from a number
of different vendors.
Telephony and other domains
ASR is now commonplace in the field of telephony, and is becoming more widespread in the field of computer gaming and simulation. In the telephony systems, ASR is now being predominantly used in contact centers by integrating it with IVR
systems. Despite the high level of integration with word processing in
general personal computing, in the field of document production, ASR has
not seen the expected increases in use.
The improvement of mobile processor speeds has made speech recognition practical in smartphones. Speech is used mostly as a part of a user interface, for creating predefined or custom speech commands.
Usage in education and daily life
For language learning, speech recognition can be useful for learning a second language. It can teach proper pronunciation, in addition to helping a person develop fluency with their speaking skills.
Students who are blind (see Blindness and education)
or have very low vision can benefit from using the technology to convey
words and then hear the computer recite them, as well as use a computer
by commanding with their voice, instead of having to look at the screen
and keyboard.
Students who are physically disabled or suffer from Repetitive strain injury/other
injuries to the upper extremities can be relieved from having to worry
about handwriting, typing, or working with scribe on school assignments
by using speech-to-text programs. They can also utilize speech
recognition technology to freely enjoy searching the Internet or using a
computer at home without having to physically operate a mouse and
keyboard.
Speech recognition can allow students with learning disabilities
to become better writers. By saying the words aloud, they can increase
the fluidity of their writing, and be alleviated of concerns regarding
spelling, punctuation, and other mechanics of writing.
Use of voice recognition software, in conjunction with a digital
audio recorder and a personal computer running word-processing software
has proven to be positive for restoring damaged short-term-memory
capacity, in stroke and craniotomy individuals.
People with disabilities
People
with disabilities can benefit from speech recognition programs. For
individuals that are Deaf or Hard of Hearing, speech recognition
software is used to automatically generate a closed-captioning of
conversations such as discussions in conference rooms, classroom
lectures, and/or religious services.
Speech recognition is also very useful for people who have
difficulty using their hands, ranging from mild repetitive stress
injuries to involve disabilities that preclude using conventional
computer input devices. In fact, people who used the keyboard a lot and
developed RSI became an urgent early market for speech recognition. Speech recognition is used in deaf telephony, such as voicemail to text, relay services, and captioned telephone.
Individuals with learning disabilities who have problems with
thought-to-paper communication (essentially they think of an idea but it
is processed incorrectly causing it to end up differently on paper) can
possibly benefit from the software but the technology is not bug proof.
Also the whole idea of speak to text can be hard for intellectually
disabled person's due to the fact that it is rare that anyone tries to
learn the technology to teach the person with the disability.
This type of technology can help those with dyslexia but other
disabilities are still in question. The effectiveness of the product is
the problem that is hindering it being effective. Although a kid may be
able to say a word depending on how clear they say it the technology may
think they are saying another word and input the wrong one. Giving them
more work to fix, causing them to have to take more time with fixing
the wrong word.
Further applications
- Aerospace (e.g. space exploration, spacecraft, etc.) NASA's Mars Polar Lander used speech recognition technology from Sensory, Inc. in the Mars Microphone on the Lander
- Automatic subtitling with speech recognition
- Automatic emotion recognition
- Automatic translation
- Court reporting (Real time Speech Writing)
- eDiscovery (Legal discovery)
- Hands-free computing: Speech recognition computer user interface
- Home automation
- Interactive voice response
- Mobile telephony, including mobile email
- Multimodal interaction
- Pronunciation evaluation in computer-aided language learning applications
- Real Time Captioning
- Robotics
- Speech to text (transcription of speech into text, real time video captioning, Court reporting )
- Telematics (e.g. vehicle Navigation Systems)
- Transcription (digital speech-to-text)
- Video games, with Tom Clancy's EndWar and Lifeline as working examples
- Virtual assistant (e.g. Apple's Siri)
Performance
The performance of speech recognition systems is usually evaluated in terms of accuracy and speed. Accuracy is usually rated with word error rate (WER), whereas speed is measured with the real time factor. Other measures of accuracy include Single Word Error Rate (SWER) and Command Success Rate (CSR).
Speech recognition by machine is a very complex problem, however.
Vocalizations vary in terms of accent, pronunciation, articulation,
roughness, nasality, pitch, volume, and speed. Speech is distorted by a
background noise and echoes, electrical characteristics. Accuracy of
speech recognition may vary with the following:
- Vocabulary size and confusability;
- Speaker dependence versus independence;
- Isolated, discontinuous or continuous speech;
- Task and language constraints;
- Read versus spontaneous speech;
- Adverse conditions.
Accuracy
As mentioned earlier in this article, accuracy of speech recognition may vary depending on the following factors:
- Error rates increase as the vocabulary size grows:
-
- e.g. the 10 digits "zero" to "nine" can be recognized essentially perfectly, but vocabulary sizes of 200, 5000 or 100000 may have error rates of 3%, 7% or 45% respectively.
- Vocabulary is hard to recognize if it contains confusable words:
-
- e.g. the 26 letters of the English alphabet are difficult to discriminate because they are confusable words (most notoriously, the E-set: "B, C, D, E, G, P, T, V, Z"); an 8% error rate is considered good for this vocabulary.
- Speaker dependence vs. independence:
-
- A speaker-dependent system is intended for use by a single speaker.
- A speaker-independent system is intended for use by any speaker (more difficult).
- Isolated, Discontinuous or continuous speech
-
- With isolated speech, single words are used, therefore it becomes easier to recognize the speech.
With discontinuous speech full sentences separated by silence are
used, therefore it becomes easier to recognize the speech as well as
with isolated speech.
With continuous speech naturally spoken sentences are used, therefore it becomes harder to recognize the speech, different from both isolated and discontinuous speech.
- Task and language constraints
- e.g. Querying application may dismiss the hypothesis "The apple is red."
- e.g. Constraints may be semantic; rejecting "The apple is angry."
- e.g. Syntactic; rejecting "Red is apple the."
Constraints are often represented by a grammar.
- Read vs. Spontaneous Speech – When a person reads it's usually in a context that has been previously prepared, but when a person uses spontaneous speech, it is difficult to recognize the speech because of the disfluencies (like "uh" and "um", false starts, incomplete sentences, stuttering, coughing, and laughter) and limited vocabulary.
- Adverse conditions – Environmental noise (e.g. Noise in a car or a factory). Acoustical distortions (e.g. echoes, room acoustics)
Speech recognition is a multi-levelled pattern recognition task.
- Acoustical signals are structured into a hierarchy of units, e.g. Phonemes, Words, Phrases, and Sentences;
- Each level provides additional constraints;
e.g. Known word pronunciations or legal word sequences, which can compensate for errors or uncertainties at lower level;
- This hierarchy of constraints are exploited. By combining decisions probabilistically at all lower levels, and making more deterministic decisions only at the highest level, speech recognition by a machine is a process broken into several phases. Computationally, it is a problem in which a sound pattern has to be recognized or classified into a category that represents a meaning to a human. Every acoustic signal can be broken in smaller more basic sub-signals. As the more complex sound signal is broken into the smaller sub-sounds, different levels are created, where at the top level we have complex sounds, which are made of simpler sounds on lower level, and going to lower levels even more, we create more basic and shorter and simpler sounds. The lowest level, where the sounds are the most fundamental, a machine would check for simple and more probabilistic rules of what sound should represent. Once these sounds are put together into more complex sound on upper level, a new set of more deterministic rules should predict what new complex sound should represent. The most upper level of a deterministic rule should figure out the meaning of complex expressions. In order to expand our knowledge about speech recognition we need to take into a consideration neural networks. There are four steps of neural network approaches:
- Digitize the speech that we want to recognize
For telephone speech the sampling rate is 8000 samples per second;
- Compute features of spectral-domain of the speech (with Fourier transform);
computed every 10 ms, with one 10 ms section called a frame;
Analysis of four-step neural network approaches can be explained
by further information. Sound is produced by air (or some other medium)
vibration, which we register by ears, but machines by receivers. Basic
sound creates a wave which has two descriptions: amplitude (how strong is it), and frequency (how often it vibrates per second).
Security concerns
Speech
recognition can become a means of attack, theft, or accidental
operation. For example, activation words like "Alexa" spoken in an
audio or video broadcast can cause devices in homes and offices to start
listening for input inappropriately, or possibly take an unwanted
action.
Voice-controlled devices are also accessible to visitors to the
building, or even those outside the building if they can be heard
inside. Attackers may be able to gain access to personal information,
like calendar, address book contents, private messages, and documents.
They may also be able to impersonate the user to send messages or make
online purchases.
Two attacks have been demonstrated that use artificial sounds.
One transmits ultrasound and attempt to send commands without nearby
people noticing.
The other adds small, inaudible distortions to other speech or music
that are specially crafted to confuse the specific speech recognition
system into recognizing music as speech, or to make what sounds like one
command to a human sound like a different command to the system.
Further information
Conferences and journals
Popular speech recognition conferences held each year or two include SpeechTEK and SpeechTEK Europe, ICASSP, Interspeech/Eurospeech, and the IEEE ASRU. Conferences in the field of natural language processing, such as ACL, NAACL, EMNLP, and HLT, are beginning to include papers on speech processing. Important journals include the IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing (later renamed IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing and since Sept 2014 renamed IEEE/ACM
Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing—after merging
with an ACM publication), Computer Speech and Language, and Speech
Communication.
Books
Books like "Fundamentals of Speech Recognition" by Lawrence Rabiner
can be useful to acquire basic knowledge but may not be fully up to
date (1993). Another good source can be "Statistical Methods for Speech
Recognition" by Frederick Jelinek and "Spoken Language Processing (2001)" by Xuedong Huang etc. More up to date are "Computer Speech", by Manfred R. Schroeder,
second edition published in 2004, and "Speech Processing: A Dynamic and
Optimization-Oriented Approach" published in 2003 by Li Deng and Doug
O'Shaughnessey. The recently updated textbook of "Speech and Language
Processing (2008)" by Jurafsky and Martin presents the basics and the state of the art for ASR. Speaker recognition
also uses the same features, most of the same front-end processing, and
classification techniques as is done in speech recognition. A most
recent comprehensive textbook, "Fundamentals of Speaker Recognition" is
an in depth source for up to date details on the theory and practice.
A good insight into the techniques used in the best modern systems can
be gained by paying attention to government sponsored evaluations such
as those organised by DARPA
(the largest speech recognition-related project ongoing as of 2007 is
the GALE project, which involves both speech recognition and translation
components).
A good and accessible introduction to speech recognition
technology and its history is provided by the general audience book "The
Voice in the Machine. Building Computers That Understand Speech" by Roberto Pieraccini (2012).
The most recent book on speech recognition is "Automatic Speech
Recognition: A Deep Learning Approach" (Publisher: Springer) written by
D. Yu and L. Deng published near the end of 2014, with highly
mathematically-oriented technical detail on how deep learning methods
are derived and implemented in modern speech recognition systems based
on DNNs and related deep learning methods.
A related book, published earlier in 2014, "Deep Learning: Methods and
Applications" by L. Deng and D. Yu provides a less technical but more
methodology-focused overview of DNN-based speech recognition during
2009–2014, placed within the more general context of deep learning
applications including not only speech recognition but also image
recognition, natural language processing, information retrieval,
multimodal processing, and multitask learning.
Software
In terms of freely available resources, Carnegie Mellon University's Sphinx
toolkit is one place to start to both learn about speech recognition
and to start experimenting. Another resource (free but copyrighted) is
the HTK book (and the accompanying HTK toolkit). For more recent and state-of-the-art techniques, Kaldi toolkit can be used.
